Will Google AdSense be Impacted by the Dell Lawsuit?

Nov 30, 2007 • 10:04 am | comments (7) by twitter | Filed Under Google AdSense
 

A Washington Post article refers to a recent lawsuit between Dell and a number of domain registrars who are cybersquatting on misspellings of Dell's various domains so that they can profit off PPC ads.

This has been a problem for quite some time. WebmasterWorld members wonder if this suit will impact Google AdSense's domain parking advertising programs.

It could, and some folks hope that it does since they're similar victims and also suffer the typosquatting fate. Forum members hope that Google will be the ones who are held responsible (but don't count on it since Google is huge). As one member puts it:

Google is guilty as charged. They aided and abbetted the whole scam by allowing it to be monetized.

A simple fact: Google could have prevented this whole dirty business by prohibiting ads from being displayed on domains that were less than five days old. A very simple and elegant solution. They, quite frankly, deserve to get fried for their complicity in the whole affair. I am sick and tired of Google and their 'partners' raking it in on my trademarks just because I don't have the resources to play wack-a-mole at $2000.00 per shot.

Go Dell.

This is a good point indeed. Why should domain tasters profit?

Forum discussion continues at WebmasterWorld.

Previous story: Lost? Google Mobile Phone Locator Will Find You
 

Comments:

Peter

11/30/2007 03:49 pm

I agree 100% about the sentiments of domain tasting. I am 100% against tasters for 2 reasons. 1) Massive amount of domains are being taken up for no value content 2) Their methods of finding domain names is questionable. Peoples whois searches and domain registration attempts should not be available for someone else to use and profit over. However I do not believe Google should be held liable for thios behaviour. Granted they could (and should) bring in rules to state that domains under x amount of days old cannot have advertising on them. But what would stop the taster using a different company instead?

Rob

11/30/2007 06:49 pm

I could not possibly disagree more, and it has nothing to do with the fact that I manage several domain portfolios (though tasting isn't involved in any). I dislike the practice of domain tasting as much as the next guy. But to suggest that somehow Google is responsible for putting a stop to it is a ridiculous position to take. Google does not govern the domain name industry and they are not responsible for protecting the trademarks of the world. If someone else has a typo of your name that is raking in so much traffic that it's actually costing you business, then you can chalk that and the "$2000 per shot" up to your own lack of foresight coupled with the cost of doing business. It's 2007 -- if you're waiting for someone else to cover your rear end for you, and you're going to get burnt.

naresh

07/09/2010 03:36 pm

my name naresh my mobile no. 9179753502 mobile lg gd510

jigar

09/26/2010 08:25 am

iemi no:355718024337782 iwant be this mobile any one find this mobile plz contact this no:8000538852

jaswant singh loiya

06/09/2011 01:18 pm

emi no 356930035162187 my mobail no is 9582452376 plz find this phone

SSURENDRANATH

10/15/2011 01:42 pm

HELLO MY MOBILE WAS LOST IMEI NO-353378034875156 IMEI NO2-353405035090152 IF IT IS FOUND PLS CAL BACK TO THIS 9618308008

CHAITHUBANDARLA

11/06/2011 08:56 am

my mobile number is  9866542333                                                                                                                                          IMEI NO - 910535606558116                                                                                                                                                      IMEI NO-  91053607068115                                                                                                                                                        IF YOU GOT IT PLEASE CONTACT 9502624505            8008364802

blog comments powered by Disqus