List Of All The GoogleBot Robots.txt Specifications Changes

Jul 2, 2019 - 8:01 am 2 by

Google Gate

With Google aiming to make the robots.txt exclusion protocol a standard, they proposed some changes and submitted them the other day. Now, Google updated their own developer docs around the robots.txt specification to match. Here is a list of what has changed.

  • Removed the "Requirements Language" section in this document because the language is Internet draft specific.
  • Robots.txt now accepts all URI-based protocols.
  • Google follows at least five redirect hops. Since there were no rules fetched yet, the redirects are followed for at least five hops and if no robots.txt is found, Google treats it as a 404 for the robots.txt. Handling of logical redirects for the robots.txt file based on HTML content that returns 2xx (frames, JavaScript, or meta refresh-type redirects) is discouraged and the content of the first page is used for finding applicable rules.
  • For 5xx, if the robots.txt is unreachable for more than 30 days, the last cached copy of the robots.txt is used, or if unavailable, Google assumes that there are no crawl restrictions.
  • Google treats unsuccessful requests or incomplete data as a server error.
  • "Records" are now called "lines" or "rules", as appropriate.
  • Google doesn't support the handling of elements with simple errors or typos (for example, "useragent" instead of "user-agent").
  • Google currently enforces a size limit of 500 kibibytes (KiB), and ignores content after that limit.
  • Updated formal syntax to be valid Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) per RFC5234 and to cover for UTF-8 characters in the robots.txt.
  • Updated the definition of "groups" to make it shorter and more to the point. Added an example for an empty group.
  • Removed references to the deprecated Ajax Crawling Scheme.

The big changes are (1) GoogleBot will follows 5 redirect hops (which we knew in 2014), (2) there are no crawl restrictions if unavailable is greater than 30 days, (3) unsuccessful requests=server error, (4) there is a 500 KiB size limit and (5) it supports URI-based protocols.

Here are some additional answers:

Forum discussion at Twitter.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Follow

Search Video Recaps

 
Google Core Update Rumbling, Manual Actions FAQs, Core Web Vitals Updates, AI, Bing, Ads & More - YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Google Updates

Google Urges Patience As The March 2024 Core Update Continues To Rollout

Mar 18, 2024 - 7:51 am
Google

Official: Google Replaces Perspective Filter With Forums Filter

Mar 18, 2024 - 7:41 am
Google Maps

Google Business Profiles Now Offers Additional Review After Appeal Is Denied

Mar 18, 2024 - 7:31 am
Google Maps

EU Searchers Complaining About Google Maps Features Changes Related To DMA

Mar 18, 2024 - 7:21 am
Google

Google Showing Fewer Sitelinks Within Search

Mar 18, 2024 - 7:11 am
Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: March 15, 2024

Mar 15, 2024 - 4:00 pm
Previous Story: Google Shares Its Robots.txt Parser Code With Open Source World