RECENT COMMENTS ON SEARCH ENGINE ROUNDTABLE

Below are the most recent 30 comments. I try to keep it clean of comment spam, but some times things get through and it takes me several hours to get to it. So please excuse any of that comment spam.

Subscribe  Subscribe to Recent Comments

Comment ID #2755163445 at 06/28/2016 01:02 pm:

Jan Dunlop commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

and another:

Comment ID #2755142595 at 06/28/2016 12:50 pm:

Jan Dunlop commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

and another:

Comment ID #2755139663 at 06/28/2016 12:48 pm:

Jan Dunlop commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Heres an example:

Comment ID #2755119400 at 06/28/2016 12:36 pm:

Paperchaser commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Been huge movement in serp in my area lot of flux going on since last thursday surprise not lot more of people notice this.

Comment ID #2755095054 at 06/28/2016 12:22 pm:

nuknuknuk commented on 34% Of Google's Search Results Are HTTPS

are you one of those anti-vaxxers too?

Comment ID #2755078407 at 06/28/2016 12:12 pm:

Michael Martinez commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

D-Wave might have a more immediate impact on algorithms like Panda than RankBrain, but Google has yet to announce full applications for the system.

Comment ID #2755038467 at 06/28/2016 11:48 am:

BushyTop commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Fair play

Comment ID #2755036288 at 06/28/2016 11:47 am:

Anon User commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Ah, 19%. Need 20.1% to trigger a penalty. Sailing nice and close to the wind and winning the race.

Comment ID #2755034399 at 06/28/2016 11:46 am:

BushyTop commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

maybe not to you, but others that I've dealt with might put two and two together.

Comment ID #2755032358 at 06/28/2016 11:45 am:

Dan Howdle commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Giving me a keyword does not reveal your clients.

Comment ID #2755018068 at 06/28/2016 11:36 am:

BushyTop commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Thought not. To give you some context, the top ranking result in this SERP currently has 19% EMA from highly untrustworthy and irrelevant sources, which in my opinion is exceptionally high (I'm sure others will disagree)

Comment ID #2755010892 at 06/28/2016 11:32 am:

Anon User commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Better to be on the inside pissing out than on the outside pissing in :)

Comment ID #2755008911 at 06/28/2016 11:31 am:

Anon User commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Nah :)

Comment ID #2755008090 at 06/28/2016 11:30 am:

BushyTop commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

This is where it gets difficult, because I'm not one for specifics/revealing clients and industry. (sorry) **take my word for it??**

Comment ID #2755005082 at 06/28/2016 11:28 am:

The Truth commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Ok then Google needs to do something about it. This does not give any benefit to the user.

Comment ID #2754984955 at 06/28/2016 11:16 am:

Ben Guest commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Even if..."In a carefully designed test, the superconducting chip inside D-Wave’s computer—known as a quantum annealer—had performed 100 million times faster than a conventional processor."

Comment ID #2754982459 at 06/28/2016 11:15 am:

Dan Howdle commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Example SERP?

Comment ID #2754980845 at 06/28/2016 11:14 am:

Ben Guest commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

lol, I know. I know. I carry scissors around with me now in order to cut all that red tape. ;-)

Comment ID #2754980763 at 06/28/2016 11:14 am:

Michael Martinez commented on Google+ Celebrates 5 Years Online

That's cruel. :)

Comment ID #2754979164 at 06/28/2016 11:13 am:

BushyTop commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Not in this case, its painful 2002 SEO.

Comment ID #2754977749 at 06/28/2016 11:12 am:

Michael Martinez commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

In other news today, Donald Trump breathed in the same atmosphere as the rest of us and Hillary Clinton walked the same Earth.

Comment ID #2754975932 at 06/28/2016 11:11 am:

Anon User commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Or, the spammers are just doing what they do best :)

Comment ID #2754975541 at 06/28/2016 11:10 am:

Michael Martinez commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

You guys are way overrating the value of RankBrain. It looks for previously served search results and recommends them to the search system. It's not a slam-dunk "this is going to take over every query" tool. It would fail if it did that because it wouldn't be able to collect data on new SERP solutions (which would cease to be computed).

Comment ID #2754974052 at 06/28/2016 11:10 am:

Anon User commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

You need to be a team player in big biz Ben :)

Comment ID #2754971237 at 06/28/2016 11:08 am:

Michael Martinez commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

RankBrain has nothing to do with how the SERPs are constructed.

Comment ID #2754966932 at 06/28/2016 11:05 am:

Michael Martinez commented on 34% Of Google's Search Results Are HTTPS

This represents a significant failure on Google's part to persuade the Web to move to HTTPS, which is an incredibly unsafe protocol to be using. It has been violated and kicked around by hackers in more ways than people realize. And it is now one of the most important conduits for man-in-the-middle attacks. HTTPS is really a very bad idea.

Comment ID #2754966887 at 06/28/2016 11:05 am:

BushyTop commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Ive seen a massive shake up, spam rising to the top? pre-release penguin?

Comment ID #2754962904 at 06/28/2016 11:03 am:

asdf commented on Google+ Celebrates 5 Years Online

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTq8TrA3hb4 mic drop.

Comment ID #2754952319 at 06/28/2016 10:58 am:

Harsh Agrawal commented on Google AdSense Classic Design Error: "Unable To Process Your Request"

I tried it on iMac & still got this error. I believe the reason is something else

Comment ID #2754949936 at 06/28/2016 10:56 am:

Ben Guest commented on Google Update Chatter : Not Huge Chatter

Once they are out of, “probably not in every query but in a lot of queries,” I'm sure they'll announce it as in full control. By this, I'm guessing they're still testing, and analyzing the results RB is providing. We will continue to see these "fluctuations" as they iron out the kinks I assume. They have no obligation to leave their real world results untouched, and I personally would prefer testing on live data anyway. When I worked in a large corp, I would take new versions of their POS software and throw it into their biggest revenue generating restaurant without anyone knowing. I didn't trust QA because buggy versions were hitting production, and the biggest revenue generator simply had more testers than QA. Many more bugs were discovered this way and we ironed them out before the version went out to the entire company. Operations got in the way when I wanted to go "public" with what I was doing so I quit.