March 2006 Archives

Ask.com's First To Serve Up April Fools Joke with RhymeRank

Leading off with a blog entry at the Ask.com blog, named What Should We Do? Ask.com asked the blog readers about launching something around April 1, does it make sense to do it, if it may be perceived as a joke. Of course, they released it, "due to popular demand." Ask.com releases for the first time, a full press release via its blog, with the title Ask.com Introduces RhymeRank™.

Tonight at 6PM (PST), to be released in "Gamma mode" at Ask.com is RhymeRank, "Cutting Edge Technology Provides Phaster and Phresher Related Search Results."

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

Continue reading "Ask.com's First To Serve Up April Fools Joke with RhymeRank"

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at March 31, 2006 4:21 PM Comments (1)

Google Launches Google Local Ads Officially

As we saw from early tests, Google has officially launched Google local business ads beta. They do not seem to be called GeoAds as we thought, but rather, Google local business ads, pretty straight forward.

Google AdWords is introducing local business ads, a new ad type that allows advertisers to promote location-based products and services to interested users worldwide... Local business ads appear with an enhanced map component on Google Local and in a text-only format on Google.com and other sites in the Google network.

More information on what it is at https://adwords.google.com/select/localbusinessads.html. Here are also, two useful frequently asked questions.

Community buzz on this topic has yet to fully begin, there is currently only one thread that I have found, and it is at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

Update: I posted a full how to with screen captures at SEW Blog.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 31, 2006 7:57 AM Comments (1)

Matt Cutts Does Q&A Session At Blog

Matt Cutts posted a blog entry he named Q & A thread: March 27, 2006, in where he answered a nice amount of questions posted in his blog, over the past couple weeks. The entry is well worth a read, if you have not seen it yet. Since then there have been over 75 approved comments on that entry. I do not know how Matt deals with all of that. :) Anyway, here are some solid snippets from the Q&A;

Q: “Is Bigdaddy fully deployed?” A: Yes, I believe every data center now has the Bigdaddy upgrade in software infrastructure, as of this weekend.
Q: “This datacentre http://64.233.185.104/ works differently to all of the others. Noticed just a few hours ago. . . . . Where does that DC fit into the scheme of things? Is it mainly made from newly spidered data?” A: Sharp eyes, g1smd. That wouldn’t surprise me. As Bigdaddy cools down, that frees us up to do new/other things.
Q: “I am seeing a lot of sites with “%09″ (tab) and “%20″ (space) in front of the URL in Googles index.” A: I’ll ask someone about that.

Much more at his blog.

But the forum discussion on this entry is at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 31, 2006 7:50 AM Comments (1)

Report of Yahoo Image Search Index Update

The other day we reported the Yahoo! Search Index Update, today word comes via DigitalPoint Forums of a Yahoo! Image Search index update. That means, that Yahoo Image Search has a new stock of fresh images for you to search on. It also means, you may be getting more or less search referrals from Yahoo! Image Search.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at March 31, 2006 7:40 AM Comments (0)

Sporadic Reports of Dynamic Keyword Insertion Function at Google AdWords Not Working

There have been some sporadic reports of the Dynamic Keyword Insertion feature within Google AdWords has not been working. There is a good thread where AdWordsAdvisor sums up the reports at WebmasterWorld.

To be precise, there have been three threads about this subject so far this week, with two of them being started by the same person. Between the three threads this is where we stand:

* Including this thread, three people report that they are having some sort of issue with Keyword Insertion.

* Also, three people report that it is working just fine for them.

Again, I have not heard of this as an problem elsewhere, and I keep my ear very close to the ground for emerging issues.

My best advice to those who are having problems is to contact AdWords support, and ask them to take a look at the account. Be sure to specify the campaigns and Ad Groups in question, and include a detailed description of what is (or is not) happening.

That said, I'll continue to keep my ears open.

Word for word. But what is really going on? WebmasterWorld moderator, eWhisper, has some ideas. He feels that there may be times when the dynamic keyword insertion function doesn't work, on purpose. The first example he says is when "an adgroup contains misspelled keywords." The second is when "an adgroup contains trademarked terms."

For now, there is no official word from Google on this. If you are having similar issues, let them know.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 31, 2006 7:31 AM Comments (0)

Wall Street Journal Loving Ask.com

As I reported at SEW Blog, Wall Street Journal's principal technology columnist, Walter Mossberg wrote a raving article on Ask.com named Ask.Com's New Look Scores Big Points Against Search Rivals. This is huge for The Little Engine That Could. With a recent spike in market share, and its new marketing initiatives I am very exciting for Ask.com's future potential.

Here are some quotes from Mossberg;

I've been testing the new Ask.com against the search champ, Google. I've found that in terms of relevant results and ease of use, Ask holds its own with Google, and even beats the champ on some searches. It has some very nice features Google lacks, including previews of the sites it finds, an easy way to narrow or broaden your search results, and frequent top-of-the-screen answers that lead you directly to core information.
In general, Ask's search-results pages are richer and better organized than typical Google results, and they give greater priority to content over ads.
Google is still great, and I'm not suggesting everyone abandon it. But Ask.com is well worth a try if you want to benefit from some features that go beyond Google. Like the George Mason basketball team, it just may surprise you.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at March 31, 2006 7:23 AM Comments (2)

GoogleBot Deletes All Of Webmasters Content; Site Owner's Fault

I started a thread over at our forums named Don't Enable GoogleBot To Delete All Your Pages. In that thread I link to an other forum thread that shows how a Webmaster left open the delete button for GoogleBot to click on. This is what happened in short...

Webmaster rebuilt the site months ago, repopulating all the content into a database driven solution. When the Webmaster published the new site, he/she left the "edit" link open somewhere on the frontend, where GoogleBot can get to it. I assume it was not password protected, and GoogleBot got in and looked around. Since GoogleBot just clicks on links, it clicked on the delete link on every single page of the site, until the whole site was deleted from the database and no other pages or content was available to delete.

Pretty crazy, huh? Yea. But GoogleBot is not to blame for this one.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at March 30, 2006 7:57 AM Comments (1)

Second Page Of Google Showing More Results Than On First Page?

A WebmasterWorld thread documents that, at least two, people have seen a different number of results on the first page of the Google results, when compared to the second page of results. For example, you search on any keyword phrase and you are presented with Results 11 - 20 of about XXXX for keyword phrase. If you click the next button, to go to page two of the results, you are presented with Results 11 - 30 of about XXXX for keyword phrase, instead of Results 11 - 20 of about XXXXX for keyword phrase.

WebmasterWorld administrator, tedster, has confirmed that he has seen this as well.

The question now is, is this a temporary glitch or an other one of Google's tests?

I personally have not noticed it myself.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at March 30, 2006 7:51 AM Comments (2)

Yahoo Updates Search Toolbars for Firefox and Internet Explorer

As I covered a few days ago at SEW Blog, Yahoo has updated their search toolbars for IE and for FireFox. The big change is tabbed browsing for IE and adding a button to bookmark pages to del.icio.us, which is a nice addition.

The folks over at WebmasterWorld are discussing this update. Where Marcia says she uses the toolbar heavily for anti spyware, she likes it because it uses less resources then other toolbars (she says).

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at March 30, 2006 7:45 AM Comments (0)

What Will Be Google's April Fools Day Prank?

That is the question at a DigitalPoint Forum thread named Google April Fools 2006: Guesses? In that past, we covered a handful of search related April Fools Day pranks. The first one we thought was what is now known as Gmail. Last year we summarized several april fools day jokes, including GoogleGulp, Gmail reaching 2GB no joke, special version of Google April Fools search, and UnderGoos. Do you think this year it is also Gmail related? 3GB of space that turns out not to be a prank? Or maybe the gmail logo is truly replaced by a woman?

The classic Google hoaxes include the mentalplex, pigeon rank, and lunar center.

What will it be this year? Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at March 30, 2006 7:35 AM Comments (1)

Gmail Logo Replaced By Image Of Woman?

This can be completely false and made up but I thought it was weird enough to report here. A DigitalPoint Forum thread named Mysterious GMail Image - Girl Sticking Out Tongue! shows a link to a comment at a particular blog, where a gmail user says his gmail logo was replaced by a picture of a woman. He posted a screen shot here of the gmail screen, with the woman replacing the logo.

This site also notes the image, saying;

Have You Seen This Person?

Many Gmail users have seen this image when checking their mail tonite. This journalist figures it must have been an inside job because Google has a whole team of security experts. The question is then, when will we know for sure?

I am not sure what exactly is up here, it can most likely be a hoax. Or perhaps Google getting ready for April Fools Day.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at March 30, 2006 7:28 AM Comments (5)

Latest Thoughts on the "Google Pontiac" Campaign

There have been some major marketing initiatives recently using traditional offline advertising to drive traffic to a website, portal, or search engine. Ask.com has unveiled some new TV spots to get people to try their new technology. This past Sunday, as blogged by Rand and Barry, Yahoo and CBS News program 60 Minutes introduced a new partnership. What seemed to kick the year off, however, was Pontiac's clever use of the verb "google" to ask people to "google Pontiac" in its TV spots. In a search engine marketing stroke of brilliance (my opinion), Mazda purchased the keyword Pontiac, which led to a debate over the use of trademarked terms that has been covered here and elsewhere.

Bill Tancer from Hitwise pointed out at SES NYC 2006:

Did Mazda benefit from the Pontiac ad? Pontiac.com received 66.8% of the traffic from the term, and the second most visited site (3.4% of traffic) for the Pontiac search term was Mazda.

Search Engine Watch Forums Editor Elisabeth Osmeloski stared a good follow up thread to the Pontiac story the other day. She describes reading a recent article about the story in Adweek Magazine, and wonders if Pontiac paid Google to use their name as a verb (and the screenshot showing Pontiac typed into the Google search bar), and reminds us that Google was for a while very protective of its name, forbidding people to use it as a verb in the media. Danny Sullivan reports that Google swears they didn't get paid for the use, and quotes them as being eager to participate.

Not many more answers in this thread yet, but it should lead to an interesting discussion about Google's recent "kindler/gentler" attitude towards the use of its brand as a verb. Read at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted chrisboggs in Legal Issues in Search at March 29, 2006 10:03 AM Comments (1)

Google Bowling For Dollars

There has been a discussion going on for well over a year about "Google Bowling." This is a theory that discusses the potential to negatively impact competitor search engine rankings by creating "unsavory" links to said competitor's pages. Google publicly denies this is possible, yet many in the industry feel that it is very possible. I have always been in the camp that feels that there is nothing that a competitor could do to affect my rankings negatively. Yet recently I have had to think seriously about this, because of the undeniably bad effects experienced by many websites that have been linked-to from so called "bad neighborhoods" ("PPC's"-Pills, Porn, and Casino sites being the unfortunate majority in this Internet community).

A thread started at Search Engine Roundtable Forums on March 16 leads to an interesting case study presented by an anonymous competitor in a recent SEO Contest. He feels that he was inadvertently "Google bowled" because his site solicited links in order to win the contest, and promised the winnings would be donated to a charity. Thus:

LOTS of people thought that donating the prize money to a good cause was a great thing, and so added links on their web sites to mine ... and in several situations, site-wide links.

As I mentioned in a post yesterday, I don't feel that sitewides can hurt, but that they could be discounted. The case study goes on to support a few more interesting theories, in my opinion, including:

What is new/unique about Google Bowling is the concept of negative weighting. If Google detects unnatural linking patterns, instead of devaluing or discarding that link weight, it may count against you…
I personally still don't buy this. One question I would have about the case study is the behavior of the rest of the top 10/15. Where they still the same or did he drop with a bunch of others?

The current discussion is at the Rountable Forum as well as Cre8asite

Rand actually started a discussion about this topic last November that Barry covered. Todd Malicoat aka Stuntdubl listed it as one of his top twenty contradictions earlier in the year at SEW Forum (before he was saving all his good stuff for his blog :). (**Added: I wanted to mention that I found another recently published and interesting viewpoint on this topic at ISEDB by Tinu Abayomi-Paul)

One more thing: at first I was a bit apprehensive about posting about this, thinking it may tip off even more tricksters. However, if this is an issue, perhaps it should be more in the open so that maybe a new subject line for Google's SPAM complaint center and for the Cuttlets (just added to my spellchecker) could be "I've been bowled." A site owner could identify specifically which links he felt were hurting him and G could come back with a vague answer.

posted chrisboggs in Search Theory at March 29, 2006 9:14 AM Comments (1)

Google AdSense Publishers Buy Homes With AdSense Income

A funny WebmasterWorld thread named house has forum members discussing the type of home they have purchased from their Google AdSense income, if they have purchased a home at all with it.

Many just use a portion of the AdSense income towards their mortgage or rent payments. Some were successful enough to pay off their entire mortgage outright. Some earned enough to by a prestigious home for their birds. Some don't use it towards their home, but rather use it towards their business, to generate more long term income with AdSense (and then possibly use it towards a house then).

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 29, 2006 8:39 AM Comments (1)

35% And More Of Google AdSense Publishers Spend Less Than Two Hours On Campaigns

A new thread at DigitalPoint Forums polls members on the number of hours they spend with AdSense. That includes your advertising time, your content writing, your coding and your account management. The time slots are broken down pretty broadly, and should most likely be broken down more narrowly. Of currently 48 members polled, here is the break down.

1 - 2 Hrs daily		16	37.21%
3 - 5 Hrs daily		12	27.91%
6 - 8 Hrs daily		6	13.95%
10 - 12 Hrs daily		5	11.63%
13 + Hours daily		4	9.30%


Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 29, 2006 8:22 AM Comments (1)

Ask.com Quickest Gainer in Market Share From Q4 '04 to '05; Google Follows, Yahoo Loses Share

John Battelle reports on comScore report that shows Ask.com gaining in market share from Q4 '04 to '05 by 32.8% and Google growing over the same time span by 24.7%. Yahoo dropped in market share by 0.3% and MSN dropped by 2.7%. Still the overall leaders in market share as of Q4 2005 are; Google with 39.8%, Yahoo with 29.3%m MSN with 14.3% and Ask.com with 6.6% of search market share.

With Ask.com's TV recent TV Blitz it will be interesting to see the impact it has in Q1 of 2006.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums, WebmasterWorld and Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at March 29, 2006 8:05 AM Comments (0)

Building Links With Press Releases To Increase Search Rankings

Press Release optimization for search engine purposes has been a growing segment of the SEO industry. One of the first companies to catch the wave is SEO PR, by Greg Jarboe. They have a service that will take your press release, optimize it to rank well in the news search engines and drive a nice percentage click through to your landing pages. He has given plenty of informative speeches on the topic at the Search Engine Strategies conferences (check the archives). But what about building links with press releases?

A Cre8asite Forum thread named Link Building with Press Release asks the power of building links with press releases. Although some of the press releases allow for static, clean, link popularity passing links, many do not. Yahoo! News releases are hosted at Yahoo! for a period of time, until the URL goes away and is no longer valid, so links from there die down quickly.

So where is the value with press releases in terms of link building? Well, a press release, and a well optimized press release, should get in front of the eyes of news reporters, bloggers and other industry experts. They will find your press release, hopefully read it, and god willing think it is interesting. If so, they may write about your service with some quality anchor text pointing to your Web site.

I believe press releases for link building purposes helps increase your site's traffic, gets your more eyes on your brand and encourages people to link to you. This is all incredibly important for the popularity factor of your Web pages.

Forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Link Building at March 29, 2006 7:52 AM Comments (4)

Roundtable Moderators Discuss Private Searches On Search Engines

In our continued Ask The Moderators thread, the next question we explored was by Viggen. He asked our roundtable of moderators the following question on what he calls; "private search engines."

what search engines are you using for private searches and why...

We opened up a thread named Private Search Engines Explored for moderator only discussion, and last night opened it up for member discussion as well.

I found it interesting in how each moderator interpreted the phrase "private searches." On one hand, does this mean searches conducted at a password protected search engine? Or maybe it means, searches conducted on a company intranet? Perhaps, he is asking about searches one does each day, but are private in nature? Or maybe he is asking about vertical search engines?

The roundtable of moderator's responses were pretty vast.

Rand Fishkin discussed how he uses Del.icio.us to search on tagged content, Ask.com for "non-search type searches" and Yahoo! for link command searches.

Dazzlindonna explained that if private search engines means vertical search engines, she doesn't use them. Donna is a big fan of major search engines and bookmarking for private searches.

Darrin Ward sticks with Yahoo! Search as his default and Google as his back up, he may also use MSN.

Ben (Phoenix) says he doesn't value Yahoo! Search at all, he sticks with Ask.com and Google. He also is a big user of Google Alerts. For internal private searches he uses Desktop Search, like Google Desktop Search. As now uses Bloglines more and more each day.

I personally use RSS News Searches exhaustedly. I subscribe to searches on a few dozen keyword phrases to be notified via RSS about the latest news and discussions taking place about those keyword phrases.

We would love you to join the conversation at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Other Search Engines at March 29, 2006 7:38 AM Comments (0)

How Important is Anchor Text Variety to Gaining Better Rankings?

The process of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) has many different associated tasks, as many of us know. The subject of linking has been discussed in great detail on many forums and blogs, and the importance of using keywords within anchor text (a somewhat simplified but fairly accurate definition) is unquestionable.

As people (read here: SEO's and SEO-"tinkerers") try to increase the amounts of inlinks to their website using keyword-rich anchor text, questions have been raised as to "how much is to much?" The current consensus seems to be that you should vary your anchor text when actively linking to particular pages. So-called "natural links" (ones that you do not solicit) will naturally [:)] have varied anchor text.

A thread was started at High Rankings Forum the other day which details an email a member received that requested that he go back and vary the anchor text he was using to link to the person's site. The thread, titled "Google Penalizing For Links?, What's your thoughts...." describes someone asking:

...I'd greatly appreciate it if, the next time you are updating your site, you could tweak your links to me so that they express what you think about my site in your own words...

OK, so this may seem a little tinfoil-hattish, and the site owner is risking losing the links completely, in my opinion. Also, I feel like Jill Whalen that there is no penalty for repetitive anchor text, just a possible devaluing of some of the links. Unless the site you are asking to change your anchor text is owned by a friend, I probably wouldn't recommend it. The answer is to instead focus on using varied anchor text in future link building efforts.

See the comments and the interesting spin off discussion on relevancy at High Rankings Forums.

posted chrisboggs in Link Building at March 28, 2006 5:58 PM Comments (1)

Yahoo! Search Index Update 03/28

The Yahoo! Search Blog just announced that they have updated their index.

We completed an index update over the weekend. As a result, you may see some changes in ranking as well as some shuffling of the pages that are included in the index. You might also be seeing a temporary spike in crawler activity. As these things go, all this should stabilize in the near future. Meantime, if you have any comments about the new index, please let us know.

Interesting to note, that Tim Mayer did not write this update entry, as he normally is the one to let us know of updates at Yahoo! Priyank Garg, Product Manager wrote this update instead.

Also, this is the first time someone mentioned an increase in "crawler activity" due to an index update. So tell your hosts to up those bandwidth limits. ;)

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums, WebmasterWorld, Search Engine Watch Forums, DigitalPoint Forums, and HighRankings Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at March 28, 2006 2:58 PM Comments (0)

Does Danny Sullivan Care If Google Is A Portal?

Danny Sullivan started a thread named Who Cares If Google's A Portal. In that thread he posts five consecutive times, so demonstrate the conversation he had with a reader. The posts include a dialog between himself and a reader, who is upset with Danny's tone on his podcast, The Daily SearchCast. Specifically, how Danny was being a tad sarcastic about Google's play on Google Finance and being a portal and not a search engine.

The deal is, Google has for such a long time, repeated that they are not a portal. The word portal, in Google's eyes, seems to be taboo. Danny, as do many in the industry, feel that this is just downright funny. Either say you are a portal or don't do portal like things... Or is it not that simple?

Danny's thread goes deeper into this long standing conceptual debate.

You can read it over at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at March 28, 2006 8:06 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! To Host Event For New Orleans Small Businesses

YahooSarah posts at Search Engine Watch Forums that Yahoo! will be holding a small business event exclusively for small businesses in the New Orleans area. They are working with Bell South to offer "free training and up to $1,500 in free products and services to session attendees to help facilitate small businesses recovery in the Gulf Coast."

WHEN: Friday, April 7, 9 a.m. – 5 p.m.

WHERE: InterContinental Hotel, 444 St. Charles Ave. (at Poydras), New Orleans, LA

The event page with more information can be found at http://events.yahoo.com/backinbiz.

Yahoo! employees from around the country will be on hand to get your business set up online. You’ll be eligible for up to $1500 worth of free online services. We’ll help you create a web site, build e-commerce offerings, and launch search advertising programs to promote your products and services on the Web.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! News at March 28, 2006 7:56 AM Comments (1)

Made For Google AdSense Sites (MFAs) Using Redirects

A WebmasterWorld thread named Use of URL redirectors in MFA ads discovers that some MFAs (Made For Google AdSense Sites) have been using redirects to bypass any blacklist the site may be listed on. What happens is that they will advertise using a URL of a public URL redirect tool, and the ads will get through the URL filters. So now you need to follow and continue to block these types of URLs. Let me explain a bit better....

URL: www.mfa.biz (fictitious URL) is a site on my filter list
Owner of MFA.biz sets up a redirect URL with, let's say tinyurl.com, to point to MFA.biz
TinyURL.com is not on my filter list and passes through the filter

What needs to be done? Well, Google needs to check for these redirects and not allow it, period.

Want to see the frustration of some Google AdSense publishers? Visit the thread at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 28, 2006 7:45 AM Comments (3)

Google Accidently Deletes Main Google Blog

Jennifer Slegg over at the Search Engine Watch blog reports that the Official Google Blog Deleted. In short, yes, Google had accidently deleted their own blog. They have confirmed the mistake;

We've determined the cause of tonight's outage. The blog was mistakenly deleted by us (d'oh!) which allowed the blog address to be temporarily claimed by another user. This was not a hack, and nobody guessed our password. Our bad.

Oopppss...

Jennifer takes you through the story as it happens. She accounts that this blogger snagged the googleblog.blogpsot.com address, and posted a message saying;

Google, fix your blog pleeasssee! <3 (P.S. Just to clear things up, I'm not associated with Google at all. I just wanted to take advantage of this before someone else with less worthy intentions did. The username was giving a 404, so I tried registering a new blog with it. Surprisingly, it worked. Oh, and no posting URLs in the comments or else they'll be deleted.)

Want to see what it looked like prior to Google getting the blog back? Jennifer posted a picture here.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at March 28, 2006 7:31 AM Comments (1)

Want To See New Google User Interface?

There is a new Google user interface floating around, it looks similar, but not exactly, like the one I covered here. WebmasterWorld points out a way that you can see it yourself. Here is how...

(1) Delete the Google cookie called "PREF"
(2) Make sure you are on the Google home page
(a) For Google.com users paste this into your address bar while on Google search and hit enter followed by a refresh.
javascript:alert(document.cookie="PREF=ID=fb7740f107311e46:TM=1142683332:LM=1142683332:S=fNSw6ljXTzvL3dWu;path=/;domain=.google.com")
(b) For Google.co.uk users paste this into your address bar while on Google search and hit enter followed by a refresh.
javascript:alert(document.cookie="PREF=ID=fb7740f107311e46:TM=1142683332:LM=1142683332:S=fNSw6ljXTzvL3dWu;path=/;domain=.google.co.uk")
(4) Then search on something...

I personally am not a fan of this look, but that is just my own tastes.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at March 28, 2006 7:16 AM Comments (0)

Google's Three Wireless Advertising Patent Applications

As Bill Slawski accurately notes in a thread he created at Cre8asite Forums named Google's 3 Wireless Advertising Patent Applications, branding, advertising, and subsidizing, discussion on wireless advertising patents have been the craze recently. News.com reports on it, first the pushed out a title that said Google has won the rights to the patent, but that was quickly corrected. But I much more prefer to read the Cre8asite Forum thread.

Bill summarizes the three patent applications.

(1) Method and system to provide wireless access at a reduced rate:

Methods and system for providing wireless access at a reduced rate. In one embodiment, access to a WAP is provided to an end-user at a rate subsidized by a first entity. The first entity includes advertisements in an end-user view.

Bill explains that this one has more to do with wireless access, which reminds me of a Gary post named Google Awarded Patent To Make Data Move Faster to Wireless Phones and Devices.

(2) Method and system to provide advertisements based on wireless access points:

Methods and system to provide advertisements in a view of an end user accessing a wireless access point. The advertisements are related to the WAP based on a predetermined criterion.

Basically discusses the "integration" of the wireless ads into wireless enabled devices, I believe there are some geo specific ads as well discussed here.

(3) Method and system for dynamically modifying the appearance of browser screens on a client device:

In one embodiment, a connection of a client device to a wireless access point is identified. Further, the appearance of a screen presented on the client device is modified to reflect the brand associated with a provider of the wireless access point.

This is basically about branding the ads with the WAP partner's logo and content.

So in short you have three patent applications from Google. One about optimizing the ads across wireless protocols. The second is about the integration of the ads and the third is about branding those ads.

Forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 27, 2006 3:04 PM Comments (3)

Google AdWords Incredibly Slow To Review Ads

A WebmasterWorld thread named Ads not reviewed for one month shows how several Google AdWords customers are complaining that it can take a month or more for Google to review any ads submitted that require manual Google review.

Some AdWords advertisers say that this is a "trend" he has been noticing in the past several months. The you have to "get back in touch with them and 'prompt' them to approve ads these days," he says. It is kind of like calling someone to make sure they got an email you sent them.

Pretty poor customer service, from the looks of it.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 27, 2006 10:32 AM Comments (0)

Top Google Rank Tracked For "Search Engine Optimization" From April 2004

search-engines-web, at our forums, has posted a thread that is quiet useful named Search Engine Optimization Top 50 SERPs since 2004. The thread links to his Google Alert Summary of the top 50 search results for the keyword term, Search Engine Optimization, at Google, since April 2004. He said the report is about 90% accurate. It is always interesting to see how some popular, and/or competitive terms shift at Google over the long run.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 27, 2006 8:31 AM Comments (0)

New Yahoo Publisher Network Features With New Messages Window

JenSense.com reports on the new Yahoo Publisher Network features launched over the weekend. The most visible change is the new messages window on the portal's homepage. It looks like;

ypn-messaging-03465.gif

When you click on a message, it fades the window and pops up, AJAX style this message;

As you can see, we've added a new messaging feature! As part of our ongoing effort to communicate directly with you, we can now send tips and information to you that are specific to your account. In addition, you'll also find messages here that are general to all members of the Yahoo! Publisher Network such as announcements and notifications of new features (just like this one). We look forward to being in touch!

Other features include a calendar icon to click on for reporting purposes. Basically, an easy way to select a date range. And you can now also "edit and remove reporting categories and URLs," JenSense says.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Publisher Network at March 27, 2006 8:20 AM Comments (0)

Google AdSense Black List Revisted

Last week we covered service The AdSense Black List For Google AdSense. The service has since undergone some scrutiny in the forums and by some bloggers. DigitalPoint Forums has Jenstar linking to a blog entry named AdSense Blacklist? which shows some history about the person who created the list.

The problem is that the person who created the list, reportedly has created MFAs (Made For AdSense Sites) themselves. The very type that should be placed on the blacklist. In addition, sites that the person created was banned for using AdSense. In addition, the person also created sites that are specifically against Google AdSense's TOS.

The beauty of a forum thread is that the accused can defend himself. Emir Pilavdzic, aka owner of AdsenseBlackList.com had Rod post on his behalf the following message;

Well discussion on this forum made me join, but I still don't have permission to reply to this topic so I'm doing it with help of member "Rod". Thanks Rod!

Ok, first of all, I was very surprised how deep people dugg, and I don't have anything to hide. I am ashamed owner of DirectAsk.com. That site was actually some sort of experiment (made in a name of science) and one of the primary reasons that inspired me to create AdSenseBlackList.com
DirectAsk has never and will never be advertised on AdWords!! So there is no chance you'll see THAT ad running on your google ads!
Right now, directask is kind of profitable and intend to use this money into blacklist site development. By doing so I belive I'm doing more good than bad.

AdsenseBlackList.com URL was banned from google adsense becuase of the buzz it has caused by using "AdSense" in URL. Since that's their trademark, they suspended ads on my pages. That's why I'm changing url in next few days (probably AdsBlackList.com) and it will be focused on YPN and MSN ad center too.

For banning proof, check this pic if you don't trust me:
http://www.slibe.com/image/0be8394f-Slibber_jpg/

Now I don't want to keep Rod waiting to publish this post, but if you have any additional questions, please post them here.

Regards,
Emir Pilavdzic
AdSenseBlackList.com

Since then he has made a public note at http://www.adsenseblacklist.com/.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 27, 2006 7:57 AM Comments (1)

Big Daddy Roll Out Complete

Reports come from WebmasterWorld that the "Big Daddy" Google update is now complete. The Big Daddy infrastructure rollout has been completely migrated to all of Google's data centers. We expected this would happen soon, and it did. There are still some supplemental issues, people are complaining about, however.

The Big Daddy update is coined as a "infrastructure" change in the Google index. It is a core change to how Google handles certain types of pages and how it stores them, I believe. The rankings and indexing of pages can be affected, and many are.

Forum discussion on the roll out at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 27, 2006 7:49 AM Comments (4)

Google Removes RK Value From Checksum

Around mid February, we covered a thread discussing the Google Checksum Features. One of those features included an RK or Rank value. It seems as if, the RK values have all been flat-lined. Over at Cre8asite Forums, Jim Westergren updates us that this indeed happened. He also had Matt Cutts from Google say "no comment" on this by stating;

I'm sorry, I can’t shed light on that at this time. :)

Best wishes though,
Matt

Forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 27, 2006 7:37 AM Comments (0)

Ask.com TV Commercials Live at Ask Blog

Friday we reported on the Ask commercials, but if you haven't seen them as of yet - you can now. Go to the Ask Blog and read their entry Ask In Primetime. You will need QuickTime to view the commercials.

The first is named the Cafe.

In the midst of an Internet cafe where searchers have yet to evolve, one discovers Ask.com's unique tools starts remembering what it's like to feel human.

The second is named the Animals In Pants.

A scientist using the Binoculars tool on Ask ponders the question of what separates man from beast...and gets some help from an unexpected source.

tvspot_ask-03200623121.jpg

Major compliments to Ask.com for posting these on the blog. And as always, forum discussion on this specific topic at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at March 26, 2006 12:17 PM Comments (16)

New Google Local Ads Being Tested; Coffee Icons Within Google Maps; GeoAds?

Google is testing placing icons within Google Maps, for some Google Local searches. For example (it only works if you are on a PC), conduct a search on booksellers nyc at Google Local. You will notice little coffee icons in within the maps. If you click on the coffee icon, you will see a "sponsored listing" for Barnes and Noble. This was first discovered by Shimon Sandler and then I blogged it over at the SEW Blog (check the SEW blog for screen shots of this in action).

In the past, Google tried sponsored listing in Google Local and Google Maps with blue balloons.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 24, 2006 10:25 AM Comments (3)

MSN To Up AdCenter Ads ON MSN Search To 70% Distribution

MSN Search began increasing the volume of its AdCenter PPC ads on the MSN Search portal this past Wednesday. They expect to reach a 70% distribution volume within "several days." On February 24th, we reported that MSN increased the ads by seventy-percent on the MSN Search portal. Here is an other push, to get the AdCenter PPC ads out there more. PPC Discussions posted the verbiage of the email notification, which I will quote here.

ust a short note this time: on Wednesday, March 22, we’ll be raising AdCenter traffic levels to 70%. AdCenter customers should start to see an impact to their campaigns beginning Thursday, March 23, however it may take several days to reach 70%. Just like last time, your budget may be impacted due to the increase. Also, as more traffic is directed to adCenter, you should expect a decrease in traffic from your Yahoo! Search campaigns.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in MSN / Microsoft adCenter at March 24, 2006 8:29 AM Comments (0)

The AdSense Black List For Google AdSense

AdSense Publishers who are serious about making big bucks with Google AdSense tend to be aggressive with the managing sites they do not want to show up in their ads. There was even a small unscientific study, where a WebmasterWorld member tested removing his AdSense filters and noticed a downward affect on his revenues. I was skimming Cre8asite Forums and found a thread named Adsense Black List, interesting.... The thread is probably at several other forums, but I found it here first.

It links to a tool at http://www.adsenseblacklist.com/ that helps you generate an AdSense filter for your industry. The tool will "filter low paying google ads which link to MFA (Made for Adsense) sites AND we will provide you with tools that will help you to substantly increase your AdSense revenue, all for free." You can even submit your own list to help the rest of the AdSense publishers.

Ah, but is there any concern for blocking your competitors unfairly on all other sites? Time will tell.

Forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

Update to this service under AdSense Black List Revisted.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 24, 2006 8:06 AM Comments (1)

MSN AdCenter Opens Sign Up Again Until Tonight at 6PM (PST)

Jenstar reports at this thread that MSN AdCenter has reopened the open sign up period until tonight at 6PM (PST). So if you missed the first open sign up period you can catch this open sign up period today. To do so, visit http://adcenter.msn.com/ and click the sign up button.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

Update: Also being discussed at WebmasterWorld and DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in MSN / Microsoft adCenter at March 24, 2006 7:53 AM Comments (0)

Ask.com US TV Commercials A Success?

If you watch some TV in the US or even outside the US, you may have noticed some apes searching on a search engine named Ask.com. Ask.com has released a blitz of TV commercials in Europe and the US to try to show users the unique flavor of Ask powered search and the creative tools Ask provides to it searchers. I have seen one of the commercials, it involves apes searching, representing how its time for a new way to search the Internet. The commercial shows Smart Answers, Binoculars and Ask's other features.

Yea, so you want to see it, don't you. Well, I think I have finally convinced Ask.com to post the commercials at their blog. I have a feeling they will be live sometime today at The Ask Blog, so keep checking (I will update this blog when I know its live).

Forum discussion to break loose at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at March 24, 2006 7:41 AM Comments (4)

Google Finance Shows News Search Volume Over Time

This week Google introduced Google Finance, which has been getting a lot of attention. They also added a feature named global trends to AdWords keyword tool. I have not seen anyone discuss the fact that Google Finance has added the ability to search and filter news volume over time, just like keyword data over time with global trends.

I was doing some playing with a client of mine, Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. (Public, AMEX:JEN) at Google Finance. I then clicked over to the more news items and found news items put into folders by month. goog-finance-volume-news.gif So then I tried the same thing for a company that is more in the news, Yahoo and notice the graph on the top left of the page. It says, "News Volume (90 days)," plus links to articles by month. You can click on the graph columns to sort news by that time period.

This, I would imagine, can be used for search term research, much like the global trends tool can be used for financial research - if you get what I mean. Anyway, I thought this was a nice little feature of Google Finance and I wanted to bring it to light.

I added this detail to our thread on the topic at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at March 24, 2006 7:29 AM Comments (1)

PageRank Tool Checks 78 Unique Google Data Centers

If you are still a PageRank follower, then you will love this tool named live pagerank. Live PageRank lists out a domain's PageRank value over, currently, 78 different Google data centers.

For example, the PageRank of seroundtable.com is a PR 7 but also a PR6 at some of the older data centers.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at March 24, 2006 7:22 AM Comments (10)

Hard Answers to Questions About Optimizing Image-Only Web Sites

Search Engine Optimization deals mostly with improving on-page content in order to "show" search engines that you are worthy of having your page ranked for a particular keyword. In my opinion, content is still the number one priority when seeking search rankings, no matter how important linking initiatives are becoming. One issue that comes up more and more often as people are discovering SEO is the optimization of image-intensive web pages. A recent site that we began working with has lots of great content, but unfortunately it is entirely inside images, which a search engine spider cannot "read." We recommended a complete redesign.

A member of High Rankings Forum posted the other day about a website that is not only in all-images, but also in frames. The member posts four potential solutions they have come up with, and asks for advice. These ideas include using alt attributes, Meta Description tags including all the content, adding content below the images (the method we are going to try for the above-referenced client), and simply adding more pages with "real" content.

The frames topic aside (also a big no-no for search friendliness), the image issue will be a tough one to tackle, based on the early concensus. The hard answers are hinted at by some, but as usual Jill Whalen gets straight to the point by saying

the only solution is a complete site redesign
Perhaps this person was looking for easy answers to this subject, but unfortunately there only exist hard answers such as Jill's. In my opinion, if you want to really succeed in getting a site ranked in search engines for competitive phrases, you have to present content separate from images.

Jump in and give your opinion at High Rankings Forums.

posted chrisboggs in Search Engine Optimization at March 23, 2006 5:49 PM Comments (5)

Most, If Not All, Supplemental Google Index Issues Resolved

We have been reporting on the supplemental index issues reported at a series of WebmasterWorld threads, seems to have been almost completely resolved. Matt Cutts reports that "I think it has already improved quite a bit, and I would expect to see more pages indexed in the coming week or two." Which means that the big daddy update at Google should be completely rolled out shortly, as Matt reports here.

We’re down to just 1-2 data centers left in the switchover to Bigdaddy. It’s possible that the Bigdaddy switchover will be complete in the next week or two.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 23, 2006 8:31 AM Comments (3)

Google Sitemaps Robots.txt Validator Does Not Properly Validate

Shawn Hogan of DigitalPoint wrote a blog entry named Google Not Interpreting robots.txt Consistently. He describes how he noticed that some of his pages were being crawled by GoogleBot, even though his robots.txt file specifically was blocking it. So he emailed Google, and they actually replied with the following message;

hile we normally don't review individual sites, we did examine your robots.txt file. Please be advised that it appears your Googlebot entry in your robots.txt file is overriding your generic User-Agent listing. We suggest you alter your robots.txt file by duplicating the forbidden paths under your Googlebot entry: User-agent: * Disallow: /tools/suggestion/? Disallow: /search.php Disallow: /go.php Disallow: /~shawn/scripts/ Disallow: /ads/

User-agent: Googlebot
Disallow: /~shawn/ebay_
Disallow: /tools/suggestion/?
Disallow: /search.php
Disallow: /go.php
Disallow: /~shawn/scripts/
Disallow: /ads/

Once you've altered your robots.txt file, Google will find it automatically after we next crawl your site.

Fine, so Shawn can easily do that. It is not a major deal, a bug Google knows about in its robots.txt protocol. But what Shawn points out is that the Google Sitemaps robots.txt validator shows that his previous robots.txt file;

User-agent: *
Disallow: /tools/suggestion/?
Disallow: /search.php
Disallow: /go.php
Disallow: /~shawn/scripts/
Disallow: /ads/
User-agent: Googlebot
Disallow: /~shawn/ebay_

was actually validated that it would not crawl the /ads/ directory. The two are not consistent, and should be, obviously.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 23, 2006 8:00 AM Comments (1)

Ask.com Search Quality & Search Index Improving?

A thread was created at WebmasterWorld forums named Has ASK Jeeves Updated its Index? but moderator martinibuster. Martinibuster says that he has noticed that Ask.com has been sending him traffic for a page that is about ten days old. That implies that Ask.com's index, which is normally slower to index new pages than Google, Yahoo or MSN, has become fresh with new pages. Martinibuster also believes that Ask.com has "tweaked their algo" to provide higher quality results. For the few searches martinibuster placed, he said the quality is on par with Google and seems to be better than Yahoo results.

Have you been noticing the same thing?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at March 23, 2006 7:51 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo To Help Publishers Prevent Ads To Be Shown To International Visitors

There is no mistake today that Yahoo doesn't want to their publishers to display the YPN ads to those outside of the United States of America. There have been dozens of reports of bans being placed on some publishers for having too much international traffic. For many publishers, setting up technology to display the ads based on geo-location, is a bit complex and overbearing. We have wrote of one solution for Blocking Yahoo Publisher Network Ads from Internation Traffic in the past. How does Yahoo help the publishers with this task?

Well, today, a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums has a post from YahooSarah stating that Yahoo! Search Marketing will begin to help its publishers with this technical task.

Hi-

We’ve received a lot of feedback today about our publisher traffic policies, so I’m writing to offer some guidance. As you know, our publisher terms and conditions prohibit displaying ad listings to users outside of the U.S. This is because the beta is intended for publishers who support primarily a US audience.

That said, we do want to help our publishers with this situation. Therefore, we are going to work with our team in the coming weeks to create some solutions that our publishers can choose to use. I’ll be sure to follow up soon.

I know this post doesn’t offer immediate help, but I’m confident that these efforts will be helpful in the long run. As always, please keep sending me your feedback.

YahooSarah

This is great news for the beta publishers.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Publisher Network at March 23, 2006 7:28 AM Comments (0)

Google Base Search Box Within Main Google Results

Google Base has recently been springing up in the Google main search results page. As GoodROI illustrates, a search on a keyword phrase like homes for sale for many users, brings back a special box at the top of the results. The box says; "Refine your search for homes for sale." The "homes for sale" link takes you to Google Base, below that link are two boxes, the first for location and the second for "Listing type", followed by a "search housing" button, then directly under that is a "Remember this location" check box.

If you do a search for the pattern, los angeles real estate it may show you local results, but it may also show you Google Base results, which actually provides a unique drop down under listing type. Here is a screen capture;

google-base-organic-203304.gif

Just an other reminder there are many ways to reach the number one spot in Google, outside of the main organic results.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable and WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at March 23, 2006 7:15 AM Comments (0)

The Zeal Directory To Go Offline Forever On March 28th

ShoeMoney posted a thread at DigitalPoint forums named Zeal directory shutting down on March 28th. It is true, Zeal will be closing its doors on March 28th. The official announcement came from this discussion thread at Zeal. The post shows that Zeal's developers will be focusing on Furl, a social bookmarking site. Zeal was a very popular directory with many dedicated users, editors, fans and "Zealots."

There have been no replies to the post of this announcement. I checked the press release section, but it hasn't been updated since 03/18/03.

Thank you for being a part of the Zeal community and contributing your time and knowledge to the Directory. After trying to put the deserved resources behind Zeal, we have made the conscious decision to shut down Zeal.com. On March 28, 2006 Zeal will no longer be available. We are not selling Zeal.com and have no future plans for it at this time.

We think that avid Zeal users will appreciate the large, interesting and vital community at Furl.net (www.furl.net). Furl is an online book marking service that helps you save information that’s important to you, share it with others and see what others are saving and find important.

Member at our forums are questioning if this is really a valid statement from Zeal or a prank. It is hard to tell, since the about us pages are incredibly old and outdated. Is it as if they are already offline?

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums and Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Other Web Directories at March 22, 2006 1:22 PM Comments (0)

The Latest and Greatest Search Engine Friendly Page Titles

The seemingly very basic topic of web page Titles comes up very often in discussion about Search Engine Optimization. One reason for this being that the performance of the title has always been something fairly easy to measure. For a while, it was prudent to uses dashes and avoid commas at all costs. Commas were an indicator of keyword stuffing that set off an alarm in the search algorithm; it was widely speculated from analysis of results. Yet, I have seen many top ten Google search results recently with commas.

A thread posted this morning at Search Engine Watch asks about suggested character limitations, the avoidance of so-called "stop words" (and, or,the, where, etc...), and using commas. A quick response from Danny Sullivan summarizes the recent accepted method of building an effective Title. Every SEO will have variations on the subject, and some may want to consider various search engines and how they treat Title structure slightly differently as well. Ironically, when looking for such a variety of opinions, I checked High Rankings Forum and voila! A thread started just yesterday on the same subject.

Both threads should draw some interesting opinions about web page Titles, and can be found at Search Engine Watch Forums and High Rankings Forums.

posted chrisboggs in Search Engine Optimization at March 22, 2006 9:54 AM Comments (4)

Socializer - Web 2.0 Bookmarking - Tagging Made Easy

There is an excellent Cre8asite Thread named Meet the Socializer, Go on, be social. The thread discusses a new free automatic social bookmarking submission tool named Socializer. Socializer gives you the ability to create one link, for your readers to click on and be directed to a landing page specifically for selecting which social bookmarking site you want to "tag" your content at.

All this talk about tagging, well what is it? In short, it allows you to write descriptive keywords and apply those keywords to content that you have written. As more people "tag" your content with those keywords, the more that content is related to the keywords. Also, you are then found within a bubble of others tagging their content under the same keywords. Enabling people to find related content by keywords, that have been tagged.

We tagged all of our SES NYC 06 content with Technorati tags, that now gives you one central place to find all the other content tagged for that conference. That is just one example of how it can be used.

If you are interested in learning more about tagging, read SEM Via Communities, Wikipedia & Tagging session I covered at SES NYC.

As you may notice, (the link under the entry, on the right, that says "Bookmark This") we have applied this tool to our pages here, but we used a handy MT Plugin made by Jon Tillman, it took me literally 2 minutes to get it up and running. Now all I need to do is rebuild the site.

Forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Link Building at March 22, 2006 8:24 AM Comments (5)

SearchFeed PPC Reviewed At Forums: Honest But Low Payouts

A thread at Digital Point forums named Searchfeed.com Experience sums up several people's experience with SearchFeed.com. The review is primarily of publishers explaining that most of the clicks are values between 1 to 2 cents, but that SearchFeed.com is honest and pays on time. Aaron Wall, in the thread, explains that with the second and third tier PPC companies, you need to be more worried about click fraud, as an advertiser.

The overall impression I received from the thread was that people were happy with SearchFeed and they just hope it paid out more.

Forum discussion at Digital Point Forums.

posted rustybrick in Second Tier PPC Engines at March 22, 2006 8:06 AM Comments (1)

Yahoo! Bid Jamming It's Advertisers? Debunked

Yahoo! is reportedly bid jamming, the process of bidding slightly under a competitor, to ensure they pay top dollar for a keyword, their own advertisers, according to this DigitalPoint Forums thread. The member reported that Yahoo! came in and started bidding 45p (Pence) for a phrase he had a bid on for 50p, the next bid was 20p, so he was only paying 21p to Yahoo! Search Marketing.

Let me clarify what I think is happening. Yahoo! Finance is a completely separate division from Yahoo! Search Marketing. Yahoo! Finance, as well as Yahoo! Real Estate and so on, are all huge online advertisers. I am 99% sure they run on separate budgets and have very little to do with each other, outside of being under the same company name. Keep in mind, Yahoo! Search Marketing was once Overture, it was then bought by Yahoo!

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

Update: YahooSarah, official Yahoo! rep, replied with what I thought was the case.

Yahoo! Finance is an advertiser just like each of you and gets no preferential treatment from Yahoo! Search Marketing. I reached out to our friends at Yahoo! Finance in the UK to get to the bottom of this, and here's what I've learned:

Yahoo! Finance uses a third-party agency to manage their search marketing campaigns and bid on keywords to drive traffic to their site. They do pay for each of their bids (no discounts) and their agency absolutely does not use bid jamming techniques.

I hope this eases your concerns.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Marketing at March 22, 2006 7:50 AM Comments (2)

Google Adds Global Trend Graphs To AdWords Keyword Tool

Monday, Google added some more data to help AdWords advertisers pick the best keywords for their campaigns. They have added "global trends," which basically means they are showing you the search volume for a particular keyword phrase, graphed over a 12 month period. You can view the keyword tool for free at https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal. After punching in a keyword phrase or two, you can click the "Get More Keywords" button, then when the page loads, select "Global search volume trends" from the "Show columns" drop down menu on the right side.

There is not much forum discussion on this addition, since most of the folks who discuss AdWords in the forums use more advanced keyword tools (I guess). But here is what I dug up; WebmasterWorld, Cre8asite Forums and DigitalPoint Forums. The main complaint is that they do not provide search volumes in numbers, without this or some sort of scale, it makes it hard for real pro users to use.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 22, 2006 7:20 AM Comments (0)

Ugly Sites Earn More With Google AdSense?

Yesterday, I posted a thread at our forums named Do Ugly Sites Earn More With AdSense? I wrote about a recent popular article named The Surprising Truth About Ugly Websites. The article discusses how a site named Plenty of Fish, an ugly dating site, made over $10,000 from AdSense in one day. The logic as to why Plenty of Fish and other ugly sites (i.e. Craigs List and IMDB) make money, is because they are extremely functional, the author states. But, in my opinion, these sites are not all that functional.

Maybe Craigs List is a bad example, but consider the site that reportedly made $10,000 in one day from AdSense. Plenty of Fish is not functional, not easy to use and, in my humble opinion, hard to look at. The reason why it made so much money with AdSense is because it drives search traffic organically, people land on the site, and immediately want to click off. They find the nearest ad, and most attractive part of the page, which happens to be the AdSense ad, and clicks off. Phew, they are saved and they move on to a real dating site, that is both professional looking and functional.

Forum discussion on this topic at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 21, 2006 9:49 AM Comments (23)

AltaVista's Founder, Paul Flaherty, Has Passed Away

Danny reports that Paul Flaherty, the founder of Alta Vista has passed away. Alta Vista was one of, if not, the first major search engine around. Chris Sherman has an old but valid history of Alta Vista paper and you can also read about Mr. Flahery here. I have no more information about the death, other than we should all show our respect at the forum thread I created at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Other Search Engines at March 21, 2006 8:02 AM Comments (1)

YPN Updates Terms And Conditions: Nothing Major For Publishers

Yahoo! Publisher Network publishers received an email last night from YPN stating there has been "several updates" to the terms and conditions posted at https://publisher.yahoo.com/legal/tnc.php. And as JenSense reports these changes most likely do not affect most publishers. I pulled up the Google cache of the old terms and conditions and compared it with the new terms and conditions, as did Jen. We both noticed the same thing; they added two sections;

You agree that you will not distribute from or promote on Your Sites or Your RSS Feeds any software application that is (or may reasonably be construed as) spyware, adware or trackware.
If you are a sole proprietor, you are not an employee of Yahoo! Search Marketing; if you are an entity, you are not owned by an employee(s) of Yahoo! Search Marketing.

Um, well, nothing really drastic here. But the forums are discussing it, so I thought it was worth a brief mention here.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld and DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Publisher Network at March 21, 2006 7:43 AM Comments (0)

Google Finance Live

Last month's rumors on Google Finance coming soon was dead on! http://finance.google.com/ now takes you to a real page at Google. The homepage has a quick overview of the market and recent news, plus it has recent stock searches with related news (very useful). But the real unique feature, at least I haven't seen it myself before, is how they plot news items on the stock graph. Conduct a search on aapl and on the right are news headlines, with letters. Click on the letters and you will see the graph move to show you the stock level at the time the article was released. Pretty neat. They have integrated Blog Search, News Search, Google Groups and more.

But the major difference? Vertical integration of Google Finance on Google.com. Conduct a search at Google.com on aapl and presto, the main AAPL text and graph link goes to Google Finance now, with links to other finance sites. Here is a screen shot for documentation purposes.

google-finance-03043843478.gif

The Forum Roundup:

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at March 21, 2006 7:25 AM Comments (2)

SEO For Framed Content Hosted On Different Domain

There are services out there that allow you to buy a site for your company, with the content already provided. You see this often with insurance brokerage sites, as well as many other industries. Often, these services are provided via a HTML frame technology. Let me explain, you have your domain name at www.domain.com, at the top of the page is your header that says "My Company, LLC." Under the header is a framed window with content provided by the third party company, hosted on a domain outside of yours. This is an SEO nightmare, and is a current issue at a thread in our forums named A major seo headache. Donna describes the problem;

1. They completely changed the site, so that now the 30,000+ pages that were indexed now show as 404's.

2. Their new site is in frames.

3. The frame with the content is located on a different domain.

4. The frame with the content is on a secure server (https://), but as far as I know, there are no cookies, session id's or password protection involved.

So what can you do? I have seen the issue in the past, what we have done was deployed a spidering and scraping tool to pull the content the client is paying for off the external domain name. It then reposts the content on a static looking HTML page, under the client's own domain name. You may run into period issues with the site being slow or the scraper failing, but overall, this solution works well. You can do the content scraping manually if the page count is low but if it is a huge product database, you will need to deploy some automated solution to this technique.

Forum discussion at the Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at March 20, 2006 11:18 AM Comments (0)

New SEO Scam; SEOs Warning Google Will Ban Site

There is a new SEO scam out there, one that seems honest and forth coming. A reported SEO calls site owners that have well-established rankings in the search engines. They warn them that Google will be banning their Web site and that they should switch over to his SEO company so they can fix the issues prior to being banned. The so-called SEO lists reasons why the site will be banned, such as some bad links (that are out of the control of most site owners) and then gives examples of other sites that have been banned, such as BMW, BigMouthMedia and Traffic Power.

The thread at HighRankings Forum documents this very nicely. After the Web site owner discovered this person was up to no good, and declined the person's services. The scammer sent the Web site owner back and email; "I make sure to report you to Google for link farming. I'm sorry. Your website will be banned and you will not be able to be found on Google not even with your company name." How professional?

Forum discussion at HighRankings Forum.

posted rustybrick in SEM / SEO Companies at March 20, 2006 8:19 AM Comments (7)

GoogleBot Goes Wireless - Google Mobile Transcoding

It looks like we have a new GoogleBot that we need to worry about. The Google spider has the User Agent; "Nokia6820/2.0 (4.83) Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 (compatible; Googlebot-Mobile/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)" and comes from a Google IP address. The bot is not incredibly new, but it is picking up speed. Many Webmasters are noticing this new creature explore their sites. There is a whole section on the Google Remove URL page under the Remove transcoded pages anchor. This transcoding translates the page and strips out some html, which is upsetting to some. Mobile is important to Google, they have even added mobile queries to Google Sitemaps recently.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums, WebmasterWorld and DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 20, 2006 8:05 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Publisher Network Adds Colors, Channels And More

JenSense reports that Yahoo has added a few new features to the Yahoo! Publisher Network interface. They have increased the channels from 50 to 100 per category and reporting URL. In addition, they have added the ability to edit and remove old color style palettes.

The folks are discussing this at DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld.

As an FYI - this maintenance caused a slow update of the YPN stats data. Your stats should now be live and updated. Forum coverage of these concerns can be found also at DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Publisher Network at March 20, 2006 7:46 AM Comments (0)

KinderStart Sues Google Over Being Dropped From Index

Late Friday news came down that Google has been sued by KinderStart.com, a parental advice site, for being demoted in the search rankings. KinderStart is trying to create a class action lawsuit for all Web site owners who have been blacklisted by Google since January 2001. "The complaint accuses Google, as the dominant provider of Web searches, of violating KinderStart's constitutional right to free speech by blocking search engine results showing Web site content and other communications." In addition, the lawsuit wants Google to turn over its secret search ranking algorithms. Plus, the complaint says that KinderStart has served its "its probation inside the "Sandbox" before release by the Defendant Google." For full news write ups, read Silicon Valley or Reuters or News.com. Also, if you like, you can read the whole filing at here, I wanted to capture a screen shot of the second paragraph of the introduction for you here, it is worth a quick scan.

Some information that may be important for this case.

  1. Google has posted its Webmaster guidelines for over three years now, clearly on its Web site.
  2. Google has recently been sending out warning emails to Webmasters who have been crossing over that line.
  3. Google has once officially confirmed a penalty in the past.
  4. KinderStart.com clearly has Google AdSense ads on their site.
  5. KinderStart has not been all that careful with managing its comments.
  6. KinderStart seems to have ~29,800 pages in the Google index. Although there seems to be huge supplemental issues.

Now for the forum roundup;

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at March 20, 2006 6:45 AM Comments (5)

Successful Site Architecture - SES China Day 2

Speaker: Stephen Noton (Adverted)
Position: Senior SEM/SEO Consultant

While Google's been around for just 7 years, Stephen already has 8 years of relevant SEM/SEO experience. Qualified Google Advertising Professional and is an Official Yahoo! Search Marketing Ambassador.

Continue reading "Successful Site Architecture - SES China Day 2"

posted macalua in Search Engine Strategies 2006 China at March 18, 2006 7:05 PM Comments (1)

Perfecting Paid Listings - SES China Day 1

NOTE: I'm not posting verbatim. It's in the first person because it's easier for me to write that way ;) also, some of the Mandarin to English translations made no sense to me and were conveniently left out. I should really start learning Mandarin.

Speaker: Johnny Zhu (Google)
Position: Client Services Team Leader

Johnny starts out with a personal disclaimer "this is my personal view, not Google’s...yadda yadda yadda". But I think he's preaching standard Google information. Some of his examples look very US-centric, e.g. social security number.

Continue reading "Perfecting Paid Listings - SES China Day 1"

posted macalua in Search Engine Strategies 2006 China at March 17, 2006 5:54 PM Comments (1)

Creating Compelling Ads and Landing Pages - SES China Day 1

NOTE: I'm not posting verbatim. It's in the first person because it's easier for me to write that way ;)

Speaker: Dale Hursh (Smart Search Marketing)
Position: CEO
Moderator: Inway Ni

The main group breaks into 2 focus groups: the Fundamentals Track and the Advanced Track. I stayed to watch the Advanced topics initially.

Why do we need to convert?

  1. get the ROI.

  2. competitors are getting valuable marketing data, so should you.

Continue reading "Creating Compelling Ads and Landing Pages - SES China Day 1"

posted macalua in Search Engine Strategies 2006 China at March 17, 2006 5:28 PM Comments (0)

Introduction to Search Engine Marketing: A Global Perspective - SES China Day 1

NOTE: I'm not posting verbatim. It's in the first person because it's easier for me to write that way ;) also, some of the Mandarin to English translations made no sense to me and were conveniently left out.

Speakers: Chris Sherman, Yu Yang (CEO - Analysys International) and Peter Lu (Senior Analyst - China Internet Network Information Center)

Chris talked about SEO 101 stuff so chose not to cover it since I assume most SER visitors are already familiar with it. The auditorium was packed. From my conversations with Chinese business owners, there's a genuine interest in SEO/SEM. Chinese business owners believe that for their brick and mortar businesses to thrive, their websites must be seen by more and more buyers.

Continue reading "Introduction to Search Engine Marketing: A Global Perspective - SES China Day 1"

posted macalua in Search Engine Strategies 2006 China at March 17, 2006 9:56 AM Comments (2)

Google Offers New "Starter" Version of AdWords

Google AdWords is the advertising portal that has revolutionized the search industry, allowing marketers to place search phrase-relevant links to their websites in search results and on other websites. Although it wasn't the first such-system, Google's current value is mostly due to this seemingly simple product. However, for those that have dabbled in it, they know that there are many complexities to the interface that are often not even used.

I posted at Search Engine Watch Forums about setting up an account at AdWords the other day and being given a new option: "Starter" or "Advanced." I chose advanced, but was curious about the new starter system. Well Moderator eWhisper at WebMasterWorld Forums posted later that night with a nice summary of the Starter version setup process. His comments began with

It took me under 1 minute to create an account.
Of course, he is an expert, but this could probably still be accomplished in the matter of minutes for someone newer to the setup process.

Jenstar posted a reply at SEW indicating that the choice was not available to her in Canada. It will be interesting to see if this is a regional test to gauge interest, and if Google plans to promote this somehow, in order to get more advertisers to give the flagship product a shot.

Google's current introduction.

Discussions at Search Engine Watch Forums and WebMasterWorld Forums.

posted chrisboggs in Google AdWords at March 17, 2006 8:53 AM Comments (1)

Search Advertising Patent Applications

Bill Slawski at Cre8asite forums started a thread he named Google advertising patent applications, have fun with a list of several fairly recent patent application on search advertising technology. Here is a quick summary of them:


  1. Adjusting ad costs using document performance or document collection performance
  2. Advertisements for devices with call functionality, such as mobile phones
  3. Facilitating the serving of ads having different treatments and/or characteristics, such as text ads and image ads
  4. Automated graphical advertisement size compatibility and link insertion
  5. System and method for rating electronic documents
  6. Results based personalization of advertisements in a search engine
  7. Rendering content-targeted ads with e-mail
  8. Selectively delivering advertisements based at least in part on trademark issues
  9. System and method for providing on-line user-assisted Web-based advertising
  10. Method and system for providing targeted graphical advertisements
  11. Generating user information for use in targeted advertising
  12. Systems and methods detecting for providing advertisements in a communications network
  13. System and method for enabling an advertisement to follow the user to additional web pages
  14. System and method for automatically targeting web-based advertisements
  15. Generating information for online advertisements from Internet data and traditional media data
  16. Promoting and/or demoting an advertisement from an advertising spot of one type to an advertising spot of another type
  17. Serving advertisements using a search of advertiser Web information
  18. Rendering advertisements with documents having one or more topics using user topic interest information
  19. Using enhanced ad features to increase competition in online advertising
  20. Method and system for dynamic textual ad distribution via email
  21. Serving content-relevant advertisements with client-side device support
  22. Serving advertisements based on content
  23. Methods and apparatus for serving relevant advertisements
  24. Method and system for providing advertising listing variance in distribution feeds over the internet to maximize revenue to the advertising distributor
  25. Method and system for providing filtered and/or masked advertisements over the internet
  26. Method and system for providing advertising through content specific nodes over the internet

Um, wow, ummm, now that is one huge list. Forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Search Technology at March 17, 2006 8:44 AM Comments (0)

Google AdWords Displaying Child Prostitution Ads

Conduct a search on this inappropriate keyword phrase at Google and you will notice an ad that reads;

adwords-illegal-ads.gif

This is obviously a misguided use of Dynamic Keyword Insertion, but you would have thought certain phrases together would trigger some flag at Google. Plus, these ads are totally against Google's Editorial Guidelines.

The search is more shocking over at Google Italy since it currently appears in the top AdWords spot.

I hope this ad is removed soon. Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 17, 2006 8:04 AM Comments (1)

Google AdSense Themed St. Patrick's Day Ads

Google AdSense has AdSense Themed Ads at seasonal times. Today is St. Patrick's Day and many AdSense ads are sporting a theme for St. Patrick's Day. The ads looks somewhat like this;

uglyadsense-st-patricks.gif

But do you think it will improve your click through rate? That is what folks are talking about in the forums, that and how much they dislike the look of these ads.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 17, 2006 7:48 AM Comments (2)

Ask.com Turns Green for St. Patrick's Day; Google & Yahoo Change Logos

If you visit Ask.com at http://www.ask.com/ today, you will notice that the Ask.com home page is green. They have changed the color from red for St. Patrick's Day. In the past Jeeves dressed up; see March 17, 2004 and March 17, 2005. Clicking on the Ask.com green logo takes you to a St. Patrick's Day search as does with Google and Yahoo! (takes you to a non search page) that are also sporting logos for the special day. However, Ask.com's inner search pages are still red, and so is http://uk.ask.com/, however, they do have a special link to a St. Patrick's Day search.

ask-green.gif
google-stpatricks_06.gif
yahoo-spl1.gif

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at March 17, 2006 7:31 AM Comments (3)

Jack Ma Keynote Address - SES China Day 1

NOTE: I'm not posting verbatim. It's in the first person because it's easier for me to write that way ;)

Speaker: Jack Ma (Yahoo!/Alibaba)
Positions: CEO Yahoo! China, CEO/Founder of Alibaba
Moderator: Chris Sherman

Tell us about Yahoo! China.
Yahoo! has been in China for 8 years but we still needed to stabilize the management team and we did that. We’re positioning Yahoo! China/Alibaba to help businesses go online (everyone’s clapping! Jack Ma’s obviously a celebrity in China). When we took over, development of SE technology should be fast. I didn’t change a lot. Yahoo.com.cn acquisition. SE is a tool. It should serve Alibaba users. In ecommerce we lack SE. We took over Yahoo! believing that. Do we develop portal? Or do we develop SE? SE is a very important support to e-commerce. Well we still have 95 years to do it, if we can’t do it this year or next year.

Continue reading "Jack Ma Keynote Address - SES China Day 1"

posted macalua in Search Engine Strategies 2006 China at March 17, 2006 6:52 AM Comments (3)

Johnny Chou Keynote Address - SES China Day 1

NOTE: I'm not posting verbatim. It's in the first person because it's easier for me to write that way ;)

Speaker: Johnny Chou (Google)
Position: Greater China President of Sales and Business Development
Moderator: Chris Sherman moderating

Johnny Chou starts out by mentioning that this is his first SES conference. 4-5 other China Googlers are speaking. Thank You’s are in order. Johnny would like to thank Google’s content partners and media friends in China. He says there are lots of things in store for Google in China. New products are coming in September. Google will continue to recruit the best Chinese talents.

Continue reading "Johnny Chou Keynote Address - SES China Day 1"

posted macalua in Search Engine Strategies 2006 China at March 17, 2006 6:23 AM Comments (1)

SES China Day 0

I'm here in Nanjing and quite excited to begin my coverage of the Search Engine Strategies China conference for SERoundtable.com. Unfortunately, Internet access is only available at the hotel so I'll be able to post the transcripts at night.

The highlight for Day 0 of SES China was the Networker's Party held last night (March 16, 2006). Lots of Chinese Internet professionals and some SEO expats in attendance. Here are some photos I took of the event.

Continue reading "SES China Day 0"

posted macalua in Search Engine Strategies 2006 China at March 17, 2006 5:36 AM Comments (1)

Blocking Yahoo Publisher Network Ads from Internation Traffic

I hear that the Yahoo! Publisher Network does not like its banners to be served up to international users (users outside of the United States). There are even reports of YPN publishers being banned from YPN for having too many international people click or view their ads. That being said, how do you hide your YPN ads from international users?

Disclaimer, I do not implement any of this geo-targeting techniques for YPN ads, so I can not verify that any of these solutions work.

A DigitalPoint thread named Block International Traffic has people discussing several solutions to accomplish the task of geo-targeting your YPN ads. In post # 7 you have a well documented plan to implement geo-targeting for your ads.

(1) Download geoIP.dat and geoip.inc and put the files where you would put your php banner script.
(2) Then use this code for your YPN ads;

<?
// This part gets the ip of the visitor and matches it to a country name/code

include("geoip.inc");
$gi = geoip_open("GeoIP.dat",GEOIP_STANDARD);

$visitor_country_code=geoip_country_code_by_addr($gi, $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']);
$visitor_country_name=geoip_country_name_by_addr($gi, $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']);

//This part shows banners/codes that YOU decide for each country

switch ($visitor_country_name) {
case "United States": { ?>

<script language="JavaScript">
<!--
ctxt_ad_partner = "xxxxxxxxxx";
ctxt_ad_section = "";
ctxt_ad_bg = "";
ctxt_ad_width = 250;
ctxt_ad_height = 250;
ctxt_ad_bc = "FFFFFF";
ctxt_ad_cc = "FFFFFF";
ctxt_ad_lc = "FFFFFF";
ctxt_ad_tc = "111111";
ctxt_ad_uc = "111111";
// -->
</script>
<script language="JavaScript" src="http://ypn-js.overture.com/partner/js/ypn.js">
</script>
<? }
}
?>

That should be it. There are also more details on this page post # 25, specifically.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Publisher Network at March 16, 2006 8:11 AM Comments (0)

SEM Salaries; The Real Deal on What You Should be Paid

Yesterday, I covered at the SEW Blog a ClickZ article about SEM Salaries. Here is a quick summary on how much SEMs get paid based on the ClickZ article.

  • Entry-level SEM position; $30,000 to $45,000 or about $10 per hour.
  • Three to five years of experience; $50,000 to $75,000.
  • Expert-level; $75,000 to $90,000
  • Senior managers; $70,000 to $120,000
  • SEM Directors; $95,000 to $150,000
  • VP level positions; $100,000 to $200,000

Danny then broke out a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums he named SEM Salaries - What People Are Paying. The thread has real SEMs talking about what they get paid. A person who is in France with 5-years experience is earning $24,000. AussieWebmaster said that Amex was offering $95k base with bonuses up to 15% of salary and options. Joe Morin added that he knew of two companies with a job open for a VP of Search with a salary of $250K+ with the top one willing to go as high as $315K.

It seems like salaries do vary widely based on job requirements, location of job, and the place you work at.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in SEM / SEO Companies at March 16, 2006 7:56 AM Comments (4)

11-Year-Old Fails With Google And Switches To Yahoo!

All the debate if Yahoo! is a more relevant or better search engine than Google continues. We ran our Search Engine Relevancy Challenge, which showed at the 10,000 result mark that Yahoo! was more relevant than Google at the time of the study. But at some point, Google took the lead at the live results page to have a 0.1764 lead over Yahoo!, not sure when that happened, last time I checked Yahoo! was in the lead.

I found a thread at DigitalPoint Forums named Interesting Google story from my daughter last night. The story shows how an 11-year-old tried to find material for school on Google and was to frustrated that she switched search engines to Yahoo! She discovered what she was looking for, ultimately at Yahoo! Search. Here is the story as documented at the forums;

Daughter says, "So dad I was working on my architecture project and presentation last night for social studies. I ended up using Yahoo to find my answers instead of Google."

Dad says, "Oh? Why is that?"

Daughter says, "I tried Google first and all I was finding was amazon site trying to sell me books on architecture."

Dad says, "So then you tried Yahoo?"

Daughter says, "Yes. I was able to find 2 sites on the first page of Yahoo last night that helped me a lot on my project!"

Dad says, "You couldn't find anything on Google?"

Daughter says, "No. Not on the first page. I gave up."

Dad says, "What words did you use in your search?"

Daughter says, "I don't remember. I was trying to find different blue prints and general architecture information."

Dad says, "Well that is why there is more then one search engine, good for you trying more then just one!"

So which engine is the most relevant? I think the last line sums it up well. "Well that is why there is more then one search engine, good for you trying more then just one!"

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at March 16, 2006 7:44 AM Comments (1)

Google Toolbar Leaves Beta & Adds Quick Search

Yesterday at the SEW Blog I covered the news that Google Desktop 3 Leaves Beta, Gains Quick Search Feature. What I find very interesting about all of this is that there is virtually zero to very little forum discussion on this topic. The only forum thread I found about this was not at WebmasterWorld or Search Engine Watch, like you would think - but at our forum. The thread title in our forum is wrong, it is out of beta, if you would like to discuss, you can visit Search Engine Roundtable Forums. The new quick search feature looks like a cool "widget" that may be helpful for PC users, on a Mac, I just hit the "apple" key and the space bar to bring up spotlight.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at March 16, 2006 7:34 AM Comments (1)

Google Indexing JavaScript; Crawling Like a Human?

Chris Boggs wrote a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named Googlebot called me on my Timpani Live Help. Timpani Live, is the live chat application from LivePerson, the most popular live chat Web based solution on the Web today. The application is generated via a JavaScript snippet of code you place on your pages. Since we know Google won't index JavaScript, we normally do not need to worry about GoogleBot ringing for help. Or do we?

Chris said that he was prompted with a chat prompt from GoogleBot on his Live Person Timpani agent. At first, I thought, that someone changed his user agent to GoogleBot but then he provided more details. He provided the referrer information, which showed the IP source came from Google.

Browser Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.google.com/bot.html) Host address crawl-66-249-64-44.googlebot.com Host IP 66.249.64.44 Country United States City Mountain View Organization GOOGLE World Region California Postal Code 94043 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ISP GOOGLE Connection Type Unknown

He then provided the code used on his particular site;

<!-- START LivePerson Button code --> <a href='http://server.iad.liveperson.net/hc/74320687/?cmd=file&file=visitorWantsToChat&site=74320687&byhref=1&imageUrl=http://www.g3group.com/assets/images/chat' target='chat74320687' onClick="javascript:window.open('http://server.iad.liveperson.net/hc/74320687/?cmd=file&file=visitorWantsToChat&site=74320687&imageUrl=http://www.g3group.com/assets/ images/chat&referrer='+escape(document.location), 'chat74320687 ','width=472,height=320');return false;" >< img src='http://server.iad.liveperson.net/hc/74320687/?cmd=repstate&site=74320687&&ver=1&imageUrl=http://www.g3group.com/assets/images/chat' alt="chat with us" name='hcIcon' width=125 height=60 border=0></a> <!-- END LivePerson Button code -->

I have heard rumors of such GoogleBot activity in the past.

Is GoogleBot becoming more human like? Can we be getting to the stage of the invisible spider? This post is kind of related to the Current Issues With Cloaking Using IP Delivery Technology.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 16, 2006 7:15 AM Comments (3)

15 Reasons Why You May Be An Undesirable Search Engine Optimization Client

Wondering why you can't find any SEO company? The following article below examines the reasons why you may not be an ideal SEO client and the reasons for that. I wrote this article based on some experience I have recently with some people that I have turned down but still insist on hiring me. How do I tell me I am not interested? This is a letter addressed to the unwanted SEO client. For more forum discussion on this see SEroundtable Forums.

Dear Unwanted SEO Client,

As I see it, you have two options. One you can run yelling and kicking to the next SEO company complaining that the last one didn't like your website and you need them to sign you up at a low low rate because you don't have an SEO budget or you think you don't need one. Can you survive for a time on free SEO Handouts? Eventually you may realize this probably isn't the best option.

Your second option is to realize that while you may have a website that no one wants to work with (really, its possible), you may have no money, you have ambitious dreams that not even you can justify, and that for once you might just have to do this SEO work yourself. You will have to create and find value in this SEO work or else it will pass your by and any hopes of ranking highly in the search engines.

In the last couple weeks I have been petitioned by a couple of "psuedo SEO clients" that insist on calling me for information on what to do with their website. Now I am a nice guy and I always give new clients a free 30 minutes of my time. Sometimes more if I know they need it. I have to pay the bills like everyone else and there becomes a point when "free advice" needs to become "paid advice". If you don't want to pay for "paid advice" then move on. So the client moves on...

Read the Full Article here - What To Do If You're The SEO Client Nobody Wants

posted Phoenix in SEM / SEO Companies at March 15, 2006 1:08 PM Comments (4)

Interested in Helping Design a Search Engine?

This is a quick follow-up post from last month's coverage of some threads at Cre8asite and SEW, discussing creating new search engines and titled Building a better search engine.

Apparently, after a month or so of trying, SEW member David has decided that he can't do it by himself after all, and is asking for others that may be interested in partnering with him on the project. If you have thought about building a search engine or directory but also felt it was too large of a task, perhaps you should contact him?

All I ask is that if you get something going you come back to the forum and let us know how things are doing, as I am sure many would be interested in hearing more about the trials and tribulations of undertaking such a project.

See the request for partners at post #20 of the thread at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted chrisboggs in Other Search Engines at March 15, 2006 10:19 AM Comments (0)

Buying and Accepting Payments at Google Base

Last night I wrote about being Accepted by Google Base to Sell Through Google Payments. This morning I discovered I have a "Buy" button on my Google Base page. So I created a product for a $1 and placed an order, let me take you through the buying and processing process at Google Payments...

Continue reading "Buying and Accepting Payments at Google Base"

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at March 15, 2006 9:15 AM Comments (1)

Ad Filtering Can Make a Huge Difference in AdSense Income

Yesterday, a member at WebmasterWorld named Nitrous started a thread named Dumping the 200 filtered ads to see what happens! Basically, he removed all the sites he filtered in his Competitive Ad Filter list to see what type of impact it would have on his earnings over a 24 hour period. Well the test is almost over and the results are in as of midnight last night.

ECPM down by 25 percent. Earnings are 74 dollars... Instead of a hundred or so expected.

So it seems by this brief test, using the Adsense Competitive Ad Filter should increase your overall figures, if used properly.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 15, 2006 8:39 AM Comments (0)

SEO & Google Make it to the Economist

A story at The Economist named Dancing with Google's spiders (subscription required) talks about how SEOs work to achieve top rankings for their clients on Google. Here is the free abstract;

The industrious spider bots that crawl around the web on behalf of Google, the world's biggest search engine, evoke both fear and reverence. Late last year the bots swept through the world's web servers to scrutinise some 8 billion web pages and determine their new rankings in Google's search results. As Google tweaks its mighty ranking algorithms, and applies them to the constantly changing pages of the web, different sites shuffle up and down wildly in its search rankings, repeatedly gaining and losing ground.…

Both Search Engine Watch Forums and WebmasterWorld have threads on this topic. Here are some quotes pulled from the article and placed in the forums;

Like hurricanes, Google Dances are given names, such as Bourbon, Gilligan, and Florida, often by commentators at a website called webmasterworld.com.
Matt Cutts, a senior engineer at Google who is assailed with algorithm questions at industry conferences, says his firm like its competitors, carefully controls access to its secrets. ‘A lot of our best ideas don’t get filed as patents because patents eventually become public.
The most powerful determinant of a webpage’s importance is the number of incoming referral links, which is regarded as a gauge of the site’s popularity.
Unethical methods, known as ‘black-hat SEO’, including renting links from popular or long established sites (their links carry more weight). Some unscrupulous SEO outfits even exploit loopholes in website-managements tools to place hidden links on prestigious sites, such as those maintained by universities.

Is SEO becoming a household name? It is just amazing watching this industry grow.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums and WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at March 15, 2006 8:23 AM Comments (1)

Current Issues With Cloaking Using IP Delivery Technology

Rand Fishkin started an excellent thread at Cre8asite forums named Cloaking Beyond IP Delivery, Discussing Other Methods to Limit Access. In his thread, he asks people for alternatives to the cloaking through IP delivery methods. He states that several black-hat SEOs have said cloaking through IP delivery "has become passe." Rand asked for alternatives. Instead of focusing on the alternatives, which can lead a site to be kicked out of the index if implemented wrong, let's focus on the history of IP based delivery to perform what is known as cloaking.

For that we must read Ammon Johns post which goes through some of the history of IP delivery and its faults. Ammon explains that based on how IP delivery works, if you are missing an IP address of a spider, then the spider will be served your standard page and not the page you would like to serve up to the spider. So Ammon then moves on to what he calls "decloaking hazards" that have shown up over the past several years. Here is a list, provided by Ammon, of some of the "decloaking hazards:"

  • Translation services, such as Alta Vista's Babel Fish Translation that showed translation of the page the spider was served and not what the end user was served.
  • The Cache feature at the search engines, when you click on the cached page, it would show the page the spider was served and not what the end user was served. Of course you can tell the search engine not to cache the page, but back in the day, it was a great way for search engines to find sites that were likely to cloak - it raised a red flag. Ammon explained that cloakers had to use hidden text on the cloaked pages, to serve up a page that looked similar in the cache to those that the end users saw.
  • Toolbars and Desktop search came out, giving search engines yet an other method "to 'sample' exactly what the user is getting if it is even one bit different to what the engine has recorded."
  • Finally, search engines can and probably do send spiders through proxies and have spiders that act more human-like, making them extremely hard to detect and cloak properly.

So before deploying a form of IP Delivery, discuss it with professionals and also make sure to check out the Cre8asite Forum Thread.

posted rustybrick in Cloaking / IP Delivery at March 15, 2006 7:47 AM Comments (0)

Jenstar Quoted in TheStreet Article on Google AdWords Demographics

An article at TheStreet.com named Google Targets Ad Gains has a quote from Search Engine Watch Forums moderator, contextual ad correspondent of the Search Engine Watch blog, and of well known JenSense.com, Jennifer Slegg. Jennifer is asked for a comment on the recent addition of demographic targeting added to AdWords, where she says;

It will enable advertisers to be more selective in the types of sites they want their ads appearing on.

There is a kudos to Jennifer Slegg thread at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 15, 2006 7:38 AM Comments (0)

Accepted by Google Base to Sell Through Google Payments

I received a notification from Google that I have been accepted to sell items through Google Payments at Google Base. I decided to document the process of accepting payments at Google Base through Google Payments, for the test Google Base product I listed tonight. I will use the extended entry for the remainder of this article, to view the article click here.

Update; Posted Buying and Accepting Payments at Google Base just now.

Continue reading "Accepted by Google Base to Sell Through Google Payments"

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at March 14, 2006 9:48 PM Comments (5)

PageRank Discussions Continue (Alternate Title: The Sun Rises)

Some swear by it, others such as Mike Grehan call it "green fairy dust." Anyway you slice it, PageRank is a topic of discussion that is never-ending. Occasionally, a really good thread comes out about this subject, and one at the High Rankings Forum going on now fits that bill, in my opinion.

A member asks what he can do to "leverage" the PR on his site to "help" other other internal pages, and is wisely instructed to make sure his navigation is sound. Then the thread starts getting good. Moderator Ron and highly respected member Michael Martinez begin a dialogue about the power of a page to "confer" PageRank.

This is not light reading, and includes a few "potshots" that may end up edited-out. Personally, I feel that people obsess a little over PageRank, but what can you expect from a topic that always incites such heated debate?

See the thread at High Rankings Forum.

posted chrisboggs in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at March 14, 2006 6:32 PM Comments (0)

Google Buys Another Cool Gadget...3D Mapping Soon?

Barry blogged this morning about Google's recent purchase of SketchUp (was trying to think about a "catsup vs. ketchup" joke here but I am slow today I think). According to the site, we will soon be able to use this product as described:

SketchUp Google Earth plugin, you can use Google Earth to view 3D models in their real-world context. You're no longer limited to just viewing the world through satellite imagery; now you can build on the tapestry provided by Google Earth.

There is a cool example at the above link, as well as instructions about downloading the product and taking it for a spin. I am personally not a big user of Google earth, having practically no time for it, but I am sure this could be of great use to many people. Of the top of my head comes the real estate profession, potentially savings thousands of dollars in aerial photography costs alone? I also assume there will be certain areas not "mapable," based on post 9/11 security issues

The discussions have just started at Search Engine Watch Forums and at the Roundtable Forums.

posted chrisboggs in Other Google Topics at March 14, 2006 5:48 PM Comments (1)

Supplemental Index Issues Resolving at Google

I reported on March 9th that the Supplemental Index Issues Discovered; Should be Visible within a Few Days. GoogleGuy posted at WebmasterWorld yesterday stating that many of the supplemental issues should be resolved now. He said;

Okay, quite a few people should see their pages coming back. If you haven't seen any change (that is, if your pages are still supplemental), I'd like to look into that too so that I can see if there's any common factor remaining. So: if your pages are still supplemental, feel free to write to sesnyc06 [at] gmail.com with the subject line of "stillsupplemental" (all one word), and I'll ask someone to check the emails out.

Hope that helps, and I'm glad that lots of people are seeing a full recovery,
GoogleGuy

There are several members who still see issues. I suspect the next batch of email reports sent to Google will help resolve the remaining issues.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 14, 2006 10:50 AM Comments (1)

Google Personalizing Results Beyond the Remove Result Feature

Google personalizes the results of some of those who search while logged into their Google Account. You should see a "Turn OFF Personalzied Results" message on the page some where, if your results are being personalized. We do not know exactly what criteria Google uses to personalize the results, but you can expect it to relate to your search history, click behavior from the engine and other search behavior. The thing is, some people do not realize the results are being personalized.

Barry Welford, Cre8asite Moderator, started a thread named Does your browser affect rankings? He believed, at first, it was a browser based personalization of his results. Not until later did he find out it was based on his Google search history. Does that mean that Google personalized search is not obvious to the user? Should it be explained clearer? Or should it just work as is?

I have a tough time arguing against either side of the debate. One one hand, serve the best results for the individual and no need to tell them more (it just confuses things). On the other hand, if you are changing the editorial purity of the results based on any criteria, even personalized search behavior, then you must clearly label the page as so. For Barry W. to miss that, it can't be clearly labeled.

Forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 14, 2006 8:14 AM Comments (1)

Google Steps Up Webmaster Spam Warning Emails

It seems as if Google has stepped up its use of the Google Notification of Site Removal emails, that we first reported on in September of 2005. A WebmasterWorld thread named Warning from Google about black hat SEO shows a Webmaster or two discussing the emails they received. The thread notes, you need to be careful about fake notifications from spammers and make sure to authenticate the email source header.

It appears that the newly formatted delisting email from Google reads;

Dear site owner or webmaster of yoursite.com/,

While we were indexing your webpages, we detected that some of your pages were using techniques that were outside our quality guidelines, which can be found here: http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html
In order to preserve the quality of our search engine, we have temporarily removed some webpages from our search results. Currently pages from yoursite.com/ are scheduled to be removed for at least 30 days.

Specifically, we detected the following practices on your webpages:

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 14, 2006 8:04 AM Comments (0)

What Do You Love & Hate About Google?

Danny Sullivan has posted two entries of the top 25 things he loves and hates about Google. It is makes for a quick or long read, but very scannable, if you want that. The lists are great and deserves forum discussion on the threads. For each blog post, Danny has a corresponding forum thread.

Now that Danny shared his personal reasons for loving and hating Google, he wants you to share your personal reasons at:

- What Do You Love About Google
- What Do You Hate About Google?

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at March 14, 2006 7:57 AM Comments (0)

Books for Sale at Google Book Search

Danny Sullivan has the nice write up explaining that Google will be partnering with publishers to sell online books. I am totally surprised this has not received more attention in the search engine industry forums. Danny started a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums and no one has commented or replied. No other forum has a thread on the book selling deal with Google, that I can find. I still feel it is important to mention here.

Google is to sell some books online, forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

Update: WebmasterWorld posted a thread just now on the topic.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at March 14, 2006 7:31 AM Comments (0)

The Link Buying Conundrum

The latest big worry on the horizon seems to be about buying links. Although this is a widespread practice, and some very reputable companies that actually broker links have not been banned by Google, many are worried due to Google's recent alleged crackdown on paid links.

A thread at High Rankings Forum covers this topic from a "newbie" viewpoint, as the member paints his scenario of being worried about buying links. Another thread at SEW Forums recently brought up the same topic, and a member there actually received a typically veiled response from Google about his site including the old

Certain actions such as buying or selling links to increase a site's PageRank value or cloaking...can result in penalization. Please review our quality guidelines at

The topic recently had its own session at SES NYC, covered here by Ben, and Debra Mastaler wisely suggested:

...to be careful of buying links from page that use words like “sponsored links” and so on the page.

This looks to be one of the big debates of 2006...can Google and others accurately figure out if you bought a link without the telltale "Buy Links here" on the linking site?

Give your opinion at High Rankings Forums
or
Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted chrisboggs in Link Building at March 13, 2006 4:53 PM Comments (0)

Search for Gmail Addresses at Google Search

Do you want a list of active gmail address to add to your mailing list? Well, Google is giving it out completely free of charge. Just use this search command at Google to get, currently, 13,000 results; site:~.googlepages.com. Of course, it is illegal to email these people without permission but that doesn't stop most spammers.

DaveN posted a thread about this at DigitalPoint forums named Google Schoolboy Error ?? In that thread DaveN explained how he came to figure this out. He noticed a ton of new spam in his gmail account, and then did some digging to come up with the googlepages privacy concern. So spam me, why don't ya?

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at March 13, 2006 8:19 AM Comments (14)

Rumors of Google Hiring 15 Year Old Not True

Last night I was scanning Digg.com and noticed Google hires 15-year old kid. Now the article is under review, after almost 1,000 diggs. The, what seems to be, real looking press release is a fraud. A thread at Cre8asite Forums notes how the information on the press release is wrong. First thing is that Larry Page isn't Google's CEO anymore, Eric Schimidt is and has been since 2001. The kids blog seems to be down now, but reportedly, it has a post saying the release is not true.

Press release spam is a major issue these days and so is control of social networking scams.

Forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at March 13, 2006 8:07 AM Comments (1)

Peeking Into Google Reveals More of Google's Architecture

An article at InternetNews.com from March 2nd, has Google vice president of operations and vice president of engineering, Urs Hoelzle revealing some of the "behind-the-scenes tour of Google's architecture."

Bill Slawski at Cre8asite Forums created a thread on this article named Google's architecture, Informative news story where he pulled out a couple quotes.

Google replicates the Web pages it caches by splitting them up into pieces it calls "shards." The shards are small enough that several can fit on one machine. And they're replicated on several machines, so that if one breaks, another can serve up the information. The master index is also split up among several servers, and that set also is replicated several times. The engineers call these "chunk servers."
The company also is applying machine learning to its system to give better results. Theoretically, he said, if someone searches for "Bay Area cooking class," the system should know that "Berkeley courses: vegetarian cuisine" is a good match even though it contains none of the query words.

To do this, the system tries to cluster concepts into "reasonably coherent" subclusters that seem related. These clusters, some tiny and some huge, are named automatically. Then, when a query comes in, the system produces a probability score for the various clusters. This kind of machine learning has had little success in academic trials, Hoelzle said, because they didn't have enough data. "If you have enough data, you get reasonably good answers out of it."

The article is definitely worth a read and then join the forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 13, 2006 7:55 AM Comments (2)

Possible Yahoo! Search Update

A thread at WebmasterWorld shows a possible Yahoo! index or ranking update taking place now. It may be the very early stages or it may not be happening at all. But confirmation comes from Dayo_UK, a senior member at WebmasterWorld, "I now see this update starting." The update seems to be coming in and out, some are noticing it, some notice it and can not see it now and so on. Very "Google Dance" like, are how people are describing this update.

I will track this and provide updates as it happens.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at March 13, 2006 7:48 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Refunds Click Fraud Without Customer Requesting Refund

A thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named Kudos to YSM Click Fraud Dept shows how two moderators have received automated email notifications from Yahoo! Search Marketing that they have been refunded money (some a large amount) for click fraud. Elisabeth, Search Engine Watch Forums Editor said,

Iwas pleasantly surprised to see a couple of automatic emails from YSM notifying me that they had automatically credited a few (one was a fairly significant dollar figure) of my clients' accounts for "some unusual clicks on your account that were not detected before they reached your account balance."

Andrew Goodman adds that "We recently received word of a substantial refund that we were not even claiming was fraud, just a spike in content spend that was quite unwanted."

This is the type of proactive action a PPC engine should take to build advertiser confidence and help the search marketing industry grow. Kudos to Yahoo! Search Marketing!

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Marketing at March 13, 2006 7:36 AM Comments (0)

Google Mars; Google Maps Mars

mars_logo.gif
Google has launched Google Mars according to Garett Rogers. It is live at http://www.google.com/mars/ with three views, "elevation", "visible" and "infrared." This is also now live at Google Labs with the date 3/13/06. The About Google Mars page has more details;

This map of Mars, published by Percival Lowell in 1895, was the result of many years spent carefully studying the Red Planet through his telescope. Now you can do the same through your web browser. In collaboration with NASA researchers at Arizona State University, we've created some of the most detailed scientific maps of Mars ever made.

The about us also tells us that Mars looks like "butterscotch." They are also working on a Google Earth like version of Google Mars. I wonder when we will get Mars driving directions, with local paid results.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums, DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at March 13, 2006 7:25 AM Comments (1)

Why Does "Loan" Bring Up Olympics Google Box?

During the Olympics Google worked with NBC to provide NBC Scores Graphical Ads/Promos. They may be perceived as ads, but they do not look like they are ads based on the click through URL. The big deal back then was that if you did a search on olympics you received the "one box" result. But try a search on loan today and you may get;

loan-olympics-googles.jpg
View Large Image

This may not be the most relevant result to those searching on the term loan. So I thought I would click over, which has the click through URL;

http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=wolympics4&q=http://www.nbcolympics.com/athletes/5085169/detail.html%3Fqs%3D%3Bt%3D14%3Btab%3DResults

So this does not look like a loan ad by the URL or the result. So I figured I would test this out on some more popular olympic names. Such as Shaun White or Apolo Anton Ohno neither brought up the NBC olympics box, in the last name query or full name query.

Something has to be wrong here; (1) Why would Google show an olympics result for a term like "loan"? (2) Why wouldn't they show an olympics box for a full name of a popular olympics athlete?

I started a thread on this discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at March 12, 2006 10:40 AM Comments (4)

"Original Content" aka "Frankenstein Pages"

A nice thread has been started in the form of a rant by High Rankings Forum member "copywriter." In "It's Illegal And Unethical And They Know It!", she describes the recent fad of "creating unique content" by pasting together thoughts from different articles and other content already found on the Internet. Jill gets to the crux of the matter; describing it as “spammer software.”

...those spam machines that claim to produce unique original copy. The folks that use these and those that create it try to say that it's not stealing, because they're only taking a sentence from here, and another one from there.

This new "Frankenstein" content, as I call it, has the ability to not only look bad from a human perspective, but also to potentially dilute the effectiveness of some original content. People are jumping on the bandwagon in decrying this technique, rightfully so in my opinion. Rand makes a good action suggestion:

IMO, there are only two ways to solve this issue in the long term:
1. Dis-incentive the tactic - remove the monetary or traffic potential
2. Remove the ranking ability; this is up to the SE's algo teams

Speak your mind on the subject at High Rankings Forums (added 3/13: the software creator is now taking part in this discussion, which has really blossomed)

posted chrisboggs in SEO Copywriting at March 10, 2006 3:35 PM Comments (0)

AdSense Adds AdWords to the Referrals Tab for Some Publishers

JenSense reports that Google has added a Google AdWords referral option to the referral settings page in your AdSense console. This gives some publishers, in select countries, that ability to earn commissions on referrals for AdWords. Jennifer said "you can now earn $20 when you refer a new AdWords advertiser, once they have spent $100 on advertising within 90 days of signing up." Who is this open to? Those in the following countries; Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 10, 2006 8:20 AM Comments (0)

Google Calendar for Real?

We have been hearing rumors of Google Calendar since last September. But it seems that we have real screen captures, this time, of screen captures at Tech Crunch of the Google Calendar in action. Here is just one frame.

google-cal21.gif

I have not found many threads on the topic, but Umit just started one at our forums named Gmail Calendar, yes it should and would be integrated into Gmail.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at March 10, 2006 8:13 AM Comments (0)

AdWords Adds "Settings" Toggle, Updates Traffic Estimator & More

It seems as if Google has updated AdWords to add a "settings" link on the keyword level pages. Here is a screen capture of what you may see;

adwords-settings-option.gif

Many of the WebmasterWorld members dislike this new placement of the settings link. Moderator eWhisper said; "Actually, I liked the old style more. The ability to quickly mouse over a few URLs to check the tracking codes was very useful."

Later on in the thread, members also notice that the Traffic Estimator tool has been updated. One member said that the tool does "not give an exact number, but a range of estimates, making the estimator feature even more useless." Cline adds (1) Inability to easily see and sort on destination urls, (2) harder to interpret traffic estimates, and (3) loss of the totals line for the traffic estimates all add up to a worse tool.

He also notes that there is a thread that shows how now reports can only be generated using IE and does not currently work in Firefox.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 10, 2006 8:00 AM Comments (0)

Accoona - AI Search or Poor Search?

There has been a lot of recent news on Accoona, a search engine "with interactive tools that provides users with better web, business and news results; powered by proprietary Artificial Intelligence technology." The news is that Accoona Relaunches 'AI Search' Engine specifically "targeting media outlets and businesses."

So I dug up a thread on this news at DigitalPoint Forums and found that most of those that replied to the thread think Accoona is a poor search engine. In fact, one member created a site named Acoona Sucks based on his initial experience with it. Why does Acoona suck? Because they have a representative joining forums and posting information about Acoona without telling the forum folks that they are from Acoona and have a bias. To be fair, it looks like they have posted under their name in the past, back in March, here and here.

So does Accoona suck or is it not that bad? Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Other Search Engines at March 10, 2006 7:48 AM Comments (1)

Pictures of Inside Google: "Google Office Spy Photos"

There is a thread at DigitalPoint forums with dozens of pictures of Google's office, the thread is named Google Office Spy Photos (INSANE!). Some pictures that come up for me (not all of them are working due to bandwidth limitations) include Employee's Cubicle, Employee Food area, a Ball pit, Office of CEO (Eric Schmidt), Larry Page & Sergey Brin Support Area, Larry Page Cubicle, Sergey Brin Massage Chair and more.

I wonder where he got them from and how old they are.

posted rustybrick in at March 10, 2006 7:31 AM Comments (0)

Google Buys Writely; Ventures into Web Word Processing Applications

Yesterday there were tons of morning rumors that Google would by Writely, a "Web Word Processor" application. Well, last night they made it official and bought them. What does this mean? Well, hello Microsoft. GDrive integration? Etc.

Of course the forums are buzzing about this buy and here is a run down:

Either people in the forums think Google is stupid or way too smart. I think that search has to go beyond the Web. And Google is looking for ways to go beyond the Web in a more efficient manner. We have desktop search, but why not own the desktop? GDrive, why not own the data storage? Gmail, etc.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at March 10, 2006 7:20 AM Comments (0)

Wedding Registries Being Indexed Causing Fraudulent Registry Orders

My finance calls me, she is all nervous, she says people are placing fake orders on our registry. She starts listing off names of people and their location. I never heard of any of the people she lists off. The list of people are names of people who have placed orders on our various gift registries but we have never received any of those items. What is even more out of the ordinary is that some of the items in the registries have order quantities of 10 or more, when we only request one. So I ask some of my SEO buddies what they think...

Oilman told me that what is likely happening is that the registry is being indexed by a search engine or two. People are searching for product, finding our registry and ordering the items, without knowing it is from a registry. The issue is, my finance now needs to zero out all the 'fraudulent' gift orders. This way people who think we have 10 items know we really have none and can buy it for us. Yea, she is pretty upset with me about this.

I wonder if the 220 others from Crate & Barrel and 800 others from Bed Bath & Beyond in my position are being scolded for this as well?

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

If you are a digger, try to dig this story.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at March 9, 2006 2:39 PM Comments (9)

Is Your Site One of the "Chosen Ones?"

How can you find out if one of your URL's has been specifically targeted by a Google Contextual advertiser? Digital Point Forum member Amit points out exactly how to see from within the advanced reports page in the G interface if you are "site-targeted" or not.

The thread has led to some well-deserved thanks from many readers, as well as a couple good questions, including:

I have some site targeted impressions with some eCPM accociated with them, but there is no earning (0.00) Number of impressions are really small, like 1-10...but still no earnings??
which apparently may have been seen by Google and responded-to within their blog. (<---Great info in this post)

I am running off now to see how popular some of our sites are, but check out the thread at Digital Point Forums for the full scoop.

posted chrisboggs in Google AdSense at March 9, 2006 11:32 AM Comments (1)

MSN Senior Exec Speaks Boldly

Note: catching up on threads from the past week or so.

Good catch of a Yahoo News Article at the SER forums notes that MSN is rattling sabers in its bid to overtake Google Search. The article quotes Neil Holloway, Microsoft president for Europe, Middle East and Africa, as saying that MSN's new search product would overtake Google in the US Market within a very short time period:

"What we're saying is that in six months' time we'll be more relevant in the U.S. market place than Google."

The article goes on to speak about problems "playing fair" that Microsoft has had in the past, and also notes that just because it may be better doesn't mean it will be more popular. MS is also apparently banking on its ability to tie it into other products, felling that Google may be "more isolated." Isn't this a bit what they got into to trouble for last time(s)?

The discussion is getting going at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.

Also covered at Webmaster World Forums

posted chrisboggs in Microsoft MSN Search at March 9, 2006 11:06 AM Comments (0)

Live Coverage of SES China March 17-18, 2006

I wanted to let you all know that we will be covering SES China 2006 live at this site, like we do with most of the Search Engine Strategies conferences. I personally will not be in China, but we have a volunteer who will be providing the detailed and immediate coverage of the sessions, as they happen, in China. The event will take place March 17-18, 2006 in Nanjing International Exhibition Center, Nanjing, China. The event is in both Chinese and English, so it should be interesting.

Our correspondent who will be covering the event is Marc Hil Macalua. He will be posting under the name macalua. Marc Hil Macalua is Director of Development for one of the leading contact centers in the Philippines. When not busy with enterprise IT project management duties, he’s out there helping people earn decent incomes online through two Internet marketing focused properties: his Macalua.com blog and the SEO Philippines mailing list. Marc holds a B.S. in Communications Technology and a Minor in Marketing, both from the Ateneo de Manila University. More information on Marc here.

Thank you Marc!

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2006 China at March 9, 2006 8:21 AM Comments (5)

Major Shifts in Google? Back in Time to December 27th

A thread at WebmasterWorld named Pre December 27th Roll Back? has several people noticing a roll back in the Google search result pages from pre December 27th results. Senior Member Walman adds, "a site of mine just disappeared from top positions." Can this be directly related to the supplemental index fix?

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 9, 2006 8:13 AM Comments (0)

Supplemental Index Issues Discovered; Should be Visible within a Few Days

I wanted to provide an update on the supplemental index issue many are noticing in the Google SERPs. Many pages have fall within what is known as the "supplemental index" in the SERPs, I explained in my initial update that Google to Fix Supplemental Index Issues in About a Week. GoogleGuy posted late last night in WebmasterWorld forums the following update;

I wanted to stop by and give an update. I think we found what the immediate issue was. Future indexing should start picking up most affected people's pages again, though it may take a few more days for it to be visible. I'll check in again after the weekend is over to see if most people are seeing pages returning.

As you can see, Google is being great with communication with the Webmaster. Also, I hope this solves the issues many are having. I will have more updates as we get them here.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 9, 2006 8:02 AM Comments (0)

Google AdWords Adds Demographic Targeting

On a positive note for Google and its customer, Google added demographic information to enable more granular targeting of searchers. Before, this was a feature exclusive to the MSN adCenter beta PPC system, but now Google has it. Jenstar at SEW Blog has a recap on Google AdWords Launches Demographic Site Targeting, describing that you can break down by Gender, Age, Income, Ethnicity, and if they have Children. She also adds that AdWords allows you more advanced use of this then adCenter, "presently, adCenter allows demographic targeting by gender and age group, however adCenter splits age between five age groups while AdWords offers six."

Where does Google get this information from? Not Gmail, not Orkut or other Google properties. They get it from comScore Media Metrix and is United States only, so if you are not geo-targeting the US then you won't get the demographics options, within site targeted campaigns. More information at What is demographic site selection?

Here is a screen capture of this interface:

demographics-adwords-s.gif

View Full Image

Forums have not yet begun buzzing about it, so here is the list I have so far.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 9, 2006 7:24 AM Comments (0)

Google to Return $90 Million to US AdWords Customers with Fraudulent Clicks

In a class action law suit on click fraud against Google and other engines (Google's AdWords partners). Google and Lane's Gifts & Collectibles (the one who filed the claim) settled on $90 million settlement fund to be returned to US based AdWords customers with invalid clicks. The class action lawsuit does not seem to involve those outside of the US; Danny Sullivan said "To date, Google's had no lawsuits over click fraud filed outside the US." If you want the whole run down, I recommend reading Danny's SEW entry.

Let me pull out one comment that maybe Wall Street will understand, but probably wont.

The why answer seems a no brainer for me. A $90 million settlement, compared to Google's revenues, is cheap to get this particular issue resolved. It seems likely to buy an out from all potential cases going back for years. Compared to the estimated $260 to $290 million Google spent to resolve a patent lawsuit with Yahoo, this deal seems an especially cheap, smart one to take.

Forums are discussing this right now at:

posted rustybrick in Legal Issues in Search at March 9, 2006 7:13 AM Comments (0)

Inverted Pyramid Writing - Techiques To Help Influence A Site's Relevance

When was the last time you brushed up on your meta-description or content writing skills? Or how about the last time you actually considered the first paragraph of the page as the top of a content pyramid of that helps define your whole site or page?

On WebmasterWorld there is an excellent thread on the topic of Inverted Pyramid Writing. What is it and how does it influence a sites relevance? According to the thread, "Inverted Pyramid Writing uses the first paragraph of a page to serve as a concise summary or abstract of the page content". So Meta-descriptions and Google snippets are also good examples of such writing. One of the members explains that in newspapers inverted pyramid writing serves a couple of purposes. One, to give readers enough info right away to get them interested in the story (or decide they're not interested, and go on to the next article), and to be sure the most important part of the story actually made it into the paper.

To further explain the use of this style, the following explanation I found helpful :


To understand what the "inverted pyramid" name means, picture an upside-down triangle -- one with the narrow tip pointing downward and the broad base pointing upward. The broad base represents the most newsworthy information in the news story, and the narrow tip represents the least newsworthy information in the news story. When you write a story in inverted pyramid format, you put the most newsworthy information at the beginning of the story and the least newsworthy information at the end.

So what are the implications to helping SEO's and webmasters do their job better. I think it makes sense in order to clarify some of basic styles the members in the thread mentions. Such as following the 5Ws (who,what,when,why,where optional which) and one H's(how) important creating inverted pyramid stories/articles. This same format can be applied in the aspect of online copywriting and the creation of descriptions. The most important information first. For many this topic might be old hat, as when writing a description I know I follow a similar format to getting the most important information out first but may not realize it at the time I am following a style. One of the interesting differences I think with SEO's is that instead of focusing on subjects like "200 people were injured, and another 50 are missing" to write about we are focused on keyword usage in the desciption. Sometimes our grammer and syntax can fly out the door as there is too much importance on getting those important keywords first.

To illustrate, think of all the new SEO's or webmasters creating meta-descriptions for the first time. Did they ever do it at first while still making it legible? Such as using the meta-description just like the meta-keyword tag is being used. Usually not, its keywords crammed in there first and then sentence structure/syntax next, and finally marketing language to intice the visitor to the site. So if we can combine all the necessary elements and look at the benefits of using an inverted pyramid writing for some pretty slick and powerful descriptions, snippets and paragraphs and articles then we can create some powerful content in which IPW and SEO/SEM go hand in hand.

To add more credence to the technique one of the members explains some additional benefits of the IPW.


" IPW and good newspaper-style copy are relevant in terms of accessibility as much as in general usability. IPW has a great influence on understanding for users with cognitive disabilities. Users that fall into this group tend to have difficulties understanding navigation, and large blocks of content can be a daunting experience. IPW helps by presenting a summary which enables the user to access enough of the information without having to tackle the entire text."

Lastly, one of the members says this is "giving away all the secrets". If its a secret then, then I would recommend checking this out if you are not familiar with the subject.

Check out continued discussion at WMW - Inverted Pyramid Writing


posted Phoenix in SEO Copywriting at March 8, 2006 3:07 PM Comments (0)

SEO Milestones - Users Share Their Past Ranking Success

Came across an interesting thread on Digitalpoint today talking about the past ranking success some of the members have been able to accomplish. Members are sharing first ranking success and some of the tactics used to get there. Besides the chatter, its turned out to be a pretty active and interesting thread. Someone though I think needs to put a disclaimer that MSN doesn't count in this thread, its too easy.

Continued discussion at Digitalpoint - Share Your SEO Milestones!

posted Phoenix in Search Engine Optimization at March 8, 2006 2:49 PM Comments (3)

Ask Launched New France Brand with Unique Algorithm

The Ask blog wrote last night Ask.com France: A Fresh Alternative. That post shows that they have updated the look of http://fr.ask.com/ to be consistent of the Ask.com brand. They also noted that the ranking algorithm used at the French engine is "unique." Finally they have many of the same features at Ask France and will be adding "news feeds, maps and itineraries, online shopping, downloads, etc."

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at March 8, 2006 8:51 AM Comments (0)

The Google Grants Program

I am not sure how many people are aware of the Google Grants Program, which gives some 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations at least three months of in-kind advertising at Google AdWords. So who is eligible for this program? Well, if you are part of the AdSense program, you are not eligible for the grant. Also if you are a religious or political organization you are not eligible. For more information, visit the details page. You can apply here and to see which organizations received grants click here.

A WebmasterWorld member asked in a thread named Info needed about Google Grants if you can "run country-targeted ads in their native languages in such a program?" The response was that you can, "organizations may accept the AdWords daily budget recommendation for their campaigns, and target their ads to other countries / languages when appropriate."

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 8, 2006 8:39 AM Comments (0)

Ask / Teoma and 301s Do Not Update?

Two senior members at WebmasterWorld posted in a thread named 301 Redirects ignored. Both report that they were never successful in getting Teoma (Ask's engine) to update a 301 redirected domain name in the Ask.com index. Have you?

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in at March 8, 2006 8:31 AM Comments (0)

AdWords to Enable Research of Trademark Terms in Keyword Sandbox Tool?

In a WebmasterWorld thread Cline posted in message #15 that the hundreds of trademark terms that are automatically disallowed to be used in your ad copy, are also disallowed in the Google AdWords Keyword Tool. Cline explains that "no-researchability does not directly correspond with the no-trademark-in-copy rule, as most trademarks that are prohibited in copy can be found in the keyword tool."

So why do I think Google may change their policy on this tool and trademark tools? Because following that post AdWordsAdvisor responded directly to Cline saying;

I'll include your feedback in this week's Advertiser Feedback Report, cline. I've just pasted it in, as a matter of fact. AWA

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 8, 2006 8:17 AM Comments (0)

Google's AdSense Margins to be "Squeezed"

The news sites are buzzing on the mistaken release of figures on AdSense. Stating that profit margins in its AdSense business would "be squeezed in 2006 and beyond." They issued a retraction of this information;

The statements regarding $9.5 billion in 2006 ad revenue and AdSense margins were not speaker notes prepared for the Analyst Day presentation, and were inadvertently included in the Analyst Day slides. These statements were instead speaker notes prepared early in the fourth quarter of 2005 for an internal product strategy presentation. These notes were not created for financial planning purposes, and should not be regarded as financial guidance. Consistent with past practice, Google is not providing revenue guidance. In addition, the statement with respect to AdSense margins does not reflect Google’s current expectations.

JenSense has here write up here.

We have the forums discussing it as well; a Webmasterworld thread named Google Reveals Margins On AdSense Tightening and a DigitalPoint Forum thread named Google states adsense profits will be squeezed in 2006. Interesting stuff...

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 8, 2006 8:07 AM Comments (0)

Windows Live Search Beta

Microsoft launched an other search engine today under the name of Windows Live Search. Personally, I hate it. (1) It doesn't work on Apple Safari. (2) It seems to be using an AJAX interface, which seems to load slow. (3) The UI is different enough from the standard to be annoying. (4) It looks like you can only get 20 results, I am not sure how to get more at this time (looking at it for a minute or two).

Chris Sherman has his write up here where he said that the "differences between Windows Live Search and MSN search appear to be largely cosmetic with the introduction of this beta, with the addition of some additional user interface controls and a few other features."

Forum discussion at Search Engine Roundtable Forums, Search Engine Watch Forums, DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at March 8, 2006 7:49 AM Comments (3)

AdSense Requesting Referrals Feedback

AdSenseAdvisor has posted a thread at DigitalPoint Forums asking the members for feedback on referrals. They also posted this information at the AdSense blog, so if you have feedback, hit the forum or email inside-adsense@google.com.

Shawn has two great suggestions:

- Channels for referrals

- Ability to create text based links for them

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 7, 2006 2:50 PM Comments (0)

Writing Articles That Get Links

The latest craze in the SEO world is to write articles for the purpose of link building. Everyone is doing it these days, there are companies that specialize in writing content for search engines, there are companies that put it in their link building plans. But as time moves on with SEO, tactics to rank well changes. I believe the fundamentals to not change but influencing those rankings, when the core of your work is not 100% true, does change. What do I mean by that?

Yesterday, some person calls me asking me my advice on having a company write articles for him to build up his linkage and page count. I asked him, how long have you been in business? He said about a year or so. I asked him, are you an expert on what you sell? He said, not really. I asked him, can you write about your business and products? He said, no not really, there is nothing much I can say about them. Then I told him, you can pay someone to add content to your site, but I am not sure about how beneficial it will be in the long run.

He then continues by explaining that this company told him that they can write the content because they are experts in search engines. They tailor the content to the search engines, he told me. I laughed at that. I said the whole purpose these days is to write content that people want to link to. Search engine do not give you links that are counted to your link popularity. You need to write content that others want to link to. And in my opinion, if you are not passionate about what you are writing, then it will be hard to get links pointing to your content. So that content will just count towards your page index count and nothing more.

A good thread at Search Engine Watch Forums sprung up last week named Recommendations on Content to Attract Links which caught my radar this morning. Justilien wrote a post that covers many of the questions one must ask himself, when writing an article. If those questions are answered positively, then you have a great change of getting inbound links to your articles, if not - then probably not. But it all boils down to, in my opinion, "writing about something you believe in" as Andy AtkinsKruger said.

posted rustybrick in SEO Copywriting at March 7, 2006 8:14 AM Comments (9)

Cre8asite Forums Launches Cross-Browser Device Assessment Panel Forum

Cre8asite Forums launched this morning a new forum named Cross-browser Device Assessment Panel (CDAP). This forum is tailored to enable members to do online testing and get feedback and solutions for improvements and repairs. The forum is already filled with quality unique threads on useful tools, resources, accessibility, examples, devices, browser standards, submission guidance and the introduction thread.

For questions or comments about this new forum, visit Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at March 7, 2006 8:02 AM Comments (0)

High Rankings Seminar March 30th & 31st

Jill Whalen is having here High Rankings Seminar this March. The dates for the event are; Thursday March 30 and Friday March 31, 2006. It will take place at The Holiday Inn in Walnut Creek, CA. For more information on the agenda and registration please visit http://www.highrankings.com/seminar. I hear that this conference provides a much more personalized and one-to-one dialog to the attendee then most conferences.

And they are offering our readers 25% off if you use the coupon code "RUSTY".

Forum discussion at High Rankings Forums.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Conferences at March 7, 2006 7:45 AM Comments (0)

MSN adCenter Does Not Support 10% of Browser Base (Firefox)

Danny has an excellent write up on the issue with Firefox not being supported for the adCenter console as well as for tracking conversions. You would think that adCenter would get it working in a browser that is now widely used. Especially by the "early adopters" that want to beta test the product, all have to switch to IE to comply. Microsoft's response? Tell your customer service people to use IE 6 and post a message on your Web site to tell your customers to use IE 6 (or don't use the conversion tracking script).

What is extremely funny is that at the Search Engine Watch Forum thread, a couple people who upgraded to IE 7 can not sign up with adCenter, because only IE 6 is supported. So they either have to uninstall IE 7 and revert back to 6 or buy a new computer with IE 6 on it, because third party browsers won't work either.

posted rustybrick in MSN / Microsoft adCenter at March 7, 2006 7:35 AM Comments (1)

Standford University Removed Paid Links and "Hosted Pages"

The latest in Google paid links and spam scandals was brought to light yesterday in a thread named Paid Links, Hosted Doorway Pages Back At Stanford Daily at Search Engine Watch Forums. AussieWebmaster discovered a page at http://daily.stanford.edu/forex/forex.html which served up content and ads for forex, the page has been 404ed just recently.

AussieWebmaster investigated a bit deeper and learned that The Stanford Daily only sells hosted content pages to Maverick Insight at maverickinsight.com.

It has been reported at 6:42 PM (EST) that the page has been removed from The Stanford Daily. GoogleGuy came in a few hours later and posted a response, saying that he will investigate this from Google's side.

What is the big deal? Well, Stanford is where Google was born. Danny has his SEW Blog write up here.

posted rustybrick in Spam at March 7, 2006 7:25 AM Comments (3)

Jenstar (aka Jensense) Joins DigitalPoint Forums Moderator Team

Recently, Jenstar stepped down from WebmasterWorld and today I got news that she has joined DigitalPoint Forums. She will be moderating the Google AdSense and Yahoo! Publisher Network DigitalPoint forums. Jennifer (Jenstar) also moderates at Search Engine Watch Forums and writes at the Search Engine Watch blog on contextual ad topics. In addition, she runs a popular contextual ad topic blog at JenSense.com.

This is a great pick up for DigitalPoint forums, since I believe it is one of the best forums on the Internet to get AdSense related advice and support.

Welcome Jenstar to the team at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at March 6, 2006 3:16 PM Comments (0)

Google to Fix Supplemental Index Issues in About a Week

A thread at WebmasterWorld that was created during the SES show last week and has grown to almost 20 pages long so far, discusses a supplemental index issue in the index. You know what I mean when I say supplemental index, right? If not, I have a picture here of what it looks like. Thing is, what results go into the supplemental index changes over time. Now it seems that too many pages have been falling into this index. The thread at WebmasterWorld was coined Supplemental club: Big Daddy coming - Part 1 has a response from GoogleGuy in message #195 saying;

Based on the specifics everyone has sent (thank you, by the way), I'm pretty sure what the issue is. I'll check with the crawl/indexing team to be sure though. Folks don't need to send any more emails unless they really want to. It may take a week or so to sort this out and be sure, but I do expect these pages to come back to the main index.

That is good to hear.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 6, 2006 2:04 PM Comments (0)

What To Expect from MSN adCenter

MSN adCenter is having signup period today, starting at 12 (EST) or 9am (PST). Before you sign up, or after you sign up, you may want to know what to expect from the program. Werty, a moderator at WebmasterWorld, started a thread just for that, named MSN AdCenter Primer for New Users. He lists off many tips and concepts you should be aware of, including what to expect, how adCenter differs from AdWords, known issues and much more.

For more information check out WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in MSN / Microsoft adCenter at March 6, 2006 8:24 AM Comments (2)

Is Yahoo! Search Getting Stale?

A thread at WebmasterWorld named Slowest Search Engine in History?: like watching paint dry discusses what many have been saying for a while, Yahoo! is ranking Web pages based on old scoring data. Let me be clear, I do not work at Yahoo!, so I do not have hard facts, but if you read forums often, as I do, you will notice people complaining about Yahoo! being slow to update certain scoring elements. Some examples of issues reported include; ranking sites based on linkage data from 5 months ago has been reported and not updating 301 redirected pages for years on end.

There are fluctuations in the SERPs at Yahoo! but when looking at individual pages and sites, often you see a huge lag in the criteria they use to rank the pages. mfishy puts it well with this line;

This does not mean that Y! are not crawling and even indexing new stuff, it means they are largely scoring pages based on either old data or their editorial staff placements - neither gives me great confidence that they will even be able to hang on to their 20% search share...

The ranking algorithms are tweaked, but the data used in those ranking algorithms seems to be old.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at March 6, 2006 8:13 AM Comments (1)

Google Violating AdWords Editorial Guidelines?

A thread at Cre8asite forums named Google Violating Ad Editorial Guideline, Nothing really informative here shows a possible case of Google violating its own Google AdWords Editorial Guidelines.

From the guidelines;

Display URL Must be Accurate

  • Your Display URL must accurately reflect the URL of your website. If your actual destination URL link is too long for your ad, use a shortened version (such as your homepage) that meets the character limit for this field.
  • The Display URL field cannot be used as another line of ad text.
  • Your Display URL must include the domain extension, for example: .com, .net, or .org.

Example:

Destination URL: http://www.shoesforsale.com/ladiesshoes/highheels.html

Display URL: www.shoesforsale.com

Now, the thread notes that a member saw an ad, by Google that read;

Blog Ads
Learn how you can earn money by blogging. Put AdSense on your blog!
www.blogger.com

When you clicked on the ad, it took you to a google.com address and not a blogger.com address. Even though Google owns Blogger, putting the URL Blogger.com in the display URL and sending someone to Google.com may be against the Google AdWords Editorial Guidelines.

Forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 6, 2006 7:50 AM Comments (0)

Protecting Yourself from AdWords Expanded Broad Match

Over a month ago we reported on, what turned out to be, a very popular thread. Our entry was named Expanded Broad Match Hurting AdWords Advertisers, the basis of the thread is that Google is taking the liberty to expand its own broad matching technology beyond, what many would believe, is relevant to the initial keywords inputted into the campaigns.

In frustration that Google has not taken the action requested of the advertiser, i.e. breaking out broad match and expanded broad match options, advertisers are taking matters into their own hands. A follow up thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named Stopping Broad Match with Expanded Match Rip-off! describes the methodology one can take in locating and preventing these wasted clicks and bids.

To summarize;
(1) You extract your log files
(2) Pull out the adwords keyword details
(3) Remove duplicates
(4) Review bad keywords
(5) Place bad keywords into negative keyword list (be careful with this)
(6) Rinse and Repeat

For the exact details of how member, Tonerman deployed this tactic, visit Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at March 6, 2006 7:37 AM Comments (0)

Google Sitemaps Adds New Features

The Google Sitemaps tool added some new features this week, I reported them over at the SEW blog about two days ago. I wrote that Google Sitemaps Adds Top Keyword Positions, Top Mobile Queries and CSV Downloads;

(1) Your average position by your top search queries. This is basically a site ranking report for the your top keywords, the keywords people search to find you on.

(2) If you have mobile enabled site, you will also now see your top search queries on mobile devices.

(3) You can now download "details, stats, and errors" to a SV file that you can then do what you like with it.

Now that this has settled in some, the forums have had their chance to speak their mind on the features.

WebmasterWorld has a thread on the topic and has several responses from the Sitemaps users.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at March 3, 2006 8:54 AM Comments (2)

200,000 AMD Opteron Processors Find a New Home at Google

I just reported over at the SEW blog that Google to Switch from Intel to AMD Chips. That is huge from AMD, the news sprung the stock up by $1.40 to $40.07 that day. But more importantly, 200,000 lonely Opteron processors have found a new home at the Google server farm.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at March 3, 2006 8:47 AM Comments (7)

AdSense Cleans Up Control Panel User Interface

The Inside AdCenter blog reports that AdSense gets a facelift. Basically, AdSense change the control panel to remove some of the top tabs and place them under one generic tab named "AdSense Setup." Under the AdSense Setup page you can find the setup details for;

  • AdSense for content
  • AdSense for search
  • AdSense for feeds
  • Referrals

Overall the new design is not bad. The forums are buzzing about it at DigitalPoint Forums and WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 3, 2006 8:24 AM Comments (0)

MSN adCenter Signup Period Monday March 6th

If you have been dying to get into the MSN adCenter pilot program, Monday - March 6th is your opportunity. If you get in early, you will have already conquered any learning curve to the adCenter control panel, you will have the opportunity to get in while the CPC prices are still relatively low and you will be part of a small number of beta testers.

To sign up without requiring an invitation, Monday, March 6th after 12 (EST) (9am PST) go to http://adcenter.msn.com/ and more information will be there.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld and Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in MSN / Microsoft adCenter at March 3, 2006 8:17 AM Comments (0)

AdSense Increases Referral Time Period from 90 to 180 Days

The Inside AdSense blog says Time limit for AdSense referrals earnings is now 180 days. In that blog entry they source a thread from WebmasterWorld, experiencing disgust the the 90 day short window. We covered this back in late January and no one was happy with the 90 day window.

So AdSense has increase that window to 180 days, which is much more reasonable to earn a commission on an AdSense referral that earns $100 or more.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at March 3, 2006 8:07 AM Comments (0)

SEO Chat Forums Delisted in Google

In recent forum news, it seems as if SEO Chat Forums has been delisted by Google. Not the main site (i.e. www.seochat.com) but the forums.seochat.com. It seems to have happened yesterday afternoon and currently, the management claims they have no idea why. Lots of wild theories out there and I have my own suspicions that I will keep to myself.

Now I see 12,700 pages indexed of the site:www.seochat.com but zero pages indexed of the site:forums.seochat.com.

As you may imagine there is a large thread on the topic at SEO Chat Forums named Seochat Booted From Google, we also have a thread at our forums named Google kicked out SEOChat from its index.

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at March 3, 2006 7:29 AM Comments (4)

SES NYC 2006 Coverage List

Here is a list of all the sessions we covered during the SES NYC 06 - Quadruple Coverage this week.

+ Keynote: Barry Diller, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, IAC/InterActiveCorp (Other coverage from ClickZ and CNN)
+ Vertical Creep Into Regular Search Results
+ Searchonomics: Serious & Fun Stats
+ Contextual Ads
+ Multichannel Metrics
+ Targeting Search Ads By Demographics & Behavior
+ Blogs, CGM, and Buzz
+ The Search Landscape
+ Podcast Search
+ Rich Media and Video Ads
+ Winning a Bid War
+ Searcher Behavior Research Update
+ Search Head Or Search Tail? Getting The Mix Right
+ Ads Beyond Search
+ BtoB Tactics
+ Pundits On Search
+ Reputation Monitoring & Management
+ Search Algorithm Research and Patents
+ Auditing Paid Listings & Click Fraud Issues
+ Search Ad Buyers Forum aka Search Marketing Style Council
+ Blog & Feed Search SEO - Blog Optimization Strategies You Need To Know
+ Practical Copyright & Trademark Guidance for Webmasters and SEMs
+ Duplicate Content Issues
+ Who's Watching Whom: Search & Privacy
+ Advanced Search Term Research Tools
+ Meet The Blog & Feed Search Engines
+ Retailer SEM Tactics
+ My SEM Toolbox
+ Ad Agencies & Search
+ SEM Via Communities, Wikipedia & Tagging
+ Buying and Selling Links
+ Branding & Search
+ In House Forum
+ Search Engine Q&A on Links
+ Search Advertising: Now & Future
+ Evening Forum With Danny Sullivan
+ Local Search Marketing Tactics
+ Organic Listings Forum
+ Measuring Success Overview
+ Earning From Search & Contextual Ads
+ Meet The Crawlers
+ SEO Overkill
+ Search and Phone Calls

Want more SES NY 2006 news? Technorati has blog reports here: . See shared photos on Flickr here: sesny2006. See bookmarked pages on del.icio.us here: sesny2006. See saved pages on Yahoo My Web 2.0 here: sesny2006. Find live coverage and discussion at the Search Engine Watch Forums here: SEM Events.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2006 New York at March 2, 2006 5:22 PM Comments (1)

Search and Phone Calls

One of the hotter topics of the day is reserved for the very last session of SES NYC. As search advertising costs on a CPC basis have gone up, so have the costs per acquisition, especially in some industries. Could Cost Per Call be the next “best value” in search advertising?


Came in late…Danny Sullivan moderating.
Missed Dave Roth from Carat’s presentation. He was finishing up with a comment about how important it is to measure calls from search-related leads.

Brian Waldman from Merchant Wharehouse. Has been working with ClickPath since they started, trying to ensure they measure inbound calls from search efforts. “How call tracking works on merchantwarehouse.com." They value people getting to the site because they are many ways they can convert. They don’t use their phone number in their PPC creative, but instead allocate a particular 800 number to each person that comes through from search. This number tracks their particular search term, which is great for their sales people.

Is measuring calls important? Many companies shy away from search because there is no onsite “conversion event.” Even on ecommerce sites, a call to an order center is highly desirable for high end products. Of all purchasing research done online, only 35% of orders occur there. With Pay per click, you are already paying for the traffic, why not know the true value. We all know that conversion is king, what if your company could now credit 50-100% more conversions from search? 73% of their paid search activity results in a phone call. Imagine not knowing where all these conversions came from? If they were not measuring this, they would be looking at a break even ROI, thus search would not provide adequate results. Impact of measuring calls: with calls: ROI 425%, without measuring them, their ROI was 113%. The use ClickPath for this and really like it. It records every call that comes in, which allows for call reviews, measures offline conversion tracking, allows for call routing and disposition, and gives a method to review fraud. The ability to allocate an 8000 through anything is very important. Call routing is big because it allows a different search to lead to a different sales section. For example, if some one searches ofr a brand name, they can lead to the page they want, as well as leading the 800 number assigned to them directly to a sales rep. With call disposition, it allows for a simple “press a button” option for the sales rep to report the results of the call. The fraud review feature is great…uses the referring URL to determine of it’s for real.

Is call tracking for you? Gives a high value to inbound calls, helps you measure your ROI more efficiently, allows for recording calls and evaluating your sales team.

Christer Ljungdahl from National Instruments. Will speak about the value of inbound calls. They really want to convert traffic to phone calls. They sell direct, which is good because they have engineers that understand. 35% of all their web traffic comes form search, and 50% of their inbound calls originate from the web. They publish and track phone numbers that are dynamic. They are country context sensitive, topic specific, and site section context specific. They can publish any number based on a multitude of parameters. First, make sure that a visitor has a good chance of finding your contact us page. They assign a greater value to people that look though the site more than just the home page, indicating more interest. Remember that phone calls don’t always come through during the visit. They use a printer friendly option with local contact information based on user. If some don’t call, email or print the contact form, find out why. They use the “call me” option also, and customers like the option. When they click on that choice and submit, within 2 seconds, the phone will ring, and the agent has a popup screen with all knowledge about the customer already harvested. If not business hours, they ask for less information and tell them they will be called during business hours. They even use the phone number on the “call me” page, in case they want to call. They try to get as much info as possible without “turning the customer off.”

Measuring the conversion flow is very easy with the analytics available today. This allows for changes like moving calls-to-action, etc. How to lose business? If you aren’t publishing your number. Takeways: make it easy for people to contact you, use different phone numbers. Understand why people chose not to call you. If you can’t get a call now, try to get one letter. Phone calls can reduce your online orders, so if this is your main goal you have to decide. It will drive your overall revenue. They saw a tripling of conversion rates when they became more aggressive in publishing the phone number.

Q&A speakers include Ted Carpenter, who has the ClickPath product, and Mark Barach from Ingenio, which has a pay per call product.

Ted: a small pool of phone numbers is allocated to various behavior patterns. You can use a number that stays active for an hour, a day, a week, etc. The longer a number stays active, the more numbers you will use. As an example, if you have a 10,000 keyword campaign, you’ll be using about 100 numbers.

“How much does it cost?” ClickPath is anywhere from 500 to 1500 dollars a month. There is a licensing fee and then a per minute charge. The calls are routed through their (ClickPath’s) switching network, and then they bill directly. Some companies that have a lot of calls spend upwards of $10,000/month.

What about privacy issues? Has there been research about the security of phone call data? They mentioned earlier that calls are sometimes recorded to help find keywords. What is being done to work the PR spin? Ted: their network doesn’t use VOIP, but instead a safer method. You get the name/address/phone number of who is calling, usually. As long as your privacy policy states that you will not resell the data, you will be fine. Danny says it is fair to say if you are going into any click-to-call situation, you should be very aware of the platform you are using and possibly note it on your site (ie: your call will be recorded to mine keywords-laughs)

What if someone calls repeatedly? Ingenio delivers customers, not phone calls. Any time the caller calls again from the same phone is an non-billed event (typically within a 30 day period). David says that their reports detail all calls, billed or not. Brian adds that they have their sales reps give their extension, and ask people to call back on that.

Woohoo all done…see you at SES San Jose!

This is part of the Search Engine Roundtable Blog coverage of the New York Search Engine Strategies Conference and Expo 2006. For other SES topics covered, please visit the Roundtable SES NYC 2006 category archives.

SES NYC Tag:

posted chrisboggs in Search Engine Strategies 2006 New York at March 2, 2006 2:02 PM Comments (0)

SEO Overkill

I think I covered this session at least twice. So let's see if there is anything new or not. One new thing I see is that Jennifer Laycock is the moderator for this session. Seems like they are a bit late to start, projector issues or something, maybe its a sound issue because I know Matt Bailey does this thing with screen reading tools that shows off how funny spam sites sound with a screen reader.

Michael Murray from Fathom SEO
I'll leave his introduction out of this coverage, since I disagree with it.

- SEO is not a shopping spree
- Yes, you need the traffic but try to pace yourself
- Even sound practices may fail if they are rushed into and overdone

- Domain Stuffing
-- Short domains are easy to read
-- Multiple hyphens or forced capitalization looks like spam

- Managing too many keywords at once
-- Prioritize
-- What are your profit margins
-- Give main keywords enough attention

- Folder and Page Name Excess
-- Yes, keywords can influence rankings
-- Make sure they match content

- Taming the Title Tag
-- Long titles are useless
-- Multiple keuwords that create lengthly titles cant all rank well

- Meta Descriptions
-- Avoid long descriptions
-- Portion appears in the search results
-- Laundry list of keywords may not match content

- Over the top meta keyword tags
-- Hard to avoid this traditional step
-- Some engines downplay this tag

- META Bonanza
-- Skip misc meta tag options
-- They do little for search engines

- Overdone Visible Text
-- Massive keyword repetition in a small space may annoy Web site users.

- Heading Tag Misuse
-- Don't overstuff
-- Avoid OVeruse
-- Complement design

- Visible Text in Unusual Places
-- Looks like an amateur put the site together
-- Text placed above the entire page

- Site Maps
-- Site maps are essential
-- Don't pursue too many keywords
-- Avoid major copy clusters

- Visible Links Blitz
-- Yes, links in content are useful
-- Too many may be viewed as spam

- Anchor Text Gone Wild
-- Too many search terms in the same hyperlink dilute the impact of a favored keyword or phrase

- Renegade Programmers
-- Know what your programmers are doing

- Link Title Attribute Mess
-- Prime example of overkill
-- You can do these things, but should you?
-- No consistent opinion about their value

- ALT Tag Overflow
-- Easy to do but use restraint
-- Only a marginal factor in rankings

- Links - Too many Too Fast
-- Be careful what link you get
-- Favor slow, steady growth
-- Relevancy is the key

- Hidden Text
-- Avoid all forms of hidden text
-- Make font colors and sizes match design
-- Excessive keywords offer no value

- Micro Sites
-- Search engines hate duplicate content
-- Add good content to your main content

- No Frames Tag - No End in Sight
-- The no frames tag space is ideal for citing browser limitations
-- Include a robust summary of the site and links to specific pages

Matt Bailey from SiteLogicMarketing.com (new company?)
- Rand heckles Matt after he puts up a Jacob Nielson slide.
How do users scan?
- Headlines
- Meaningful Sub Headings
- Bulleted lists
- Headers
- Content Arrangement: Inverted Pyramid style
- Half the word count, double the retention

- He gets into his screen reader slides, see chicago, last session
- Then the mobile device...
- This as was Fathom SEO's presentation, is basically the same...so please see past coverage
- Sorry about that

Heather Lloyd Martin of SuccessWorks
Why SEO Overkill is Bad for Conversion
- Troublesome title stuffing
- Kooky copy to get clicks (just to get clicks)
- Linkarama Losers (same slide as Chicago)
- Conversion Confusion (hard to find buy button, too much info)
- Baby, don't stuff keyphrases
- Clean up your stuffing
- Bad, Bad, Misspellings

SES NYC Tag:

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Strategies 2006 New York at March 2, 2006 1:34 PM Comments (5)