Is a Great Design A Sure-Shot Way for Links?

Oct 20, 2008 - 7:27 am 2 by
Filed Under Link Building

What would you prefer:

* A pretty website that has no content * An ugly website that has a lot of content

If you were building links, which kind of site would you prefer to link to? In a WebmasterWorld discussion, it seems that appearances may not matter. A "nice clean" look may be fine, though.

Some disagree and believe that aesthetically pleasing sites are likely to be linked more than other sites. Most people do not feel that this sentiment is appropriate -- the content is really the most important thing for link-building, according to many webmasters. Of course, it depends on the niche, but people want informative content. Think about Wikipedia, for example. Is it "pretty?" Nope -- it's clean and neat -- but it has a lot of content that many people are looking for.

Forum discussion continues at WebmasterWorld.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: October 1, 2025

Oct 1, 2025 - 10:00 am
Blog Administration

Programming Note: Offline Thursday For Yom Kippur 5786

Oct 1, 2025 - 9:25 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

October 2025 Google Webmaster Report

Oct 1, 2025 - 7:51 am
Google Ads

New Google Ads Message Assets Requirements

Oct 1, 2025 - 7:41 am
Google

Google AI Overviews With Sticky Citations As You Scroll

Oct 1, 2025 - 7:35 am
Google

Google AI Mode With More Visual Responses & Visual Fan-Out Technique

Oct 1, 2025 - 7:31 am
 
Previous Story: Daily Search Forum Recap: October 17, 2008