SEO Extortion Lands An SEO In Federal Prison For 37 Months

Jan 6, 2016 • 8:05 am | comments (6) by twitter Google+ | Filed Under Search Engine Industry News
 

We've heard plenty of cases of SEOs extorting their customers by threatening to hurt their rankings or online reputation if they do not pay them a fee or ongoing monthly stipend. Well, this landed one SEO in federal prison for 37 months.

The Justice Department announced that William Stanley, a 53 year old SEO consultant, "was sentenced yesterday by U.S. District Judge David C. Godbey to 37 months in federal prison for attempting to extort money from a business in Dallas." Also the court "ordered Stanley to pay $174,888 in restitution to a dozen identified victims of Stanley's extortive conduct."

Here is what the release says he did:

A legitimate SEO business engages in standard practices such as optimizing the underlying HTML code on a website for certain keywords that a search engine indexer, (e.g., a web crawler for Google, Bing, etc.) would associate with a given search query. An illegitimate SEO business engages in deceptive tactics to affect search engine rankings and the volume of results. Such deceptive tactics include creating fraudulent reviews (good or bad), creating fictitious websites, or hiding text on websites.

While Stanley engaged in some legitimate SEO work, he also engaged in illegitimate and illegal SEO activities. Stanley also extorted individuals and companies by threatening to engage in the illegitimate SEO work, that being posting fraudulent comments and creating negative reviews online, if the victim did not pay him a certain sum of money.

Here is more:

In November 2009, GE entered into a contract with Stanley for SEO services and reputation management. Stanley was hired because of his ability to improve a firm’s online reputation through search results. After approximately one year, however, GE sought to terminate its relationship with Stanley after it determined he had acted outside of his contracted duties. Stanley also created websites that had the ability to damage GE’s reputation by associating GE with a scam. Stanley demanded additional payments to end his contractual relationship with GE and to surrender the administrator rights to the websites to GE. From November 2010 through January 2011, GE paid Stanley a total of $80,000 to terminate the relationship.

Posing as “William Davis” and “William Laurence,” Stanley transmitted threatening communications, via email and telephone, from foreign countries to GE in the Northern District of Texas. Those communications threatened to post comments on the Internet wrongfully disparaging GE’s reputation, if GE did not send money to Stanley.

Because of Stanley’s threats to harm GE’s reputation through negative Internet posts that would adversely affect GE’s ability to conduct business if it failed to send money, GE responded to the wrongful inducement by sending four payments totaling $29,556 by MoneyGram to Stanley in Brasov, Romania.

According to the factual resume, the government could readily prove that Stanley’s extortive conduct caused GE to make the above payments and to lose revenue. The extortive conduct also affected interstate commerce. In addition, the government contended that it could readily prove that Stanley engaged in similar extortionate conduct with approximately 40 to 45 victims (including GE).

This is just a sad thing for our industry but hopefully this will set some SEOs straight.

Pedro Dias, an SEO but former Google Search Quality guy, posted this on Twitter calling it shameful.

Forum discussion at Twitter.

Previous story: Was There A Google Update Yesterday: I'm Not Too Sure.
 
blog comments powered by Disqus