The Human Equation: Giving Back Internet Style
Moderator:
Greg Jarboe, President and Co-Founder, SEO-PR
Speakers:
Darian Rodriquez Heyman, Executive Director, Craigslist Foundation
Ben Rattray, Founder & CEO, Change.org
Nan Dawkins, Founder, RedBoots Digital, Serengeti Communications
Darian Rodriquez Heyman
They take the name and spirit of Craiglist into the community sector via online and in person. They have a non-profit bootcamp. Work with over 150 partner organizations. Calling their new project “entry point” which is a redesign to their website that launches in January.
Traditionally it was about push but now it’s turning into push back. Its more than receiving information and pulling what I want but now it’s about giving back like youtube for example.
Ben Rattray
$220 billion given by individuals in 2006
$50 billion spent on fundraising
Can the internet change this?
The aim was to make it easier than ever to give
Donation portals
Nonprofit websites
But unrealized expectations
Only 3% of current giving is online
Why?
Donations are not like commerce
* People don’t go around looking to donate
* People need to be asked
Failed to address core problems
* Impersonal
* No idea about quality of organization
* No idea where money goes
* No sense of impact
* Not treated as valued member of community
Overcoming barriers to giving
* Peer-to-peer connections
* Personalized communication to donors (unique advantage in terms of having evangelists to communicate for them)
* Collective action & magnified impact
* Status of Web 2.0 Adoption
* Many organizations excited & dedicating resources
* Focused primarily on MySpace and Facebook
* The bottom line: budding interest, but not fully embraced
Future
* Deep Integration - Building communities around organizations
Most of the donors aren’t on the Myspace and Facebook’s but the problem is that it’s hard to build a discreet community on a single organization. Its important to find an in between where non-profits can brand, capture data, and directly communicate with their supporters through one space. Branding is very important in doing so (Flickr, Yelp etc..)
You need a sufficient amount of content and a large user-base in order to bring people back. That makes building your own social network tough. It's worse to build a social network for your brand that has little to no activity for your brand than to have none at all. Start out by using Facebook and sites that are already out there.
Nan Dawkins
Early Web 1.0 non profit sites just told people its all about me.
Nonprofits and web 1.5 got people more involved to take an action.
They are using social media channels to drive people to do the same things as before (donate, take action) so its still all about me as an organization telling you what to do.
People are now creating content and pushing causes with absolutely no affiliation or organization. Woman raised $2 million dollars off 1 YouTube video and blog (ironmatt.org)
When you have a social network that is based loosely around your cause they tend to work well but the narrower you get, the tougher it becomes.
In a web 2.0 world:
Companies no longer own their brands
NPO’s no longer own the cause
No longer control the message
.... Its really a partnership now
* You are no in control of the message
* The cause comes before the brand
* Focus on creating/facilitating evangelists (not just donors)
* Pay Attention: What interests them, what motivations them, what are they doing because they want to?
* Help Them
Can I use Web 2.0 for fundraising?
You can but you’re only focusing on the tip of the iceberg.
Contributed by: Justin Davy is a search engine marketing specialist for the E.W. Scripps Company and a guest writer for SER.
Like The Story? Vote For It On Yahoo Buzz! Or On Sphinn!
rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2007 Chicago at December 3, 2007 12:26 PM
Comments (0)
