Below are the most recent 30 comments. I try to keep it clean of comment spam, but some times things
get through and it takes me several hours to get to it. So please excuse any of that comment spam.
hi sir dimitris. have you seen my previous comment regarding your site techmaniacs. This is just my opinion I hope you will understand. I am from Philippines and when I search for your site, the dot com is on the top, not the dot gr. Could this be one of the reasons why your site is experiencing less serp visibility.
Shitdar will not stop until the entire world is in poverty and starving.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3d9e58adc8b83d727d837b9b21df642a120badbcee70b10852f8d6d6913feb91.jpg
While I think Sam is on the wrong idea path, I still respect her opinions. The good thing about discussions is to view multiple angles to form a better understanding of how things may play out.
Google has too much dominance, and too many friends in American politics, to falter. If Google hits some bumps in the road, all they have to do is call in a favor from one of their owned American politicians, put more ads in search, kill off a competitor, etc. But I see no change in Google's strategy to consume and eliminate as many publishers as they can. Total control of billions of users, and influencing what they think/what & where they spend their money, is Google's end game.
Ok, thanks, I've found the article. Going forward, can you include the titles of the pages which you are getting your sources from so we can then Bing/Google it.
<a href="https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/the-uk-government-gets-it-spectacularly-wrong-on-ai-just-3-percent-of-the-public-agree-with-its-stance-on-copyright-law-changes">https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/the-uk-government-gets-it-spectacularly-wrong-on-ai-just-3-percent-of-the-public-agree-with-its-stance-on-copyright-law-changes
</a>
Whats the bet that the Government will ignore the results and favour their experts who will say the benefits outweigh concerns?
I didn't take part, I did write to my MP some time ago and he sent back a generic response referencing things as though they were in the future but had happened in the past. In other words, another constituent had written to him five months prior and he sent the same letter he sent that one without amendments.
Yes google it, I can't post links as it will be spam then it thinks all my posts are spam. It was by TechRadar. com: The UK government gets it spectacularly wrong on AI – just 3% of the public agree with its stance on copyright law changes
News
By Eric Hal Schwartz published 28 January 2026
A massive majority want opt-in protections, not opt-out loopholes
Absolutely and that's why Amazon kept them and fired the Americans. Amazon has benefited from $11 billion in tax subsidies, and these subsidies have payroll requirements. To the best of my knowledge, not one of these subsidies treats import workers different than American workers. Theoretically Amazon could employ 100% low paid H1B workers and still be in compliance with the terms of their subsidies.
Sux for those of us with stores because Americans are not subsidizing our business and we have no import workers. Basically American policy is designed to core out the economy and destroy small businesses like ours.
i really feel big tech is all a scam! they are sending advertisers a huge portion of bot traffic. sometimes i see these bots visit my link again and they all waited exactly 29-30 seconds then they click on my cta button AGAIN. so that means 2 clicks per user! wtf!!!!
Their (Google et al) egos are too big to acknowledge that AI is a fraud. Do you have a link to this 88% survey so we can digest it, rather than you just saying, " go and Google it. You keep coming up with these facts but never publish any links. You sound like ChatGPT when they state facts, but no links to corroborate.
Monopolies like Google don't need market research, because they have successfully dominated what once was a free market, and are free to impose their will on the world. I hope in the UK you can claw back some money from the Google thieves. It won't happen in the USA where our President loves creating AI slop himself and says nothing as Americans lose their jobs to H1B visa imports to Make Amazon Great Again.
<b>‘Boycott Amazon’ calls grow over claims Americans were laid off for H-1Bs</b> - <a href="https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/01/30/boycott-amazon-grow-claims-americans-were-laid-off-for-h-1bs-474246/">https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/01/30/boycott-amazon-grow-claims-americans-were-laid-off-for-h-1bs-474246/</a>
<blockquote>The post, shared on the subreddit r/AmericanTechWorkers, claimed that during two rounds of layoffs, only American employees on the author’s team were let go. According to the post, the engineer was part of an eight-person senior development team with similar tenure levels. Three employees were laid off in the most recent round, and the author said all three were U.S. citizens. The same pattern allegedly occurred during a previous round of cuts.</blockquote>
Google shouldn't be too big to fail. If it went bankrupt, yes, people's pensions and investments will lose which I know is harsh. If they went bankrupt, lots of Googlers will lose their jobs which we'd all be happy about given how many jobs have been lose because of their scumbag operations.
If they were at threat at going under, I'm sure for "National Security", the government would step in.
I'm using probably an overpowered VPS for the amount of true visitors I get, if I downgraded, I'm worried that the server will then start crashing. Those visitors don't include Google, Bing, Facebook bots that correctly identify themselves so the actual true number of visitors I do get is a lot higher.
I'm not sure that a Google Update is news anymore - we know that the company is moving at speed to feather its own nest and damn the consequences for the rest of us. Another update, another Google win - that is all they care about; no news in that.
This typical day for Googlers in Brokeback Mountain View California is pretty full to have time for much else.
<a href="https://youtube.com/shorts/vBDjNzXKx3c?si=DSlVLgLPfHJTDF6F">https://youtube.com/shorts/vBDjNzXKx3c?si=DSlVLgLPfHJTDF6F</a>
Where's Google's market research evidence that people want AI answers and not search? ChatGPT doesn't mean people want AI in search - they're different products. They are burning trillions rather than admitting they were wrong. There is some good news 88% of people in the UK in a survey the government published were not happy about AI using creator material to train. Only 3% supported how the USA are dealing with it. This means if you are a UK/EU creator you will likely have legal rights to your work for training AI.