Is Cloaking : Serving Google Different Content?

Jan 13, 2010 - 7:58 am 4 by
Filed Under Cloaking

A WebmasterWorld thread has someone asking if what Amazon is doing, is considered cloaking. First let me show you what they are doing.

Go to this page on Notice, at the top right of the results is a "Sort by" drop down. Here is a picture:

Amazon Cloaking?

Now, go to the Google Cached version of that page:

Amazon Cloaking?

Yes, it is not there. It seems like Amazon served Google the page without the sorting feature, which technically is a form of cloaking. But is this done with intent to artificially boost their rankings?

The content seems exactly identical, minus just the sort by feature. The sort by feature can produce duplicate content and make it harder for Google to index the incredibly large site. Is this being done in a way that is trying to hide something?

If they really want to be white on white - they could now keep the sort by there and use the canonical tag for all the sort by options. But this might be something Amazon has doen for years prior to the canonical tag coming out?

Personally, I wouldn't consider this against Google's cloaking guidelines, but I am not Google.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community


Search Video Recaps

Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: February 26, 2024

Feb 26, 2024 - 4:00 pm

Google To Make A Content Deal With Quora Next?

Feb 26, 2024 - 7:51 am
Google Maps

Google Reviews Disclaimer For Beta Questions

Feb 26, 2024 - 7:41 am

Google Most-Read Articles Search Carousel

Feb 26, 2024 - 7:31 am
Google Ads

Google Ads Tests New Change History Page

Feb 26, 2024 - 7:21 am
Web Analytics

Google Analytics Referral Spam From Poland - Complaints

Feb 26, 2024 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: Daily Search Forum Recap: January 12, 2010