Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: September 12, 2025

Sep 12, 2025 - 10:00 am
Search Video Recaps

Search News Buzz Video Recap: Google Heated Spam Update, Web Declines, AI Mode Updates, AI Max Rolls Out & More

Sep 12, 2025 - 8:01 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google Search Quality Raters Guidelines Gains AI Overview & YMYL Definitions

Sep 12, 2025 - 7:51 am
Google

Google Search Tests Dropping 100 Search Results Parameter

Sep 12, 2025 - 7:41 am
Bing Ads

Bing Tests Microsoft Sponsored Ads With Three Dots By URL

Sep 12, 2025 - 7:31 am
Google

Google Shows AI Overviews For Currency Exchange Rates

Sep 12, 2025 - 7:21 am
 
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good