Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: July 7, 2025

Jul 7, 2025 - 10:00 am
Google

Google Says AI Mode Rolling Out To Workspace Accounts

Jul 7, 2025 - 7:51 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Cloudflare: We Will Get Google To Provide A Way To Block AI Overviews

Jul 7, 2025 - 7:45 am
Google Ads

Google Keyword Planner Update Gives Breakdown By By City, Region & Device/Platform

Jul 7, 2025 - 7:41 am
Google

Google Tests Low, Typical, High Price Labels In Search Result Snippets

Jul 7, 2025 - 7:31 am
Google Maps

Google Business Profiles Reverification After Suspensions Increasing?

Jul 7, 2025 - 7:21 am
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good