Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Google Search Volatility

More Details

Search Video Recaps

 
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Google Updates

Google Search Ranking Update Hits Friday June 19th Impacting Black Hats?

Jun 21, 2026 - 8:20 am
Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: June 19, 2026

Jun 19, 2026 - 10:00 am
Search Video Recaps

Search News Buzz Video Recap: Google Volatility, Bing AI Reporting Updates, UK Orders Google To Hand Over Its Search Ranking Algorithm & More

Jun 19, 2026 - 8:01 am
Bing Search

Bing Tests Updated News Design In Search

Jun 19, 2026 - 7:51 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google Speaks On Chunking, Site Signals, Content, Paywalls & AI Clicks

Jun 19, 2026 - 7:41 am
Bing Search

Bing Tests Color Options In Product Results

Jun 19, 2026 - 7:31 am
 
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good