Below are the most recent 30 comments. I try to keep it clean of comment spam, but some times things
get through and it takes me several hours to get to it. So please excuse any of that comment spam.
Interesting observation! It definitely sounds like a timing or indexing issue that might resolve once Google addresses it more thoroughly. It’s a bit perplexing, though, that sites with manual actions can still appear in AIOs despite being deindexed, which could be contributing to confusion for both users and site owners. If it’s a bug, hopefully it gets ironed out soon, but in the meantime, it highlights the complexities and nuances of Google’s indexing and AI systems.
John Mueller: You can use AI.
Googlers: Will you rank if you copy and paste chatbot answers? Probably not.
Sometimes I feel John Mueller is used as a guinea pig. Lily Ray claims she has not seen any chatbot generated site rank today.
So it could be that technically you can use AI. But as Google has said, it won't rank. It's a play on words.
On the other hand, what would Lily Ray know about what is AI content? She's not a skilled writer. She and all others like her are just using tools that supposedly tell them what AI content is. But those tools are either unreliable now or soon to be unreliable. You could be using AI now without Lily Ray knowing about it.
results are pure rubbish. google puts serious effort into making sure you can't find what you're looking for. the worst wordpress search plugins/native do a better job of finding relevant results. using google as a normal searcher is a waste of time nowadays. even local searches are terrible. how can it be this bad. how can they think results are acceptable. there is one answer: it's on purpose. they are sabotaging their search engine. in fact, let's hope this is the case and they're really not this dumb. smart folks work at google, but whoever is in charge of this is as bad as it gets.
I think this is the link he may have posted earlier...
<a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/uks-antitrust-regulator-investigate-googles-search-services-2025-01-14/">https://www.reuters.com/technology/uks-antitrust-regulator-investigate-googles-search-services-2025-01-14/</a>
Copyright DataDonkey...
Amazon gonna pay regardless and wants independent stores wiped out which Greedle is helping them with. This way the circle of consumer spending is between them as much as possible and others shut out unless they pay. It's called an ogilopoly or something like that. See if you think ChinaZon and Greedle meet this definition:
Oligopoly - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligopoly">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligopoly</a>
<blockquote>An oligopoly (from Ancient Greek ὀλίγος (olígos) 'few' and πωλέω (pōléō) 'to sell') is a market in which pricing control lies in the hands of a few sellers.[1][2]
As a result of their significant market power, firms in oligopolistic markets can influence prices through manipulating the supply function. Firms in an oligopoly are mutually interdependent, as any action by one firm is expected to affect other firms in the market and evoke a reaction or consequential action.[3] As a result, firms in oligopolistic markets often resort to collusion as means of maximising profits. </blockquote>
He's a novice as in an inexperienced noober CEO. Half the years he was CEO for Greedle, he was overshadowed by Brin/Page who ran Greedle's parent company Alphabutt which he had to answer to. Since Pinchya became CEO of Alphabutt too, he has done nothing but step on one land mine after another. Guilty of antitrust violations in the Google Play Store. Guilty of antitrust violations in search. Probably going to have another antitrust guilty verdict for ads too. All these crimes despite having a battalion of attorneys on staff to advise his dumb ass. Also ChatGPT kicked Greedle's ass in AI and still has much more marketshare than GermInEye. And what has this novice CEO done to make more money to please shareholders? Spam ads, which anyone could do. He's a novice by any definition because he can't run a company, except into the ground.
Actually the opposite of that makes more sense.. rank small niche relevant sites with good info and have amazon pay to get above it with their thin content pages?
New domain, zero seo, 1 million words of rubbish... this is 100% going to fail.
Go buy an expired tech domain for $50k and put it on that and you might have a chance.
This guy's claiming to use keyword Ian as his go-to. He got that from this comment section. We were promoting keyword Ian right here recently for the same reason.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3d2270436a63c8fa77789bb6af56a2983d5c52b3762904f17716667ffee54575.png
if anyone gives a fuckk, I still pumping my AI site, but I said I gonna do 15-20k a day
sorry I cannot too much
10k is my limit (a few days I hit 14k)
currently, sitting at 425k content
producing 90% long form content - 2k words per post - turns out I like the niche and reading 2k per post is fine for me
i know some people hate me, some care, it's all good
site is indexed normally (some post index the same day, some index in a week)
I have only bot traffic for now (new domain)
also zero SEO for this site
I would rather pump a 2k post than spend 1 hours doing keyword research
edit - could be a total fail
I plan to stop once I reach 1mill words
I concur but the reverse logic should be what Google should be doing. The biggest sites can afford the ads. I remember seeing a quote that said if Google didn't rank larger sites they'd be annoyed or something along those lines. To me, it sounds like Google are scared rather than just thinking of income.
Any harsh recommendations will be dropped. There's a case allegedly when a company wanted to buy a certain company, the Gov wanted to reject it on national security grounds. The company had words with a sentator who then threatened to withhold intelligence if it didn't come through. And the defence company was sold.
I never agree with one country telling another country's company to break up including Google. I'd rather it came from the origins country. The CMA should make recommendations which the USA should take on board though.
SERPs - very unstable
Allegedly, could be that Google has learned to fool the volatility tracking tools.
Allegedly, they have any reason and interest to do so.
Technically this only requires them to reduce the number of sites affected each day, while the impact on each site can be significant. Just my opinion.
I think, although UK isn't part of the EU anymore all this lawsuits ans antitrust trials will be taken down without result in the near future. Why? Because of the same reason the EU is doing it: for fear of Big Tech and its protectors. The EU is already back-pedalling.
no surprise at all. it's more surprising "seo experts" even comment on the usual fluctuations. in fairness, I'm sure they (and us) hope 'this time' will be the time google finally gets it right. but it's never 'that time'