Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Follow

Search Video Recaps

 
Google Core Update Coming, Ranking Volatility, Bye Search Notes, AI Overviews, Ads & More - YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: July 25, 2024

Jul 25, 2024 - 10:00 am
Google Ads

Google Again: We Will Test Ads In AI Overviews Soon

Jul 25, 2024 - 7:51 am
Bing Search

Microsoft Now Testing Bing Generative Search Experience

Jul 25, 2024 - 7:41 am
Bing SEO

Reddit Blocked Bing Search & Others But Not Google

Jul 25, 2024 - 7:31 am
Local Search

Apple Maps Web Version Launches Beta

Jul 25, 2024 - 7:21 am
Google Ads

Google Local Service Ads Shows Phone Number On Hover

Jul 25, 2024 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good