Being "Condemned to Google Hell" and Matt's Rebuttal

May 2, 2007 - 10:37 am 5 by

Yesterday, a popular article on Digg (stay tuned for the Digest) was the Forbes article on the impact of Google to search engine rankings and how losing rankings can negatively affect your business.

A Webmaster World forums post discusses the topic of Google Hell, a term that was coined by Jim Boykin, I believe, and links to Matt Cutts's response.

In a nutshell, a jeweler was delisted from Google and people were confused as to why. The article mentions some reasons why you may lose your visible rankings:

Web designers have found that pages with duplicate content, few words or pictures, and a lack of links to other quality sites are the most likely to be pulled in [to the supplemental index].

Matt, however, provides another take. Google received spam reports of link exchange emails and that caused the site to lose its credibility in the search engine's eyes.

Reciprocal links by themselves aren't automatically bad, but we've communicated before that there is such a thing as excessive reciprocal linking.

Still, a few questions remain:

If Google is weighing in on these email reports, did they just admit that they're looking at email? The thought is unsettling.

Did he just let us all know that Google is now looking at emails?

What's the point of the supplemental index anyway?

What exactly is the purpose of the “supplemental” index? Why do they need it? Why do they need to have two categories of results? The index, and then the supplemental index?

Personally I don’t see anything “supplemental” about it. Why not just a continuum of results, based upon relevance?

Another member believes that the supplemental results do serve a purpose:

Supp index exists because of all the crap that is made everyday. Unfortunately a lot of good stuff could get thrown in too.

I will chime in and say that I think ranking for regular results would become all the more competitive if there was no way of filtering out extraneous results and putting them into some sort of supplemental index.

Discussion continues at WebmasterWorld.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Follow

Search Video Recaps

 
Google Core Update Rumbling, Manual Actions FAQs, Core Web Vitals Updates, AI, Bing, Ads & More - YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Google Search Engine Optimization

Google: Canonicalizing From WWW to Non-WWW Won't Impact Your Search Rankings

Mar 19, 2024 - 7:21 am
Google News

Google Changes: Liz Reid New Head Of Search, Pandu Nayak Steps Down As Search Quality & Rankings Lead

Mar 19, 2024 - 7:11 am
Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: March 18, 2024

Mar 18, 2024 - 4:00 pm
Google Updates

Google Urges Patience As The March 2024 Core Update Continues To Rollout

Mar 18, 2024 - 7:51 am
Google

Official: Google Replaces Perspective Filter With Forums Filter

Mar 18, 2024 - 7:41 am
Google Maps

Google Business Profiles Now Offers Additional Review After Appeal Is Denied

Mar 18, 2024 - 7:31 am
Previous Story: Social Media Revolt: Digg and Democracy
Next Story: Digg Digest - 5/02/07