Is Cloaking : Serving Google Different Content?

Jan 13, 2010 - 7:58 am 4 by
Filed Under Cloaking

A WebmasterWorld thread has someone asking if what Amazon is doing, is considered cloaking. First let me show you what they are doing.

Go to this page on Notice, at the top right of the results is a "Sort by" drop down. Here is a picture:

Amazon Cloaking?

Now, go to the Google Cached version of that page:

Amazon Cloaking?

Yes, it is not there. It seems like Amazon served Google the page without the sorting feature, which technically is a form of cloaking. But is this done with intent to artificially boost their rankings?

The content seems exactly identical, minus just the sort by feature. The sort by feature can produce duplicate content and make it harder for Google to index the incredibly large site. Is this being done in a way that is trying to hide something?

If they really want to be white on white - they could now keep the sort by there and use the canonical tag for all the sort by options. But this might be something Amazon has doen for years prior to the canonical tag coming out?

Personally, I wouldn't consider this against Google's cloaking guidelines, but I am not Google.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.


Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community


Search Video Recaps

Google Core Update Coming, Ranking Volatility, Bye Search Notes, AI Overviews, Ads & More - YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: July 22, 2024

Jul 22, 2024 - 10:00 am

Google Tests Link Icon Citations For AI Overviews

Jul 22, 2024 - 7:51 am

Google Testing Save Button For AI Overviews

Jul 22, 2024 - 7:41 am
Bing Ads

New Microsoft Advertising Brand Lists For Performance Max Campaigns

Jul 22, 2024 - 7:31 am

Google Knowledge Panels Using AI-Generated Images

Jul 22, 2024 - 7:21 am
Bing Search

Bing Tests Related Searches At Top - Below Search Bar

Jul 22, 2024 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: Daily Search Forum Recap: January 12, 2010