Most SEOs Say Redirect, Not 404, When Pruning Old Content

Apr 15, 2019 - 8:27 am 8 by

Street Closed

Cyrus Shepard posted a poll on Twitter asking SEOs what is better to do when pruning old content, to 301 redirect or 404 the page. That is if the page cannot be updated to have better content, what do you do? Either (a) Noindex/Remove (noindex, 404, 410) or (b) 301 Redirect to a relevant, better page.

I was surprised by the results, I have to be honest. Almost 800 responses and 77% said you should go the 301 redirect route.

I guess like much of SEO the answer would be "it depends." You'd have to really review the content on the old page and compare that to the page you want to redirect it to. If there is enough of a match, then sure - 301 it. But if it isn't close enough, a 404 would make more sense. But I guess, the question is, how much is enough overlap?

Not too long ago we saw many SEOs say they blanket 301 pages to the home page which is a bad idea according to Google.

Forum discussion at Twitter.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Follow

Search Video Recaps

 
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: October 10, 2024

Oct 10, 2024 - 10:00 am
Google Maps

Google Local Service Ads To Soon Require Google Business Profile

Oct 10, 2024 - 7:51 am
Google Ads

9,000 Google Ads Campaigns Created Every Second???

Oct 10, 2024 - 7:41 am
Google

Google Tests Quick View Button For Recipes That Keep You On Google

Oct 10, 2024 - 7:31 am
Google

Google Search Tests Verified Labels For Product Results

Oct 10, 2024 - 7:21 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google Store Ratings Now Available In India, Australia, Canada & UK

Oct 10, 2024 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: You Want Google To Stay Stagnant & Not Improve?