Does The First Anchor Text Link Only Count in Google?

Mar 18, 2008 • 7:42 am | comments (4) by twitter Google+ | Filed Under Google Search Engine Optimization
 

SEOmoz posted results from a study he did where he concluded that only the first anchor text on a page is counted by Google as the anchor text for that link.

For example, let's say you have a two links to the same URL on the same page. The first link on that page uses the anchor text [Big Blue Pineapple Chair] but the second anchor text uses [Small Red Cantaloupe Chair]. Which one will Google count as the true anchor text to be associated to that page? According to Rand's study, it is the first, i.e. [Big Blue Pineapple Chair] and not the [Small Red Cantaloupe Chair].

The Sphinn thread on the topic actually says this study was first conducted by the SmackDown blog (here is the Sphinn thread for that post). Smackdown explains that you may want to rethink linking your logo to your home page if this is the case. I am not sure about that, unless you use some weird code that interprets the image tag as an anchor tag.

It makes sense why Google or any other search engine might pick the first use of anchor text for a page on the page. I personally did not validate the studies but it is important to point out, nevertheless.

There is also a debate about nofollowing those links and what type of impact that may have on those links.

Forum discussion at Sphinn.

Previous story: Concerns Over Yahoo Search's New Microformats Support For Open Search
 

Comments:

Michael Martinez

03/18/2008 04:16 pm

Both SEOmoz and Smackdown's tests are invalid because neither of them attempted to take into consideration the fact that pages in the Supplemental Results Index are handled differently from pages in the Main Web Index. These claims they are making are entirely bogus, without substance, and completely unsuppoprted by any credible data.

Michael VanDeMar

03/18/2008 06:31 pm

MM, no offense, but again, you are spewing cluelessly. I myself specifically tested using non supp pages, and later when the source page fell into the supps I re-tested using fresh links. The very first test I did, having to do with the meta description, was invalid... but only because I didn't know what I found out later based on the results of the second test. So, aside from your absolutely baseless claims about the legitimacy of my test, are you going to say that you have any evidence to the contrary as far as the conclusions go?

No Name

12/09/2008 06:04 pm

It makes sense why Google or any other search engine might pick the first use of anchor text for a page on the page. I personally did not validate the studies but it is important to point out, nevertheless? YES

No Name

04/22/2010 07:52 am

It makes sense why Google or any other search engine might pick the first use of anchor text for a page on the page. I personally did not validate the studies but it is important to point out, nevertheless.

blog comments powered by Disqus