Is a Great Design A Sure-Shot Way for Links?

Oct 20, 2008 - 7:27 am 2 by
Filed Under Link Building

What would you prefer:

* A pretty website that has no content * An ugly website that has a lot of content

If you were building links, which kind of site would you prefer to link to? In a WebmasterWorld discussion, it seems that appearances may not matter. A "nice clean" look may be fine, though.

Some disagree and believe that aesthetically pleasing sites are likely to be linked more than other sites. Most people do not feel that this sentiment is appropriate -- the content is really the most important thing for link-building, according to many webmasters. Of course, it depends on the niche, but people want informative content. Think about Wikipedia, for example. Is it "pretty?" Nope -- it's clean and neat -- but it has a lot of content that many people are looking for.

Forum discussion continues at WebmasterWorld.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Google Search Volatility

More Details

Search Video Recaps

 
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: July 2, 2026

Jul 2, 2026 - 10:00 am
Google Ads

Google Ads Makes Changes To Bidding For Campaigns Limited By Budget

Jul 2, 2026 - 7:58 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

July 2026 Google Webmaster Report

Jul 2, 2026 - 7:51 am
Bing SEO

Bing Webmaster Tools Backfilled Data For AI Performance Reports On June 1st

Jul 2, 2026 - 7:41 am
Google Ads

Google Ads Updates All Campaigns Drop Down

Jul 2, 2026 - 7:31 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google Sends Searchers To Site-Hosted AMP Pages Instead Of Cached Page

Jul 2, 2026 - 7:21 am
 
Previous Story: Daily Search Forum Recap: October 17, 2008