Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Google Ads

Campaign Type Selection In Google Ads Channel Performance Report

Oct 15, 2025 - 7:41 am
Bing Search

Bing Tests Search Refinements Above Shopping Ads Directing To Bing Shopping

Oct 15, 2025 - 7:31 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google Search Console API Update Speed Unchanged

Oct 15, 2025 - 7:21 am
Google

Google AI Mode Based On Your Google Activity When Signed In

Oct 15, 2025 - 7:11 am
Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: October 14, 2025

Oct 14, 2025 - 10:00 am
Google Ads

Google: Ads Coming Soon To AI Mode In EU

Oct 14, 2025 - 7:41 am
 
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good