Is Amazon.com Cloaking : Serving Google Different Content?

Jan 13, 2010 - 7:58 am 4 by
Filed Under Cloaking

A WebmasterWorld thread has someone asking if what Amazon is doing, is considered cloaking. First let me show you what they are doing.

Go to this page on Amazon.com. Notice, at the top right of the results is a "Sort by" drop down. Here is a picture:

Amazon Cloaking?

Now, go to the Google Cached version of that page:

Amazon Cloaking?

Yes, it is not there. It seems like Amazon served Google the page without the sorting feature, which technically is a form of cloaking. But is this done with intent to artificially boost their rankings?

The content seems exactly identical, minus just the sort by feature. The sort by feature can produce duplicate content and make it harder for Google to index the incredibly large site. Is this being done in a way that is trying to hide something?

If they really want to be white on white - they could now keep the sort by there and use the canonical tag for all the sort by options. But this might be something Amazon has doen for years prior to the canonical tag coming out?

Personally, I wouldn't consider this against Google's cloaking guidelines, but I am not Google.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: September 17, 2025

Sep 17, 2025 - 10:00 am
Google

Google Discover Tests Showing X Posts From Just Your Followers?

Sep 17, 2025 - 7:51 am
Other Search Engines

OpenAI Updates Search In ChatGPT: Factuality, Shopping & Formatting

Sep 17, 2025 - 7:41 am
Google

Google: Searchers Want AI Summaries Over Links

Sep 17, 2025 - 7:31 am
Google Maps

Google Business API Q&A Feature Going Away November 3 (Changes Coming?)

Sep 17, 2025 - 7:21 am
Google Ads

New Google Merchant Center Suspension Video Verification

Sep 17, 2025 - 7:11 am
 
Previous Story: Daily Search Forum Recap: January 12, 2010