Wikipedia Corruption Discovered: Should Search Engines Respond?

Dec 7, 2007 - 7:08 am 6 by

The Register reports about some corruption that was discovered within Wikipedia: the existence of a secret mailing list that cracks down on users why may be threats to Wikipedia administrators' power. The article goes into depth about what ensued, what happened, the reaction, and the community is pretty shocked.

Can Wikipedia still be considered a trusted source by search engines with this information known? Well, most people say that there are always flaws in these sources, but the data is still more relevant than other search terms.

The real story here seems to be the paranoia and the heavy handed treatment of dissent by the Admin group. It comes down to control. I don't think Jimbo wants to lose that.

Users will still be in control to keep the results relevant.

Forum discussion continues at Cre8asite Forums.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Follow

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: November 6, 2024

Nov 6, 2024 - 10:00 am
Google Updates

Election 2024 Google Search Ranking Update 🇺🇸

Nov 6, 2024 - 7:51 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Report: 22% Of Sites Hit By Google's Helpful Content Update Are Up 20%+

Nov 6, 2024 - 7:41 am
Bing Ads

Microsoft Advertising Updates Shopping Audience Campaigns

Nov 6, 2024 - 7:31 am
Google

Google Highlights New Google Shopping With New Label

Nov 6, 2024 - 7:21 am
Google Ads

Google Shopping Ads With Bag Icon In Search

Nov 6, 2024 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: Google Changes Site Exclusion Process: Confusing Advertisers