Competitors Spamming? Google Says Report Them

May 23, 2012 • 8:52 am | comments (8) by twitter Google+ | Filed Under Search & Web SEO Spam
 

pointing fingersMatt Cutts of Google published a video on what to do if your competitors are spamming Google and benefiting from it.

Matt Cutts talks about the various ways to report spam to Google.

He also says that webspam doesn't last forever and algorithm updates like Panda, Penguin and so on are examples of updates that tackle these issues. He also said Google takes manual action of spam reports when needed.

The good part of this video is that if you have a client who is complaining their competitor is ranking above you and you know they are spamming - you can show it to your client and say, which route do you want to go. Short term gain or long term plan.

Here is the video:

Yea, of course Google wants you to to report spam to them.

Here is the transcript:

0:00 Today's question comes from Hood River, where lisawilliams
0:04 wants to know, "White hat search marketers read and
0:07 follow Google guidelines.
0:09 What should they tell clients whose competitors use black
0:11 hat techniques such as doorway pages and whom continue to
0:15 rank as a result of those techniques?"
0:17 So first and foremost, I would say do a spam report.
0:20 Because if you're violating Google's guidelines in terms
0:22 of cloaking or sneaky JavaScript redirects, buying
0:25 links, doorway pages, keyword stuffing, all those kinds of
0:28 things, we do want to know about it.
0:30 So you can do a spam report.
0:32 That's private.
0:33 You can also stop by Google's Webmaster forum, and that's
0:36 more public.
0:37 But you can do a spam report there.
0:39 You can sort of say, hey, I saw this content.
0:41 It seems like it's ranking higher than
0:42 it should be ranking.
0:44 Here's a real business, and it's being outranked by this
0:46 spammer, those kinds of things.
0:48 There are people who keep an eye on that forum, not just
0:51 Google employees, but also sort of
0:52 superusers or bionic posters.
0:55 And they can also pass those reports on.
0:57 So there are a lot of different ways to report
0:59 specific incidents of spam.
1:01 The other thing that I would say is if you look at the
1:03 history of which businesses have done well over time,
1:07 you'll find the sorts of sites and the sorts of businesses
1:10 that are built to stand the test of time.
1:14 If someone is using a technique that is a gimmick or
1:19 something that's like the SEO fad of the day, that's a
1:22 little less likely to really work well a
1:24 few years from now.
1:25 So a lot of the times, you'll see people just chasing after,
1:28 OK, I'm going to use guest books, or I'm going to use
1:30 link wheels or whatever.
1:32 And then they find, oh, that stopped working as well.
1:34 And sometimes it's because of broad algorithmic
1:36 changes like Panda.
1:38 Sometimes it's because of specific web spam targeted
1:41 algorithms. But it can also be the case that we can crack
1:45 down on even large companies.
1:47 If you go back and look at the New York Times articles about
1:51 JC Penney or Overstock, we're willing to take action on
1:54 anything that we consider to be a violation of our
1:56 guidelines.
1:57 So my short answer is go ahead and do a spam report.
2:00 You can also report it in the forums. But it's definitely
2:03 the case that if you're taking those higher risks, that can
2:07 come back and bite you.
2:08 And that can have a material impact.
2:10 So I would recommend that people avoid going with the
2:13 black hat techniques.
2:15 And we're happy to hear, we're happy to get feedback either
2:17 at conferences, on Twitter, online, blogs, forums, if
2:21 you're seeing sites that are prospering and are using black
2:24 hat techniques.
2:25 Now, it's possible that they have some low-quality links,
2:27 and there are some links that people aren't aware of that we
2:30 see that are actually high quality.
2:32 But we're happy to get spam reports.
2:33 We're happy to dig into them.
2:35 And then we'll try to find either new algorithms to try
2:37 to rank the things more appropriately in the future.
2:40 Or we're certainly willing to take manual action on spam if
2:43 it's egregious or if it violates our guidelines.
2:46 We have a manual web spam team that is willing to respond to
2:49 those spam reports.
2:50 So thanks very much.

Forum discussion at Google+.

Image credit to ShutterStock for kid pointing finger

Previous story: How Does The Google Moog Synthesizer Work?
 

Comments:

Tim

05/23/2012 01:16 pm

Thats how far things got, google wants us to denounce and blackmail competitors and vice versa just because of their inability to simply ignore spam in their algo. Google, your business model depends on links. Fine. Then use your monopoly and your billion dollar profit to create an intelligent and fair algorithm and do not penalize people for getting huge amounts of exactly what you need: links.

Casey

05/24/2012 02:27 am

So I can point spammy links at my competitors and then report them to Google? Wow.

Alan

05/24/2012 06:20 am

Do they really need us to report them?

Ken

05/25/2012 12:18 am

Google is the nanny-statist of the internet. Tell on this guy, tell on that guy. These guys think they frikken own the internet. Mark my words, these guys will be the alta vista of the web in 10 years.

Dennis

05/28/2012 05:26 pm

Try reporting spam to Google. It is just as worthless as the spam you receive. That is why more and more crooks are using gmail.

Flower Delivery Guy

10/01/2013 05:31 pm

and where exactly would one go to report a spam site to google? i would really appreciate if someone can tell me where

Barry Schwartz

10/01/2013 05:32 pm

See https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/35265?hl=en

Thomas Lartin

04/15/2014 08:50 pm

I disagree with the people in this thread because they are obviously black hatters. Google is doing this properly, some these websites not only have black hat techniques but then immorally destroy people's bank accounts while doing it while people who work hard are getting screwed. Only someone who is guilty would talk shit about Google in this situation, because if you were doing things according to their guidelines you wouldn't be angry at all at this.

blog comments powered by Disqus