Why Does Irwin Mitchell's Redirect Rank, If Google Penalized Them?

Jan 27, 2014 - 8:45 am 35 by

Irwin Mitchell LogoCyrus Shepard last week posted on Google+ that the big UK law firm was likely penalized by Google based on looking at:

(1) A recent large drop in traffic and search visibility as reported by Search Metrics and

(2) Irwin Mitchell's web site no longer ranking in Google for it's own name.

What is interesting is that the .co.uk version of their domain name ranks #1 but the .com does not. The .co.uk version actually 301 redirects to .com, so why wouldn't the penalty flow through to the .co.uk version as well?

Irwin Mitchell's Google Ranking

David Naylor's blog goes into detail on this Irwin Mitchell penalty, showing why they were penalized.

But shouldn't Google also penalized the .co.uk? I know the .com, which has the penalty, doesn't redirect to the .co.uk version. But it does go the other way and it is a 301 redirect. So Google knows the .co.uk version should be the .com version.

This just seems weird to me.

Forum discussion at Google+.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: July 1, 2025

Jul 1, 2025 - 10:00 am
Google Updates

Google June 2025 Core Update Is Rolling Out - What We're Seeing So Far

Jul 1, 2025 - 7:51 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

New Google Search Console Insights Report

Jul 1, 2025 - 7:41 am
Spiders

Cloudflare To Block AI Crawlers By Default & Pay Per Crawl Model

Jul 1, 2025 - 7:31 am
Bing Search

Who Ate The Bing Search Results

Jul 1, 2025 - 7:21 am
Google AdSense

Google AdSense New Privacy Law & Opt-Out Mechanism

Jul 1, 2025 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: Google Play Movie Ads In Search Results