Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: April 22, 2025

Apr 22, 2025 - 10:00 am
Google Ads

Google To Allow Same Advertiser To Show Ads In Top Ads & Bottom Ads

Apr 22, 2025 - 7:51 am
Google

Google Tests Shaded Blue Gradient Site Name & Favicon

Apr 22, 2025 - 7:41 am
Google Maps

Google Local Panel Tests Get There & From Your Location

Apr 22, 2025 - 7:31 am
Bing Search

Bing Copilot Answers Tests Read More Link

Apr 22, 2025 - 7:21 am
Google Ads

Google Ads PMax Campaigns 90 Characters Of Text For All Descriptions

Apr 22, 2025 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good