Daily Search Forum Recap: February 12, 2009 | Main | Google Drops Audio/Radio Ads, Some Advertisers Care

Webmasters Skeptical But Loving New Canonical Search Engine Tag

Yesterday, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft announced together a new way to handle internal duplicate content issues with a new "canonical" header tag. Vanessa Fox does an excellent job explaining what it is all about in her piece at Search Engine Land.

So for all duplicate pages, you insert this tag in the header elements of those pages, specifying the main URL. The tag looks like this:

<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/true-url.html" />

Google, Yahoo and Microsoft have detailed explanations of how they work.

Three main things:

(1) This works only internally, not across domains.
(2) Treat this like you would a 301 redirect, so be careful
(3) Search engines consider this a "hint" and do not have to abide by it (just yet)

Outside of that, there is good recaps on this at Techmeme.

We have a ton of Q&A on this from our live coverage of the Ask the Search Engines panel from SMX West. I am sure your questions are answered in that panel or in the discussions below.

This tag can be confusing, because it is new. But after webmasters begin to understand where, if and how to use it, they are more likely to love it.

JohnMu said in a forum post:

Here are some examples where this could be used: - Web-shops (mutliple URLs depending on how you got to a page) - Sites that work with Session-IDs within the URL - Ad-tracking URLs (eg using AdWords + Analytics) - Affiliate tracking URLs - News sites with multiple URLs per article - Forums with multiple URLs per thread/page (eg "&highlight=", etc)

Plus, Yoast already posted plugins to support this for Wordpress, Magento and Drupal.

Forum discussion Google Webmaster Help, Cre8asite Forums, WebmasterWorld and Sphinn.



Like The Story? Vote For It On Yahoo Buzz! Or On Sphinn!

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at February 13, 2009 9:25 AM Comments (6)

Comments

Very useful for the larger websites I manage, always suffering dupe content issues due to search and archive parameters, this should really help, can't wait to see it tried and tested to see its effect.

 

That's all well and good but it does nothing for the amount of simply unusable and unreliable content that is out there. I am still curious to see how someone can find a middle ground between human powered and mathematical search to provide some sort of filtering based on knowledge and experience. The only reliable start I have seen so far has been sweetsearch.com

 

Barrie Adams, the only thing I'd add is to take it slow at first (e.g. try it on just one site, or part of a site) to make sure you fully understand the tag and if it works for you the way you want it to. But I'm pretty excited. :)

 

The time will prove it, anyone knows if a html-document is still valid with this tag?

 

Hi Dietmar, yes, documents will remain valid with this additional link element (provided you use the appropriate XHTML/HTML version). Search engines will generally not care which version (XHTML/HTML) you use so it's fine if you accidentally use the other version on your pages.

 

@ Matt Cutts - thanks, I am waiting for someone else to do the testing! I will implement fully once I have feedback RE its effect, though I'm tempted to try it out on a drupal site, Joost de Valk has released a plugin for it.

 

Post a comment (Note: Can Take 120 Seconds For Your Comment To Show Up)

Do you want us to save your personal Information?

Premium Sponsors + advertise

To subscribe to the Search Engine Roundtable, click here