Is There a Recent Big Brand Bias at Google Search?
There is an interesting thread at WebmasterWorld that Google may be biased towards showing more and more "big brands" in the top Google web search results.
Yea, yea - big brands have more links, more trust, more pages and bigger budgets to rank better. We all know that. But some are speculating that this month, more than any other month, there was a spike in how Google ranks these big brands.
Tedster, WebmasterWorld's administration, goes as far to possibly imply, and I quote, "Eric Schmidt made some comments that brands were more important."
The question is how would Google do this?
- Manually?
- Using social media metrics
- Linkage data
- Something else
There is a lot of speculation and concern in that thread right now.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Update: Aaron Wall from SEO Book wrote more details, with examples, of this claim. Pretty enlightening, if I must say, so take a look at Aaron's post.
Like The Story? Vote For It On Yahoo Buzz! Or On Sphinn!
rustybrick in Google Search Engine at February 23, 2009 8:35 AM
Comments (6)

Comments
You've got to think what makes a brand, its a name or something very recognisable.
A brand is always going to have a large volume of highly relevant link text coming back to the site - just by the nature of it.
I'd have thought that if Google modified the importance/weight of the link text, it'd have the effect of boosting brands naturally due to link text theme?
Posted by Al at February 23, 2009 09:24