Is a Great Design A Sure-Shot Way for Links?

Oct 20, 2008 - 7:27 am 2 by
Filed Under Link Building

What would you prefer:

* A pretty website that has no content * An ugly website that has a lot of content

If you were building links, which kind of site would you prefer to link to? In a WebmasterWorld discussion, it seems that appearances may not matter. A "nice clean" look may be fine, though.

Some disagree and believe that aesthetically pleasing sites are likely to be linked more than other sites. Most people do not feel that this sentiment is appropriate -- the content is really the most important thing for link-building, according to many webmasters. Of course, it depends on the niche, but people want informative content. Think about Wikipedia, for example. Is it "pretty?" Nope -- it's clean and neat -- but it has a lot of content that many people are looking for.

Forum discussion continues at WebmasterWorld.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: January 2, 2026

Jan 2, 2026 - 10:00 am
Search Video Recaps

Search News Buzz Video Recap: Google December Core Update Done, News Publishers Hit Hard, Frankenstein AI Recipe Horror & Happy New Year

Jan 2, 2026 - 8:01 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Some News Publishers Saw Big Declines With The Google Core Update

Jan 2, 2026 - 7:51 am
Search News

(John) Mueller Report Of SEO Memes (2025 Edition)

Jan 2, 2026 - 7:41 am
Google

Google Search Tests Blue Send Button In Query Box

Jan 2, 2026 - 7:31 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google: Why 404s Don't Matter For SEO

Jan 2, 2026 - 7:21 am
 
Previous Story: Daily Search Forum Recap: October 17, 2008