Below are the most recent 30 comments. I try to keep it clean of comment spam, but some times things
get through and it takes me several hours to get to it. So please excuse any of that comment spam.
When the fluctuation lasts for more than 45 consecutive days, it ceases to be an update and officially confirms the idea that they are more lost than a son of a b 1tch on Father's Day.
Something really weird happening today. A branded search term for a client's name that is very unique no longer shows any of their socials or portfolio sites and now a bunch of unrelated TikTok videos and foreign websites in the SERP.
Fair enough. It's that up to 10% where the catch is. Doesn't matter, I'll be here in the USA cheering the EU on and pushing back against the tariff tantrum threats that follow.
This profile is innactive since May and in August he posted that the account is innactive. This is an official answer from Google... They don't have a clue anymore. @rustybrick:disqus your thoughts?
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/47679fcd7282324566ac5c97986b652c90c65d2bcffce406ae317f0f125cd606.jpg
I noticed "publishers" as a vertical ...appear to be missing from the future Google ad strategy....Looks like Gemini is the publisher now, looks like they expect people to TRUST AI. Thoughts?
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b18ca54377c5ad3826f77558f3ec3602a64913d11a792aa696081beb24d33cf8.png
I don't care how huge it is, you need to have a mechanism of allowing to opt out of AI Overviews. Applies to all Answer Engines. Yes, you can use robots.txt for Claude and CHatGPT but they use proxies where they don't identify themselves.
Just because something is difficult or huge to do doesn't mean you don't have to do it...
Sure didn't seem like it was too much of a problem for them to set up the system to steal all that content. Odd that it's too hard for them to <i>not</i> steal the content.
I appreciate @rustybrick:disqus for designing such a variety of thumbnails for the Ranking volatility updates. Hope you find it difficult because it is happening every other day.
Umm....shouldn't AI be used to get AI to get stop showing in Overviews? In other words, just "tell" AI to stop doing it - create the script/code.
So since google is saying a HUGE engineering project, is the takeaway what AI can do is overrated?
If it is a huge engeering project then maybe Google should wind it back and stop using unfair / rip off AIOs until they are in a position to do the right / ethical thing and provide publishers proper choice. Typical Google - quick to screw every publisher, but slow to do anything that limits their predatory behaviour.
Turnover as in gross profits?
I think 10% is still weak because it assumes 90% of Google's revenue is earned honestly when it's not. The foundation for fines must always consider victim's losses, which 10% is far short of what would be needed to compensate these victims fairly.
Have a read:
<a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/1r70nbm/gmail_search_option_is_absolutely_useless/">https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/1r70nbm/gmail_search_option_is_absolutely_useless/</a>
All the comments are bashing Google Search too. lol
The EU's feeble 10% fine compares to what a waiter/waitress gets as a tip in restaurants. While a 10% fine is wimpy, it's still more than Judge Meathead's 0% fine in the USA.
just reading slovak post, EU is after google, says "If a breach of competition rules is confirmed, the European Commission can impose a fine on Google of up to 10% of its worldwide annual turnover."