Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 — by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Google Search Volatility

More Details

Search Video Recaps

 
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: October 19, 2026

Oct 19, 2026 - 10:00 am
Blog Administration

Is It New? AI Scan Tool

Oct 19, 2026 - 7:51 am
Google Maps

Google Moves Google Posts Higher Up On Local Panel

Oct 19, 2026 - 7:41 am
Google Ads

Google Ads Now In AI Mode With Personal Intelligence

Oct 19, 2026 - 7:31 am
Google

Google AI Mode Citations With Preferred Source Preferences

Oct 19, 2026 - 7:21 am
ChatGPT Ads

ChatGPT Ads New Ad Formats, Updated Conversion Page, Performance Emails...

Oct 19, 2026 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good