Why Google Added Hacked Site Label To Search Results

Dec 21, 2010 • 8:25 am | comments (4) by twitter Google+ | Filed Under Google Search Engine
 

Google Site May Be Compromised LabelAs you know, Friday of last week Google began labeling sites with this site may be compromised when a site was hacked. But why did Google start doing this?

In the past, hacked sites were simply removed from the Google index and the webmaster was sent a notice via Google Webmaster Tools and via email (when possible). Why did Google decide to leave the hacked site in the index but simply label it as being compromised?

That is the question asked by WebmasterWorld members and answered by Google's Matt Cutts. Matt Cutts explained:

The fact is, not everyone logs into Webmaster Tools obsessively to see if they have any messages. So we needed to find a way to surface this potential risk so that site owners would find out more quickly if they've been hacked.

We now have two different responses for sites with malware vs. sites that we think may be hacked. When we detect malware, we try harder to let users know that they may be stepping into a dangerous part of the web (e.g. an interstitial so that users really need to be sure they want to visit that page).

In contrast, a hacked site might not be immediately dangerous to users. But we still want to alert site owners, because if a site is hacked right now, in practice it's not too much harder for a bad actor to add malware to the hacked page.

You see, a webmaster is more likely to see their site's label in Google then look at their notifications in webmaster tools or trust an apparent email from Google about a site hack. The label in Google might encourage the webmaster to close the hack sooner than later.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Previous story: Small SEO Changes That Make A Difference
 

Comments:

Amit Verma

12/21/2010 04:52 pm

So, it means - This site may harm your computer = malware label This site may be compromised = hacked site label

Jerry Nordstrom

12/21/2010 05:28 pm

I believe these types of communications need to be in private with notifications sent via Webmaster tools interface or other Google services. There are just too many drawbacks to posting this information in such a public fashion. Listing the site as malware infested, okay good warning, but why not remove the listing altogether? The larger question is how far and how deep should Google's reviews and ratings go? Will they start categorizing and ranking according to content? Syndicated content Scraped content Grammatical and Spelling error rate 94%. No Privacy policy No Terms of Service notice No address or contact info on site Parked domain Ad only site Foul language warning Warning - Conservative content generated by the Tea Party Okay I jest, but really once Google heads down this road it can be a slippery slope to chaos. So to calm the cynical like me, details on their policy and goals need to be made clear on a regular basis. JerryNordstrom.com Pro Google posts: 453 Anti Google posts: 256 Status: Active :-)

Shaniadavid86

12/22/2010 04:32 am

nice and good to read

Chavi

12/24/2010 09:35 pm

Users won't know the difference. They just won't touch a site with a label.

blog comments powered by Disqus