Google's Click Fraud Efforts Are "Reasonable"
I reported Friday afternoon at the SEW Blog on an Independent Report: Google Click Fraud Detection Practices Are "Reasonable". Bottom-line, the report stats that "click fraud detection practices that shows Google makes reasonable efforts to detect click fraud." What is also interesting is that the folks in the forums don't seem to care, well, as of yet.
There are no forum threads outside of one that I found at DigitalPoint Forums and that one doesn't have much feedback from forum members.
This 47-page report by Dr. Alexander Tuzhilin, Professor of Information Systems at NYU, has tons of clues about AdWords, that can benefits SEMs. Anyway...
Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.
Like The Story? Vote For It On Yahoo Buzz! Or On Sphinn!
rustybrick in Google AdWords at July 24, 2006 7:29 AM
Comments (3)

Comments
CPC is so easy to use that many forget that it is also so easy to click.
Intended Click (Interested) - This person likes your AD and wants to see your website/service/product.
Intended Click (Fraud) - The person doing the click has something to gain by clicking. It could be Revenue Share or to drive the competition advertising costs up.
Accidental Click - The person clicking intended to click on another link.
Quick Click - The person clicking has a preconceived notion about what your website should look like, but leaves before looking at what you have to offer.
Though the numbers in my custom tracking application often don't match the number in my Google AdWords acocunt I don't assume the higher numbers are all fraud.
The CPA model may help identify some fraud, but your competiton will figure out how to generate a false "Action".
CPC, CPA, CPM each model has its good points and bad points.
I would like to see a timed CPC model. Only pay for clicks where the visitor stays on the site for more then 10 seconds. Makes it harder for fraud when exchanging time for money.
Take Care,
Michael
Posted by Michael at July 24, 2006 12:31