Google: We Use The Most Restrictive Crawling Command On The Page

Dec 24, 2018 - 7:58 am 2 by

Google Restrictive

Google's John Mueller said in a Reddit thread that Google will typically use the most restrictive crawling command or signals they find on the page. "Google will use the most restrictive setting you have on the page," John Mueller said. It doesn't matter if Google found it via HTML or JavaScript, assuming Google can find it.

Here is what John Mueller said:

Google will use the most restrictive setting you have on the page (this matches how robots meta tags are generally processed, eg if you have a "noindex" + "index", then the "noindex" will override the "index"). If you have a "nofollow" in static HTML and remove it with JS, Google will still use the "nofollow". Similarly, if you don't have any robots meta tag, and add a "noindex" with JS, Google will use the "noindex". In short, adding a "nofollow" via JS would work, removing it won't.

See that last line? If you add a nofollow using JavaScript, Google would honor that. If you add JavaScript to remove the nofollow from the code, Google won't honor that.

Google goes with the most restrictive signal they get here.

Forum discussion at Reddit and Twitter.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Google Search Volatility

More Details

Search Video Recaps

 
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Google Ads

Google Ads Expands Alcohol, Gambling & Games Policy

Jul 14, 2026 - 7:51 am
Google Ads

Google Ads Asks For Justification When Requesting Removal Of Access

Jul 14, 2026 - 7:41 am
ChatGPT

OpenAI Crawlers Can Update Its User Agent String

Jul 14, 2026 - 7:31 am
Google Ads

Google Merchant Center AI Performance Insights For AI Mode & AI Overviews

Jul 14, 2026 - 7:12 am
ChatGPT Ads

ChatGPT Ads Manager Gains Attributed Sales Value & Sales ROAS & Products

Jul 14, 2026 - 7:11 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google Fixes Google-InspectionTool User Agent String In Help Doc

Jul 14, 2026 - 7:05 am
 
Previous Story: Agency Claims They Are A "Google Partner SEO Agency"; Google Calls Them Out