Is a Great Design A Sure-Shot Way for Links?

Oct 20, 2008 - 7:27 am 2 by
Filed Under Link Building

What would you prefer:

* A pretty website that has no content * An ugly website that has a lot of content

If you were building links, which kind of site would you prefer to link to? In a WebmasterWorld discussion, it seems that appearances may not matter. A "nice clean" look may be fine, though.

Some disagree and believe that aesthetically pleasing sites are likely to be linked more than other sites. Most people do not feel that this sentiment is appropriate -- the content is really the most important thing for link-building, according to many webmasters. Of course, it depends on the niche, but people want informative content. Think about Wikipedia, for example. Is it "pretty?" Nope -- it's clean and neat -- but it has a lot of content that many people are looking for.

Forum discussion continues at WebmasterWorld.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: November 3, 2025

Nov 3, 2025 - 10:00 am
Google

Google & Bing Are Indexing Grokipedia - AI Generated Wikipedia / Encyclopedia

Nov 3, 2025 - 7:51 am
Google Ads

The New Google Search Ad Layout Is Causing Accidental Clicks

Nov 3, 2025 - 7:41 am
Misc Google

Reddit: Search Traffic Flat, AI Not Traffic Driver & 50% Of Traffic Is From Google

Nov 3, 2025 - 7:32 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google PSA: Verify Your Hosted Cloud Provider Host In Search Console

Nov 3, 2025 - 7:31 am
Google News

Publishers Say Google Used Their Data to Cheat Them, Raptive Lawsuit

Nov 3, 2025 - 7:21 am
 
Previous Story: Daily Search Forum Recap: October 17, 2008