May 2005 Archives

AdSense Keyword Tag & Match Type Tag

Philipp Lenssen spotted over at Inside Google shows how Findory is Feeding AdSense Keywords to possibly help AdSense serve up better targeted ads. Both blogs link to Greg Linden's comments on this topic.

The additional AdSense code looks like:

google_kw_type = "broad";
google_kw = "Tech then about with that blog this between arousal del

In a thread I started at Search Engine Watch Forums I decided to have some fun by asking the question;
Is this an other form of "acceptable cloaking"?

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 31, 2005 11:22 AM Comments (0)

Fastest Method of AdSense Payment: Check vs. EFT

A thread at WebmasterWorld named What arrives faster? Checks or EFT? Based on the AdSense payment options screen you really have three options:

adsense-payment-options.gif

Of which, the first two give you a hint on when you can expect payment:

*Standard Delivery checks are sent by regular mail and should arrive within 2-3 weeks of the mailing date.
**Secured Express Delivery checks are sent via courier and should arrive within 1 week.

EFT, well that is beta, so we need to go to the forums and see what people have been experiencing. From skimming that thread, it seems that it totally depends on where you live. If you live in the middle of the dessert (no offense if you do live in the middle of the dessert) then it can take a lot longer to get you check. So EFT would be quicker. I personally opt for the 1st option at this point.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 31, 2005 11:07 AM Comments (0)

MSN Showing URL Only

I don't remember ever seeing a URL listed in the MSN Search results before. I see it every now and then in Google but I have not seen it in Yahoo! or MSN. A member at WebmasterWorld is reporting such an event at MSN Search. I know it works this way at Google for new pages or pages where Google just has link information for and nothing more.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at May 31, 2005 10:49 AM Comments (0)

Forums Poll on PageRank's Future

With this week's PageRank Hysteria many forums started polls at to what Google should do with that (as Mike Grehan would say, but I am making it more techie) "Green Pixel Dust".

At Cre8asite Forums a member posts a poll asking How would you redesign the Google PR bar? with four options:
(1) No more little green bar, please.
(2) I don't like it, but I don't want it to go away either.
(3) Give the PR bar more power and information.
(4) Leave the PR bar as is.

So far there are only three votes, two for number one and one for number three.

At Search Engine Watch Forums an other poll is taking place, asking Should Google remove PR from the Toolbar? with the following options:
(1) Yes, remove PR from the Toolbar Altogether
(2) No, but update it once a month
(3) No, but update it every 3 months
(4) No, but replace it with another Ranking Method

This poll has 26 votes so far. 13 go for answer one, 9 for answer two, 1 for answer three, and 3 for answer four.

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at May 31, 2005 8:44 AM Comments (2)

Jim Lanzone - Answers Questions @ Cre8asite

On Friday I informed you of Ask's VP, Jim Lanzone, Live Q&A Session taking place over at Cre8asite Forums. Many of the members and even some new registrants signed on to take advantage of this opportunity. Jim Lanzone, Senior VP over at Ask Jeeves, posted a long but detailed response to member questions. In addition, he did it with some humor by uploading an Avatar of himself, but using Bill Gates's photo.

My favorite quote:

We don’t want to spaz out and just turn out product after product just to get headlines, nor do we want to offer something that isn’t an improvement over the status quo (e.g., email just for the sake of it).

Rahul, the Ask Jeeves techie, is suppose to stop by to answer some of the more technical questions. I am not sure if Jim can stop by again soon, but he might.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at May 31, 2005 8:33 AM Comments (0)

SES London is Tomorrow

Tomorrow is the date for the much anticipated SES London show. I really made an effort to attend this one, more so, so I can see some of the UK SEOs that don't come to the American shows.

I doubt there will be much coverage of the show, but if there is, I will let you know. Danny Sullivan posted a SES Toronto Round-Up before it happens.

Before SES London was the ThreadWatch Pub Get Together. There is a lot of feedback and thank you comments taking place at ThreadWatch now.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Conferences at May 31, 2005 8:27 AM Comments (0)

PageRank is Back

Well PageRank Dead, nope, just a technical glitch. Also, nothing to do with TrustRank... Message # 359 by GoogleGuy at WebmasterWorld says:

I suspect that the toolbar pagerank will be visible again in a few hours or so--I'll ask around about it... It's true that long holiday weekends are the best time to switch in or out different pieces of infrastructure. no trustrank, just back to the normal display. I talked to a few people and there was some new infrastructure that was swapping in. They expect normal toolbar pagerank display to resume in a few hours--no need for concern.

More forum discussion at Search Engine Watch and I am sure the others. I am seeing the PR values shining, DigitalPoint was right again.

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at May 30, 2005 5:09 PM Comments (3)

Call To Action Hits Bestseller Lists

Bryan and Jeffrey Eisenberg's book Call To Action: Secret Formulas To Improve Online Results made the Top Sellers Lists of the NY Times, Wall Street Journal & USA Today. I am still reading the book, about half way in, and it offers gem after gem. For only $13.95, it almost makes sense to yell at anyone who doesn't buy it.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Articles & Books at May 30, 2005 2:51 PM Comments (0)

TrustRank & Recent Google Update

There are lots of theories about the recent removal of PageRank from all sites and theories on backlink update. One such popular concept is that Google is using something known as "TrustRank".

Aaron Wall from SEO Book has one of the easiest to understand explanations of TrustRank, I have found to date. He says:

Human editors help search engines combat search engine spam, but reviewing all content is impractical. TrustRank places a core vote of trust on a seed set of reviewed sites to help search engines identify pages that would be considered useful from pages that would be considered spam. This trust is attenuated to other sites through links from the seed sites.

Gary Price at SEW Blog in early March wrote an entry named Combating Web Spam with TrustRank and then followed up that entry in late April with Google Trademarks: TrustRank & The Neighborhood Wide Web.

The paper's abstract and a link to the full document can be found at http://dbpubs.stanford.edu:8090/pub/2004-17.

The forums are discussing it at:
- WebmasterWorld Free
- WebmasterWorld Paid
- DigitalPoint Forums
- SEO Chat Forums

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at May 30, 2005 11:01 AM Comments (1)

8,600 Results - Want 10,000

I gave up on getting 20,000 rated searches, but can we at least get 10,000 rated searches before I give out the raw data, minus IP addresses?

Please help out and make RustySearch your default search engine for the next week.

Thank you.

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at May 30, 2005 10:42 AM Comments (0)

DigitalPoint Says Google's PageRank Is a Glitch

Yesterday we reported on forums that were discussing the recent blackout we have been seeing with the Google PageRank Value's Being Null. DigitalPoint makes a very technical point, where he believes that this PageRank thing will not being going away (at least today). He believes there is a technical glitch, his reasoning:

(1)Google lists PageRank on the Toolbar as a Toolbar feature still

(2) toolbarqueries.google.com is still a working subdomain. If they dropped it, might as well drop the sub-domain since that's all it's used for

(3) A query from the toolbar to Google for PageRank gives an error that looks like someone made a boo-boo when configuring the allowed/disallowed IPs (like someone disallowed all instead of allowed all).

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at May 30, 2005 8:56 AM Comments (0)

AdSense CTR of 200 Percent

A member reported an AdSense click through rate (CTR) of 200 percent at a Search Engine Watch thread.

Jenstar replies with some logic;

There is the possibility it straddled the date changeover - if the impression was recorded the day before at 11:59 pm, but the click didn't actually take place until 12:00 am. Does the day before show impressions without clicks?

Mikkel said he once saw a 300% CTR, but it was a bug. Most likely a reporting glitch that occurs ever now and then.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 30, 2005 8:50 AM Comments (0)

Ask Jeeves Commemorates Memorial Day

If you visit the Ask Jeeves Home Page you will see a silhouette of the butler blowing a trumpet. Clicking on that silhouette will take you to an Ask Jeeves search results page for Memorial Day.

sdj_memorialday_1.gif

I assume Google is too busy working on the PR thing?

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at May 30, 2005 8:45 AM Comments (0)

End of Toolbar PageRank?

Its been about 24 hours and the Google Toolbar is still grayed out for all sites. I have not seen it myself, since I don't have a toolbar installed, but forums are buzzing about it. Is this the end to PageRank? Toolbar PageRank? Google?

Forum discussion at:
- WebmasterWorld
- Search Engine Watch Forums
- DigitalPoint Forums
- Cre8asite Forums
- SEO Chat Forums
- HighRankings Forums
- SEOGuy Forums
- IHelpYou Forums
- WebWorkShop Forums
- SitePoint Forums

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at May 28, 2005 9:56 PM Comments (11)

Ask's VP, Jim Lanzone, Live Q&A Session

Jim Lanzone, Senior Vice President, Search Properties of Ask Jeeves, Inc. has agreed to conduct a live question and answer session at Cre8asite Forums. I have named this thread Live Q&A Session with Jim Lanzone, VP of Ask Jeeves.

jim-lanzone-ask.jpg

Jim has promised me to stop by starting Sunday to review and answer questions posted by Cre8asite Forum members. This is a great opportunity to find out what is going on at Ask Jeeves.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at May 27, 2005 3:27 PM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Mindset

Have you ever really wanted to use a single search engine for both research and shopping but somehow tell the search engine that you're looking for one or the either? Well, now Yahoo! announced something new named Yahoo! Mindset Beta, that lets you do that.

Yahoo! Mindset
A Yahoo! Research Labs demo that applies a new twist on search that uses machine learning technology to give you a choice: View Yahoo! Search results sorted according to whether they are more commercial or more informational (i.e., from academic, non-commercial, or research-oriented sources).

I tried it out for ipod cases. Since I do not personally own an iPod, I was doing research only. I decided to slide the lever all the way to the right.

slider-mindset-yahoo.gif

The first two results based on that slider action was the organic result #2 and #25, so something did really happen.
results-mindset-yahoo.gif

But are those results more relevant to my search on iPod cases, in research mode? Well, ipodlounge.com has a wealth of information on iPods, so its relevant. The second research full mode result was from gizmodo.com. That result sent me to a blog entry of a review of cases, very research mode, IMO. Are the results more research relevant in research mode? Yes, try it out without the slider all the way to the right.

This reminds me of the MSN Slider but this version is for the normal user. I opened a Search Engine Watch thread on this topic and I am sure that WebmasterWorld will have a thread in the Yahoo! Search Forum shortly. The Mindset FAQ can be found here and Yahoo! has a forum thread taking place here.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at May 27, 2005 1:30 PM Comments (1)

Google Cache Server Reported Down

At around 10AM (EST) this morning, I was notified by Todd Malicoat that the Google cache server was down. I waited and then checked again, and it was still down. I started a thread on this topic at Search Engine Watch Forums at 10:08 AM.

Try it out yourself by doing a search on google cache or whatever you want. Then click on the cache link. What I have noticed is the 64.233.161.104 is having issues, but the 66.102.7.104 is fine.

google-server-cache-error.gif

WebmasterWorld reported this a bit later at 10:32 am. Danny blogged about it at 11:04 AM. So its still an issue at 12, noon.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at May 27, 2005 11:58 AM Comments (1)

Pros & Cons of a Dmoz Listing

I felt it was time for a good old fashion directory thread. And there is no better place to go to discuss clean, easy to understand, search engine optimization topics then High Ranking's forum. A recent thread named Buying A Dmoz-listed Domain From An Owner, Is it worth it? shows a member slightly obsessed with obtaining a link from the ODP. Jill quickly tells the member to submit it and forget it. Which is good advice but the discussion kind of leads the member to believe that a ODP listing is just as valuable to the search engines then a link from this site. I have to believe that a listing from authoritative directories like the ODP and Yahoo! Directory are worth more. There is the whole concept of the mighty hub, which would apply to a powerful directory like dmoz (odp). I certainly agree with Debra, "if you're listed in the ODP and your cat is picked up in a topical directory or listed on a category specific site, you're ahead of the game without even trying. For that, being listed is a great thing."

But are there any cons to being listed in the ODP?

(1) Like Yahoo!, Google sometimes uses the ODP title in the SERPs. Which can drive down your CTR for that organic listing.

(2) Dmoz recently shut down the Status Check portion of Resource Shelf which fogs things up a bit more then it was.

(3) Reports of Penalization of Particular DMOZ Categories by Google and PageRank0 are not promising as well.

(4) And you have Corrupt Editors running about.

What a dilemma.

posted rustybrick in Open Directory Project at May 27, 2005 9:31 AM Comments (1)

Should Ask Serve Ads for BitTorrent?

The blogs and the news sites have been buzzing about the recent news that Ask Jeeves is to provide the PPC ads for the new BitTorrent search engine.

The controversy comes in, when you look at what BitTorrent does for a living. Basically, BitTorrent uses peer-to-peer technology to "give you the same freedom to publish previously enjoyed by only a select few with special equipment and lots of money." Or BitTorrent, also, allows you to easily download the latest Star Wars movie.

A thread at WebmasterWorld named AskJeeves in Ad Distribution Partnership with BitTorrent, asks the question...Does Ask Jeeves want to serve up sponsored ads for searches on keyword phrases like pirated star wars movie, software serial numbers and so on? As you can imagine, this goes to the heart of many freedom of speech types.

The question at heart is, is this good for the Ask Jeeves brand?

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at May 27, 2005 9:12 AM Comments (1)

WebmasterWorld Policy on Linking to Blogs

The folks over at WebmasterWorld do not always ask for member feedback when it comes to linkage rules. But this week, things are different, Brett Tabke (owner of WebmasterWorld), started a thread named Frogs, Blogs, Moderation and The Current WebmasterWorld Policy (must be a WMW supporter to access thread). In that thread he outlines the dilemma he has regarding linking to blogs and asks for paid member feedback. I am sure many of you are not "supporters" of the forum, so luckily DG's Desk has a little write up on it, discussing one of the subtopics in the thread on So, Are Blogs "News"?

Basically, I have no issue if they decide not to link to blogs. I have no issue if they decide to not link to any site. WebmasterWorld is its own forum, I go there daily and I know what to expect. Do I dislike the forum because of its strict policies? Absolutely not. I respect those policies and participate, as best I can, within those guidelines. On the other hand, I also participate in extremely liberal forums. Again, I know what to expect there and change my style of posting for that forum. The policies help make up the forum culture. The topic on "what is a blog?" is of more interest to me. That is why I removed the term "Weblog" from this site, see WayBackMachine.

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at May 27, 2005 8:47 AM Comments (0)

AdSense Benefits to Rise in Response to Competition

A thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named Will AdSense Improve Given Competition? discusses the strategies Google can use to control advertisements on publishers content. With Yahoo! on the horizon of their own flavor of Yahoo! AdSense, Google has been revving up features and benefits for their publishers. We recently had reports that AdSense Sales Team Reaching Out to Publishers, but is that all?

Jenstar replies to the question stating that "There is no evidence" that Google will increase the percentage of revenue share towards the benefit of the publisher. She goes on to explain that revenue is determined by dozens of factors and to simply increase revenue share will not make all publishers happy. She goes on to further explain;

The last thing they want is a lot of grumpy publishers complaining about a dropping EPC, because grumpy publishers are much more likely to try out the competition than happy ones.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 27, 2005 8:34 AM Comments (0)

10 Google Engineers at WebmasterWorld's Conference

Brett Tabke is doing an outstanding job driving up the buzz on the upcoming WebmasterWorld 2005 New Orleans Conference.

(1) He recently secured John Battelle to keynote the event.

(2) He named the most recent Google Update, Bourbon

(3) And now he secured ~10 Google Engineers to answer your questions, specific to Google.

In an unprecedented move, Google is sending a team of engineers to support WebmasterWorld’s World Search Conference, being held in June 21-24, 2005. Conference delegates can get involved in roundtable sessions with the Google engineers on specific subjects of interest. In addition, the event will feature an invitation-only cocktail party where conference delegates can meet the engineers on specific subjects of interest and relevance.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2005 New Orleans at May 26, 2005 4:13 PM Comments (0)

DigitalPoint Forums Helps Member Increase CTR 4X

A forum thread at DigitalPoint Forums named Quadrupled my CTR thanks to DP members thanks DigitalPoint Forum members in helping her (I believe its a woman) increase her AdSense click through rate by four times! In the thread she depicts before and after shots of the site to try to help others realize those results.

This is what forums are about. Learning from each other, improving, sharing, and repeating.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 26, 2005 3:33 PM Comments (0)

Nominated for MarketingSherpa Award

I was just notified that this site, has been nominated for the MarketingSherpa Award. That means if you like this site, you can go over to 2005 Readers' Choice Blog Awards - Voting Form and vote for the "Search Engine Roundtable". Question number 8 is where you will find "Blogs on search marketing" and we are the last in the list.

It is a true honor to have been nominated.

Voting ends Wednesday June 8th, and then we'll announce the winners. Prizes this year include a "Winner" icon for your Blog, a special coffee mug, and your name and blog URL on our site and in a press release. So please vote for us.

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at May 26, 2005 2:04 PM Comments (8)

AdSense Sales Team Reaching Out to Publishers

With Yahoo! building their own flavor of AdSense, Google is not taking any chances. According to a WebmasterWorld thread, Google AdSense's sales team have been making active phone calls (not only emails or snail mails) to publishers, asking them to add "adsence and other google apps" on potential publisher sites.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 26, 2005 11:36 AM Comments (0)

SEW Forums Adds New Moderators

Search Engine Watch Forums adds a handful of new moderators this past week. The new moderators are:

- 5staraffliateprograms moderating Affiliate Issues
- Chris Boggs moderating Link Building
- DaveN, moderating Google Web Search
- Jenstar moderating Google AdSense; Contextual Ads & Alternatives
- And one more surprise moderator, to be named later, I think.

Expect there to be an official welcome at the SEW Forums: Forum Policies & Operations Forum.

What an awesome team!

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at May 26, 2005 9:13 AM Comments (0)

Ask Allows Enhanced "Zoom" & "Web Answer" Functions

News comes way that Ask has announced two new very useful features named Zoom and Web Answers. John Batelle has a quick & easy write up on those features but I will try to make it even quicker for you below. Chris Sherman & Gary Price has a more detailed write up at SEW.

Zoom: Search Ask for the beatles and look at the right side of the page. "Narrow Your Search", "Expand Your Search" and "Related Names" make up the zoom feature.

Web Answer: Search Ask for deadliest snake and see [Web Answer] in red. You can then click through to the three other Web answers to see 3 groups of answers.

Forum coverage at Search Engine Watch Forums and I have updated the Ask Jeeves SEM Time Line of Events at Cre8asite Forums.

Side note: Notice how I titled this enter "Ask" versus "Ask Jeeves", but what is weird, Jeeves9000 made a surprise appearance last night.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at May 26, 2005 9:04 AM Comments (0)

Web Analytics Association Calls for Standards

Monday I wrote that Web Analytics Needs Standards Bad, which I then followed up with Bryan Eisenberg live at WebmasterRadio.FM. He told me the Web Analytics Association was working on something and hoped to have it soon. Today, he called me to let me know they posted a white paper at the news section of the WAA site named Web Analytics Key Metrics and KPIs. If you visit that news item, you can then download the white paper from that site. It is very encouraging and I like to see more pressure on the analytics companies to take action on this.

I know Urchin (Owned by Google) is aware of it, but I can not discuss their comments on the topic. Maybe we can drive up enough buzz on this topic that they take action or maybe not.

posted rustybrick in Tracking & Conversion Measurements at May 25, 2005 4:33 PM Comments (1)

Ask Jeeves to be Renamed to Ask

Just rumors at this point, but there is speculation that Ask Jeeves is to be renamed to simply "Ask.com" or "Ask". Gary Price over at the Search Engine Watch Blog posted an entry named Diller: Ask Jeeves Might Get New Name. In there, he quotes Barry Diller as saying; "Might be one of those words [Ask or Jeeves] without the other," Diller answered, adding that the final decision on AskJeeves' new name isn't "finalized."

Gary rationalizes that ""Jeeves" by itself would be no better than what they have now." So the assumption is that the name will be Ask.com. Does the butler give Ask Jeeves a bad rep?

I have posted a thread for discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at May 25, 2005 3:52 PM Comments (0)

SEOmoz's SEO Quiz

SEOmoz, randfish, created an SEO Quiz, in reaction to the SEW thread asking you to Vote for the Most Knowledgeable SEW Forum Member. If you look at the Leaderboard, you will see some well known forum member's names. I personally find the "texas holdem - spammer ;)" link to be funny.

Forum discussion on this started mid-way in the thread linked to above. I think it is a fairly good quiz, I have some suggestions for revising some of the questions and answers. Danny Sullivan has his ideas as well, including "I want more. I want a news quiz each month."

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Tools at May 25, 2005 2:06 PM Comments (0)

Gray Bars for DMOZ, Yahoo! & Google Directory Categories

During the last pagerank update it seems as if Google has gave the PageRank of death to many (not all) directory categories at the ODP, Google Directory and Yahoo! Directory.

Example specific categories that have been assigned a PageRank of 0, reported over at DigitalPoint Forums, include;

- http://dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Searching/Directories/ [Check SEO Chat PR Tool]
- http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Internet/Searching/Directories/ [Check SEO Chat PR Tool]
- http://dir.yahoo.com/Computers_and_Internet/Internet/World_Wide_Web/Searching_the_Web/Search_Engines_and_Directories/Directories/ [Check SEO Chat PR Tool]

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at May 25, 2005 12:05 PM Comments (1)

Google RSS Ads Removed Mostly

Based on your feedback, I have removed the RSS AdSense Ads from the abridged versions of the RSS feeds. You should no longer see them in new entries.

I have made the full RSS feed more visible and left the ads in that feed. So if you like the full RSS feed - it will contain small AdSense ads in it. If you prefer the abridged version, they are without ads at this point.

rss-full.gif

Thank you for your feedback.

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at May 25, 2005 11:29 AM Comments (1)

Publishers Say No to Google's Library Digitization Program

We talked about Google Print becoming Mainstream in the past, and as it becomes more mainstream and larger, publishers will have issues with it. Recently, the Google Library Project has undergone some widespread controversy amongst the publishing community. Gary Price, who is a library guy and also a publisher, blogged about this on Monday under the title Some Publishers Not Happy With Google's Library Digitization Program. Then Danny Sullivan, who has his origins as a writer and publisher, and the leading authority figure in the SEM world, followed up Gary's entry with his own named Forget Google Print Copyright Infringement; Search Engines Already Infringe. Both entry titles are incredibly descriptive of their respective thoughts on the topic. There is some concern as well, that this is leading towards Google Taking Over the World.

A forum thread at WebmasterWorld discusses an article published yesterday at the Washington Post named Publishers Protest Google Library Project. The SEM world is buzzing about it at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Legal Issues in Search at May 25, 2005 10:33 AM Comments (0)

RSS Ads - Asking For Your Feedback

The AdSense RSS Ads I have been beta testing for Google have been live for less then two days now. It seems to be really annoying some of the readers here - as Cre8asite Forums points out. Trust me, it is not permanent. My first priority is to bring you the latest from inside of the SEO world, and if I can make some money on the side that is great, if not, then I wont put the ads up.

So let me ask you what you want to see or not see. Here are the options and please, please comment or email me at barry AT rustybrick.com with your feedback.

(1) Convert the abridged versions of the RSS feeds to full entry feeds and keep Google Ads in them.
(2) Remove ads from abridged versions of the RSS feeds and just put them in a full entry feed, for those who want it.

I think those are the two options that seem fair. But you're the reader, so you tell me.

Do you want the full entries in the feed and if so, would you mind if there is an ad at the bottom of each of those entries? Hopefully, they will be targeted and hopefully I will be able to change the colors to make them less distracting. Or do you prefer the clean abridged versions of the RSS feeds? Or something else?

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at May 25, 2005 9:10 AM Comments (8)

SearchViews Interviews Jim Lanzone from Ask Jeeves

SearchViews blog posted an entry last night named 5 Questions with Jim Lanzone, Senior VP of Search Properties, Ask Jeeves. As many of you know, I am a huge fan of Ask Jeeves and Jim Lanzone. He asks Jim in question number 5, if Ask will be pursuing a PPC engine to compete with Google, Yahoo and soon to be MSN. Of course, he said he could not discuss it. He did however say, "But that doesn't mean we'll rely 100% on any one revenue source in the future. Today, about 30% of our ad revenue is generated by our internal products and sales force, and we believe there's a lot we can do ourselves in this space over time."

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at May 25, 2005 8:56 AM Comments (0)

MSN Virtual Earth Interview with MapPoint Dev Team

MapsPoint will ultimately be replaced by MSN Virtual Earth. Right now, MapsPoint covers over 30 countries, however, MSN Virtual Earth is just the US now. They are working fast to cover more countries. I think he said he is going live with this (out of beta) in February or January of next year (but listen to the video to validate this). There is no activex, it works pretty much in both Firefox and IE.

The video is available at virtual_earth_2005_channel9_video.wmv

msn-virtual-earth-interview.jpg

I am still watching the video, I love hearing techs talk about cool stuff like this.

This comes by way of Michael Nguyen at Social Patterns, nice find!

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at May 25, 2005 8:20 AM Comments (0)

~20 Instant Gmail Invites

A reader, kusadasiguy, emailed me last night to point me in the direction of a thread that is giving away "instant gmail accounts." Basically, you do not need an invite, you just sign up directly from the link. The thread is at the Gmail Forums and basically, someone copied links (URL Hash) from unused Gmail invite emails into the forum. Some are already used, but if you want a gmail account, most are not used.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at May 25, 2005 8:10 AM Comments (7)

Y!Q - Free Contextual Ad Network for Yahoo!

Yesterday we tried to clarify some of the buzz around the recent press release by Yahoo! named the Y!Q Challenge. Y!Q is basically a snippet of code you add to your pages that allows a user to search yahoo from your page. For an example of this, check out a single searchblog entry and see the Y!Q button. A WebmasterWorld thread rightly points out that Y!Q Challenge doesnt pay for the clicks. It is not a program like AdSense where they share the revenue generated. Now maybe, just maybe, that is the reason for the Challenge and $5,000 jackpot.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Marketing at May 24, 2005 7:23 PM Comments (4)

MSN Virtual Earth

So now it looks like Google and MSN are competing to allow anyone and everyone to peak into my bedroom window. Search Engine Watch Blog has an excellent write up with screen shots at MSN Virtual Earth To Take On Google Earth. Forums are discussing this at WebmasterWorld and Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at May 24, 2005 9:04 AM Comments (0)

AdSense Wide Skyscraper Showing Favicons

Reported over at WebmasterWorld, people are noticing favicons on Google AdSense Wide Skyscraper Ad (160x600). Reports dictate that they were displaying favicons of Register.com, Amazon.com, eBay.com and TripAdvisor.com.

Jensese has more coverage on this and she posted an Amazon sample and a Register.com sample.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 24, 2005 8:50 AM Comments (0)

Google Backlink Update May 05

It has been about a month since the last Backlink update. There seems to be a backlink update taking place as I type this. One of the Google datacenters where you can see the revised backlinks is at 72.14.207.104. Again, Google shows little if any relevant information when doing a backlink lookup (link:www.domain.com), so take it for what it is worth.

Also there are reports that the Google Directory has updated its PageRank values for sites.

Forum discussion:

Related to WebmasterWorld Names Google Update; Bourbon.

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at May 24, 2005 8:34 AM Comments (1)

Google AdSense Page Hijacked

The other day we discussed how Google Outranked itself for Google, but now, we see some pay back. Someone was actually daring enough to page hijack the Google AdSense page. DotComicide has a screen capture and Jensense has a very detailed write up on how it happened.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Spam at May 24, 2005 8:17 AM Comments (1)

Vote for the Most Knowledgeable SEW Forum Member

There is now a thread at Search Engine Watch forums that is named Which SEW Member is The most Knowledgeable. The thread has a poll asking you to vote on "Which SEW Member is the most Knowledgeable?" I am not sure how I made the list, but I am honored to be there. I think others were mistakenly left out, but I won't name any names here.

If you have a login, go vote for your favorite.

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at May 23, 2005 7:47 PM Comments (0)

Google RSS Ads - Come & Look

No touching, but you can look. Loren Baker from Search Engine Journal was actually able to see my Google RSS Ads after I was approved. He only saw it once or twice but was able to take a screen capture of it for me. I check my feeds very often in both Bloglines, My Yahoo! and Safari RSS and have never seen them. But Loren has proof, which he emailed me. This is the first posting of a picture of a Google RSS AdSense Ad to-date, I believe.

SERSnag.gif

Now if they worked 100% of the time. Just kidding, I am beta testing it for them, so its cool for it not to work. Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

Update: Wow, I actually now see Google AdSense RSS ads in my Safari reader.

google-adsense-rss.gif View Large Image

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 23, 2005 7:20 PM Comments (7)

Y!Q Challenge: Not the Official Beta Launch

I was reading a thread at WebmasterWorld named Received email from Yahoo!: Y!Q Challenge, which started off reading; "YPN is finally here. Well it is Y!Q and it is in Beta but I'm excited!"

As the thread went on, it seems like there is great confusion about this product.

(1) This is not new. It was launched back in early February, and here is the YSearchBlog entry.

(2) This product, Y!Q, is not YPN (Yahoo Publishers Network). I made sure to clarify this with Yahoo! and they told me that Y!Q is one of their publisher offerings but at the same time Yahoo is working on other publisher products as well, something like an AdSense competitor.

All the email announced was a program named Y!Q Challenge, which was posted at the YSearchBlog on Friday. So its really no big deal, basically you can win $5,000 but that is it. :)

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! News at May 23, 2005 6:53 PM Comments (0)

Web Analytics Needs Standards Bad

Is the Web Analytics Association doing anything? I am not being sarcastic, I really do not know. What I do know is that when you install any Web analytics program, each one will report different numbers. Today, I installed an open source analytics program named AW Stats just to test this. AW Stats reported about three times the level of daily visitors then Urchin 5.7. Even Urchin 5.7 compared to Urchin 3.0 reported widely different visitor counts. We need standardization.

In the mean time, if you are a publisher and you want to inflate your visitor counts, simply demo all the analytics programs and see which one produces the highest visitor count. Then tell your potential advertiser that figure. I hear Bryan Eisenberg, one of the founders of the Web Analytics Association, will be on Webmaster Radio: Wizards of Web today at 12:00 EST. Well that was an hour and 45 minutes ago, so maybe I missed it. Would have been a good question to ask.

posted rustybrick in Tracking & Conversion Measurements at May 23, 2005 1:45 PM Comments (3)

WebmasterWorld Names Google Update; Bourbon

On May 17th we reported on recent Major Google SERP Movement Detected. On May 20th, WebmasterWorld named the update Bourbon and split off the thread into its own. Why Bourbon? Since the upcoming WebmasterWorld conference will be in New Orleans, why not name it after the famous Bourbon Street in New Orleans.

For more information about this update visit Google Update Bourbon - real deal where people are reporting the Google Sandbox being "busted". I see cases of that, on some level, which is a good start by Google.

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at May 23, 2005 11:41 AM Comments (0)

12 Step Program for Google SEO

Marcia posted a fun thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named 12 Step Program for Google Optimization and Updates. She ends off the list by saying; "Hello, my name is Marcia and I'm an SEO." I am sure she will be OK if I quote the 12 steps here, but make sure to join the discussion at SEW Forums.

1. We admitted that we were powerless over Google and that our rankings had become unmanageable.

2. Came to believe that our sanity and Google traffic could be restored.

3. Made a decision to turn our time and our efforts over to creating better sites for our users.

4. Made a searching and fearless inventory of our sites.

5. Admitted to ourselves and another trusted human being the exact nature of our wrongs and deficiencies.

6. Were entirely ready to have all of of our spam and optimization defects removed.

7. Humbly asked for help in overcoming and correcting our shortcomings.

8. Made a list of all the ways we had overstepped Google's guidelines and sound optimization principles and practices, and became willing to make amends and modifications.

9. Made direct modifications wherever possible, except when to do so would hurt or injure other webmasters.

10. Continued to take inventory of our sites, and when something was wrong we promptly faced it, admitted it and and fixed it.

11. Sought through diligent effort to improve our knowledge and understanding of Information Retrieval science and algorithms and marketing, praying only for knowledge of sound, effective optimization principles and practices and the ability to carry them out.

12. Having had an awakening as a result of these steps and having received the help we needed from others, we tried to carry the message and offer our help to other webmasters and marketers in return, and to follow sound optimization and marketing practices for all of our sites.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at May 23, 2005 11:04 AM Comments (0)

Making an Modest Living with AdSense? Move Abroad

I know several people who have or will be quitting their day job to become a full time publisher. They make their money from advertisers and AdSense. There are new discussions taking place at WebmasterWorld where people are discussing the pros and cons of moving outside of the United States to find a lower cost of living. This way they can use their Adsense income and live modestly in a place like India or other places that cost less. Maybe even tax free, like the Bahamas.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 23, 2005 9:49 AM Comments (4)

Exterminate the Blogs to Achieve an Unbiased Google News

There was a study conducted by Eric Ulken named Non-traditional sources cloud Google News results. In the study, Eric claims "that the search engine's selection of online-only news sources to include in Google News skews its search results toward political extremes."

When articles from non-traditional sources are omitted from the comparison, there is no significant difference in the spread of the article balance scores between Google News and Yahoo News. This indicates that virtually all of the difference in bias between articles returned by Google News and those returned by Yahoo News is attributable to Google’s use of non-traditional news sources.

He showed how Yahoo! News, which uses more "traditional" news sources then Google News is less bias.

I decided to start a thread on this topic, after finding a blog entry by Brad Hill on this topic. I named the thread at Search Engine Watch Forums Google News Unbiased When Blogs Left Out? The thread goes into a discussion of what makes a blog's opinion less "skewed" then a traditional news outfit? But, as Danny Sullivan carefully clarifies,

As for bias, the study specifically looked at whether stories were favorable or not to Bush and Kerry. With Google, it found mainly not that it was leaning any particular direction but that along with showing lots of "balanced" stories, it also showed extremes on the spectrum. Which if you think about it, is kind of balanced.

Update: Looks like Greg Jarboe posted an entry on this topic this morning at his new blog named SEO PR News Blog.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at May 23, 2005 9:24 AM Comments (0)

I am Feeling Lucky: What's the Point?

Over at Cre8asite Forums there is a fun thread named I'm Feeling Lucky. The thread has a poll asking, "What do you guess is the proportion of Google searches done with the [I'm feeling lucky] button?" Which all the respondents reply to as below 5%. You and I know, that no one ever uses it. So why is it there?

I remember back to a SES Conference I attended, the question was posed to Google at the Inside The Searcher's Mind session at SES San Jose 2004.

Is the "I am Feeling Lucky" button used? Not really but they don't know what it does. They asked the user, should we take it away? The user said no way! Its fun and they keep it there for that reasons.

The Cre8asite thread quotes from a blog that basically says the same thing (Mayer from Google was quoted in my coverage at SES);

4. The infamous "I feel lucky" is nearly never used. However, in trials it was found that removing it would somehow reduce the Google experience. Users wanted it kept. It was a comfort button.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at May 23, 2005 9:03 AM Comments (10)

ODP (dmoz) Status Check Closed

You can blame me and the thousands of other dmoz editors that simply log in once or so a month to review submitted dmoz listings. I assume, it has become overwhelming for the senior editors to track down normal editors to locate the status of certain submissions.

Threads at Search Engine Watch Forums, Cre8asite Forums and WebmasterWorld all discuss the official news.

Following discussion by, and consensus of Moderators and Administrators of this forum, we have chosen to discontinue site status checks effective May 21, 2005 ... There were a number of factors involved in making this decision, but probably the biggest was that these requests were always beyond the mission of this forum. The original mandate of this forum was to put a better light on the ODP by allowing the public to interact directly with the editors. At some point the submission status requests seem to have taken over and almost become the focus.

See full explanation at http://www.resource-zone.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39125.

odphead_rz.gif

In the threads listed above, members discuss the pros and cons to such a decision and what they could have done to help keep it open.

posted rustybrick in Open Directory Project at May 23, 2005 8:48 AM Comments (4)

The Future of Cloaking & SEO

A member at Search Engine Watch forums started a new thread named Cloaking, load of BS?, where he asks, "Does anyone come across cloaked sites in the SERPs anymore, 'cos I don't seem to." The question is, is there a future for cloaking in the search engine optimization world?

What makes this thread fun is that we have fantomaster, the king of cloaking, chime in and then GoogleGuy, who absolutely hates cloaking, discuss the concept as well. So far, everything is very professionally discussed.

Fantomaster says, "demand [for advanced cloaking products] has been on a steep rise and if current figures are anything to go by, we for our part expect to double our cloaking products and services related revenue this year."

Fantomaster explains that the reason the original thread creator, glengara, doesn't see the cloaked results is because, as rcjordan said, "the big dogs -good & bad- are using high-grade cloaking as much or more than ever." Basically, the cloaking tactics practices by the top experts are extremely hard to recognize by the end user. Fantomaster continues by saying; "sure, you may have a hunch perhaps, but it will never be more than guesswork."

Mikkel, who has been around forever, like fantomaster said:

Cloaking is definitely still around - I know for a fact. The main reasons my clients chose cloaking is because they are either too lazy or restricted to change their own site and work, because they want to target keyword variations or misspellings they are not allowed to have on the website, or because the entire site is graphic or multimedia based.

Back on topic of if cloaking is a growing or declining business. GoogleGuy posts that it is declining based on his observations. He said; "In my experience there's fewer cloaked domains in SERPs these days. It's not completely gone though; there are still some sites that cloak, especially when the owner views the domain as disposable."

It is possible that there are less novice cloakers out there, so both fantomaster (Mikkel as well) and GoogleGuy can both be right. There has never been a published paper on the number of cloaked sites in the search engines as of today, compared to 5 years ago. I am sure the number is higher, but on percentages of number of sites on the Internet compared to cloaked sites, it might be lower. Again, we simply do not know. Maybe Gary Price can locate a paper on this topic, with actual figures and data? :)

posted rustybrick in Cloaking / IP Delivery at May 20, 2005 11:08 AM Comments (0)

Members Discuss Sandbox Jail Time

A forum thread at WebmasterWorld named Longest You've Been in the Sandbox?, which first required me to post the previous entry named Google Sandbox Defined: Sandbox = Ranking, Not Indexed, also discusses the time frame people have been finding themselves stuck within the gates of the Google Sandbox.

Skip over the first several posts, because the users is misinformed about the definition of the sandbox. I'll post some of the stats and somewhat, terrifying messages left in that thread.

Launched in early May, first spidered by Google in May 2004 - 12 months in the sandbox.
I have one site which has been in [the sandbox] since December. But this recent "update" seems to show a little encouragement as some of its pages have jumped 200+ positions on one DC (and no they had no change whatsoever on the pages and no huge difference in backlinks).
10 months now and still waiting.
Site launched in February 2004. It was a move from an old URL to a new URL so the content was identical when it launched (of course I changed it since then). It came up ranking very close to the old site for a couple of weeks and then went into the "sand box." Over the year I was able to achieve high rankings on related terms but not the primary terms. I was able to get the primary terms into the top 100 but not the top 10. After just about a year, rankings were finally "normal" (top ten for primary terms).
Site launched in September 2004. Again, some terms rank but not as high as I think they should. I believe that the site will be out of the sandbox this fall. Time will tell.
First crawled in Dec. Average position for main target KW, page 280-300. This went on for 4 months. To date, absolutely no-where vanished entirely out of the search results.

That was just the first page, continue reading from the second page on. Come on, Google.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at May 20, 2005 9:36 AM Comments (0)

Google Sandbox Defined

I find it to be a real shame about the confusion around the Web as to what the term "sandbox" means. Google, of course, would not admit to it and I do not blame them. But there are so many different definitions of what defines a site to be sandboxed.

I believe we, at the Search Engine Roundtable, was the first information site (outside of a forum) to publicly acknowledge the existence of some form of issue with Google and new sites. The first post we had was named New Sites = Poor Results in Google, that was before it had a name. In a WebmasterWorld thread linked to from the "New Sites = Poor Results in Google" entry, the term "sandbox" came about. Later on, guest author SEO Guy posted an entry here using that title The Sandbox Effect, which helped make its name. Then Garrett French, who was writing at WebProNews wrote an excellent, early recap of all the coverage and named it Google "SandBox Effect" Revealed. Since then the word sandbox has been discussed here dozens of times. But it seems to me based on the forums I am reading, (see this thread and the confusion there), that people do not know that the true definition of a sandboxed site, so here it is.

A site is sandboxed when it is new and does not rank for keyword phrases that are not incredibly competitive (such as a unique company name) in Google after making the page "search engine friendly" and after being indexed.

Some are mistaken that a sandboxed site is a site that has not been indexed by Google. That is wrong. Sandboxed sites are very much so indexed by Google, but have a hard time ranking for keyword phrases, no matter how competitive they are.

How does Google do it? Well that is for an other entry. I have my theories but so does everyone else. :)

Help set the record straight about the definition of the Google Sandbox.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at May 20, 2005 9:18 AM Comments (28)

Ask Jeeves Buys Excite Europe

This morning, or last night, Netimperative reported that Jeeves buys Excite Europe, however, it seems like the story was pulled (at least it is currently not loading anymore, it was 10 minutes ago).

Luckily, there is forum discussion on the topic. First forum to post something on the topic was WebmasterWorld. I was then responsible for the next two forum posts at Cre8asite Forums and Search Engine Watch Forums.

Also, you can find the Press Release at PR News Wire.

Rumor is that it cost 6.1 million euros.

Keep snagging small pieces of the pie, Jeeves.

Update: Gary Price writes Ask Buys Excite Europe; To Share Excite.com With Infospace, "the company has agreed in a "comprehensive settlement of litigation" with InfoSpace to share marketing costs and revenue from the Excite.com Web search function."

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at May 20, 2005 8:41 AM Comments (0)

Google Homepage Personalized or Portal?

Many of you are already aware of Google's new lab announcement, Personalize Your Homepage. It is very interesting that Google says nothing about "portal" in this announcement, at least I haven't seen the word used much. It is more about "personalization" then "portal". There are tons of opinions on that distinction at the various blogs around the Web, but this site is about uncovering the forum discussion.

For a quick recap of features and more, see Search Engine Watch and Search Engine Journal (currently offline).

So what are the folks in the forums buzzing about?

Search Engine Watch Forums thread was started by Danny Sullivan, linking to his article on the topic. There are no real negative comments yet, just comments that they knew it would happen.

Cre8asite Forums thread, Bill makes a insightful comment, "As Yahoo! starts becoming more like google (http://search.yahoo.com/), Google starts becoming more and more like yahoo!, looking like a portal site with these additions."

WebmasterWorld already has two pages, and some of the comments include. "Google is losing it, they've now become MSN and Yahoo." Shak says, "Superb Stuff Google...absolutely love it." GoogleGuy replies, "Some people will enjoy having things all in one spot--different things for different folks, you know? :)"

SEO Chat Forums, the thread was named "Surprise (not!) Google portal cometh." Followed up with a comment, "One of the best defenses against big bad Microsoft is a potent offense. Hit them before they can really hit you."

DigitalPoint Forums thread is currently all positive, but I liked this post "Nice, can making it Yahoo style home page or portal."

I visited many of the other forums, either they don't have a thread yet, or there is not anything currently substantial. Or I couldn't find the thread.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at May 20, 2005 8:30 AM Comments (2)

Was Google Down Again?

On May 7th, Gary Price wrote Google Says DNS Issues Caused Outage. Today, Loren Baker from Search Engine Journal emailed me telling me that all of Google's properties were offline for him and he wanted me to verify. By the time i tried it, everything was loading fine except for Blogger, but then that worked a few minutes later. Loren Yahoo! 360ed it as well. I wouldn't have posted anything based on one person, since a squirrel could have been "chewing on [his] phone line."

But I was then browsing DigitalPoint forums and saw an old thread named Is Google Down? revived with a post around the same time of Loren's email.

Was Google Down Again?

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at May 19, 2005 3:41 PM Comments (3)

Andy Beal @ Google Factory Tour

Andy Beal is at the Google Factory Tour today. There is a webcast to check out. But Andy is providing coverage of it at his blog.

So far we got:
- Live from the Googleplex!
- Google Factory Tour Agenda
- Google Explains Lengthy Beta Process
- Google's Marissa Mayer Highlights Google's Heroes
- Google Launches "My Google" Portal
- Google Lunch is Good, But Maybe Not for Much Longer
- Google Explains Click Fraud Policy
- Google Learns Lesson from Web Accelerator Launch

factorytour2.gif

Slides will be available at SEW Blog. And DigitalPoint Forum has a thread, so does Cre8asite and WebmasterWorld.

Updates to come throughout the day.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at May 19, 2005 1:45 PM Comments (1)

AdWords Adds Account Size Limitation

I haven't heard this talked about anywhere else, but a client of mine notified me that his AdWords representative told him he needs to reduce the number of keywords within his new campaigns "to ensure that they do not place unnecessary load on our advertising servers." To be honest, my first impression was, that the client heard his AdWords rep incorrectly. Why would Google need to worry about "unnecessary load", these are paid ads, and the more keywords, the more money they make. To be stingy about large AdWords campaigns seems a bit ironic.

So I posted a thread on this topic at Search Engine Watch AdWords Forum. And in good AdWordsRep spirit, AdWordsRep replied to the thread with a confirmation of my beliefs.

As the number of advertisers has grown, and as a trend towards using truly vast numbers of (mostly untargeted) keywords was noticed, we decided to take proactive action.

I wonder how most AdWords customers feel about this...

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at May 19, 2005 11:28 AM Comments (4)

Search Engine Localization Optimization

A thread at WebmasterWorld named "Google Language: How do they recognise which index you want to show in?" These types of questions are becoming more and more popular at the forums and conference. At SES Toronto 05, there was a session specifically about these issues, named Language & Domain Name Issues. Some really great information there. The take away points I got from that session and what I would recommend to those that currently want to proceed with a country specific SEO localization strategy are:

Get domain name extension local to the country, write the site in the language of the country, try hosting in that country, and get links from pages that have the above characteristics. I believe that I ordered the last sentence in the order of importance. In addition to this entry, I have more entries related to this topic named:

- Country Specific Filters & Weights
- Ranking Well Outside US Centric Google Results

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at May 19, 2005 10:24 AM Comments (0)

8,000 Rated RustySearches

Here is an other update for you with 8,000 rated searches completed to date. Total searches placed at RustySearch is 11,000+, of which, 8,000 were rated. I still want to reach the 20,000 mark before publishing the actual data. Please help me make this happen.

The graphs and charts below are the most recent results pulled from The Search Engine Relevancy Challenge, RustySearch search engine. I'll explain each graph and chart below.

The "Search Engine Relevancy Dials" below show how each search engine scored on average in terms of relevancy on a one through five scale at this point in time. The search engine with the highest score is considered the most relevant search engine voted by you.

Search Engine Relevancy Dials

Yahoo!

3.4146
Google

3.3723
 
Ask Jeeves

3.2010
MSN Search

3.1195
 

This link graph groups search engines by rating. The reason we plotted it on a graph like this is to show you that there is this U shaped curve that is consistent between all search engines when rated. In our opinion, it means that most people either feel the results are relevant or not relevant. Very few people feel that a search engine can be "somewhat" relevant.

8k-rustysearch-bar.png

Finally, here is a raw summary count of data that we placed on a simple chart view for you. This data is real time and will continue to update as people rate. The averages from top-down are the average rating count by search engine. The averages from left-right are the average rating count by rating group. The value at the far bottom-right corner is the total rated search results obtain at this point in time at RustySearch.

Raw Summary Data
Search Engine12345Average
Ask Jeeves579198192205771389.00
Google520181194290843405.60
MSN Search637200189218747398.20
Yahoo!543160171237927407.60
Total2,2797397469503,2888,002

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at May 19, 2005 9:47 AM Comments (1)

Search Engines Leave My Title & Description Alone!

There has been a recent flux of posts at Search Engine Watch Forums on where Google is getting the title and description content from in the search results pages. In classic form, Danny Sullivan is a little annoyed that there is so much confusion, do to the fact, that there is no standard. At the end of a thread, Danny posts a summary of the issue. Basically, sometimes Google will use the ODP listing (see my entry named Google Showing Dynamic Titles) and Yahoo! uses the Yahoo! Directory title when available (see my entry Titles that Differ in Google and Yahoo).

Danny started a thread named Proposed Search Engine Standard For Titles & Descriptions with a poll asking, "How Should Titles & Descriptions Be Formed?"

Danny believes that its best for search engines to use the following rules:

1) Always use the page's actual title
2) If the page has provided a meta description tag, NEVER go beyond the page to create a description
3) Consider the meta description tag strongly as the description to be returned, especially if the search terms for the query appear within it
4) If the meta description tag seems inadequate, then form a description by taking text from anywhere on the page.
5) If NO meta description tag was provided, and you don't feel the page has enough content to form a description, then you can go to a secondary source to create a description.

Join the thread to voice your opinion.

Danny also wrote a blog entry on this topic named Time For Search Standards For Titles & Description?

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at May 19, 2005 9:28 AM Comments (0)

Google Launched Inside AdWords Blog

In my opinion, the most active and helpful official search engine representative at the forums (WebmasterWorld & Search Engine Watch Forums) is the AdWordsAdvisor. For those that frequent the WMW AdWords Forum and the SEW AdWords Forum, you will notice the volume of posts and replies by AdWordsAdvisor & AdWordsRep, respectively.

So it only makes sense for the AdWords Reps & Advisors to start a blog to help the AdWords pro. The blog is named Inside AdWords and is at the URL adwords.blogspot.com.

Here’s what you’ll find when you visit adwords.blogspot.com… - Updates on enhancements we've made to the system - Thoughts on things that advertisers have been asking about - Tips on getting the most from AdWords - Details on tools we think you'll find useful - Links to articles you might find interesting

This was announced at WebmasterWorld this afternoon. Jensense, points out that adsense.blogspot.com, "returns a password protected message, which hopefully means we will be seeing an Inside AdSense blog in the near future, as well."

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at May 18, 2005 4:57 PM Comments (0)

Force Google My Search History Data

Philipp Lenssen writes Planting My Search History Entries, and Social Patterns explains that this code:

<iframe src="http://www.google.com/search?q=Google+Blogoscoped+sneaked+in+through+the+backdoor" style="width:0; height: 0; border: 0; overflow: hidden” border="0></iframe>

Makes it possible for you to force someone who uses Google My Search History, to embed saved results by just visiting a page.

Currently there is no forum discussion about this loophole but there is a big discussion on My Search History and other issues at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at May 18, 2005 4:47 PM Comments (1)

India Cold Call Offering Reciprocal Link Exchange

I just got my first cold call from India offering a reciprocal link exchange. Sounded much like those other cold calls we get here for outsourcing Web development and design to India. But this one was asking about a reciprocal link exchange. The call lasted about 20 seconds but I thought I should notify you guys. I prefer the emails, deleting those (if they are not caught by spam filters) takes about 1/20th of the time.

NewDNCLogo.gif

I believe we registered our phones with the National Do Not Call Registry.

posted rustybrick in Spam at May 18, 2005 4:03 PM Comments (5)

AdSense Text Ads Versus Banner Ads

A thread at DigitalPoint forums named do images pay more? discusses whether graphic ads over text ads or more profitable for the publisher. Everyone seems to agree that graphic ads pay the highest cost per click to the publisher, when compared to the text ad equivalent. However, there is argument in the thread, if a graphic ad has a higher or lower click-trhough rate when compared to a text ad.

I have personally heard from some large 3rd party PPC management companies, that they almost always opt to have their clients show image ads on the AdSense content network, when possible. They seemed very confident, based on tracking data, that they had a higher CTR and conversion rate then text ads.

In the thread, some say they have seen their CTR and CPC go up when turning on the image ad option in AdSense. But some members in the thread argue that everyone has "ad blindness" towards banner and graphic ads.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 18, 2005 2:39 PM Comments (1)

Major Yahoo SERP Movement Detected

Yesterday we reported on Major Google SERP Movement Detected so why not today, report on major Yahoo SERP Movement. According to a WebmasterWorld thread started last night named jumping in serps like crazy, some are noticing a major flux in search results returned by Yahoo! Search.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at May 18, 2005 10:05 AM Comments (4)

MSN's Ballmer Calls Google a Google 'One-Hit Wonder'

Yes, it is true, Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's CEO, calls Google a "One Hit Wonder" according to a Business Week Article. The best part of it, is the discussion over at WebmasterWorld where Webmasters discuss whether they think its true or not. They get into a whole discussion about is or is not Google diversified. This of course all gets me worried about Relevancy's Importance in Microsoft's Quest, at this point, they are not doing too well, but will it matter? :)

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at May 18, 2005 10:00 AM Comments (0)

Urchin Calls Google, "Home"

End of March, shocking news came our way that Google Buys Urchin Web Analytics. Today I found a new thread at WebmasterWorld named Web Analytics by Google, which led me to a URL by the looks of http://www.google.com/urchin.html. The re-branding of my all-time favorite Web analytics package has begun, look what they did to the logo.

urchin_fromgoogle.gif

So here it begins. My biggest question is this the end of Urchin's appeal to professional SEOs? Of course, I can see Urchin's product striving amongst everyone outside of the SEO world.

posted rustybrick in Tracking & Conversion Measurements at May 18, 2005 9:50 AM Comments (1)

Pick the Search Marketing Day

Danny Sullivan from Search Engine Watch, started a thread named Vote On Day For Search Marketing Day! Danny set up a poll asking What Day Should Be Search Marketing Day? In the poll are several options, I placed my vote.

Some are of the opinion that they don't want a day, because they don't want to take off from work (since they love it so much). Trust me, I can relate. But fundamentally, I believe, it is a good idea to have a day for Search Marketing. I probably won't take the day off, but having the day for the industry, can't be bad.

Danny continues to explain that Yahoo & Google "both suggested interest in the holiday." So much so, that Yahoo "was especially excited about doing something for it." So get over to the thread and vote.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Industry News at May 18, 2005 8:51 AM Comments (0)

Approved for AdSense RSS Feeds

At 5pm today, I posted about Google Offers AdSense for RSS Feeds and at 8:30pm today, 3 hours and 30 minutes later, I was approved.

I am posting this entry, mostly to test the ads out in the RSS 1.0 and RSS 2.0 feeds. Update again...

Update: Google said it was a slight bug (which is cool with me)....
%URL%

on your feeds with:

<$MTEntryPermalink encode_url="1" archive_type="Individual"$>

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 17, 2005 10:23 PM Comments (3)

Google Offers AdSense for RSS Feeds

News come by way of the Google Blog under the entry name Feed me, that you can now apply to test out AdSense ads in your RSS feeds. I have applied to test it out, should be fun to play with.

For more technical details, visit the Google Support for AdSense page.

Forum coverage currently only at Search Engine Watch Forums, since I posted a thread there. But make sure to keep an eye on the WebmasterWorld AdSense Forum and DigitalPoint AdSense Forum (two forums with heavy AdSense forum discussion activity.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 17, 2005 5:02 PM Comments (1)

Being Banned - A Blessing in Disguise

randfish, started a very interesting thread over at Search Engine Watch Forums named Banned by Yahoo! - A good thing? The story is that one of his clients (or maybe his site) was banned by Yahoo! for being perceived as being spammy (probably has to do with Yahoo!'s overly aggressive duplicate content filter). Their rankings drop in Yahoo!, but the client (office managers) have no idea. In fact, the client calls randfish and asked him, "how did you manage to filter out the bad requests?" In fact, the randfish tells us that his client claims "it's been great for productivity so far."

Few things...

(1) Does Yahoo! provide less relevant referrals in the commercial real estate market?
(2) Do "spammy sites" make for less productive office environments?
(3) Does Google and MSN provide better results then Yahoo!? Even though, so far, our tests show that Yahoo! is the most relevant.

This should make for an interesting thread.

posted rustybrick in Spam at May 17, 2005 4:43 PM Comments (2)

MSN Search Phishing Spyware

I am not sure if this is a major issue or simply a generic fluke but...

A thread at SEO Chat reports of a user going to MSN Search and being asked to provide evidence that he/she is an adult. The method of evidence, provide your credit card information.

Classic signs of a phishing attempt. If you see this as well, please run a spyware/adware program on your PC (I think AdAware is a good free one, but I use a Mac). I wonder if this specific phishing attempt is only targeting MSN Search users or more wide-spread then that.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at May 17, 2005 9:01 AM Comments (0)

Unique versus Reprinted Content

There is a nice thread over at SEO Chat Forums named Unique Content vs Reprinting Articles. In the thread, members discuss if it is better to write your own content or reprint (with permission) content already published.

As many of you know, I am all about unique content. I rarely republish anyone else's content, unless it is written specifically for this site. Why? Nothing at all to do with on-page search engine optimization. It is about you guys. I want you to have new, fresh, unique and (I hope) valuable content on a daily basis.

There is no doubt in my mind, since we have all seen it, that reprinted content can rank well and make money for the publisher. I like how Egol put it in message number 11;

You can reoptimize someone elses content, empower it with links and outrank the original. Still, you will always be in competition with all of those other versions of that content which are out there.

But normally, the "source document" (original content) gets a link back from the reprinted versions of its clones. If you are not actively in the mode of working to get links back to your articles and you do not "optimize" the content better then the source, it is more likely that the source will rank higher then the reprinted materials. Of course, there are tons of factors involved.

Think of it from a search engines perspective. Do they always want the original source? Or do you think they want the version that has the most value (i.e. user reviews, feedback, comments, links and so on)?

posted rustybrick in SEO Copywriting at May 17, 2005 8:53 AM Comments (0)

Major Google SERP Movement Detected

A WebmasterWorld thread reports on major changes to some search result pages over the past two days. I have not validated any of this, because I have to run to a meeting and I would like to post at least once more before I go.

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at May 17, 2005 8:41 AM Comments (0)

Stop Clicking Me! Warn Click Fraud Offenders

There are several click fraud programs out there that help you detect fraudulent click activity. Some even go further by throwing up a warning screen after X clicks from the same IP address. The warning screen might say something to the effect of; Thank you for clicking over to our site. In order to keep prices competitive, we would like to notify you that your IP Address (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) has click over to our site from [referral] X times. Please note that we have logged this information for reference. Please feel free to bookmark our site by selecting control + B and thank you for stopping by".

A thread at WebmasterWorld named Self Clicking Syndrome: Why doesn't Google build a blocker? asks why doesn't Google do this themselves? The reasoning is that why would Google want to reply to all of those "I've clicked on my own adsense, will I get banned?" emails sent to them.

Most people in the thread feel Google has transparent detection software built in. And you an I know, its not really to Google's or Yahoo!'s advantage to pop up one of those screens to the end user. Maybe the advertiser will get mad, maybe the end user will be upset. If anything, maybe Google can offer it as an option to the AdWords customer. But there are third party tools that do this already.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at May 16, 2005 5:17 PM Comments (0)

Google Advertises, Google Local on Radio & Print

According to a WebmasterWorld recent post by SEOMike named Google Advertises on the radio, Google is advertising its Google Local search program. SEOMike says he lives in Kansas City, USA and has been hearing ads for Google Local on the radio waves. In addition, he has seen a "8.5" x 11" laminated insert" in one of the local papers. The ads "talks about Google's intuitive search and how it helps the commercial's "subject" find a "window fixer" because she doesn't know what that type of person is called."

Google is not known to spend money on advertising through TV, Radio and Paper. Or least, not until recently. :)

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at May 16, 2005 4:47 PM Comments (0)

Yahoo!'s Trend Analysis Patent

Bill Slawski over at Cre8asite Forums posted a thread named Yahoo! Adds Trends to Concept Analysis. In that thread he introduces a new patent released by Yahoo! named Systems and methods for search query processing using trend analysis. Abstract:

Systems and methods for processing search requests include analyzing received queries in order to provide a more sophisticated understanding of the information being sought. In one embodiment, queries are parsed into units, which may comprise one or more words or tokens of the query, and the units are related in concept networks. Trend analysis is performed by sorting the queries into subsets along a dimension of interest and comparing concept networks for different subsets. Trend information is usable to enhance a response of an automated search agent to a subsequently received query.

Bill explains, "the patent application begins to explain how MyYahoo! information might be used to help the search engine create search results." Kinda makes me wonder, once again, about the keynote with Jerry Yang and Yahoo! Life Engine - Is it Happening?

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at May 16, 2005 9:53 AM Comments (2)

The SEM's Industry Biggest Growing Pain?

Nacho started a new thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named SEM Industry Biggest Growing Pains. In that thread, he asks what is the Search Engine Marketing Industry's biggest growing pain?

So far a few well named industry folks chimed in, including Mikkel, Orion, IBrian and Danny Sullivan. Some feel that there really are no growing pains, some believe that SES has specific growing pains, others believe that the growing pains are about the unknown in this community.

I agree, the industry either has a bad reputation or a unknown but voodoo like reputation. There is simply so much misinformation out there about the industry, it is dangerous. Traffic Power and the BBB is a good step, in my opinion. But more needs to be done. I believe the root of the problem are the ways some of the SEO Companies behave. Join the discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Industry News at May 16, 2005 9:21 AM Comments (1)

Google Search by Number Spam

I always wondered when content spammers would begin taking advantage of some of the "Smart Searching" functions, provided by the search engines. I have been tracking a package of mine and decided to use Google. So I entered in a UPS tracking number, for example, 1Z W64 W91 67 4523 244 6 and using Google's Search By Number feature, it brought me the following results.

ups-google-spam.gif

But it is perfectly ethical, since they are not cloaking, the cache page is exactly like the landing page. Don't worry, nothing is currently being shown on that landing page besides for tons of numbers and a link to the site.

I started a forum thread at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at May 16, 2005 8:38 AM Comments (0)

Why The Big SEO Company Is Killing The True SEO

Earlier today, Barry wrote on a thread over at Cre8asite that details the balance between good user centered design and the ability to maintain rankings. When it came down to it you will ultimately have to sacrifice somewhere and often its hard to reach the right balance of both. Ideally we would all like balance for our sites, we want both the usability of a well planned site to assist in high conversions and we also want high rankings. Not just any rankings, we want a #1 ranking in Google. The most coveted position, and even without any pre-conceived knowledge about SEO you may know that that is the spot to be. Getting to this position might be your goal when contacting an SEO company to do work for your site. I decided today to write an article on some trends that I have seen in the industry that I am not happy about. I have never written openly about such topics but I do feel a need to document some of it. I have started to receive a good deal of emails from people looking for SEO services that were previously burned by past SEO companies. They are confused and want to know the real truth about what is capable for them. They also feel used for the fact they have been paying for services they never received. I run into this so much I kinda expect it now. I see this trend moving towards the turning of larger SEO companies turning into sales organizations who sell just a pre-packaged SEO product. I call these companies, sales effciency organizations. They may or may not charge a lot for these services but they not are ultimately living up to their end of the bargain.

I wrote the article looking at past examples of companies set up to take orders, those that are doing it now, and things that you should watch out for when looking for SEO services. I also wanted to examine some of the tricks of the trade in order to gain new clients. The money that has flowed in the SEO industry and what it's doing to things. Why companies want to obtain big clients to gain smaller clients and the problems with this. I base a lot of this from personal experience talking with people, my own opinions, trends on the forums, and the influx of people I have talked to getting "burned" by SEO companies for one thing or another. Hopefully you might enjoy it.

Check out: Why The Big SEO Company Is Killing the True SEO

posted Phoenix in Search Engine Industry News at May 13, 2005 5:58 PM Comments (1)

Google Blog Moves And Adds "What We're Reading"

I was checking my referral logs for today and I noticed referrals from http://googleblog.blogspot.com/. I first thought, is this a copycat site of the original www.google.com/googleblog/, where the original Google Blog resided. But no, click on http://www.google.com/googleblog/ and it redirects you to http://googleblog.blogspot.com/. In addition, the URL being linked to from the About Google page (see left top) is http://googleblog.blogspot.com/. Not sure when that happened.

So finally, Google added a "What We're Reading" section. Of course, I am honored to have this site included in the list. Glad you are reading. :)

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at May 13, 2005 12:55 PM Comments (2)

MSN Search Has the Google Sandbox?

A DigitalPoint forum thread named MSN might have a sandbox, is where some people are suspecting that MSN has its own flavor of the Google Sandbox. The consensus is that either MSN is really smart or has become really slow at indexing new sites. You decide...

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at May 13, 2005 9:11 AM Comments (0)

Notify Google of Click Fraud or Not?

As a follow up to my entry just a minute ago named AdSense Click Fraud Revenge there is an other WebmasterWorld thread related to this topic. The thread is named Contacting Google After Suspicious Activity where a member asks, what is the benefit of contacting Google about this?

One senior member says "but if Google see fraud they'll kick you out without explanation or conversation. At that point it's unlikely that you can get their decision overturned. Not impossible, but very unlikely." But another member wrote, "I have emailed G before when I have noticed strange things happening and they normally have got back to me within 24 hours saying "nothing to worry about."

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 13, 2005 8:59 AM Comments (0)

AdSense Click Fraud Revenge

Click fraud is a major issue with all PPC engines, but to make it even worse, there are people out there using click fraud to hurt people out of spite. There is a thread at WebmasterWorld named Revenge by click fraud - what to do?, where a few members discuss the fact that they are aware of people who repeatedly click on their AdSense ads simply to raise a red flag at Google. The clip-happy people are looking to have their AdSense accounts banned and destroy their AdSense income.

In the thread, they discuss way to prevent click fraud. None of which are fool-proof.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 13, 2005 8:54 AM Comments (1)

Is SEO Ruining the Web?

A Cre8asite Forum thread started by Kim, named It's the SEO that counts, not user centered design talks about a recent article at C|Net named Is search ruining the Web? Read the article and take a look at the thread for some very good opinion.

You and I spend our days balancing usability & rankings. Often there is a win-win situation, but sometimes you need to make a choice. But when you think about it, the title of the article, "Is search ruining the Web?" Well, in my opinion, sometimes yes. In some cases, where you need to sacrifice usability to ensure your pages are search engine friendly (i.e. duplicate content, breadcrumb string without cookies or sessions, and so on) within budget and without the risk of going against a search engines quality guidelines - the Web user is hurt by search.

Is the search engine optimization consultant to blame? Absolutely not. It is the search engine that is to blame. But to be fair, the search engines do not want there to be an SEO Industry. They would prefer to allow people to build Web sites and not think about SEO. Then the search engines would be smart enough to rank pages no matter what types of unintentional issues occur with the pages being search friendly. Unfortunately for the search engines and fortunately for the search engine optimization industry, I can not see search engines achieving this milestone any time in the next five to ten years, or more.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Articles & Books at May 13, 2005 8:45 AM Comments (1)

Pay-Per-Click Search Engine Marketing Handbook Review

Two weeks ago I read a book by Boris & Eugene Mordkovich named Pay-Per-Click Search Engine Marketing Handbook. The book has a tremendous amount of advice, strategies and even future opinion on Pay Per Click engines. The beginning of the book talks about the history of PPC, which is nice but not really meant for someone who wants to simply improve or get started with his or her PPC campaign. After you get past the intro pages, you get to the meat of the goodies. Of course the book delves deep into Google AdWords and Yahoo!'s Search Marketing (Overture), but it also goes into the 2nd and 3rd tier PPC engines and contextual components of PPC.

As you read through the book, you learn a great deal about the pros and cons of each PPC engine. They also provide detailed reviews of pay per click tools; management tools, tracking tools and research tools. This book is a no-brainer for anyone seriously using the PPC engines. For under $20, the coupons you get alone make it worthwhile.

For more information on this book, visit http://www.ppcbook.info/.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Articles & Books at May 12, 2005 4:58 PM Comments (0)

RustySearch Hits 5,000 Rated Searches

I would like to thank you for Helping to Promote RustySearch and the Search Engine Relevancy Challenge. We have surpassed 10,000 searches of which 5,000 searches were rated. Please continue to promote it, so we can hit 20,000 rated searches. The graphs and charts below are current as of 5/12/2005 at 3:30PM (EST) pulled from The Search Engine Relevancy Challenge, RustySearch search engine. I'll explain each graph and chart below.

The "Search Engine Relevancy Dials" below show how each search engine scored on average in terms of relevancy on a one through five scale at this point in time. The search engine with the highest score is considered the most relevant search engine voted by you.

Search Engine Relevancy Dials

Yahoo!

3.4287
Google

3.3668
 
Ask Jeeves

3.2602
MSN Search

3.0855
 

This link graph groups search engines by rating. The reason we plotted it on a graph like this is to show you that there is this U shaped curve that is consistent between all search engines when rated. In our opinion, it means that most people either feel the results are relevant or not relevant. Very few people feel that a search engine can be "somewhat" relevant.

rustysearch-bar-new.png

Finally, here is a raw summary count of data that we placed on a simple chart view for you. This data is real time and will continue to update as people rate. The averages from top-down are the average rating count by search engine. The averages from left-right are the average rating count by rating group. The value at the far bottom-right corner is the total rated search results obtain at this point in time at RustySearch.

Raw Summary Data
Search Engine12345Average
Ask Jeeves369121112110537249.80
Google332103126177527253.00
MSN Search422111105120470245.60
Yahoo!344104100139603258.00
Total1,4674394435462,1375,032

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at May 12, 2005 3:38 PM Comments (9)

IP Detection for Currency Content Delivery

As many of you know, there is no fine line when it comes to what is acceptable IP Delivery and what is not. Google clearly states in its Quality Guidelines, "Don't employ cloaking or sneaky redirects." But Google, "cloaks" or uses IP delivery methods themselves. I have a whole category at this site devoted to Cloaking & IP Delivery, and you will find that even Google Banned Itself for Cloaking. But is there acceptable cloaking?

Of course. One such case of acceptable cloaking is found in a brand new, and really quick thread at WebmasterWorld named Display Currency Prices Depending On IP Address. The member simply asked,

A client of mine wants me to set up his site, so that if the ip address comes from America, then all prices should be in US dollars. From the UK, pounds, and Europe etc ... Is this going to cause a problem with google?

And Brett Tabke simply answered. "No."

posted rustybrick in Cloaking / IP Delivery at May 12, 2005 10:14 AM Comments (1)

Please Help Me Promote RustySearch

We almost have a total of 5,000 rated searches at RustySearch, when we hit the 5k mark, I will publish revised stats, including new types of reports. But I really want to get a wider and more representative sampling. I know larger news sites are reading this, please help out this small search engine industry, by driving people to RustySearch: The Search Engine Relevancy Challenge.

The four major search engines have went beyond the call of duty to help us gather this data. I promise to provide detailed raw data to the public, but I will be excluding IP addresses to protect user privacy. However, I will be converting the IP address into a unique number, so you can use that unique number to see the number of unique searchers.

If you have more ideas on how to get the word out and do not want to leave a comment here, please contact me directly at barry AT rustybrick DOT com.

Sample of Text Ads:

Try The Search Engine Relevancy Challenge, by making RustySearch your default search engine for two weeks.
Which Search Engine is the Most Relevant? You Decide at The Search Engine Relevancy Challenge.

Sample of Banner Ads:

rustysearch232x29.gif
rustysearch468x60.gif
rustysearch150x150.gif

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at May 12, 2005 9:11 AM Comments (7)

Search Engine's Obligation to Public Sector?

There has been a Search Engine Watch thread I have been watching, actually since before it became a thread. The thread started off on the topic of a company's Web site being de-listed from Google. The thread is named Webposition.com de-indexed, but the news of Web Position Gold being de-listed is not new. It is fairly well known that Google dislikes Web Position Gold, and they have every right to like or dislike a company.

The thread had turned over to a more interesting tangent. What is a search engines legal or ethical obligations to include the most relevant Web pages of a search query, even though they might disagree or dislike a company? This question is an important one. For example, since Webposition.com does not rank in the Google results, simply because Google penalized them, when someone searches on "Web Position Gold", should the official Web site not come up?

I am not an opinionated person, so let me leave my own comments out. If you are looking for some strong opinions, I highly recommend clicking through to the thread. Here is just a short list of some of the well known names in our industry who have chimed in with their thoughts:

fantomaster - "It would require some hefty legislation to convert them into a public utility type outfit tying them up into such obligations.

Mikkel deMib Svendsen - Yes, I would surely like guaranteed inclusion by law - it absolutely would reduce the risk dramatically on certain kinds of questionable tactics.

dannysullivan - In fact, I'm hard pressed to think of examples where Google overtly will remove material from its index like this -- self-interest. For example, if they banned Yahoo from showing up, there'd be a huge outcry.

DaveN - The smart move would be for google to ban all sites that have used WPG imo. they broke the rules.

massa - Instead of quoting this one, you probably want to click through, since this guy is the man for this thread.

A few more from Danny Sullivan that I should include - This highlights the absurdity. Ban WebPosition, and you've done nothing but downgrade relevancy for your own searchers. They'll still find the product -- heck, even though your own partner Amazon, which has one of the top listings. What they won't find is the official company web site. That's your job as a search engine, to help peopel navigate correctly.

posted rustybrick in Legal Issues in Search at May 12, 2005 8:57 AM Comments (1)

The Real "MSN Search Preview"?

A Crea8site Forum thread named MSN trying a different SERP reports that there is something really called MSN Search Preview. In the past, MSN Search Preview referred to the "Technology Preview" released at http://techpreview.search.msn.com/ when they first began beta testing the new MSN search technology. But this MSN Search Preview looks to be totally different.

In the thread, Barry Welford identifies referral data from http://sea.search.msn.co.uk/. I looked back at my notes and found that there was an archive here that discussed the URL sea.search.msn.com, under the title of See the Old MSN Search Results, found over at SEO Chat. But this is different or maybe really old, I am not sure.

If you go to the search query listed by Barry Welford, http://sea.search.msn.co.uk/preview.aspx?&q=ten+commandments+of+communication, you will notice it shows little snapshots of Web sites from the sponsored results. Towards the bottom of the page I saw a link named Website owners: prevent your page from being previewed. Officially this looks to be called, "Search Preview image" and there are tons of more details at MSN Help. There is a page specifically about this here, that says:

Search Preview displays small images of websites in your search results. These are useful in deciding if you want to visit a site. Small preview images are displayed for the first six search results on each results page. To view Search Preview images, you must:
Use Microsoft Internet Explorer as your web browser.
Set MSN Search as the default search provider for the Search Explorer bar. For more information, see Search Assistant uses a search engine other than MSN Search.
Turn on the Search Explorer bar in Internet Explorer. For more information, see Open the Search Explorer bar.
Use the Search Assistant in the Search Explorer bar. For more information, see About the Search Explorer bar.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at May 12, 2005 8:31 AM Comments (2)

Apple Safari's RSS Reader

I switched RSS readers three times this year so far, the last one I used was Bloglines and I still think its great. But Apple came out with Safari RSS which has some awesome browser based RSS reader functionality. I am not limited at all by switching, so I decided to make the switch.

I have been using it for the past hour or so and I am enjoying. I have posted a quick video of some of the features here. Sorry if it is a bit choppy. I have also posted a thread on this topic at Search Engine Watch Forums.

I want to thank Gary Price for posting Feedster Publishes RSS Tutorial For Safari Users which helped the process.

posted rustybrick in Informational Sites at May 11, 2005 11:55 AM Comments (3)

Yahoo! Music Engine Reviewed by Yahoo! Employee

In Yahoo!'s pursuit to be integrated into the daily lives of its users, Yahoo! has launched an other product today named Yahoo! Music Engine.

LAUNCH_hdr_gradient_left.jpg

I have not used it, I probably wont anytime soon. But if you want a pretty unbiased review from a Yahoo! employee who is intimately involved with Yahoo! Music Engine, I would check out his Yahoo! 360 Blog entry named Why You Should (or Should Not) Use the Yahoo! Music Engine.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! News at May 11, 2005 10:04 AM Comments (0)

Ask Jeeves Goes Deep Purple

It has been a while since I last wrote about Ask Jeeves, April 28th, to be exact. Jim Lanzone and Mark Fletcher (Bloglines) went over to Japan to take care of Ask Jeeves Japan business. Mark Fletcher blogged about it at his blog wingedpig.com, he posted a link to the report of the trip in both Japanese and a poor translated English version, I personally like the picture.

So what is with the title of this entry? "Deep Purple", comes from the band who sings a song named Woman from Tokyo, but I do not believe they are in Tokyo at the moment. Anyway...

With the release of Tiger, Ask Jeeves released a Dashboard Widget named Immediate Answer and they blogged about it under the name of Easy Tiger. Maybe I missed it but I am surprised they didn't mention the more useful (in my opinion) Bloglines Notifier Widget.

immediateanswer_200505051122.jpg bloglinesnotifier_200504261238.jpg

Also, it is true. Ask Jeeves and the people that work at the company care a ton. They are obviously less crazed with requests compared to Google and Yahoo! but based on my interactions with them. They have been going far and beyond where they need to go to make a difference. I wish I can give specifics.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at May 11, 2005 9:36 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Search to Reinvent the Search UI?

There has been some discussion on the topic of The Future of Results Pages? at Cre8asite forums. Yesterday, Gary Price posted a blog entry at SEW Blog named Software Design Legend and Guru Heads to Yahoo. This got me thinking. I know Yahoo! has tons of Internet properties that can use a top notch design legend but what if one of the tasks given to Yahoo!'s new VP of User Experience and Design Group was to reinvent the user interface (UI) of the search results page?

The possibilities...

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at May 11, 2005 9:04 AM Comments (0)

Best Paying AdSense Ad Formats

Nacho started a poll at Search Engine Watch forums asking What is your BEST paying Adsense Ad Format? Currently, we only have six votes, so I felt an obligation to get the word out and ask you to get over to that thread and place your vote.

We all know about the AdSense Heat Map released by Google to help AdSense publishers drive more exposure to the AdSense ads. But what really works for you?


Please vote at What is your BEST paying Adsense Ad Format?

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 11, 2005 8:57 AM Comments (2)

Yahoo! Increased Mail to 1GB

AussieWebmaster at Search Engine Watch Forums points out that Yahoo! has actually implemented the promise that they would Increase Storage to 1GB. I logged into my Yahoo mail, which has about 4,000 messages of spam and tons of unread "real" email that I will never read and saw that they have indeed increased the capacity to 1GB.

yahoo-1gb-status.gif

Not sure why it says 0% of 1GB, it looks like I am least using 1%. Now that Yahoo! Mail is up to 1GB, I decided to see my status of my gmail account. My gmail limit is now up to 2183 MB (or ~2.1GB). I can always pay to upgrade to 2GB on Yahoo! Mail.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! News at May 11, 2005 8:53 AM Comments (1)

Relevance Defined by the Scientists

Most of you know about my little project, The Search Engine Relevancy Challenge. Outside of user's perceived relevance of a search response, how do the PhDs and scientists define relevancy. I particularly like the way Orion clearly described three ways to measure relevancy in a thread started by another researcher named nanocontext, the thread was titled The relevance of "relevance". Orion said that "relevancy has a lot to do with perception" and then he pulls out three types of "perception".

1. Which content is relevant according to user's perception?
2. Which content is relevant according to scoring functions used by a machine (IR system or search engine)?
3. Which list of content (documents) scored and already prequalified as relevant by a search engine algorithm are actually relevant according to user's perception and to the query that has been used?

Orion says that we are trying to measure number three, with RustySearch (by the way, please make this your default browser for the next two weeks to help the study). Nanocontext believes that "#3 is the most critical question, because thats where the money is." In addition, I am told that I should refresh my memory on the topic of "precision versus recall", which I promise to do and write a brief entry on it here. This thread, of course, sprung my interest.

posted rustybrick in Search Technology at May 11, 2005 8:46 AM Comments (0)

Contextual Video Ad Network VidSense

Gary Price, news editor of Search Engine Watch, informed me of a blog entry at Adrants about a new contextual ad program. This contextual ad program is unique, in that it displays relevant video ads based on the content of the page. VidSense.com is the name of the program. VidSense "categorized the video content into a multitude of channels" and displays the relevant ad based on your content.

I have posted a thread on this topic at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Contextual Ads at May 10, 2005 2:46 PM Comments (0)

Press Release Editorial Process Lacking Quality

Press releases have been a very popular strategy in the search engine optimization industry for a couple years now. If you wanted immediate top rankings in the news portals of the engines plus some additional quick anchor text links, you send out a press release. Here at the Search Engine Roundtable, we even did our own, I wrote up the results under the entry Press Releases & Search Engine Optimization. A new forum thread at Search Engine Watch named Press Release Spam discusses how easy it is to write a press release on about anything and get it widely syndicated. The example the thread creator (mod mcanerin) used was named SEO Firm Raise My Rank Announces New Client and Search Marketing Experiments which is a 154 word release. In the release, if you read it, it is basically mocking the PR system available to us. "Experiments for the week included an attempt to determine the efficacy of the use of search engine submission forms and a study of the attention spans of editors working for online press release services."

In the thread Mikkel deMib Svendsen says that this is not spam. He said, "The offender in my mind is the stupid editors and algos that accept such bad press releases and the sites that agrees to show them." So if the press release distribution methodology is not yet abused enough to be an issue, how much longer until strict guidelines are issued?

posted rustybrick in Informational Sites at May 10, 2005 2:11 PM Comments (1)

PRWeb Increases Available RSS Feeds from 220 to over 15,000

It's incredible to know that "According to recent surveys by the Pew Internet & American Life Project, 8 million American adults say they have created blogs; blog readership jumped 58% in 2004 and now stands at 32 million Americans, or 27% of Internet users."

In effort to continue finding domination for press release visibility, PRWeb increased into over 15,000 new pre-defined RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feeds. The news says, "These RSS feeds are fully compatible with all newsreaders and web browsers that support RSS, including PRWeb favorites Apple OS X Tiger's Safari RSS , Opera and Mozilla"s Firefox." Interesting to see that there was even a feed for SEMPO (Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization).

posted nacho in Informational Sites at May 10, 2005 1:42 PM Comments (0)

Ingenio Pay Per Call Currently a Success

On April 14th, 2005, WebmasterWorld Local Search Moderator, Chicago, started a thread named Ingenio Pay Per Call to Launch on AOL tomorrow. About one month later, there is mostly positive feedback on the Pay Per Call advertising model launched by Ingenio. Chicago's full review can be found in that thread message # 5, but here are the bullet points:

AOL Display: Excellent - Premium Position, Professional Display
AOL AD Distribution: Very low - 1 ad per category will display for user query. Broad categories are mapped to keyword queries.
Tracking: Very good interface
Landing Page: Very good - Map, Coupon, descriptions, etc.
Ad setup process: Good and getting better
Bid process: Intuitive but restrictive due to category (not keyword) distribution
Bid Levels: Some really nice opportunities exist for early movers

Member GameMasterM posted a rave review on Ingenio's Pay Per Call service;

We have real estate ads in California and we are capturing a good part of the state (major and minor cities) unchallenged right now. $2.15 per call and loving it. I believe we are unchallenged because no one is selling the idea. It is word of mouth from what I see. Our FindWhat campaign has a little more competition. Not as many calls because we are not showing statewide (by choice).

posted rustybrick in Local Search at May 10, 2005 11:37 AM Comments (0)

Ill-Informed Decision Makers

A search engine optimization consultant posted a heart-breaking story (well not heart-breaking but it does sound good on paper) about how his client fired him due to stating the facts. The thread is named Beer Google's and is situated at SEO Chat forums. All you need to read is the documented (by the SEO) conversation between the SEO and his boss:

Boss: "Mr. Holland, would you please explain why we mysite.com sucks for organic search results? Are you not the head of the SEO department?"

SEO: "My assumption is that your decision for the design department to lead the website project seriously undermined are natural position in SERPS."

Boss: "Oh I see…its' blame the design department day Mr. Holland."

SEO: "That's right."

Boss: "I think the layout on mysite.com is beautiful! The design team spent three weeks on that assume flash intro, not to mention the incredible genius of a navigation bar coming out of thin air by a simple mouse rollover! Head quarters think mysite.com stands alone in the Internet Advertising Market. We expect to win Awards with this beauty!"

SEO: "It certainly is a stand alone because it is all alone at the bottom of the SERPS."

Boss: "Your Fired! Holland!"

SEO: "What's new?"

How sad...

posted rustybrick in SEM / SEO Companies at May 10, 2005 10:56 AM Comments (3)

How Much Content is Required to Enforce the DMCA?

There is a nice new forum thread at WebmasterWorld named Google is refusing to act on DMCA notices, where a member initially reports that Google has declined his request to remove a page from its index based on the DMCA guidelines and laws. As you read down the thread, the thread creator writes:

The sites are all scraper sites of one kind or another. Most are pulling 2-4 sentences of content from my sites (about 40-50 words of content). This content is then listed alongside content scraped from 10-12 other sites and capped with a block of Adsense ads to monitize it.

It's probably not enough duplicate text to have any effect on my rankings, but it's pretty annoying to me that both spammers and Google are knowingly making money off my original content.

From this statement you can see that bits and pieces were "scraped" from his site and put together to make a highly targeted AdSense page. This is nothing new, it is done all the time and it works. It is extremely hard for Google to automatically detect this type of content, since it is far from mathematically "duplicate" and for Google to do anything manual, outside of embarrassing things, is not reasonable. I like how member walkman put it; "don't blame Google then. Copyright is not absolute. 50 words is nothing and easily falls within fair use."

posted rustybrick in Legal Issues in Search at May 10, 2005 8:40 AM Comments (0)

Google.com at Google.com Ranked #2 for Query Google

Do a search at Google for google and where do you find the result for the main Google.com homepage? Currently, I see https://desktop.google.com/ as the number one result and www.google.com as the number two result. In terms of relevancy, www.google.com should be number one. But when you click https://desktop.google.com/ it redirects you to www.google.com.

google-search-google.gif

Over at Search Engine Watch Forums they are discussing if the www.google.com url should show first or the deskbar. You will also notice the result under the last result in the image above is to http://desktop.google.com/, the https version redirect to www.google.com and the non secure goes to the correct place. Nice to see.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at May 9, 2005 3:48 PM Comments (4)

WebmasterWorld Conference New Orleans - June 21

Brett Tabke was able to secure John Battelle as the keynote speaker for the WebmasterWorld Conference, pretty big news. I will be providing our coverage of the conference, I have booked my stay at the hotel at hotels.com for less then what they were offering at the "group rate". In addition, there is forum discussion on this conference at WebmasterWorld. More information about the conference itself at WebmasterWorld Conference page.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2005 New Orleans at May 9, 2005 1:11 PM Comments (1)

Search Engine Watch Forums LIVE!

Last week, Search Engine Watch Forums Editor, Elisabeth, announced the first annual Search Engine Watch Forums LIVE!. Here are the details:

Join us on Tuesday, June 28th, 8:00am - 1:00pm, at the Ritz Carlton in Atlanta, Georgia for Search Engine Watch Forum's first live and in person event. Search Engine Watch Forums Editor and Moderator, Elisabeth Osmeloski will be hosting this inaugural breakfast event. Search marketers Stacy Williams of Prominent Placement, David Williams of 360i and one of Search Engine Watch Forum's own moderators, Christian Griffith aka "Sebastian" will kick things off with a panel discussion of the latest trends, hot topics and issues in today's SEM marketplace. Informative, expert-led roundtable sessions afterward then follow, allowing attendees to network and have focused discussions around key areas of interest.

The agenda is posted as:
8:00am - 8:30am Continental Breakfast
8:30am - 9:30am Panel Discussion
9:30am - 10:00am Break
10:00am - 11:30am Roundtable Sessions
11:30am - 1:00pm Networking

sewlive.gif

There is currently forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums. The date is the week before the WebmasterWorld Conference, I wonder how that will play into this.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Conferences at May 9, 2005 1:06 PM Comments (0)

Place Your Best AdSense Ads at the Top

Listening and reading what very niche experts talk about sometimes makes you go wow. Jenstar, in a thread at Search Engine Watch forums named More ad units = less money? discusses how adding more AdSense units (ads) on a page can reduce the price per click you will be making on that specific page.

Basically, the more ads shown the more chance a lower priced ad will show up. So if you do show many AdSense ads on a page, the strategy will be for you to show the highest priced ads in the most prime spot on your page. How is that done?

Well according to Jenstar who uses the "AdSense support documents" as a reference, she says that AdSense ads are ordered by "Ad Rank" (CPC X CTR) in the order the AdSense code is found within the source code of the page. So if you want your most expensive ads (assuming the CTR of the ad is equal to other ads) in the prime real estate of your page, you need to strategically use CSS positioning in your code to make that possible. Or you can get lucky and assume the first AdSense ad in the source code is the most likely ad your user clicks on.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at May 9, 2005 11:05 AM Comments (3)

Favicon & Search Engine Optimization

Having a favicon for your domain name will not currently help your search engine rankings. But it does have indirect benefits that might, in the long run, benefit your site's rankings. This is the topic of a threat at SEW Forums named Is there any SE benefit to using a favicon.ico file?.

A favorite icon (favicon) is the small little graphic displayed to the left of the URL in the browser's URL bar. For Search Engine Watch it looks like sew-favicon.gif for this site it looks like ser-favicon.gif and for my corporate site it looks like rb-favicon.gif. So how can this favicon help?

(1) Makes your site standout from the others (since many still do not have favicons).
(2) The extra branding might help you get more links to your Web site, helping with search engine ranking.
(3) On some browsers, that have "tabbed browsing" (Firefox, Ssafari, Netscape), it helps identify which tab has which site in it.
(4)Keeps your error logs cleaner

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at May 9, 2005 8:51 AM Comments (5)

ResourceShelf makes HispanSource.org Resource of the Week

Some of may be familiar with Gary Price's blog ResourceShelf where he posts news and other resources of interest to the online researcher. This week Shirl Kennedy, Deputy Editor, gave us HispanSource.org as the "Resource of the Week".

HispanSource bills itself as "your one-stop source for credible, objective, and relevant information on the U.S. Hispanic/Latino market. The information sources featured in HispanSource have been chosen by the top experts in Hispanic marketing and practical business information." Once you register, everything here is free.

Still not sure if you should add Hispanics or Latinos to your search marketing mix? Get the facts from the many sources of inforemation here. I've already downloaded a bunch of new white papers and powerpoint presentations I didn't have with the latest information on marketing and advertising. It's highly recomended.

posted nacho in Hispanic Search Marketing at May 8, 2005 12:25 AM Comments (0)

Google pays $1 million for google.com.cn and google.cn

SEW Forums member InChina reports in this thread:

Google bought google.com.cn and google.cn for million dollars. which should be the record of domain business in China.

To launch a more localized business model will be more important than to buy a .cn domain.

Most of the well-educated Chinese users know the google.com domain well.
To attract new users, a domain in Chinese pingyin will be more acceptable for them. Yahoo launched a yisou.com for its Chinese search engine, which means the first search or "the one" search in Chinese. Sohu.com launched a sogou.com for its search engine, which means search dog in Chinese.

More promotions for google.com branding, a localized business mode, and a sub-branding domain as a plus, probably will help those guys in Google Shanghai office.


I can tell it's all over the Chinese media from a Google News search over there, but unfortunately I have yet to learn the language.

posted nacho in Google News & Press at May 7, 2005 2:18 PM Comments (0)

User Navigation Behavior to Effect Link Popularity

In yesterday's session named The Search Engine Landscape, I reported Jay McCarthy from WebSiteStory as saying:

Search engine referral and direct navigation have similar trends. Internet links and search referral have crossed over, no longer do people get to sites with links, but now they use search, its not a web anymore.

I wanted to expand on this concept. Basically what it means is that people are getting to Web sites differently then in the past. For example; a year or so ago, more people visited Web pages by visiting page A, and clicking on a link on page A to page B. Then they clicked from page B to page C via a Web link. This past year, Jay McCarthy reported that the hyperlink style of navigating the Web has been surpassed by individuals using the search engines. Basically, if I find a concept on page A and I want more information about it, I might highlight the phrase and copy/paste them into Google.

I was thinking about this data during my 8 hour drive back to New York. Let's think about how search engines rank Web sites. One of the main components that factor if page A should rank above page B is the linkage data. Simply because, that was the way the World Wide Web worked. Page A links to Page B so the reader of Page A can find out more about a particular topic.

If people are now less likely to navigate the Web via hyperlinks and are more likely to navigate via search engines, we have the potential to lose one of the core factors in ranking criteria, linkage data. This of course is not an issue now, the if you saw the chart posted at the conference, the line graph was pretty shocking, in my opinion. User navigation via hyperlinks were declining at the rate user navigation via Web search. If this trend continues, less and less linkage data will be available for search engines to rank Web sites.

I thought to myself, can this happen, is it happening? Are people not linking to Web sites anymore and relying on the user to use Web search? First memory that popped into my head was that I have noticed that many new pages are linking to search results. For example, I commonly notice a sentence like, "If you want more information about widget, search Google." where the link to Google would contain the search phrase. Not convinced yet? Well, my new OS (Apple Tiger) came with a new search feature named "Spotlight" which has revolutionized the OS. Everything I right click on, any word, any file, pretty much anything in any program has an added two options. (1) Search in Spotlight and (2) Search in Google. How hard is it for someone to now right click on a search phrase or word and click on "Search in Google". Am I saying people will stop linking to pages? I doubt that; look at the number of times I linked to other pages in this entry. But think about the possibility of such a future.

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at May 6, 2005 1:14 PM Comments (3)

Early Results from RustySearch

So which search engine is most relevant after 3,244 rated search results? Here are some charts I put together for a quick preview of what is going on with The Search Engine Relevancy Challenge. Have your friends, family and the person working with you use it, so we can get a more representative sample. We are testing relevancy, not if my site ranks number one in this engine or not.



This pie chart shows the "most relevant" search engine by averaging the scores of all the ratings. The search engine listed at the top, is the most relevant engine. The number to the right of the name in the legend is the average rating for that seach engine. We then plotted that data in the pie chart.



rustysearchpie.png



This link graph groups search engines by rating. The reason we plotted it on a graph like this is to show you that there is this U shaped curve that is consistent between all search engines when rated. In our opinion, it means that most people either feel the results are relevant or not relevant. Very few people feel that a search engine can be "somewhat" relevant.



rustysearchbar.png



Finally, here is a raw summary count of data that we placed on a simple chart view for you. This data is real time and will continue to update as people rate. The averages from top-down are the average rating count by search engine. The averages from left-right are the average rating count by rating group. The value at the far bottom-right corner is the total rated search results obtain at this point in time at RustySearch.






Raw Summary Data
Search Engine12345Average
Ask Jeeves248737761329157.60
Google2445073105345163.40
MSN Search291665676314160.60
Yahoo!234687076388167.20
Average254.2564.2569.0079.50344.003,244

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at May 6, 2005 12:25 PM Comments (10)

Catching Up After SES Toronto 2005

Sorry for the lack of posting today, I have at least two things in mind that I want to share with you. One, I think, would be really interesting, a future thought provoking concept. But until I catch up with real work, let me summarize the conference sessions that I covered.

For a complete listing of sessions I covered, please visit Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto Archives. Within there you should see coverage on:

- Cleaning Up Spam & Other Messes
- Organic Listings Forum
- Buying Search Engine Advertising
- Balancing Paid & Organic Listings
- Link Strategies 2005
- Perfecting Paid Listings
- The Search Engine Landscape
- Language & Domain Name Issues

The conference was relaxing compared to New York, San Jose, or Chicago. I enjoyed it very much, met a ton of new people, caught up with a ton of old people and so on.

Regarding SES London, I really do want to go, but the flight cost is way too much at this time for me to consider. With SES Sweden, last October, I wanted an excuse to visit family in that neck of the woods, but the current fares for London from New York are crazy.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto at May 6, 2005 10:43 AM Comments (0)

Relevancy Perception vs. Relevancy Score

In the WebProNews article titled What Constitutes Search Engine Relevancy?, Chris Richardson asks "The question is how do you define relevancy? More importantly, how do search engines define relevancy?"

After a great conversation with Dr. E. Garcia, he pointed me to his latest paper Fractals, L-Systems and Semantics and more specifically to this:

"... users and search engines may not agree in the way they see, read or interpret documents. Essentially,

  • users assess document relevancy by visually interpreting -not necessarily in a linear fashion- information displayed.

  • search engines assess document relevancy by interpreting -tag by tag and in a linear fashion- information coded."


The entire point that he is trying to make is that both users and marketers think of relevancy based on perception while search engines see relevancy as a scoring function.

He also mentioned that this has to do with "the ability to discriminate terms that have different meanings in different context" otherwise known as "term disambiguation". To read more on this subject I recommend you read an outstanding paper called "Disambiguation for Text Mining on the Web" by Einat Amitay and her colleagues at IBM. I believe this paragraph is a good summary:

"The Web today contains a treasure trove of information about subjects such as people, companies, organizations, products, etc. that may be of wide interest. A first step toward any Web-based text mining effort would be to collect a significant number of Web mentions of a subject. However, due to the infamous ambiguity of natural language, many subjects have several meanings. This is particularly true for brand names, which often derive their name from the real word. Thus, the challenge becomes not only to find all the subject occurrences, but also to filter out just those that have the desired meaning."

Ultimately, the user does have the last word on what he or she determines to be the right listing to click on. Therefore, I believe that Barry's [Schwartz] project called RustySearch will be an excellent form of sampling measurement of web search relevancy. Hopefully many webmasters, marketers, business owners, journalists, academics, students and of course users will take the test and by contributing to this experiment will help determine the competitiveness of relevancy between the mayor 4 search engines based on perception.

Barry has already posted the Early Results from RustySearch.

posted nacho in Search Theory at May 5, 2005 2:55 PM Comments (0)

Language & Domain Name Issues

Moderated by well known forum moderator, BakedJake (Jake Baillie from True Local). First up is Cole Harrison from Ask Jeeves. He goes over the standard slides on Ask Jeeves stats. Ask Jeeves focuses on the US and UK search markets, but not they are devoting more resources towards other country specifics. He showed the Spain oriented Web site, since they do not have a Canadian version. He showed you can search in that country, language or all of the Web. So how do they do this? They classify each individual page into a language and a country, one page fits in one box. Searching by Language you need your page to be classified in the right language; this is based on the text on the page, they identified by frequencies of words and groups of letters. Search engines have trouble with this when, you have very little content, meta tags contain text in different languages from body, all text is in JS or Flash, text is evenly divided in two languages, if you have different versions of a page based on IP address (that can be an issue for Ask Jeeves, because you have one URL per box (see above)). Country search is limited to pages in a specific country. Identified by top level domain name, IP address of local ISP, text of page, and link patterns of pages. Recommendations is to use a local domain name such as www.mysite.ca and include address on pages. He strongly recommends having a Web site (domain name) for each country/language.

Bill Hartzer from INTEC, a computer software company for the teleco industry, they are pretty big. Intec's Web site goals are (1) brand company products or services, (2) convert web site visitors into possible sales leads, (3) establish a local web presence in each country that the company serves (27 currently), (4) show up number one in every search engine and every language. Language issues: (1) Main web site is in English and resides at intecbilling.com. (2) they have translated/localized versions reside on country specific TLDs, (3) intex treats each web site as a separate entity, we do not combine language son web sites and link between the sites in a JavaScript menu (no link spam). Optimization strategy; create separate sites, translate site, host site in local region if possible, address info and so on. "Pre Optimization", translation issues, keyword research tools, gather keywords for each product, research competitors, finalize lists, give list to translator, local office personnel for approval. He adds code to specify the language code in the html of the page. Never use more then one language on a Web page. Off page optimization; regional directories, press releases translated, links from local web portals, links from industry sites. Domain names: unused country specific domain names use 301 to main site, internationalized domain names are domains that include non ascii characters.

Bill Hunt from Global Strategies. He discusses specific examples working with IBM, 83 localized languages in 31 countries. Two main issues, domain name issues, and language issues. Domain issues are; not included or ranking in language specific engines, not using local country top level domains, and duplicate content. Language issues include; poor quality translations, incorrect keyword and improper language tags. Barrier # 1, getting country sites indexed; popups cant be indexed, pull down country maps cant be crawled, restrictive JavaScripts language detects, and restrictive robot.txt and meta robots. Barrier #2, language and language detection. Country detection; top level domain and or ip of server/host, detected language is required to be in the results. Language detection; most engines detect top 33 languages, automatically and 90% of European searches select restrict to "language". Domain pointers; multiple top level domain names pointing to a single .com address, use 301 redirects from TLDs to .com/country. Top Level Domains; wherever possible use the TLS and a local IP. And make sure to use language. Barrier #3 Poor Quality Translations; cheap translation us just that...cheap translation. Many translators are not optimizers. Machine translation and translation memory, is very poor. Develop an "Opportunity Matrix", "notebook" is not search on in Italy, they search for "computer" more often. Integrating SEO into Localization process; Glossary development, content development, proper tag usage.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto at May 5, 2005 1:52 PM Comments (0)

The Search Engine Landscape

Stephen Evan from MSN Search Canada is up first. He has two main objectives to show you how MSN search views global search and challenges. Search is a vibrant, competitive arena (two major competitors doing a good job), the landscape evolving quickly, much more opportunity in the landscape. MSN is in search because there is a customer need, merchant need, growing category, company-wide focus. He said if you look at the total documents out there versus what is indexed, its a tiny fraction. He said merchants love it because it has a huge ROI, MSN thinks they can help their merchants, since MSN is an online adverting company. Microsoft, company wide, with all its company wide products must be able to tell you that you can find your stuff across all of the products. Plus the growth is exciting for MSN. Search is a growth opportunity, he put up some slides about worldwide growth, canadian, and the estimates search industry. He said there is no winner take all scenario in search. Canadians are the 2nd most active searches in the world (UK is #1). Searching is paramount among youth 12 - 17. However, only 54% of consumers found search engines easy to use. 4.8M uncommitted Canadian searches. Many people are not loyal when it comes to search. The switching costs is very low, take a look at altavista and lycos. Where search falls short? (1) Delivering links but not answers (like ask jeeves), on average it took 11 minutes to find the answer this way. (2) Only 50% of complex queries go unanswered. (3) Not understanding user intent (apple, saturn). (4) Lack of user control (personalization). (5) Limited scope (need to index more types of content). What;s new with MSN Search; Microsoft built algorithmic search engine; canadian input into algorithms, relevancy testing in english and french markets in canada. New user experience, better results, convenient, better results and new features. MSN Search Strategy: Better answers - faster, broader selection (fresh), integrated user experience (computing business), platform for innovation (enabling 3rd party ecosystem). New MSN Search Service: Better, more relevant results (5 billion documents, new algorithm and instant answers with encarata, music, images, news and so on). More control (search near me, search builder, category search). Beyond the Web (multiple access points with office, messenger, toolbar, PC search and EMail search).

Next up was Jay McCarthy from WebSiteStory. They aggregated data from the millions of visitors we see through customers of our web analytics services, since 1999, with 37+ million visitors per day and 22+ million are US, and its all passively collected not influenced by panel. US Stats: How are users getting to sites on the web? Google, Yahoo, MSN. But MSN dropped a bit, due to Google rise in share (more on that later). Search engine referral and direct navigation have similar trends. Internet links and search referral have crossed over, no longer do people get to sites with links, but now they use search, its not a web anymore. New MSN search hasn't stopped the decline, he thinks MSN is declining because of lack of a whacky name, even after all the new features MSN came out with. In addition, MSN has strong dips in traffic on the weekends - so msn is more business oriented. Canadian Rankings: Google 65% then Yahoo and so on. Google is much stronger globally then in North America. Yahoo! Japan is huge (40%) but Google is not doing so bad, Yahoo is dropping 4.21% and Google is rising in market share over the years in Japan. China, Google is 57% and Baidu is 31%, then Yahoo at 8.25%, MSN then after (not know percentage, couldn't type that fast).

Bryan Segal from comScore qSearch. comScore is a panel based metric service, passively measured. They measure everything search related (organic, paid, and so on). 13.1 million canadians searched in Feb 2005, searching an average 39 times each. In terms of online ad dollars, Canada is 3.3%, compared to US at 6.8%. Search now consumes 40.8% of all online ad spend. Google has 60% share in Canada, MSN 17%, Yahoo! 16% and Ask at 4%. this has changed recently, where they saw Google share move to MSN's share (contradicting the other presenter). Searchers per day are higher on Google per search then the others. Searcher penetration (searchers/searches), Google 68.8%, Yahoo 37.1% and MSN 49.9%. US Search Seasonality, search likely the "anchor" of Internet use. Internet usage dips on seasons, as well as dollar spend but internet searches remains flat throughout all of the dips. Growth in Toolbar searches, a 136% growth in US, 58% installed a toolbar, and 12% uninstalled. Heavy users dominate search, 20% of users contribute 68% of volume. Searches are online buyers, non searchers are non buyers. 61% of consumers are aware of search based ads. Relevancy remains the main motivation switching search engines. People are willing to switch to a more "relevant search engine", and less ads. 92% of all purchased offline, 7% happen in a later session and 1% happen in same session. 85% of all search transactions are latent.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto at May 5, 2005 11:43 AM Comments (0)

Perfecting Paid Listings

Chris Sherman on this panel as the moderator, the speakers with him are Matt Van Wagner, Mat Kain, Yann Le Roux and Doug Bates (very nice guy, smart, and a forum participant). Basically, the reason I selected this session was because Doug Bates and also Matt Van Wagner. As Chris explains how the little green, yellow and red lights dictate the time they have remaining, I am writing this.

Matt Van Wagner was up first, he is from FineMeFaster. He said you will never actually perfect your paid listings, but you can get closer every day. He explains the concept of "connecting on longer phrases", where a large percentage were coming into their site on 3+ word phrases, but the majority of the words they were buying were 2 word phrases. So as you know, the longer and more specific the search term, the cheaper, the higher the CTR and higher conversion rates. The point he is making is to try to find longer keywords, by using the free tools (overture, google's keyword suggestion tool, and your web logs). He explained that his client sells BMWs but not motorcycles, so he put that in as a negative word and his costs go down and CTR goes up (less impressions). He expands on this concept and shows the he was able to save money using negative match. He then explains how Google and Overture Word differently; determining relevancy and positions, and content bidding. Google determines what matches are relevant, by CTR x CPC and closed bid bids influence position - but you have to make guesses. On Overture they do the same thing but they rank based only on CPC, they also have an "open bidding" system, your bid is exposed. Performance can vary by position; so its hard to say on a general level what rank to bid yourself into. He shows some of his excel spreadsheets. Overture/Yahoo gives you the ability to bid differently on Content versus Web search, Google does not. So what he does, is make two separate campaigns, one for content only and one for web search only. He sets his content bids low and search bids high. He also recommends to not use different naming conventions on Google versus Overture. What he does is on Google where they have campaign / adgroup, Car-Sport / BMW and names it the same way on Overture, Car-Sport-BMW. He showed how measuring conversions make a huge difference. Become process oriented to gain advantage, make improvements not changes, and plan, do, study and act.

Matt Kain from 24-7 Search, 247realmedia.com. He will focus on (a) "coverage", (b) "cost", (c) "yield", and (d) "optimization". (A) Keyword coverage, there are two related strategies; content to keyword and broad match refinement. Steps include; (1) Harvest "actual" search terms, (2) 1 Document = many keywords, (3) use source data for segmentation and creative templates and (4) feedback into P4P. Make sure to use negative matching and experiment a ton. They have an automated method to take 1 document and turn in 5 different keyword phrases ads to target those pages automatically. (B) Cost: It is important to look at the conversions of the keyword phrases, there are free tools to do this (Overture and Google have conversion tracking). He added that if you can also find a way to test different creatives and landing pages, that will further your campaign success. If you dont have enough data on a keyword phrase you can look at the conversion rate of the ad group, the specific product and the creatives to help you estimate the conversion rate of your specific keyword phrase, in a combination of the other 3 factors. This provides a "Weighted average of break even price per click". (C) Yield / Profit Management: Diminishing returns means spending more money will not always give positive results. Factors affecting yield; CPA, conversion rates, and so on. (D) Bid Optimization: Bid Gap Optimization, current rank is 2, test rank below and rank above for best ROI, finds the optimum gap (Rank 3). Also think about "Friendly bidding".

Yann Le Roux from Media Contacts, with a French accent. He will be basically talking about ROI tracking and bidding strategies. ROI Tracking: They have a proprietary data analysis platform, across all channels. They can data warehouse this data. Tips: Track ROI by individual keyword by engine, Track the true conversion value (deep traffic, sign ups, transactions, sales, rev) and understand and customize the post-click attribution window. Tracking online traffic, clicks or homepage traffic is not sufficient, when the web site is a brochure you need to use uniques or deep visitor measure (when you do not have sign ups or shopping). They combine different data sources and weigh them differently to build a better metric. Tracking online sales is very important. He also says its important to understand the "delay to action", [this is also called "latency reports" in most advanced analytics packages.] He will briefly not discuss some of the process of handling bid management. The process is far more important than the tools. Replicate the keyword selection across all engines to facilitate analysis and optimization. manage keywords separately by engine. Organize keywords into strategic categories, once you know they perform similarly. You aggregate conversion data across all engines and client, they put that information into one Excel spreadsheet and then plug in position, competitor bid, engine efficiency, value, keyword efficiency, ctr and cpc, and then send the data back to the campaign to optimize it for the future. Bid management tools: searchvision, bidbuddy, decidedna, atlas search, advertising.com and performics. There are pros to tools; keyword management is easier, single source of info for analysis and reporting and optimization is more frequent (1 - 6 hours). There are cons to tools; no tool does everything that we demand, optimization lagging begind human, and they still require considerable human involvement.

Last up is Doug Bates from Aderit Internet Marketing, he does a lot of PPC management. He will be going over a lot of the common things that are wrong with campaigns that he came in to fix. (1) Traffic must exist, no one is searching for the keywords you are bidding on. (2) Intense competition (room for ~8 players, 4-5 major ones). (3) Pricing & Margins (parity pricing or better / margins equal or greater). (4) Uniqueness (<5 direct competitors). (5) Credible, User Friendly Site (perfecting your site is as important as perfecting your PPC). Failure to Manage Bids; keywords have different values, ego bidding will kill you, track and act on historical profitability data, for any other purchase this big you'd have a purchasing agent. Keyword Research: Once and done keyword research, insiders can be too close to the subject, lots of people can't do good keyword research (lots of people bid on one word or so). Clients who did good research had these characteristics: large vocab, sales or direct marketing backgrounds, understand boolean logics, product experts, detailed oriented. The ones that did poor research were; average to lower computer and internet experience, minimal marketing background, minimal experience listening to customers, not detail oriented, prefer phone over emails (talkers not readers). No formal marketing economics; its not about a marketing budget, its about your marketing allowable. Marketing Allowable = (AOV * margin) - Fulfillment. Weak copywriting; for any other ad that you spent this much on, you'd hire a copywriter. Why is your marketing admin writing your PPC ads? Short text ads are deceptively simple to write. Ego copywriting: just because you think it's great doesn't mean it's good. No copy testing.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto at May 5, 2005 10:00 AM Comments (0)

Link Strategies 2005

Mike Grehan is moderating this session, and starts off with some jokes. He explains that they rolled the basic session into the advanced sessions. This is probably the 5th time I have seen him do the sticky note on the bottom of the chair trick...I wonder how many times he can get away with that. So basically, why should your page be the #1 result and not your competitor? Well, Search engines look at what other people say about your pages, and use that data to determine if you should rank well. He explains with his great, classic slides how direct and indirect edges work (linking pages together). Linkage data has two main algorithms; HITS versus PageRank. PageRank is keyword independent, HITS is keyword dependent. He then puts up his "GAS" slide, Google Anxiety Syndrome and you are suffering GAS. Mike moves on to explain the hubs and authorities concept. He then gives the top ten of linkage; (!) its quality over quantity, (2) anchor text and text around links are important, (3) use search engines to find link partners (the top 10, you want links from), (4) don't dilute content to multiple pages for same keyword, (5) affiliates can cause issues, sometimes (6) be choosy who you link to, (7) dont fake linkage data, (8) when asking for links, offer something of value, (9) link building is time consuming, should I automate it? (10) why waste time building a link directory, why not build content.

Next up was Keith Hogan from Ask Jeeves. He goes over some Ask Jeeves news, acquisition, and so on. He then moves onto the standard slides Ask uses to explain topic specific popularity. Sorry, more basics, not willing to type them out. He explains link building using directories, specifically showing ODP. He discusses that wikipedias are good places (but they do use the nofollow link tag). He shows the teoma resources area on the right side of the results pages. Should you buy or sell links? Ask Jeeves does not list directory pages highly, in general. Local search is big. He then puts up what to avoid. He did say, if you are going after "viagara" then try the tricks, otherwise do not.

Debra Mastaler from Alliance-Link was up next. Anchor text. All link building tactics use targeted anchor text to succeed, match your anchor text to the title/h1 and even the file names (she is a strong believer on file names). She uses Teoma to find authority sites, to get links from. When doing a link building campaign, try to emulate a natural link pattern (dont use the same anchor text over and over again, link in, link out within the community, secure links from a range of PR sites, avoid placing links in "typical ad spots"). It is doubtful that a page would get 5,000 links from the same site in no time, so don't do it if its not natural. How much cross linking between sites can you get away with? She said, cross link in moderation with a single rather then site wide links. The fastest, easiest, and safest way to get links is from a directory. She then discusses the topic of "Trust Links", so if someone bought something from you, ask them for a link, etc. Blog/RSS for link popularity is great.

Eric Ward is the last speaker for the day, the legend of link building. He brings up the amazon.com, then furniture.com, and so on. He has been doing this since 1993 and hasn't changed the way he works. He does believe that old links help, over new links. He explains hubs, authorities, and "quality links". What would the company your building links for tell you what a quality link is? He said he would prefer on topic links with good anchor text on pagerank 1 then off topic links with wrong anchor text from pr 8 sites. He said, don't ever let a search engine dictate your link building. He showed Teoma as a way to find new links, he also uses LinkSurvey, DMOZ categories (Google Directory lists it by PageRank), Yahoo Directory and so on. He said don't buy links for search engine reasons, but for marketing.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto at May 4, 2005 5:31 PM Comments (0)

Balancing Paid & Organic Listings

First up was Greg Jarboe from SEO-PR, he said the title of this session should be renamed to Balancing paid, organic, news, blog/feed, shopping and local listings. He asked the audience how many people are doing the optimization of the above, in that order listed above and less and less people rose their hands as he went down the list. 82% spent on paid placement but 25% of links chosen are sponsored, only 12% go to SEOs (organic). There is new research out that says that 25% of the people would click on paid listings, 69% would click on organic and 6% click on the other listings (news/local/pictues/etc). So why is 82% of the money going to 25% of the clicks? "Who seeks what in which channel from whom with what effects?" Who is doing the searching? What are they looking for? Whom are they looking for? And then what are the effects? WHO: Both the public & media use search engines to find information. 98% of journalists go online daily (92% for article research, 81% to do searching, 76% to find new sources/experts and 73% to find press releases). WHAT: Popular queries on Google vary from top Google News queries. "John Kerry" was not a big search at Google, but a huge search at Google News. Yahoo! news and Google News are the top search engines out there. WHOM: Eye tracking study found "golden triangle" above the fold, he showed Enqurio's tests released at SES NYC 05. EFFECTS: All of this is measurable, keywords, rankings, clicks, and conversion. SEMPO # out of 1,800 stories for keyword search engine marketing, in Google News. BTI blog ranks #3 out of 7,790,000 listings for small business voip. Verizon SuperPages.com release generated 3,229 clicks on one link, they tracked then conversions, and the ROI. Southwest Airlines sold $1.5 million in tickets with four press releases.

Jim Hedger at StepForth was next up, he said he is far more used to writing to you then speaking to you. There are free and paid listings. Organic listings is free for the taking. Jim brings up a Google snap shot of the result "search engine placement", I believe his site was number 4 in the organic, but he did not point it out. When you are looking at a result page that only list 10 results, you need to get your name out there, in the 10. Repetition is the key to success, advertising is about imprinting ideas. Even if a user doesn't click on your ad, if they see it, it will most likely be imprinted in your mind. You must understand where your ads will be placed (networks, content networks, gmail, etc.).

Mitch Joel, who I met in the speaker room, from Twist Image was next up. He said, he remember pre Google, and be progressed but nothing has changed much. He said, the reality is that we are overloaded (ads all over the place). He said there are too many choices. He said, we are all in a race to be #1 but they keep moving the finish line. He believes the church and state concept. Content is content, ads are ads. He said you need to create compelling content. Organic content; create content to a very specific landing page. Paid content; and same with paid. He said, if you give the user any other option then buying, then you give them an excuse not to buy. Always lead them to buy. What are there words; the types of people you market to. So how can you create this balance? Create ISO Standards for SEO. Know your basics (domain names, linking, and so on). He put up a picture of a little girl and a huge fat naked fat guy (i think I saw that fat guy when searching in Ask Jeeves Pictures for "ugly fat man"). You can have a unique voice by using a blog. Mitch's slides are extremely visual, a very unique method of presenting at SES, good stuff.

Finally, Joe Laratro from MoreVisibility is up with case studies. First Case is a B2C company, that sold adjustable beds. The web site goal is to generate internal leads (not sell online). Their conversion is to sign up on the site. They were getting about 50 leads per day. They did natural, xml, and ppc SEM strategies. They had a 10k upfront consulting fee, 20k of maintenance over the year, 6k for xml traffic, 720k on ppc. 5% of the total budget (756k) went to organic and 95% went to organic. Case Study Two is a B2B company that sells group ticket sales, and the conversion is a request information form. They were getting 100 leads per day, and they implemented a the same approach as above. They have a 15k upfront consulting fee, 20k maintenance, $2,800 xml traffic, 14k ppc, total 52k. 72% went to Organic the rest Paid. The natural results had the best conversion rate in his case study. XML was producing twice the number of conversion compared to PPC. But paid brought in the volume. Special considerations of natural SEO; initial costs, programming/design costs and ongoing work. Paid inclusion (XML); flat rate cpc, content approved by yahoo editors, 30% - 40% better ROI on average of clients with tracking. PPC; management costs - personnel or software, click fraud, volume, fast to implement. He broke his clients into aggressive, standard and low margin or ultra conservatives. Aggressive - 70% of their budget is sponsored listings. Standard - 50% of their budget is sponsored listings. Low margin - 10% of their budget is sponsored listings. "% out of 7 clicks are in the natural results section" - Marckini.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto at May 4, 2005 3:57 PM Comments (0)

Buying Search Engine Advertising

Dana Todd from SiteLab, also known as the girl who thinks Google is bad (see CNN article from yesterday). Danny Sullivan introduced her better then I, he said she is the veteran of Search Engine Advertising. She starts off by saying "Why wait for organic rankings?" It offers instant gratification, can be changed quickly, easy to rank. She goes over some of the history, i.e Overture being renamed into Yahoo! Search Marketing. She explains the distribution network of Yahoo/Overture and Google. She explains that Google AdWords is not only based on cost per click, but also click through rate. AOL uses Google's AdWords (right in the middle of the page), more prominently then Google, itself. The little players, tier two, are really no longer that little. There are 400+ PPC Networks like FindWhat and LookSmart. Ask Jeeves has a "branded response" sold on a CPM basis, and she loves it, try a jeeves search for "shop for flowers." Shopping search engines are doing well these days. Shopping.com, MySimon, Pricegrabber and so on. B2B and Vertical Search Engines, business.com. Tech specific from knowledgestorm, industry brains, etc. She shows Yellow Pages and Local Search, Yahoo! Local, Google Local, etc. PPC Issues; click costs are rising 10 - 25% or more per years. Some keyword marketplaces are overpriced, forcing advertisers out. Expensive and time consuming to manage - bid software helps, but you cant really just set it and forget it. Bid-wars with your affiliates, dealers or channel partners. Trademarks; very little or no protection. Very little control over which sites in the network display your link. Fraud does occur! competitors and network affiliate fraud. Paid links may be ignored by users who do not like to click on ads. Potentials of declining overall ROI in some categories - increasing prices + higher volume of clicks; potential for conversions to decrease or flat-line. How do I get started? (1) Dont start without a keyword strategy. (2) You need a credit card, mostly. (3) 10k per month gets you an assigned account manager on Overture. (4) Min bid between $0.05 - $0.10 per click. For CPM, promotional sponsorship and long term contracts, contact a media rep to negotiate and or design a campaign. She then briefly goes over keyword strategy. Get a competitor reports at EpicSky.com and adgooroo.com. Look at your organic log files. 2 - 3 word phrases may convert to a sale more frequently, and may costs less. Average gross profit x conversion rate is the break even CPC point. She also glances over isolating out keyword groups. Effective campaign tips; Repeat the exact search term within the ad title, pre-qulify clicks, adjust creative, use tracking system that does day parting and then do some A/B testing of landing pages and ads. She then explains 'bid-traps', which is a method for #2 who is bidding $2 to inflate the price per click for the #1 spot, who set a bid of $4. #2 can make their bid $3.99 to force #1 to pay $4.

Kevin Lee from Did-It was next up. Google, Yahoo, MSN, and AOL are the places you need to concentrate your efforts. At every instant throughout every day each bid can be only too high, too low or just right. There are many PPC budgets; (1) pure direct marketer, search budget is "carte blanche"; (2) fixed budget marketer, (3) cross media or hybrid marketing budget. The first mistake made by marketers when doing SEM is forgetting to think like their prospects. Second mistake is using the wrong success metric; think about immediate orders, lagged orders, and so on. Make sure to do your keyword research, go deep. Make sure to fine tune your creative, do it constantly. Do not send ALL your traffic to your homepage. Then make sure to test your landing pages. There is a major issue with setting daily budget caps, in that it randomly picks keywords not to show up, but in reality you want your best keywords to come up first. You must measure and manage granularly. Do not simply measure on average, break it out and look at specifics to improve your overall average. Do not neglect localized opportunities. Do not only use broad match in Google, be specific. Bidding emotionally is a bad idea, do not outbid out of spite. By avoiding those mistakes, you will realize great success.

Eric Morris from Google was next up. He starts off with the basics of Google AdWords. The Google network reaches over 80% of the US Internet Users, the network includes; Google search, Search partners (Ask, AOL, amazon), Contnet publishers (AdSense). Target a local audience with Google, he showed off some of AdWords targeting by location (by city, state, radius of address, or latitude or longitude). Writing effective ad text is very important (specific + relevant text = effective ads). It is important to then measure your results, he showed the built in reporting system (conversion tracking also). Test our assumptions for brand persona. He discussed the extension of the AdSense, image ads, flash ads, and so on. A beta tester, Chrysler, was able to segment 23 different demographics amongst 927 sites and serve up targeted ads on a CPM basis.

Last up is Erick Vadeboncoeur from NetWorldMedia, a Canadian. He said in Canada there are only 3 networks, and no 2nd tier. NetWorldMedia is one of the three. Share of searches in Canada by major search engine; Google 62%, MSN/Yahoo 27% and All other 12%. Share of searches in Quebec by major search engines; Google 59%, MSN/Yahoo 22%, NetWorldMedia 16% and others 3%. He kept it short, and did not repeat what others said.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto at May 4, 2005 2:13 PM Comments (0)

Organic Listings Forum

I figured I check this out again, since some new people are on the panel. He introduced everyone, Mike Grehan, Rand Fishkin SEOMoz, Mikkel Svendsen, Alan K'necht and Greg Jarboe.

Mike Grehan was up first; and he started up wit his background where he was raised in a village and trained in the fine art of mystical SEO. Wish I taped that 1 minute introduction. Rand Fishkin discussed how his tools were banned but they had a work around. Mikkel introd himself as the dynamic and dark side of SEO. Alan K'necht from Toronto, an SEO company from Canada. Greg Jarboe from SEO-PR, he said all SEO PR's are all dark, he was joking but he said he uses all "white hat techniques" and borrowed Bruce Clay's code.

Q: What is the best way to handle subscription content, paid content?
A: Show a sample of the content, an abstract. Mikkel adds there are other solutions but they get more risky and complex (i.e. allowing spiders only, only allowing bots in for 2 weeks). People added that if the content is quality enough, like NY Times then it is accepted to ask people to register, it can be annoying but some sites can get away with it.

Q: GoPros.ca (or gopro.ca) has hundreds of domain names, it is a directory site, with keyword based URLs, and then pages are redirected back to the main URL. It ranks very well.
A: Mikkel said he has seen cases like this and it can be banned, and if it is banned, it will be very hard to get back. You should probably put all the content on the single domain name, 301 the rest to the landing page, and it should continue to rank well in time. It will help with link building to link to one domain name, instead of many. Mike adds that buy linking between these hundreds of domain names, its much like a link network, and gopros.ca is much like that. Mikkel then got upset that someone can ruin these great generic domain names, "ruin" in get them banned forever.

Q: RSS feeds and how can I use it to help?
A: Greg answers that its big now and will be huge soon. Greg says its easy to add RSS feeds. But what people do not think about is that they take their content and syndicate it. He said if you don't think about optimizing that content you are syndicating, then your making a mistake. Mikkel adds an other reason to use RSS is that (1) there is a cool factor with RSS, (2) there are quality directories of RSS feeds and those are nice links back to your site, (3) from a distribution standpoint, it is great. Rand explains more about RSS. Mike adds that you can easily build a resource section and use other people's content, the abstract in almost real time, which links back to the source.

Q: What do I do if I have a USA, Canadian, French, etc. version of my Web site? How do I handle it?
A: Many recommended doing IP redirection based on user location. Many sites ask you to select your location or enter a zip code and this is bad.

Q: I did a search on "Montreal Web Design" or something like that, and the #1 ranking was by a site that "harvested" a .edu site and pointed links to its site. Should I do this?
A: Everyone said no. Google and other engines will pick up on it. Rand threw me a plug about my quick chat with Matt Cutts from Google about Google not becoming a register to register domain names. Short term it will work, but long term - no one would do it.

They then went off on a tangent about PageRank being a hoax, in other words.

Q: Submitting your site to an Add URL page.
A: Mikkel gave this awesome analogy. He used to work in a records company and people used to send in demo tapes, which the company kept in a hug box. Then at the company annual party, they used to randomly pick demo tapes to play at the party and laugh at them. That is what the search engines do with your submitted pages. :)

Q: My old content is being ranked above my old content, what do I do?
A: Point more links to the new content, and also link from old content to the new content, use RSS to help, press releases, and so on.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto at May 4, 2005 12:10 PM Comments (0)

Cleaning Up Spam & Other Messes

Shari Thurow from Grantastic Design was first up and she said that big sites with big money can and do get banned from the engines for spamming. MedicineNet.com (A WebMD company) came to Shari about their site. The symptoms included that in August 2002, the entire Web site disappeared from Google's index. Only listing that appeared were from ODP. And recently they hired a SEM firm. They then checked the site to determine if there are technical reasons preventing the indexing/crawling of the site. Does it need more lead time after the redesign, robot txt and so on. She explains that lots of people mix up being indexed and ranked; you can not rank, but still be indexed. She then showed the site:www.domain.com command, if you are indexed, you will show up. She said also use the link: command to check if your banned, but do not rely on the PageRank. Also do not rely on the tools to check links, go to the engines manually to check ban status. She then listed out the 19 types of spam she identified./ Hidden text, hidden links, The treatment; all mirror domains should have a 301 redirect to a single domain name, you wish to promote, permanently. Stop all links to and from FFA sites and they did a lit of PPC purchasing. After they fixed all the issues, they sent an email to Google to beg them to let them in. Funny, she skipped over slides about reporting spam; she was about to give a reason, looked up at the audience and then decided not to say why. I guess Greg Boser (WebGuerilla) got to her. :) She says that you should resubmit to the engine, review pages, keep checking Google. Generally, she says that a site can get in trouble, when you hire multiple SEOs to work on your site. Red flag names are; doorway pages, hallway pages, envelop pages, mini sites, satellite sites, directory information pages (DIP), SEE pages, advertising pages, instant link popularity, permanent positions, guaranteed positions, and so on. Shari openly admits that she goes after her client's competitors who are spamming and she does her best to boot them.

Anne Kennedy from Beyond Ink was next up and she is from Maine, which she called "occupied Canada." She goes over the common sense of SEO. She pulls up a slide named "Guidelines, not games" where she goes over the concept of building your pages for humans and not search engines. She said, "learn what looks funny", like multiple Google results, unfamiliar domains pointing to your site, mirror sites and so on. She showed an example on a Google search at "Inn at Oceans Edge" and showed a result with a url that had the #2 in it, then she viewed the cache of the page and it showed up as blank, it was basically a doorway page, old school spam. She is annoyed that this stuff still works in Google. It is also important to Avoid the appearance of spam, i.e. multiple domains with different links to search. She brought up an example of Lifelinesys.com, they used to have a second site with same content but different URL (domain name alias). They realized that the spider was confused, the home page used a client side redirect from the root level domain to a subdomain, links from other sites to multiple domain names, and many dead end page not found errors. The solution was to choose one domain and link all internal pages to the main site. They did a 301 redirect at the server level for the old domain names. Mirror sites appear to be spam, avoid that stuff. Vendors to watch out for, and she covered some of the same "red flags" as Shari. She says go to SEW's sites or SEOConsultants.com to find good vendors.

Matt Bailey from The Karcher Group was the last one up. Client concerns after being with bad SEOs, they paid 3 other agencies, and they wanted to give up. They looked at the Web site and said they will fix the site and if it works, then you can pay us what is fair. (Cool offer) Warning signs include; search engine referrals dropped drastically, no referrals form Google in 4 months, back links dropped off search month, and overall reporting dropped, poor rankings out of the gate, drastic drop in PR (from 4 - 1, he went on to explain why Shari doesn't like it), loss of pages reported by Google search month and could only find Web site by URL search. Finding included were (1) Doorway pages hidden within a 100% frameset - generated by software and (2) a 1x1 clear gif GIF links to additional doorway pages, placed by a 2nd SEO company. Treatment; clean up the code. You need to know HTML, JS, CSS, robot.txt, examine eery page and match the code with every element on and off the page. And get rid of the doorways - offending tactics. They then sent the apology email to Google and pointed the finger to the firms that caused the problems. He went over some of the names of the tools they used to diagnose the site; lynx.browser.org, home.snafu.de/tilman, dreamweaver mx, coffee cup, webbug http viewer, google cache, log files (urchin, click tracks, web trends) and finally look at all the include files. Then he goes into Traffic Power; 1p.com and so on. He said they just called him yesterday as a sales pitch, he informed them that he will be talking about them at SES. The BBB has a whole claim against them. What did Google not like? (1) JavaScript Mouseover redirect, (2) Within doorway pages, they linked to other TP clients, (3) they created pages for engines and not users, (4) link address resolved to another location (5) page loading graphic when mouse is not on the page and (6) /domain.com_friends.html. He then says that usually the problem is not spam, first step, do not panic. Then check the robot.txt, then look at your navigation (is it SE friendly), https issues (duplicate content), htaccess (keep everyone out), session IDs are a huge issues and site changes/design changes.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto at May 4, 2005 10:12 AM Comments (2)

Urchin Price Drop & Google API Integration

Just got to Toronto now, but I had to post this Urchin/Google release...

As you recall, Google announced it agreed to acquire Urchin Software Corporation on March 28, 2005.

http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/urchin.html

Today, Google is dropping the price of Urchin On Demand, Google's comprehensive marketing intelligence and web analytics service, making it affordable for all sites large and small. This service, provides web site owners and advertisers data to enhance their user's experience and increase advertising return on investment (ROI).

Starting today, Urchin On Demand from Google, is now reduced to $199 per month, a 60 percent drop from the previous cost of $495 per month. With Urchin, Google is helping more website owners learn how users interact with their site. The knowledge provided by Urchin can benefit anyone with a website by enabling them to enhance the experience users will have on their site. Advertisers using any online ad medium can gain a better understanding of visitor preferences, optimize online marketing campaigns and redesign website content to maximize conversions.

Specific benefits of Urchin On Demand:
. Better Intelligence: Urchin helps site owners and advertisers understand how visitors find, navigate and convert on their websites.

. Higher Conversions: Urchin tracks visitors from all online sources including search engines, natural links, and any variety of paid advertising campaigns such as paid banners, keywords, emails, etc.

. Actionable Data: The service provides many reports designed to help users visualize their data and take quick action including: Funnel Analysis, Website Overlays, GeoTargeting, Ecommerce Reporting, Campaign Comparisons, Keywords Suggestion Tools, and much more.

The $199 per month Urchin On Demand also now includes report profiles for up to fifty individual websites (Urchin's previous offering included reporting for only one site). The price includes up to 100,000 pageviews per month. Users can add one million more pageviews for only $99 more per month.

In addition to the reduced price and increased number of profiles, Urchin On Demand is now able to import -pay--per-click costs directly from Google AdWords accounts. This data will simplify a user's ability to analyze the ROI of their online campaigns. This is the first integration of Google services with the Urchin platform. More information, including a 15-day free trial of Urchin On Demand, can be found on the new Urchin from Google website at www.urchin.com.

posted rustybrick in Tracking & Conversion Measurements at May 3, 2005 9:48 PM Comments (0)

Quick Tiger Spotlight Review

Yesterday, I installed Tiger and the process went pretty well. Skipping over all of the other OS related topics, let's quickly discuss Spotlight, Apple's new OS Search technology.

After installing Tiger, and restarting, Apple started to index the contents of my harddrive behind the scenes. It really did not slow down other tasks I was performing at the time, so that was nice. After conducting a few searches, I was disappointed with the speed. Don't get me wrong, it is a hell of a lot faster then Apple's previous seach, but I was expecting more based on the reviews. I am using a G4 1.25GhZ PowerBook with 1GB RAM. I will test this on several other macs, including Dual Proc G4s, other PowerBooks and iBooks. But I think it should be snappier.

My biggest disappointment is that it does not search Microsoft Entourage, my default email client. This was expected, "Microsoft says Word, Excel, and PowerPoint documents will appear in Spotlight searches (but not Entourage, due to the way the e-mail client was built)." MacWorld has a great write up on Spotlight, better then I can do at this time. Leaving for Toronto SES now.

posted rustybrick in Other Search Engines at May 3, 2005 11:24 AM Comments (0)

The Search Engine Relevancy Challenge Live: RustySearch

A few weeks ago, I proposed the idea of The Search Engine Relevancy Challenge: Pepsi vs. Coke. In this challenge, I proposed building a "white labeled" search engine, that randomly selected results from one of the top four engines and asked you to rate the search engine results, individually, from one to five. Well, we have built the white label search engine.

Officially, this is being released tomorrow, but I wanted you guys to get to it first. There is more information at the official, The Search Engine Relevancy Challenge. I named the white labeled engine RustySearch and it works as follows:

1. Go to RustySearch (will open in new window)
2. Enter a search phrase and click search
3. Click on the title, the URL or the "rate this result" link. The site will open up in a framed window, so do not open the result in a new window.
4. At the top, there is a frame that says, "Rate the relevancy of this Web page for 'search phrase here'". Rate the result from one to five, one meaning a very poor relevancy and five meaning an excellent relevancy.
5. After you click a radio option, it should read, "Thanks for your input! Your vote (and many others) will decide who, really, is the search engine king!"
6. Then click on the button to take you back to the results
7. Continue on by rating the next result on that page, or search on a different result.
8. Repeat...

It is close to impossible to make everyone happy with a study on relevancy. Please try not to search on terms you are looking to rank well for. Search on terms when you have a information search need, outside of rank checking. This way, you can really test the relevancy as an end user and not an SEO.

I am off to Toronto SES, speak to you all tomorrow!

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at May 3, 2005 8:35 AM Comments (5)

Tiger Here

Update on Apple Tiger. Posting will be slow today, since I will be playing with Tiger and doing other work. I will update you with its search features as soon as I have time to play with it.

Thanks.

posted rustybrick in Other Search Engines at May 2, 2005 12:51 PM Comments (0)

Case of the URL & File Name

Moderator Egol pointed me to an excellent SEO Chat thread named URL Casing. The question is, if I had a domain name such as www.bigbluepineapplechair.com and you wanted to tell people to go to www.BigBluePineappleChair.com to make it easier to read, then would that affect your link building campaign?

Member, 2K replies to the thread with an excellent answer:

Cases do matter... The problem is that for IIS/Microsoft platform url's point the same place despite their casing. In Posix-world (UNIX,LINUX,BSD etc) url's are always case sensitive - ie. page.htm and Page.htm are physicly different files. IMO the latter is also they way RFFC-standards treat URL's.



Google and other SE's use mainly the latter. So if you have links to pageX with mixed casing (ie. pageX.htm, PageX.htm,pagex.htm etc) you are looking for troubles like

a) duplicate pages problem

b) pr flow/Internal linking structure problem (same page showing various PR with different casing)



I know this because we had a situation related to this about a year ago. Things might have changed in the way, but I'm not willing to test my luck



Domain names however can be a totally different story, because they are officially in small caps format, everything else is fiction/spelling mistakes made by users.

My understanding is that the domain name upper or lowercase will not matter. Most browsers automatically convert a domain name, subdomain name and tld to the lowercase version. In addition, you can't buy different cases of the same domain name. Having a link to a www versus non www version of a domain name, should affect your link building. So try to ask them all to point to the www version, or be consistent. Also, 301 redirect the non www to the www or visa versa. What about the file names? Well, its best to be careful with that and be consistent. I personally keep all my file names lowercase. As member Linux98 says, " Finally, your Path is case sensitive (domain.com/Path/To/File <> domain.com/path/to/file). Google would not lower case this element before inserting into its database because it will cause problems on a regular *nix server as pointed out above."

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at May 2, 2005 10:20 AM Comments (1)

SES Toronto 2005

Tomorrow I leave for the SES Toronto 2005 show. As always, I will be providing comprehensive coverage of the sessions I attend. I will make a larger effort to add more detail, as to what is going on behind the scenes, when I am "on the record."

If there are any sessions you would like me to attend, please comment here. The session overview can be viewed here. In addition, if there are any people you would like me to direct specific questions at, let me know.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2005 Toronto at May 2, 2005 9:33 AM Comments (0)

Premium Sponsors + advertise

To subscribe to the Search Engine Roundtable, click here