FairSearch, Microsoft & Others Claim Anti-Competitive Practices With Google's Android: Really

Apr 10, 2013 • 8:04 am | comments (4) by twitter Google+ | Filed Under Google News & Finances

Google MonopolyIf you missed it, FairSearch announced a complaint with the European Union over Google's mobile strategy, specifically with how Android prevent competition.

Google achieved its dominance in the smartphone operating system market by giving Android to device-makers for ‘free.’ But in reality, Android phone makers who want to include must-have Google apps such as Maps, YouTube or Play are required to pre-load an entire suite of Google mobile services and to give them prominent default placement on the phone, the complaint says. This disadvantages other providers, and puts Google’s Android in control of consumer data on a majority of smartphones shipped today.

Google’s predatory distribution of Android at below-cost makes it difficult for other providers of operating systems to recoup investments in competing with Google’s dominant mobile platform, the complaint says.

Um, did they miss the Facebook Phone announcement?

Let me share some of the fun comments from webmasters at WebmasterWorld:

What a load.

Andoid is no more a trap than iOS w/Siri, FaceTime, etc. or Windows 8 w/Bing, Office, etc..

Microsoft of all companies has no room to talk about abusing hardware dominance as they wrote the play book that Google now uses. MS still rules the desktop nut can't get a grip on the phone like Google or Apple thru technology and customer loyalty as Win 8 is obviously not cutting it using their old arm twisting operating system methods to gain market share.

Good point that Open Source is hardly a trap unless the license requires Google junk to be installed but I'm thinking without all the Google apps vendors have nothing to offer.

The cost to the consumer would be even lower if Google didn't have to hire lawyers to deal with this stuff.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Previous story: Daily Search Forum Recap: April 9, 2013


Jordan McClements

04/10/2013 12:34 pm

Yup. Pot. Kettle. Black. (It is true though).


04/10/2013 01:21 pm

Hmm not to rain on "anti" anything, but seriously? First it was Apple suing Samsung and now companies are crying foul-play because Android is gaining smartphone OS dominance. I really think that companies like MS just can't take it that they are fighting a losing battle with mobile.Hell don't even know why MS is crying like a B, since they are still making lot's of $$$ with desktop OS dominance and their suite of Office products. I say why don't all these companies try and work with "it" and stead of against it and see how it pans out, instead of just blaming Android for being Anti-Competitive the whole time.


04/14/2013 09:57 pm

So obviously you can replace Microsoft with Google a few years ago and come to the same conclusion? Why not? They should and i hope the Fairsearch occupants win. I don't want, nor need anything Google and as Google continues pushing their agenda to become "Everything", my choice as a consumer dwindles, because majority trumps all.


04/14/2013 09:57 pm

Google will topple, the question is when.

blog comments powered by Disqus