Google: We Use The Most Restrictive Crawling Command On The Page

Dec 24, 2018 - 7:58 am 2 by

Google Restrictive

Google's John Mueller said in a Reddit thread that Google will typically use the most restrictive crawling command or signals they find on the page. "Google will use the most restrictive setting you have on the page," John Mueller said. It doesn't matter if Google found it via HTML or JavaScript, assuming Google can find it.

Here is what John Mueller said:

Google will use the most restrictive setting you have on the page (this matches how robots meta tags are generally processed, eg if you have a "noindex" + "index", then the "noindex" will override the "index"). If you have a "nofollow" in static HTML and remove it with JS, Google will still use the "nofollow". Similarly, if you don't have any robots meta tag, and add a "noindex" with JS, Google will use the "noindex". In short, adding a "nofollow" via JS would work, removing it won't.

See that last line? If you add a nofollow using JavaScript, Google would honor that. If you add JavaScript to remove the nofollow from the code, Google won't honor that.

Google goes with the most restrictive signal they get here.

Forum discussion at Reddit and Twitter.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Google Updates

Google Search Ranking Update Volatility May 16th

May 18, 2025 - 8:15 am
Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: May 16, 2025

May 16, 2025 - 10:00 am
Google Ads

Google's Pichai: Search Ads With AI Overviews Earn Same As Ads Without

May 16, 2025 - 8:50 am
Search Video Recaps

Search News Buzz Video Recap: Google Rethinking Search, Replacing Reddit, Search Console Annotations & So Much More

May 16, 2025 - 8:01 am
Google Maps

Google Maps 2024: 999 Million Reviews & 752 Million Photos / Videos Published

May 16, 2025 - 7:51 am
Apple App Store

Apple Maps Adds Insights, Ratings & Reviews From More Sources

May 16, 2025 - 7:41 am
Previous Story: Agency Claims They Are A "Google Partner SEO Agency"; Google Calls Them Out