Below are the most recent 30 comments. I try to keep it clean of comment spam, but some times things
get through and it takes me several hours to get to it. So please excuse any of that comment spam.
Nothing is wrong for Google and is going as planned. They are probably moving the final chess pieces into place to checkmate organic results.
Google successfully has Trump under their spell and he is now their Trumpnocrat who will use his power to help Google. Republicans in his party are too scared of Trump so they stay silent. Best hope is Trump resigns after declaring himself acting President of Venezuela since he can't hold an office in another nation while being President of the USA. Not sure if the makeup wearing hillbilly would do better, but at least the party might not get hammered as bad in the midterms.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/14fc8ea833a661ec81411227cecc97dfb4e0e2e768cc3a26fbbd592ac29824e1.jpg
Google search is just dead and doesn't matter how they stir their toilet bowl. I haven't seen a sale from Facebook in a very long time, so I was poking around and found Meta hired a Trump insider yesterday. Happens in all admins, and these slithering politically connected snakes find their way into high paid executive positions.
<b>Meta taps former Trump adviser to be president, vice chair</b> - <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/meta-taps-former-trump-adviser-155025849.html">https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/meta-taps-former-trump-adviser-155025849.html</a>
<blockquote>Meta named former Trump adviser Dina Powell McCormick to serve as president and vice chair Monday, further cementing the company’s growing ties to Republicans and President Donald Trump’s White House.
In addition to a long career on Wall Street, Powell McCormick served as Trump’s deputy national security adviser during his first term. She was also a member of the George W. Bush administration.
She first joined Meta’s board last April, part of a broader play by the social media and artificial intelligence giant to hire Republicans following Trump’s election.</blockquote>
the only trend is real traffic going down and bot traffic going up. I have spent 3 hours today already (it's barely 8 am) just blocking bot and AI Ips today. Real traffic? Ain't happening. haha.
All of our stores have experienced a drop in the number of products in Google Merchant Center. On the same day and at the same time, the products literally disappeared. No changes of any kind were made on our side. We are asking whether this is happening to other users as well, or only to us.
What you see in the image are the graphs showing the number of products published in Merchant Center.
These are independent stores, with separate domains, selling different products. Some of our technicians believe this may be related to a server outage we experienced on Friday the 9th in the afternoon, which lasted for approximately three hours, and is only now being reflected in Merchant Center. We will continue to monitor the situation.
i noticed big pattern with growing sites, google loves me as long as I have more stuff to offer and publish quickly, once i have nothing more to offer and stagnate, it start going down
Are you seeing a decline in products in Merchant Center? I've been seeing it in all my stores since Monday the 12th. I don't know if it's something that only affects me or if it's widespread. I'm still investigating.
Again, another way to disrupt sales traffic. I am in e-comm USA, and this is the 3rd Monday that traffic is non-existent. And this is the worst of the 3 Mondays. I've had 1 sale eek through today so far. Not that I can boast about sales anyway, it's just that every time G makes adjustments, you can actually feel the sensation you're in a ghost town instead of on the internet.
Seems like that's their goal isn't it? Just to take over the whole internet and become the monopoly on everything. Sadly enough, I think the government would let them too.
Probably be a bit like what they do with App Payments, if you find something via them, you HAVE to pay via their service... Inch by inch, they're taking over the Internet.
I hadn't seen it, thx.
I guess Google will pay $10 billion (arguments sake) and make $20 Billion back from the new monopoly where they get commission on this new marketplace feature to compete with Amazon.
Wish I had seen your post before I posted above because you're spot on about Google creating another monopoly. Did you see in the news today Apple will use Gemini to power Siri? I know this was expected by many, but now it's official.
<b>Apple picks Google’s Gemini to run AI-powered Siri coming this year</b>
<blockquote>Apple is joining forces with Google to power its artificial intelligence features, including a major Siri upgrade later this year, the tech giants said on Monday.
The multi-year partnership will lean on Google’s Gemini models and cloud technology for future Apple foundational models, according to a statement obtained by CNBC’s Jim Cramer.</blockquote>Full story: <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/12/apple-google-ai-siri-gemini.html">https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/12/apple-google-ai-siri-gemini.html</a>
<blockquote>I saw gbot interacting with our shopping cart (directly adding products to the cart with a URL and passing referrer info)</blockquote>Same. Google doesn't pass the referrer (Google) in StoreBot because it has no intent to complete a sale. When Gbot is hitting the direct product add to cart URL, it's passing Google off as the referrer as if Google wants credit for the sale if it occurs.
Here we go with another Google imposed standard that gives them more control over the industry. Some of us sell products that have safety considerations and bypassing the product detail pages would leave some customers clueless to these considerations. Also purchasing, without agreeing to our terms, increases our liability exposure. Is there an opt-out option or must stores disable their product feeds to avoid the headaches these purchasing agents pose?
How long will it be before Google becomes their own payment processor and processes the transactions themselves? Or will Google demand these processors share a percentage of each sale with them or get booted out? As with anything Google is involved with, at a minimum I expect this to increase their revenue by dipping into processor's revenue which they will recover by increasing the fees they charge us.
In other words: Google is now trying to manipulate publishers into making their raw content even less user-friendly, by telling them to size up their content, even if the nature of the content doesn't demand or justify that.
This will make in turn users want less and less read their over-lengthy articles, and will more and more push them towards consumption of content through AI, which will be either able to create a summary on the fly, or integrate and present the content wholly and exclusively through AI mode and chatbots, in a digested form.
Also, publishers themselves will also obviously use AI to make the articles longer (or those who will use AI will be more profitable than those who use human writers to do that), which will degrade the overall quality of their articles and speed up the way to model collapse.
Google: do this, don't do that. keep creating original, never seen before content.
also Google: can you believe these morons train our ai for free?
Google has moved Danny boy to another position since he made his false statements about potential HCU recoveries. Now he has an easy out to hide from any accountability.
Definitely don't expect him to do the honorable thing by still giving a response anyway.