Auto-Responders Via Google Reconsideration Requests?

Jun 14, 2011 • 8:03 am | comments (2) by twitter Google+ | Filed Under Google Search Engine Optimization
 

Google WebmasterMany many webmasters and SEOs use the reconsideration request form that has been around for years. Even more so now that Google responds to them.

But a WebmasterWorld thread asks if all or some or none of them are automated responses.

One SEO said, "They [Google reconsideration requests] all are [automated]. Google isn't listening."

But is that true? Tedster, WebmasterWorld's administrator said something I agree with. He said:

I do think the RR team now has a number of quick reply buttons they can click for standard actions, and it's not impossible that the "no manual spam actions" look-up could be automated. But it is frustrating that algorithmic spam actions might still catch an occasional false positive, and now it feels like you can't get a human look to overrule that - to see if your site might be worth putting on the "exception list".

I think there's still a human look somewhere along the stream, and the key is that your request needs to immediately look like it's not "just another one of those."

I am sure the Google webmaster team gets a huge number of these reconsideration requests and I wouldn't blame them if they had "quick reply" mechanisms after a human reviews it and labels it as such. But I would guess that a human does review each and every reconsideration request - maybe they do not personally reply to all.

I am sure not everyone agrees with me and only Google knows for sure.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Previous story: Daily Search Forum Recap: June 13, 2011
 

Comments:

seogabs

06/14/2011 12:52 pm

see these tweets http://twitter.com/#!/mattcutts/status/75589291388055552 "we take another look at the site. We do that regardless of what you say in the the text of the reconsideration request if you have a manual spam action on the site." 

Will Spencer

06/14/2011 01:09 pm

In this context, I think "we" means "our script" and not "our $1/day Indian intern."

blog comments powered by Disqus