Jagger 3 Take Away

Nov 9, 2005 - 8:20 am 0 by
Filed Under Google Updates

Thought I share a post I like from the huge Part 3 Update Jagger WebmasterWorld thread. The post is on page 64, message number 961 by walkman.

Google's problem as I see it, after reading trust rank, is that they focus too much on likelyhoods and stats:

MIT links to you site, you must good pages, whether you have stuff about engineering or Teletubies.

You got a ROS link, so you must've cheated so we'll send you to #300, instead of just ignoring the suscpicious links unless they can be checked. Too broad of a brush, and very easy to fall way off the radar IMO. We're not talking about from #2 to #5, we're talking going to 10 visitors a day.

Basically, from what I am hearing, at this stage of the update.... Getting a link from a solid site, seriously solid Web site, like a reputable newspaper, you are set. Im still looking for gems in these threads - I probably missed a few - but I'll keep looking.

As of 2:54AM (EST) this morning, GoogleGuy posted that Google is "still in flux, reseller. I [GoogleGuy] still expect 66.102.9.104 to spread to other data centers."

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Follow

Search Video Recaps

 
Google Core Update Volatility, Helpful Content Update Gone, Dangerous Search Results & Ads Confusion - YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: April 18, 2024

Apr 18, 2024 - 4:00 pm
Google

Google Notes On Search Won't Necessarily Go Away In May

Apr 18, 2024 - 7:51 am
Google Maps

Google Maps Releases New Directions, Travel & EV Features

Apr 18, 2024 - 7:41 am
Google Ads

Google Ads Reminds Advertisers Some Ad Customizers Will Go Away May 31st

Apr 18, 2024 - 7:31 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google Drops Video Carousel Markup

Apr 18, 2024 - 7:21 am
Google Maps

Google Business Profiles Register Your Defibrillator (AED)

Apr 18, 2024 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: Link Spam Detection Research Paper