Google Emailing Webmasters For Bad Links, Cloaking & More

Jan 6, 2011 • 9:08 am | comments (11) by twitter Google+ | Filed Under Google Search Engine Optimization
 

Google Webmaster SEO ReportMatt Cutts of Google said in his PubCon Keynote a month or so ago that Google would be stepping up their notifications of spam issues and they indeed have.

In early December, Google started sending out notices of doorway pages via Google Webmaster Tools and now webmasters are receiving more spam notifications.

A paid WebmasterWorld thread has reports of Google warning over "unnatural links" and a Google Webmaster Help thread has reports of warnings over "cloaking". Both are against Google's Webmaster guidelines.

Unnatural Links warnings look like this:

Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links on [domain]!

We’ve detected that some or all of your pages are using techniques that are outside our quality guidelines, which are available here:

http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&hl=en

Specifically, look for possibly artificial or unnatural links on your site pointing to other sites that could be intended to manipulate PageRank. For more information about our linking guidelines, visit http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66356&hl=en

We encourage you to make changes to your site so that it meets our quality guidelines. Once you’ve made these changes, please visit https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/reconsideration?hl=en to submit your site for reconsideration in Google’s search results.

Cloaking Warning looks like this:

Dear site owner or webmaster of bfenthusiasts.com,

While we were indexing your webpages, we detected that some of your pages were using techniques that are outside our quality guidelines, which can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/webmas...er=35769&hl=en. This appears to be because your site has been modified by a third party. Typically, the offending party gains access to an insecure directory that has open permissions. Many times, they will upload files or modify existing ones, which then show up as spam in our index.

We detected cloaking on your site and suspect this is the cause. For example at http://forums.bfenthusiasts.com/ we found:

racially online phentermine reviews racially biconvex Madames confuser Alberich adipex jackson ms guy Madames earls adipex uk buy biconvex confuser bewailing order adipex phentermine breath Alberich Eastwick sheik buttocks ambien 20mg dosage Madames bewailing bloated bowl diazepam vs xanax Steven occupies diligent penguin valium dosage iv confuser sniffed bowl monotonicity factual valium drug effects ambien cr bluelight Alberich sheik lorazepam od . Chariots adipex rx bewailing klonopin

For more information about what cloaking is, visit http://www.google.com/support/webmas...er=66355&hl=en.

In order to preserve the quality of our search engine, pages from bfenthusiasts.com are scheduled to be removed temporarily from our search results for at least 30 days.

We would prefer to keep your pages in Google's index. If you wish to be reconsidered, please correct or remove all pages (may not be limited to the examples provided) that are outside our quality guidelines. One potential remedy is to contact your web host technical support for assistance. For more information about security for webmasters, see http://googlewebmastercentral.blogsp...-now-what.html. When such changes have been made, please visit https://www.google.com/webmasters/to...deration?hl=en to learn more and submit your site for reconsideration.

Sincerely, Google Search Quality Team

Note: if you have an account in Google's Webmaster Tools, you can verify the authenticity of this message by logging into https://www.google.com/webmasters/to...overview?hl=en and going to the Message Center.

Have you also received quality guidelines emails or notices in Google Webmaster Tools recently?

Forum discussion at paid WebmasterWorld and Google Webmaster Help.

Previous story: Link Builders Building Link Wish List
 

Comments:

Boris Zilberman

01/06/2011 03:18 pm

Do you see these warnings if it's already too late and your site has been slapped or as a preemptive warning?

William Topping

01/06/2011 04:11 pm

If you get these warnings then you need to take action as you're dropped from the index. Or, suffer a major drop. I imagine the unnatural links is going to be a toughie to resolve compared to the cloaking.

Falko Luedtke

01/06/2011 05:55 pm

OMG! At least they let you know that they think you are a Spammer now but question is if those links are not unnatural how to defend them? Cheers Falko http://websitebusiness.ca

ShaneHudson

01/06/2011 11:36 pm

This is annoying, Google should have released a way of keeping track of their... well opinion... of a site without having to be dropped from the index first!

David Iwanow

01/07/2011 03:41 am

Hmm... i guess it's a move forward can someone keep a tally of how many clients receive due to cheap/automated link building campaigns...

Curt Cella

01/07/2011 04:58 am

Sincerely, Google Search Quality Team Now THAT is the single biggest laugh I've had in a while. ANYONE who spends some time focused on one market segment can tell you that Google is asleep at the switch: The same - pardon my french - crap litters the index day after day, month after month. Quality? Good grief: The words Google and QUALITY should NEVER be allowed in the same sentence. At best Google is doing a yeoman's job convincing folks that they care anymore about the quality of Web search and at worst they are just laughing their butts off reading the SEO comment boards like this one where folks all around me are speculating on doing this that and the other thing as they try to unravel the 'mystery' of high rankings. From what I've now seen there can't possibly be ANY connection between quality content and quality rankings. The "older" sites that have been around for awhile just have the TOP spots locked down tight no matter if they are a big steaming pile of you know what. The new(er) sites - less than 12 mos old? Forget it: You can have the best quality in the world and you're invisible. 1-2 years old? Same. Older sites have been grandfathered in by Google. They need not add any new content or try and improve quality. They just sit on their fat ass on slots 1 thru 10 and giggle their rears off at anything beneath them because Google basically acts as their protector with their unique brand of indifference to anything new - think about it: The whole concept of the Web is immediacy. Google takes that and flips it on its ear and basically puts everything new into a deep freeze... I literally want to vomit each and every time some Google guy spews "knowledge" about SEO best practices. What a crock.

SEO Freak Show

01/07/2011 02:58 pm

In theory, we could set up an unnatural link campaign on our competition to knock them out of the serp (for a limited time) with the help of Google....hahahahahaha... in theory... Wonder if Google considered this?

benivolent

01/08/2011 10:05 am

From what I've now seen there can't possibly be ANY connection between quality content and quality rankings. The "older" sites that have been around for awhile just have the TOP spots locked down tight no matter if they are a big steaming pile of you know what.

idietcola

01/10/2011 02:32 pm

Great read indeed - a must to clean up the current rankings. Spam has always had its place, but nevertheless - its something to experiment with on both side of the seo pond! moreover - perhaps nowadays a "Natural" Link profile encompasses some spam

Linkbuildr

01/10/2011 03:18 pm

I'm all for it as long as Google starts warning the biggest brands who are still getting away with paid links and selling links. They're so wishy washy these days!

SEO Professionals

08/08/2011 03:23 pm

A lot of people use e-mail as their method of communicating with other people in this day and age. In fact it is a lot more affordable to send out emails instead of sending out letters because of the cost of stamps. In fact you might know more than one person using email as their form of communicating with their close acquaintances, loved ones and relatives. And sadly you might be aware of a individual or two that will often use e-mail as a way of keeping in contact with their mystery lover.

blog comments powered by Disqus