Below are the most recent 30 comments. I try to keep it clean of comment spam, but some times things
get through and it takes me several hours to get to it. So please excuse any of that comment spam.
i think it is really the end...
been trying facebook ads for the past few weeks and it is horrible. i've also installed a custom tracking script and i notice some of the 'users' would leave the page in less than 0.1 second. some would even click my cta button in less than 2 seconds on page, which is humanly impossible! it just points down to bot traffic.
to make things worse... i still haven't heard back after sending out another round of resumes...
:(
a very valid point as another revenue model, sadly! This alone and would still allow them to push for AI forward.
What I feel Sam doesn't get is that Google is not pushing for AI because they want/love it, they're forced to do it by the market around them, no choice for them either. If they don't do it then they experience the Nokia feeling!
Later edit: The only ones capable to stop this AI crap are the end users to say NO to it (I have no hope they will ever do!).
You're tunnel visioned on ads and not seeing the bigger picture. Google knows they can't rely on ads for growth which is why they are pushing subscriptions. Just recently Google killed background play on Youtube for non-paying users. Google will continue to turn the screws to make people subscribe to one thing or another.
Just like we couldn't imagine organic results pushed to the bottom of the serps a few years ago, it's hard to imagine Google not being reliant on ads for their main revenue. But that's where it's going and organic results may be gone for many queries soon.
If users hated Google's AI, they would scroll past it and we would still be getting traffic. But most user's aren't scrolling and traffic for us is down 95%+ on some queries where we rank #1. If Google were losing users, they would have already disabled AI or given users the option to easily disable it. Google hasn't done this because they aren't losing users or at least not enough to be concerned with.
All indications point to Google's continued push forward with more AI and less free traffic to publishers as they use their monopoly to push toward a subscription based revenue model.
Heheh, you look too simplistic, but sorry to tell they have that time and beyond that.
I said they'd need 2-3 yrs to discover the right spot to monetize it, but you'd be surprised to know that in this transition period there will be "plenty of fish" represented by the advertisers willing to spend money with them (even if as a one time only) and it still makes for the 2-3 years they need to figure it out. If them won't succeed on this path, no one else will so I feel you're slightly naive to think otherwise.
I am telling you from own experience, we spend in the region of $50K to $80K/month (in peak months) with Google Ads and we receive calls from their reps with all sorts of updates and AI features they plan on pushing forward and yes they will get there.
To top it off, from own standpoint -- if let's say tomorrow Google is forcing us to advertise in just AI mode and AI overviews, guess what we would do? We have no choice than to try it out.
No business in this world will say no to it without trying it out for a while (so it makes the 2-3 yrs easily). Saying no to it from the start would mean not much business left. That's a reality.
Lets wait and see, make no mistake I'll save your above comment!
You're giving them 2-3 years they don't have. Advertisers won't spend with noreturn for years waiting for Google to "figure out" ROI. They pull spend within quarters when they can't measure returns. I actioned to stop millions within 24 hours when I worked for Amazon. The stock won't survive 2-3 years of declining revenue. And in 2-3 years, what's left? Publishers gone, real content gone, AI training on AI slop. You can't rebuild the ecosystem after it collapses.
The problem isn't user adoption - users already use ChatGPT and Perplexity. The problem is that chatbots AI structurally can't monetize like search. No clicks out of conversations = no ROI proof. Nokia had resources. Yahoo had resources. IBM had resources. They all had years to "figure it out." but the didn't
Time makes it worse, not better. Every month: publishers are gone, content goes down, advertisers retract payments, the market won't wait 2-3 years. Advertisers spend in quarters, not years. If they follow this strategy and Google are still throwing billions on AI in 3 years like it is now I will eat my hat.
Datacenters don't matter if they can't monetize AI. They will just burn cash regardless of tax breaks. Apple just released an update to collect user data every 15 minutes to see what they are searching for. You have to turn it off. (Apple intelligence) iOS 26.2 which was a LATE update which never normally happens. Apple won't call it a search engine just modifying Siri, but it will be search. Tax benefits mean nothing without profit. When advertisers can't measure ROI, they pull spend. Stock crashes. We're at the traction now where Google could revert but if they don't do so by March 26... then it will be game on cartnage, for them and for us.
Now it's getting serious:
Google informs me in Search Console that my pages have been deindexed.
The reason for the deindexing is an unspecified “redirect.”
At the same time, all past data in Search Console is being changed as if my site had neither clicks nor impressions.
My site has been around since 1999. It contains in-depth information on almost 3,000 pages.
Google has demonstrably “trained” its AI with every single page of my website.
In some cases, the content of my site is even offered unchanged by Google in its AI overviews as its own Google content.
Now Google apparently no longer sees any value in the content of my site. Everything has already been copied and backed up.
Google no longer values new content from my site, but prefers to deindex my entire site and spit out my life's work.
To the John Muellers, Elizabeth Reids, Gary Illyes of this world:
I hope the bonuses for 2025 were adequate. May Google choke on its money!
Total distraction.
If you opt out of AI using your content, does that only apply from that point onwards? Like, they stop using anything new you post, but they don’t delete what they’ve already taken in and trained on? Because once a model has been trained, they can’t realistically “unlearn” your data, so opting out feels like it just means “we won’t use MORE going forward”, not “we remove what’s already baked in”.
Then there’s the bigger issue: who actually regulates this and checks it’s being honoured? Google? Some watchdog? Because if AI can paraphrase and spin content, there’s no reliable way to prove whether your opt-out was respected.
And even if one company does honour it, other AIs will still spin the same ideas for other people to copy and paste onto their websites which Google will then train off if they don't also opt out. So your knowledge gets reused one way or another, regardless. This is all pointless IMO
I think you confuse big time the general idea of search (how you & I used to know it - that is what I say will not exist anymore) to where the AI led search goes - which is into conversational mode. Let's catch up in less than 2-3 yrs and you will see I'm right in the sense that ofc Google can't return ROI NOW using AI Mode and AI Overviews, but things will change dramatically in the short term future.
It is obvious why they can't yet offer good ROI on AI as this is something quite new for them as well, but make no mistake they will figure out the right path just in time when the user gets familirized with the sort of AI led experience .
As soon as the user is ready, I bet you will see Google doing well using only or mostly AI mode & overviews.
The mistake you do is that you judge Google now based on something which is sure to change. We can't know yet how good or bad they will do but I bet they will figure out the way to go about this, having a scary financial power and otherwise data, resources, knowledge etc.
I would love to see them struggle like SMEs do during this transition, but I am afraid they won't taste from this sort of pain small sites and SMEs suffer now.
Google's marketshare is 90% while Bing's is 4%. If the Google Crime Syndicate weren't heavily engaged in economic crimes against humanity, you would expect them to have delivered revenue 22.5 times that of Bing or 4,624.42.
<blockquote>The "stay in your lane" now does not apply as Google has tried to invade every lane, including now our lane which made them who they are.</blockquote>Correct. Which is why I said other big tech doesn't want to pick a fight against Google (search) and why they stay in their own lanes so they stay out of Google's crosshairs.
Google borrowing money is to be expected since they are rapidly deploying datacenters around the world while maintaining about $100 billion cash on hand. Depreciation reduces tax liability and Trump's Big Beautiful Bill allows Google to depreciate 100% of the cost of datacenter equipment the year it's placed in service from 1/1/2025 forward. Most of the datacenters have property tax abatements and energy subsidies, so the cost of keeping them online after build is minimal for a company as large as Google.
Ads won't go away, but subscriptions will rise. Like all big businesses they model growth with forecasts for 5-10 years that provide a blueprint for actions to be taken. I'm sure Google will push more monetization models simply because they can and nobody can stop them. Even something like a PPC (Pay Per Crawl), where publishers are billed by Google for the pages Google crawls, would not shock me. But for the time being, they can maintain revenue with ads as they focus on growing AI subscribers. If need be, they can spam the AI Overviews box with ads to compensate.
I don't see a return to Google sending free traffic to publishers. It's not Google's business model that will fail, but everyone around them who they victimized with content/traffic theft that will fail. Sure, the part timers and hobbyists will survive because they have other income coming in. But for those of us who do this full time, and survived this far, it's not looking good at all.
They were all in it together for 15 years but now Google broke it. AI Overviews and many updates, and spam has stopped publisher revenue and with it advertiser ROI. They did this to themselves. Google Shopping competied with Amazon and Amazon pulled their ads.
If Google wanted AI-first, why are they still showing the ten links? They have not got rid of them because 74% of their revenue is ads - $300 billion. Subscriptions make $18 billion, maybe $36 billion if they 10x subscribers. That's an 88% collapse. You don't survive that.
And they are burning $91-93 billion on AI capex, $115 billion next year. By 2030 depreciation costs will be $400 billion annually - more than their total profit today. They're borrowing money for the first time because cash flow won't cover it. IBM, Kodak, Nokia, Blockbuster, Yahoo - all "too big to fail" until they weren't. The blue links prove AI mode doesn't make money. They're burning cash while the ad model collapses.
The "stay in your lane" now does not apply as Google has tried to invade every lane, including now our lane which made them who they are.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d36ce9459a10960fa1e26ccdf51bfc409424ea91d0f2cee94682526d60fca748.png
For me, Bing provides double the income Google does, the figures are extremely low as well compared to Nov 22.
Same. But Bing is just slightly gaining ground. It is more a case of declining traffic overall, where G traffic is vanishing update after update and Bing increasing just a tiny bit, so in anaytics it looks like Bing and duckduck etc are growing, but they arent in my case.
Really seeing a major drop in rankings and traffic since Jan 27, which aligns with Gemini 3 becoming the default model for AI Overviews globally. The continued SERP volatility appears to be driven by ongoing algorithm adjustments, AI-driven search tests, and increased competition, resulting in highly unpredictable ranking and traffic fluctuations.
After a significant drop, I notice that in the last 7 days, almost 50% of the traffic that brings me money from Google is actually BING. This means that Google is regressing and Microsoft is gaining ground. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7cebfd5f153c655d02acc5574090b85a831583b235d2ea685f37aae463e461b9.jpg
Just yesterday, BBC News posted this on their homepage (not the top, of course, but near mid-section).
<b>How to make Google put preferred sources up top when you search</b>
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260128-how-to-make-google-put-trusted-sources-up-top-when-you-search">https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260128-how-to-make-google-put-trusted-sources-up-top-when-you-search</a>
Not just BBC, I also noticed some other big publisher websites posted the same notice some time back. It makes you wonder how desperate big publishers are too...
Its definitely still possible to make money in seo, but some of the complete car crashes of websites you see people posting here... most look to have no chance.
I'm glad you seem to have made peace with the fact this won't work for you any more, and moved on from it employment wise at least. There's a few more regular posters that need to accept that reality and join you there. Some people have been working for 10 cents an hour here since you got that job.
<blockquote>take the fitness niche
is there something that hasn't been phucking said 1000 billions times</blockquote>At least every once in a while some failed attempts at doing something new in that niche have been entertaining.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c5d180851a27004bd7eba4b176709cd9d9dd51c77acea89bd4889623deb7dfd0.gif
I mentioned this the other day but Youtube is painful as an end user right now, Shorts are already dead for me. With the increase in quality of these tools / availability of them to Scumdars ditch pooping pals, its only going to get a million times worse.
I've been looking up loads of videos on home construction as I build a little house in my garden.
I'm having to filter through utter garbage like this - <a href="https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xMYJliRTJso">https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xMYJliRTJso
</a>
There's zero disclosure before I click on that that its just a load of absolute rubbish.
Just one random niche observation but it's the same all over YouTube now, in every niche unfortunately. And this only gets worse & worse & worse as its easier to spam it up with full length vids of this shit.
If your blog is about premier league football then you're completely and utterly screwed as once you stop updating the site for a week you've got no content anyone is going to be searching for.
If your content is relatively evergreen, you can leave it live indefinitely without it looking bad. My hobby site, I've not updated in a good while now but it doesn't look awful, the info is all still valid, nothing is stale cos there is no 'breaking news' in my hobby niche.
Perhaps I'm causing my hobby sites downfall by refusing to update it but the give/take with Google is bust now as far as i'm concerned... I used to spend a lot of time/money creating really good content and win back more than that from amazon comms over the next year. Now I'd need to be stupid to keep trying that. I'm genuinely working for < min wage in UK if I keep trying to push that stuff.
So as always, the main sites / spam stuff continues as they pay the bills, and my actual useful content is being retired :(
I think you're of the mindset that there will be some rollback to the past 10 blue links because Google needs revenue from publishers displaying Adsense ads. Google doesn't need publishers or the Adsense revenue the produced otherwise they would have rolled back already. Not only did Google not rollback, but they had their best quarterly revenue ever. Ads grew 16%, but Google's cloud/AI more than doubled that with 35% growth. That's the shift that's occurring - Google becoming more reliant on subscriptions to drive profits instead of ads.
My point about Google's revenue being cut in half and still growing their wealth is because of wealth inequality. If Google is making money when everyone else is losing, the wealth gap widens. Wealth is relative. If you have a $100 bill in your wallet, then you are well off to those who only have a dime in their pockets. Wealth inequality was in the news last week with the Fed releasing data indicating the gap between rich and poor is the most its been in 30 years. It will get even worse.
What Apple may do who knows. Apple and Google are trading billions among each other in strategic partnerships. They both are part of oligopoly just like Amazon is, who was just in the news for potentially investing $50 billion into OpenAI. These big techies have their own thing going, and we're not invited to the party.
Whatever the CMA says may only affect the UK, I'm guessing, but why would Google afford to have two ranking systems? I hope what was said yesterday is not just aimed at Google but will have to apply to BIng and the Aholes... Also hope that it inspires other politicians around the world notably EU and US to force Google & others to do the same.
You can't even rank yourself, your localised seo site has ZERO organic traffic, but you want to peddle some BS entities, semantic SEO, and other fluff. Parasite SEO is literally at an all-time high. Google would rather rank garbage like linkedin, facebook pages etc. to keep the user clicking on ads and keep them longer on Google vs legitimate businesses.
50% of all new content is generated by AI...
<a href="https://theconversation.com/more-than-half-of-new-articles-on-the-internet-are-being-written-by-ai-is-human-writing-headed-for-extinction-268354">https://theconversation.com/more-than-half-of-new-articles-on-the-internet-are-being-written-by-ai-is-human-writing-headed-for-extinction-268354</a>
it won't get better because our work is no longer as valuable
take the fitness niche
is there something that hasn't been phucking said 1000 billions times
all of this chit was worth it in 2005 or so
but now the Internet is too saturated and AI can pin pong the existing content anyway it likes
it's over