Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Follow

Search Video Recaps

 
Google Search Ranking Volatility, Site Reputation Abuse Enforcement & Pichai On Search Quality - YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: May 10, 2024

May 10, 2024 - 4:00 pm
Search Video Recaps

Search News Buzz Video Recap: Google Search Ranking Volatility, Site Reputation Abuse Enforcement, Pichai On Search Quality, HCU Recovery & More

May 10, 2024 - 8:01 am
Bing Search

Mikhail Parakhin No Longer Working On Copilot At Microsoft

May 10, 2024 - 7:51 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google: Site Reputation Abuse Isn't About Linking

May 10, 2024 - 7:41 am
Google Maps

Google Local Panel With Owner Attribute

May 10, 2024 - 7:31 am
Google Ads

Google: Proximity Not A Relevancy Factor For Local Service Ads

May 10, 2024 - 7:21 am
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good