Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: February 6, 2026

Feb 6, 2026 - 10:00 am
Search Video Recaps

Search News Buzz Video Recap: Google Discover Core Update, Listicles Hit, Google Ads, ChatGPT Ads Ready & Microsoft Publisher Content Marketplace

Feb 6, 2026 - 8:01 am
Google

Google AI Mode Follow Up Search Suggestions

Feb 6, 2026 - 7:51 am
Google Ads

Google Ads Mixed Campaign Type Experiments Live For Some

Feb 6, 2026 - 7:41 am
Bing Search

Bing Unshipping Frankenstein Recipes In Search

Feb 6, 2026 - 7:31 am
Google Ads

Google Partner Portal Gets A Redesign

Feb 6, 2026 - 7:21 am
 
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good