September 2005 Archives

Sandbox Removal Tool a Hack

SEOmoz reports on a Dodge the Sandbox for $79... Is this for real? which links to an SEO Chat thread named RankAttack/SEO Sandbox Tool Advisory. It discusses a tool named RankAttack which claims to have a product that gets you out of the Google Sandbox (see page at http://www.savemoneyfast.com/sandbox.htm).

This is the product offering:

This software was designed using Google's new relevancy models and patents. The technology used in this software is brand new and no other software package offers it. First understand that the most important attribute your site can have, in the eyes of every search engine, is relativity. SandBox received its name from one of Google's new secret weapons, the SandBox filter. The new Google filter sends all new websites into the garbage can for an unknown period of time -- and it also places websites that have been abused or have low quality into the garbage can. This means, no matter what, your website cannot get listed with Google on any keyword that gets decent traffic. Hundreds of search engines are adapting this concept and it is becoming quite a problem. RankAttack's SandBox software can get your website off this list and much more.

The thread links to a blog entry which explains how this software works.

The means by which the software appears to increase "...popularity..." is by submitting a massive amount of queries to each search engine in its database by taking the url and keywords provided. The algorithim used is apparently a trivial combinitoric permutation of submitting search queries in a cascading manner to each engine by spoofing the HTTP REFERRER from another engine in a fashion similar to spanning trees. This manner is of questionable ethics and even more questionable in results given the simplicity of the algorithim.

Not good, not good at all.

Forum discussion at SEO Chat.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at September 30, 2005 3:25 PM Comments (2)

AdSense Electronic Funds Transfer Out of Beta

Yesterday, Google took Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) out of beta for the first time within AdSense. Next time you login to AdSense you should see:

eft-beta-adsense.gif

That links to Electronic Funds Transfer is out of beta;

Electronic Funds Transfer is ready for the big-time! We've been working hard on our payment system, and with our thanks to the thousands of AdSense publishers who took part in our beta test, we're now ready to bring EFT out of beta.

Publishers who have already received payments through EFT don't need to do anything – they can continue to have their payments conveniently deposited directly into their bank accounts.

The forum discussion on this topic is at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 30, 2005 11:29 AM Comments (0)

October Schedule for RustyBrick

Just an update for the readers. This October, please expect more guest writers here, including Andy Hagans from Text Link Ads, to fill it. Ben will be writing more often this month and the Guest authors confirmed to write include; Nacho Hernandez, Kim Krause, Andy Hagans, Chris Boggs, and possibly Shawn Hogan from DigitalPoint.

The dates I will be out this month includes;

Here are the dates:
October 4th
October 5th
October 13th
October 17th
October 18th
October 19th
October 25th
October 26th

I hope to write more on the weekends to make up for it.

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at September 30, 2005 9:14 AM Comments (0)

How Does One Get Web Category Links Under Ones Google Result?

Google has implemented a while back, something we named Google Search Web Categories, basically, those little sub links you get under the URL to take you to other popular sections of a site. You can see an example if you search on search engine watch. So how does one earn those links? That is the topic of discussion at a thread in WebmasterWorld.

The answer? Well, no one really knows exactly. I would assume you would require lots of repetitive linkage data to the core sections of your Web site. For example, check out apple and you will notice the web categories for apple are "iTunes - Download iTunes - iPod+iTunes - QuickTime - online". Those are probably the four most popular sections on the site. Was it done manually? I doubt it, why would they use "online" to symbolize the Apple Store? So I believe it is based on linkage data.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at September 30, 2005 9:01 AM Comments (3)

Google Calendar Coming Soon?

Based on a Google Blogoscoped blog entry, it looks like Google is prepping to start some sort of calendar application at calendar.google.com. What exactly, we don't know - will it happen? Seems like it.

I started a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums on the topic.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at September 30, 2005 8:39 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Site Explorer Forum Round Up

Ben wrote that Yahoo! Site Explorer is Live and had a nice summary on it. He did however forget to mention the Site Explorer API Web Services which enables developers to work with the data in a more streamlined fashion. Outside of that, I thought I share with you a forum round up on the topic.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 30, 2005 8:29 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo Site Explorer Finally Live!

Finally! It appears Yahoo reads this blog and answered Barry's prayers, but Yahoo Site Explorer looks like it just went live. I am including a screen shot for verification. Barry has been diligently watching and documenting Yahoo Site Explorer progress like a kid waiting for an ice cream truck, so I hope he doesn't hate me for posting on this for him. I just checked the site and I am able to plug in URL's and get results. Such as a site check tool listing all pages from a website, and also more detailed stats for what Yahoo calls "Inlinks" or backlinks to the website.

This tool enables users to check linkage data and bulk submitting of urls to Yahoo.

Check it out: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/

From coverage at SES here is a recap of what it includes:

Yahoo Site Explorer is a place to see which pages Yahoo has indexed. After clicking "Explore URL" you'll find the number of pages found in the Yahoo Index and also the number of inlinks. You can sort pages by "depth," submit URLs, and quickly export the results to CSV format. Site Explorer is also supported via an API.

Except a more thorough overview from Barry when he gets back.

SP32-20050929-153237.gif

posted Phoenix in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 29, 2005 4:29 PM Comments (4)

Site Explorer Back to Advanced Search Page

Just part of my documenting of how Yahoo! Site Explorer is still coming soon. Today I checked it out again and now its back to being redirected to the Yahoo! Advanced Web Search.

Getting very boring Yahoo!

It was promised back in June at the WebmasterWorld New Orleans Conference.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 29, 2005 9:27 AM Comments (0)

Five New Search Patent Threads at Cre8asite Forums

Cre8asite Administrator Bill Slawski does it again by posting five (yes you heard me right) different threads discussing two Google patents, two Yahoo patents and one MSN patent. Lets start with Google.

Google Patents:
- Variable personalization of search results
Bill explains;

This invention would enable a searcher to fill out a profile, perform a normal search, and then use a slider button to indicate how much his or her personal information from the profile should be used to modify (rerank) that search based upon the personalization information that they have entered into the profile, by sliding the button partially, or all the way to a full influence on the results.

- Google Help with Advertising Creatives
Bill explains;

This invention is aimed at novices to advertising, and to individuals or small business owners that may not have a web presence, or may need assistance in coming up with creatives, keywords, etc... The description of their "Advertising Generation Engine" is interesting, including the generation of a creative. I'm wondering where they will be getting their "eye catching images."

Yahoo Patents:
- Yahoo! Color Graphing and Personalization
Bill didn't have enough time to summarize, but the patent application's abstract reads;

In a search processing system, identifying input authority weights for a plurality of pages, wherein an input authority weight represents a user's weight of a page in terms of interest; distributing a page's input authority weight over one or more pages that are linked in a graph to the page; and using a resulting authority weight for a page in effecting a search result list. The search result list might comprise one or more of reordering search hits and highlighting search hits.

- Inverse searches and User Annotations
Bill explains;

Imagine being about to enter a URL, and find out information about the site, collected over time, such as which other sites point to it, what other people feel about it, and more. A couple of new patent applications from Yahoo! cover these types of topics.

This is really two patents in this one thread.

MSN Patent:
- Assigning textual ads based on article history
Bill explains;

There's something to this new patent application from Microsoft that reminds me of the movie Minority Report, where the protagonist goes through a shopping area, and his past purchases inform the billboards and advertisements of his potential future interests... Collecting keywords from pages that you've visited in the past, to decide what ads to show you now? It's an attempt, somewhat, to get away from contextual based ads that may not be appropriate...

Makes for some nice light reading... :)

posted rustybrick in Search Technology at September 29, 2005 9:16 AM Comments (0)

Why Would MSN Rank Google.com For Batman Room Decor?

Search Engine Watch Moderator, Marcia, created a thread named Google ranks #9 for Batman room decor at MSN! And she took a screen capture to prove it was on the first page. Currently it dropped to the second page of MSN results.

DaveN suggests that this is "msn trying to fix there 302 problems." Now if you look on the first page results for batman room decor you will notice the result mid way down, to Google groups;

http://groups.google.co.uk/froogle_url?q=http://www.linenstore.co.uk/children-s-bedding-batman-bedding.html%3Fsource%3Dfroogle&fr=AJnTJbmmMai_Bvuv_NUNVzxikdH7SP3tZTmEFoFOKLtqw0HMnXTKao4AAAAAAAAAAA

DaveN explains that if you look at the cached result for this page shows header information of HTTP/1.1 302 Found. Hence the results above found in MSN, a 302 redirect issue.

This is speculation, but seems reasonable to me.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at September 29, 2005 9:02 AM Comments (0)

Bid Jamming: Make Your Competitors Spend Top Dollar

DaveN writes Yahoo! Overture Bid Jamming is "when you raise your bid amount to just a penny below the top bidder." So basically if your competitor ups a bid to $25 and the next two highest bids are $5 and $4, all you need to do, is raise your bid to $24.99 and that will ensure that your competitor pays. DaveN says;

#1 is 25 ( what they pay is 5.01 ) <- silly boy !
#2 is 5 ( what they pay is 4.51 )
#3 is 4.50 (these guys pay .10 )

but you want to play in this keyword. So if you bid 24.99

#1 is 25 ( what they pay is 25.00 )
#2 you 24.99 (but you pay 5.01) <- Bid Jamming
#3 is 5 ( what they pay is 4.51 )
#4 is 4.50 (these guys pay .10p )

Forum discussion on this basic but important topic at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Pay Per Click Engines at September 29, 2005 8:44 AM Comments (0)

Site Targetting Made Easy: AdSense Offers "Advertise On This Site"

Ruben over at ThreadWatch writes, Google Adsense "Advertise on this Site" which links to a blog entry spotting a new feature on AdSense. If you go to AskTheBuilder.com you will notice on the top right portion of the Google AdSense ads is a link that reads, "Advertise on this site" which takes you to a customized landing page about AskTheBuilder.com

advertise-adsense-site.gif
AsktheBuilder.com is a home improvement website created and maintained by national award-winning home builder and remodeler Tim Carter. The rich content at AsktheBuilder.com is a combination of Tim's 20+ years of hands-on experience and time-tested methods that tell visitors the right way to build and remodel homes. AsktheBuilder.com has won countless awards since 1995 and it continues to be one of the leading home improvement websites on the Internet.

For more screen images check out AskDaveTaylor for the information on "What is the 'Advertise on this site' link?" visit the Google AdWords Support page.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 29, 2005 8:27 AM Comments (0)

An SEO Combats on Martha Stewart's Apprentice

david-seo.jpg

A couple of days ago, Avi from Promediacorp.com, emailed me that while he was at WebmasterWorld PubCon New Orleans his sister saw a guy named David Karandish. Then when Martha Stewart's The Apprentice aired, she noticed David was on the show. His bio reads;

David, 22, is fresh out of college but already an accomplished businessman. David, the youngest candidate, was a charismatic student at Washington University in St. Louis and was known to lecture classes at the request of his professors. The American Mensa member now earns six figures as the owner and creator of an internet advertising company and a mortgage information services company - both of which he started while still in college. In high school, David created "AIM Talk," a plug-in for AOL Instant Messenger that spoke instant messages using text-to-speech. David has a B.S. with a second major in entreprenuership. He lives just outside of St. Louis.

Prove he is an SEO, check out his site at karandish.com.

Search Engine Watch Forums has a thread supporting David in this conquest. Go SEO David, represent the industry well!

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Industry News at September 29, 2005 8:18 AM Comments (1)

Upcoming Forum Moderator Birthdays

I wanted to wish the following forum moderators and administrators a happy birthday. This is the list I have, so I am sure I am missing a bunch. Feel free to let me know if I missed yours.

- Respree, Garrick Saito, Site Administrator at Cre8asite Forums, who is celebrating a birthday today!
- Phoenix, Ben Pfeiffer, Moderator at SEO Chat Forums, who is celebrating a birthday on September 29!
- Black_Knight, Ammon Johns, Administrator at Cre8asite Forums, who is celebrating a birthday on October 01!
- Adrian, Adrian Lee, Site Administrator at Cre8asite Forums, who is celebrating a birthday on October 02.
- Nacho, Nacho Hernandez, Moderator at Search Engine Watch Forums, who is celebrating a birthday on October 03!

Happy birthday guys, your dedication to the SEO/SEM community is much appreciated by us all!

posted rustybrick in SEM / SEO Companies at September 28, 2005 12:53 PM Comments (1)

Wrong URLs Published - Duplicate Content Issues

An excellent thread at WebmasterWorld discusses one person's case of making a typo and being dup filtered out because of it. The member accidently put an extra hyphen in the URL of his products, but before he had a chance to remove the extra hyphen Google found them. So now the original pages (single hyphen URLs) are marked as duplicate content and the others are not. So what should this person do?

One person recommends 301 redirecting the double hyphen URLs to the single hyphen URLs. But most suggest just removing the double hyphen URLs from the index completely either using a 404 or 410 response code or the remove URL form at Google.

Join the discussion to find more tips and debate on the topic.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at September 28, 2005 10:14 AM Comments (0)

Premium AdSense Pageviews Count Lower Outside North America

This might be obvious to many but it looks like if you are outside of North America and Canada, you do not need to have 20 million pageviews on your site to qualify to become a Premium AdSense publisher. Instead, you need only half of that, 10 million pageviews to qualify.

The page with the information is apparently geo-specific, so the content is dynamically changed, based on your ISP's location.

If your site receives more than 20 million page views a month, you may be eligible for premium service, which includes:

If you are in German it reads;

Wenn Ihre Website im Monat über 10 Millionen Seitenzugriffe (Page Views) hat, können Sie sich auch für den Premium-Service bewerben. AdSense Premium bietet Ihnen:

I don't speak German, but it seems to me that "10 Millionen" is 10 million. :)

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 28, 2005 9:54 AM Comments (2)

Google AdSense Keyword Density

The forum folks at DigitalPoint are discussing what is the best keyword density for your AdSense ads to show the most relevant ads. Some member say you want at least a total "around 200 words with a 4% density" to get the most relevant ads. And here is a quote from page two.

go for 4% but not from the get go. I kind of work my way up there. The problem is, it could take anywhere from 2 days to 2 weeks for the change to take effect.

To complicate matters a change may take effect very quickly within a few hours only to return to the original in a day or two! So you need to monitor it carefully.

Also, in my opinion the mediapartners bot prefers to “see” a couple of keyphrases so I always target say “striped blue widgets” 2.5%, “blue widgets” by itself around 3.5% and 1% or so of “blue striped widgets” while all the time target is really “blue widgets”.

Note that the above densities are not cumulative. Total “blue widgets” density never exceeds 4%

Talk about watching AdSense like a hawk. :)

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 28, 2005 9:20 AM Comments (0)

Hurricane Rita Damages Link Vault Network

Monday morning, the Link Vault team sent out this email.

Link Vault Status

We have received an email from our server hosts in Port Arthur, Texas.

They have told us that they have had no power since Hurricane Rita hit the area on Friday. The flooding around the area has not damaged any of the servers that they supply us so that means all our servers and data are ok.

They have an emergency generator that they use when they lose power. However this generator runs on gasoline and has ran out during the storm. They are currently trying to get a supply of gasoline from the only available working gas station in the area. They have said if they manage to get gasoline they will have the power back to the servers ASAP.

The worst case scenario is that they do not manage to get some gasoline and cannot get power back to the servers. They are estimating it could be up to 14 days until the power lines are repaired and stable.

We will keep you all updated on the situation with the servers.

We would like to thank you for your patience on this unfortunate matter.

The Link Vault Team

The links on the Web sites were not slowed or anything due to this outage. But access to the forums and the site were down. Now, we all know DigitalPoint has his Coop Network which almost competes directly with the copy-cat Link Vault network (competition is a good thing). But what is very high-class of DigitalPoint, is not only allow the Link Vault users to participate in his forum about the incident, but also offer advice to the network. Other forum discussion at SEO Chat Forums.

posted rustybrick in Link Building at September 28, 2005 8:58 AM Comments (0)

Paid Inclusion at Yahoo Not a Hijacking?

Danny spotted and featured a thread by moderator Jeff Martin at Search Engine Watch Forums. The thread is named Paid Inclusion Making Yahoo Results Seem Hijacked? and shows how since the recent Yahoo! SERP Update business.com redirect PFI links are being drifted to the top of many of the competitive keyword searches.

Jeff reports that he is noticing these Business.com redirected URLs are "now ranking #1 over state government agencies that police this industry and .edu sites." Jeff has more detail here where he suggests that Yahoo! PFI results have been hijacked. Danny offers a logical reason for all of this in the thread. So he feels that the paid inclusion part makes it look like a hijack when it is really not.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 28, 2005 8:29 AM Comments (0)

AdWords Customers Change Login to Google Accounts

Smart? Annoyance? Privacy Issues? Easier Management?

Just like Orkut, Google AdWords accounts will be migrated into the Google Accounts username/password system. Why are they doing this? Most probably for consolidation, integration and flexibility for its current programs and future developments.

Next time you login to your AdWords account, you will notice the following box.

adwords-accounts-login.gif

There is forum reaction at both WebmasterWorld and Search Engine Watch Forums.

At SEW Forums, Andrew Goodman summarizes:

You'll soon be able to update your login any time before Jan. 15, 2006, through your account. Here are some things to consider when updating your login:

* Your login is the only thing that will change. All your account information - such as billing and campaign details - will remain the same.
* We recommend you don't share your Google Account with other users in order to safeguard your information.
* If you already have a Google Account, you can use it as your new AdWords login. You might already have a Google Account if you use Gmail, Google Groups, Google Alerts, Froogle Shopping List, Personalized Search, Personalized Homepage, and Google Answers.
* If you currently share your AdWords account with other users, each user will be asked to create their own Google Account when they sign in. You can also send each person an invitation to make the switch.
* After you choose your new Google Account, you'll still be able to sign in to AdWords at adwords.google.com. In addition, if you choose a Google Account that you use for your other Google services, you'll be able to move back and forth between accounts - without having to sign in and out each time.

However, Danny Sullivan is more accepting of this change. He says, "I'm OK with it. I was kind of tired of having three different logons, adwords, gmail and everything else."

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at September 28, 2005 8:19 AM Comments (0)

Site Explorer "Coming Soon" Page Back

I keep tracking the Yahoo! Site Explorer page and today, the coming soon page, is now back from the dead. Brief update, not all that important, but I am just noting these events as they happen for my historical records.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 27, 2005 9:39 AM Comments (0)

Many Switching to YPN Exclusively

It looks like according to a DigitalPoint thread that asks Would you switch to YPN 100%? that many will switch to YPN now. Why? Bottom line, Google is paying out a lot less then Yahoo! on a CPC basis. I wonder how this will change as the network grows and the advertisers adjust the campaigns to factor in YPN advertisers.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Publisher Network at September 27, 2005 9:36 AM Comments (0)

New Duplicate Content Filter

Cornwall at ThreadWatch has the scoop on New Duplicate Content Filter at Google? He reports on a really long WebmasterWorld thread that I wasn't yet able to read. In that thread he reports Caveman posting in msg # 171;

There are cases where established site homepages and subpages are holding their ranking for one phrase, but dropping out of the SERP's for another closely related phrase (when the site previously ranked for both) ... and where there is no evidence of dup content filters playing a role where pages dropped out.

They've tweaked something else IMO. Possibly related to linking/anchor text/kw patterns.

I have been receiving emails from people about these types of changes, but I have not reported on it until now.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at September 27, 2005 9:28 AM Comments (0)

Ask Jeeves Powers New Search Service: TrustWatch

GeoTrust, probably the second most popular online security brand on the net, launched a new search service today named TrustWatch. Ask Jeeves wrote a blog entry named “Trust, But Verify" to symbolize the message behind the new search service.

Powered by Ask Jeeves algorithmic search technology, the new service is designed to combat web-based fraud, identity theft and phishing scams. Users simply type queries into the search box at www.trustwatch.com and view easily understood green, yellow and red verification symbols beside each search result that represent the web site's trustworthiness rating.

For example, users wanting to donate money for tsunami relief can type "Tsunami Relief Organizations" directly into the TrustWatch search box. The Ask Jeeves search engine will return relevant search results based on each site's authority on that specific topic, including redcross.org, usaid.gov, directrelief.org and americares.org. Each result will also appear with the TrustWatch rating prominently displayed, so users can quickly select trustworthy sites and donate with confidence.

So I decided to give it a spin, let me take you through it. Searched on web site design services and the first result was http://www.hwg.org/, which was not verified. So I clicked on the little yellow light with a question mark (verification icons explained here) and received this pop up window.

verification-1.gif

The next two top tabs look like, this and this respectively. To me, this seems pretty easy to spam.

Forum thread started at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at September 27, 2005 8:49 AM Comments (0)

Google Grows Index Size

There has been lots of speculation in the past about Google Increasing Index Size Again. As a present to us, Google says, in appreciation of Google's Official 7th Birthday, Google says, "for our seventh birthday, we are giving you a newly expanded web search index that is 1,000 times the size of our original index." In that, they link to a new page posted at http://www.google.com/help/indexsize.html notes, "search engines' published metrics for index size measurement vary greatly and are no longer easily comparable."

A must read on the topic are the following articles;
- Google Announces New Index Size, Shifts Focus from Counting by John Battelle.
- End Of Size Wars? Google Says Most Comprehensive But Drops Home Page Count by Danny Sullivan

The thread discussing this at the moment is at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at September 27, 2005 8:29 AM Comments (0)

Google Celebrates Floating Birthdays

On September 7th, we thought Google would celebrate its 7th Birthday, but we noticed Google hasn't posted any logo to celebrate - like they normally do. Today, up goes a special logo to celebrate Google's 7th birthday and it looks pretty tasty;

7th_birthday.gif

Google's blog entry reads; "Google opened its doors in September 1998, and we’ve been pursuing one mission ever since: to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. For our seventh birthday, we are giving you..." More on what they are giving us later.

In the forums, there is some confusion about the birthday, like I mentioned above. Search Engine Watch Forums asks "I thought this a week or two ago?" The date of 9/7 happened to be pulled just a few days ago, from the Google site. Danny explains;

It was. But then Google decided today was the day it would be celebrated. Apparently the date floats around a lot within Google and they've now decided to go with this one. Or maybe they want two slices of cake. Or prefer to be a Libra over a Virgo

Other forum discussion at WebmasterWorld, DigitalPoint Forums & SEO Chat Forums.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at September 27, 2005 8:12 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Mexico Prepares for Reinauguration Ceremony Next Month

In previous blog I had reported about Overture Mexico being launched between August and September, but nothing has happened yet. Most likely it wil be delayed to early October is my hunch.

Last week while I was in Mexico CIty I was able to meet lots of great people that are doing a big effort in growing the search marketing industry. Amongst them, I came across the rummor that the company is scheduled to throw a reinaugural ceremony (party) for it's efforts to present the new Paid Search model in the Yahoo! Mexico office now headed by Rafael Jimenez who reports to Peter Celeste, Latin America Manager.

So, which brand will be used for this effort?

terespondo.com

Will TeRespondo remain to have a very strong brand in Latin America and they might be keeping that name? I'd be very happy for Juan Diego Calle and Danny Echavarria to see their brand prevail. Nothing official yet, so we'll soon find out.

posted nacho in Search Marketing in Latin America at September 27, 2005 2:25 AM Comments (0)

How Clean Is Your Code?

Is it clean enough to eat off of? Is it elegant? There is a great thread going on over at HighRankings talking about the benefits of having clean HTML code on your website. The original thread starter has questions whether having clean code correlates to having high rankings in the search engines. He wants to know how you would even know if have clean code to begin with.

One the members says that having clean code and doing well in SEO is an urban myth. Its true, having sparkling clean code doesn't necessary mean you will have great search rankings nor is it a primer for ever having high rankings. Out of practice I am a big fan of cleanly coded HTML websites, its a standard for me and more out of continual principal then anything to set a good browsing environment for my visitors. It makes life a lot easier when you can easily read a website source HTML. You can diagnose errors, make changes, and reduce the size of the page for your visitors.

I think some of the confusion coming out of the clean code / SEO debate has to do with a bit of the history of SEO. Back in the days when SEO was more "optimization" than it is "link building" these days clean code did make a difference. Things were based more on on-page factors than on off page. Optimization is truely a process of cleaning up something to make it more efficient. When I optimized a website back many years ago, the primary goal was to get it cleaned up and essentially target it for selected keyphrases based on research. These days things are bit more complicated and not necessary worse either. Making sure you have clean code is really doing your due diligence for your high ranking chances so that can't hurt at all.

posted Phoenix in Web Design at September 26, 2005 2:48 PM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Slurp Clicking on YSM Ads?

An interesting thread at WebmasterWorld reports Slurp entering site through Overture Ads. The thread creator reports this behavior only on Thursday mornings.

On four seperate days (all Thursday mornings) we had Slurp bombarding our site for about an hour with over 1000 requests, all of these being referals from our Overture Ads

An other member confirms the same activity on his site;

show an abnormal amount of Slurp activity between 07:00 and 14:00 every other Thursday (as well as on a couple of Saturdays). Each time it's about 1,000 visits from the Inktomi IPs.

The interesting portion is that the other member reports that the Inktomi bots are coming through on ads that they pay for but are not being charged to them. BrotherAl says, "Some of the keywords used by Slurp to get to our site have never been clicked according to Overture's stats, so we're pretty sure this activity isn't being charged for."

Can it be some sort of destination page verification process?

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at September 26, 2005 2:16 PM Comments (0)

Google Personalized Search Removal of Results Feature

Matt Cutts last week posted an entry named UI fun: Remove result where he describes an added beta feature added to some Google Personalized search users. Matt describes;

But if you’re in this experiment, you’ll have newfound powers. Click the “Remove result” link and with one click you can drop that url from your search results. It looks like this.

By default, it will only block that url for that particular search. If you’re really annoyed, you can click “More options” and you’ll get two more choices: block this url from all future searches and (my personal favorite) the ability to block the entire host from all future searches. Here’s what it looks like:

How do you see it?

f you have an email address like johnpublicuser@gmail.com, you should be able to go to http://www.google.com/psearch and sign in with “johnpublicuser@gmail.com”

If you don't want to do that, I did a search on "Web site" and removed the first result. Here is the step by step.

remove-step1.gif

I clicked the remove result link and was shown this line.

remove-step2.gif

Then I clicked more options and was presented with...

remove-step3.gif

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at September 26, 2005 8:43 AM Comments (0)

MSN Ad Center to Go Live Today?

Tons of speculation floating around right now, based on a New York Time article that says Microsoft Plans to Sell Search Ads of Its Own. Last week, a representative from MSN Ad Center called me asking me if I was interested in getting signed up with them and testing the puppy out. I told them, honestly - I am not, but referred them to Ben (phoenix), so he can report more on it. Then today, this article comes out and the blogs begin to buzz.

The Microsoft Corporation will unveil today its own system for selling Web advertising as it struggles to compete with Google and Yahoo in the expanding Web search business. The system, to be used by MSN, is meant to improve on those of Microsoft's rivals by allowing marketers to aim ads on Web search pages to users based on their sex, age or location.

For a while now, there has been lots of positive feedback on the MSN AdCenter, so there are high expectations to be met.

Forum coverage at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at September 26, 2005 8:29 AM Comments (1)

Industry Leader Danny Sullivan Turns 40

Over the weekend, our industry leader, Danny Sullivan, celebrated his 40th birthday. Nacho, is good taste, spent the time collecting photos from the SEW mods and put together a new thread with an image of all the mods around Danny. The thread is Happy 40th Birthday Danny Sullivan!!!! Wow, the big 40 - I wonder what that feels like. Shows how old the industry is getting...kidding...

Last year the mod team was a bit smaller so you can compare the image below to last years.

sew-gang-2005.jpg

Happy Birthday Danny!

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Industry News at September 26, 2005 8:20 AM Comments (0)

Email Notifications of New Entries

For those of you that signed up for the email notification on this site in the past or want to in the future, you now can. If you signed up in the past, you will need to sign up again, I am sorry. But you will be notified daily of new entries via email and you can manage your subscription as well.

Basically, to be notified when a new entry is added to this site, just fill in your information below.

Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at September 23, 2005 2:25 PM Comments (0)

AOL Portal Beta Officially Leaves Beta Status

Gary reports that AOL.com Portal Leaves Beta, after "a three month beta period, the AOL.com open web portal has been officially released." I personally don't remember what the AOL homepage looked like before, but Gary told me it was not much of a visual change, since the roll out has been slow, in terms of UI. But yesterday, AOL officially announced;

AOL.com is no longer in Beta! hanks very much for all your testing assistance.

Notice the typo in the word "thanks." :)

I started a forum thread at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Other Search Engines at September 23, 2005 10:16 AM Comments (0)

AdSense Easily Integrated into Blogger

JenSense reports that Enhanced AdSense interface launched on Blogger where you can easily now add AdSense to your Blogger templates. This was something that was very hard for most Blogger users to do, until now. Besides for the standard AdSense features; JenSense says that;

Another unique feature is that in addition to the regular Google AdSense color palettes offered within the account, bloggers can also select "Match Template" or "Blend Template". While some of the Match Template color combinations are on the garish side, a few of the blend templates are not too bad, but still not as "blended" as I would make them for the highest CTR.

You can also select "Custom" from the drop down template menu, and supply your own colors (click the screenshot below for full-size), although there is not the built in color picker available as there is in the regular AdSense control panel.

It literally took me 30 seconds to put up the AdSense ads into one of my blogger blogs. Nice addition.

Forum discussion started at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 23, 2005 9:39 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! SERP Update

Ok, without a doubt, there are some major shifts in the Yahoo! search results page for some of the more competitive keywords. I have seen a few examples, but the forums are now buzzing about it. I held off on posting on this, until I can verify some of these results. People starting noticing these changes on the 19th of September. Here is the forum coverage.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 23, 2005 8:55 AM Comments (0)

Preparing Your Site for Hurricane Rita

The ever so much feared downtime and its effects on search engine rankings have sprung up conversation at the WebmasterWorld supporters forum (paid access only). The thread is named My server is in Houston & Hurricane Rita's Coming, Should I Move it ASAP?

Hurricane Rita is being tracked and expected to hit over Texas. The storm's path does not look good for many, and we just hope and pray it does not do as much damage, as is expected.

But what about the damage it can have on an online business. Many hosting farms are located in Texas, and what if those hosts go down and are not operational for 12 hours, 1 day, 2 days and so on? Besides for the fact that if your site is down for any number of hours, you are losing potential sales and customers. What about the affect it can have on your search engine rankings?

The longer you are down, the higher the potential for a negative impact on search engine rankings. Personally, I think it is logical to assume being down for 12 hours will not impact your rankings in the engines. But beyond that, I do not know. All the engines say they keep trying, but for how long?

So how should you prepare? (1) Get your sites set up on a backup server, in a different location. (2) Make sure all the files and databases are sync'ed up frequently. (3) Lower the TTL (time to live) to the lowest maximum you can. (4) Test the backup server. (5) Get ready to change your DNS information to point over the domain names to the new server's IP addresses. If the TTL is low enough, you can expect some name servers to update within 30 minutes or less, whereas others can take up to 48 hours.

Paid forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Other Search Topics at September 23, 2005 8:42 AM Comments (0)

AdWords API Bug Causes Major Issues with Advertisers

In yesterday's Google AdWords blog entry named Yesterday’s release has been rolled-back says;

We have identified a bug in yesterday’s release and are working to correct the issue. In the meantime we have rolled-back the latest release so your future operations will not be affected. Once the bug is fixed we will notify you and re-release the code. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

But supposedly it was a major issue for those customers who used the API daily (big customers). One advertiser wrote to me stating, "Their new API release erased all the destination URL’s. This had a huge impact on a number of SEM firms including us." The Google Groups AdWords API Forum has more details.

There is also a forum discussion taking place at SEW Forums. In that discussion the thread creator has a good explanation of the issue;

Basically anybody (themselves or their bid management service) using the API to manage their bids will be affected by this problem. What happens is that when any bid was changed for a keyword using the API, that keyword’s “destination URL” would get deleted and would change to that ad groups default URL. This is happening each time a bid was changed for every keyword.

AussieWebmaster clarifies that "this was not limited to bid interfaces. The Google internal tools for mass uploads were also effected as they use the API."

Good thing for versioning systems, at least they were able to roll back to a pervious production release.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at September 22, 2005 1:28 PM Comments (0)

SEOmoz's SEM Exam

sem-exam.gif
Last time Rand put up an SEO Quiz it was a huge success and much fun, as well. A couple weeks ago, he put up an other quiz, this time named the Search Engine Marketing Exam. It is 44 questions long and has been underway for a few weeks now. I happen to rank fairly well on the SEM Exam Leaderboard but I am sure I will be knocked down shortly. Of course I disagree with Rand on the questions I got wrong, at least some (kidding of course).

Forum discussion on SEOmoz's SEM Exam at SEO Chat Forums. Take the Search Engine Marketing Exam if you got time, its fun!

posted rustybrick in Other Search Topics at September 22, 2005 10:00 AM Comments (0)

AdWords Pricing Experiment Shows Weird Results

I am far from an AdWords expert but a thread at WebmasterWorld named Please join the "fideladeloopiedoo" experiment sprung my attention. Basically, WebmasterWorld members are bidding on a keyword phrase that has no meaning or value to anyone, the keyword is "fideladeloopiedoo". After they bid on it, they are comparing what the bids suggested by Google are for each person trying it out. The spread is wild.

$0.05 -- $0.10 -- $0.30 -- $0.40 -- $5.00

An other member tried;

In a Campaign where my maximum bid is only $.04, fideladeloopiedoo requires $.03 to go active.
In a Campaign where my maximum bid is $1.10, fideladeloopiedoo requires $.04 to go active.

Finally one member puts this all into perspective;

This is an interesting thread and should give some mathmatically inclined (or bored) individual an opportunity to work on their differential equations and develop some meaningful information. Let me know if any develops.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at September 22, 2005 9:29 AM Comments (0)

Too Many Pages of Your Site Indexed?

Commonly an issue with dynamically driven sites and sites that depend on session IDs, is that you have too many pages indexed. You are thinking, probably, how can I have too many pages indexed? The more pages I have indexed, the better off I am! Well not always. The issue is that when you have a site that isn't well optimized you can run into issues.

Trouble Sites:
(1) Session IDs in URL: A session ID would be dynamically generated and appended to the URL of every page. So a unique page about a blue widget might have hundreds of different URLs. For example; http://www.mysite.com/blue-widget.html?SESSIONID=5fd5ds14f56s1fs, http://www.mysite.com/blue-widget.html?SESSIONID=dsf45dsf54sd5s, http://www.mysite.com/blue-widget.html?SESSIONID=5dfs1651ssdffds, http://www.mysite.com/blue-widget.html?SESSIONID=jdfnkfjdsnfkjdfns55 are all the same page, but look unique to Google, because they are different URLs.
(2) The same title on every page of your site can sometimes confuse Google, especially when your content is not well indexed or not visible to the search engine spiders.
(3) Paginated category landing pages, so you have 10 pages of products within the widgets category, each page may contain the same title tag (i.e. widget).
(4) Paginated search engine forums, like WebmasterWorld, page one, page two, ..., page forty-four. All different URLs, but the same exact title tag, yet different content on each page.

But often this is not a major issue with the search engine. They all have built in ways to handle what they might call "duplicate content" and filter them out. I would be more careful with issues one and two listed above then the others.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Dynamic Site Topics at September 22, 2005 8:50 AM Comments (0)

Optimize Methods for Load Time on AdSense Ads

A thread at WebmasterWorld named Does AdSense cause a Download Lag? asks for confirmation on that question. What he gets are methods to increase the perceived load time of the AdSense advertisements.

I use tables and the browser displays the page real snappy and then you see AdSense fill in as it can.
If you position your layers through the stylesheet then you can load them into the browser in the order of content and load the ads layer last.
Pack your ad units into a div, and give that div a fixed size in pixels (the same size as the ad unit, of course). This allows the browser to position that div and to immediately continue with the rest of the layout.

Other suggestions in the thread.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 22, 2005 8:41 AM Comments (0)

SEW Forums Live Goes to Disney Land October 27th

sewlive2.gif
The second Search Engine Watch Forums LIVE! event is taking place this October 27th in Anaheim, California. Registration and detailed information is at http://www.jupiterevents.com/sewlive/oct05/index.html.

The posted agenda:
1:30pm - 2:30pm Registration
2:30pm - 4:00pm General Session
This informative, interactive session covers the latest trends, hot topics and issues in today's SEM marketplace. Short presentations will include expert views on the future of organic and paid search, contextual advertising, multilingual search, affiliate marketing, and more!
4:00pm - 4:15pm Break
4:15pm - 5:00pm Open Session with the SEW Forum Moderators — Meet the Mods!
Get answers to your most burning questions from expert panelists on any search related topic.
5:00pm Networking

The first SEW forums Live event worked out very well.

This event will be hosted by Forums Editor, Elisabeth Osmeloski, and features a special appearance by Search Engine Watch's own Founder and Editor, Danny Sullivan.

Confirmed guest speakers and featured attendees include SEW Forum moderators JenStar, Nacho, Joseph Morin, 5StarAffiliatePrograms, Lex and Marcia.

SEW Forums LIVE! is a terrific networking opportunity for SEO consultants and SEM firms, interactive agencies and in-house search marketing managers in Southern California.

Cost is ONLY $75 Advance Registration / $100 On-site or Day

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Conferences at September 22, 2005 8:20 AM Comments (0)

Ask Jeeves to be Renamed to Ask.com

Back in May 2005 we heard the rumors about Ask being renamed but today word comes from TheStreet.com article named Diller Sacks the Butler.

Jeeves is out of a job.

IAC/InterActiveCorp. is dropping the butler who doubles as the mascot of its recently acquired Ask Jeeves online search business.

I guess we no longer need to play the name guessing game and just try to play the 'when will it happen" game.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums & Cre8asite Forums & WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at September 21, 2005 4:08 PM Comments (0)

Anchor Text Misspellings - The Unexpected Surprise

Often when building links naturally people misspell the text in the anchor text area. If it happens often enough, you can expect unexpected search term referrals from the search engines. This is the story of a member at SEO Chat forums, the story of an Accidental Discovery.

In a secondary site that I have, I noticed searchers getting in through MSN using the miss spelled phrase: ortgage calculator. So I tried it, and bang! my site (www.mortgagecalculatorsandrates.com) showed up in the first place… Convinced that I must have a spelling mistake on the page, I checked it up and down and couldn’t find it! The other sites all have miss spelings, and yet my site comes up first. The only explanation being that it must be in a back link someplace, though I couldn’t find it. The lesson is: if you are targeting miss spelled words go for the BLs. Now before you get very exited about this one perticular search phrase, let me add that I got 22 visitors in 20 days of September!

Of course there can be other reasons to why this site ranks for ortgage calculator at MSN Search.

posted rustybrick in Link Building at September 21, 2005 1:14 PM Comments (1)

Site Explorer Page Down

I have been tracking updates on Yahoo! Site Explorer and from August 23rd up until this morning, some time, there was a coming soon page at http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/.

At the time of writing this entry, no page is found when you go to http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/.

This can mean a couple things. Firs thing it can mean is that someone at Yahoo accidently deleted the coming soon page. Or it can mean that Yahoo! is prepping to go live with the real Site Explorer. Keep checking... Same forum discussion linked to in the August 23rd entry.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 21, 2005 9:34 AM Comments (0)

The Destiny of DMOZ & Orkut

A thread at Cre8asite Forums asks Which will survive the longest, Orkut or DMOZ? There is a poll up at the thread and currently DMOZ is in the lead, people believe DMOZ will outlive Orkut. I personally do not think they should be compared to each other, they are completely different organisms, but nevertheless, it still makes for a good topic.

ProjectPHP suggests, "DMOZ, with absolutely no funding, will die at some point. Servers cost money, and since AOL pulled the plug and gave 'ema bunch of $$$ to go away, AFAIK there is no revenue coming in fullstop. So, DMOZ must die in it current format. When is the question. No more than 10 years I would think." However many across the Web, including Barry Welford, who started the thread, said they barely log into Orkut anymore (same here) and it seems to him that Orkut might die soon.

Recently Google invested the time to integrate the Google Accounts login with Orkut. I am sure it wasn't an overnight process, but it is now done and you have one login across all platforms. Would Google spend the time and money with such a venture, when they feel it will just die out in a few years? I doubt it.

The question then moves over to DMOZ. I personally consider DMOZ to be a historical monument on the Web. To knock one down and let it rot, seems unethical to me. Of course, this can happen and I am not trying to kid myself. So I thought that possibly a Google or Yahoo! would buy them out or give them money to help them continue. Ammon Johns replied to that staying it would be a "class-action lawsuit of the decade" if someone would buy them out. Why?

You do remember that AOL got rid of all its initial unpaid volunteers from the early days because of the class action they faced? You see, there's this thing called minimum wage. And people in DMOZ keep referring to themselves as 'staff' ... The exact same situation that AOL faced and distanced itself from once before...

To have any real hope of escaping a legal minefield, DMOZ must clearly be indentified as a non-commercial, open, voluntary project that happens to be given support by a commercial entity. Anything that erodes such identification, be that commercialization thru ads, or a purchase rather than a donation, is like throwing stones at a hive.

The thread gets into deep discussions on Tar baby and quotes from T. S. Eliot.

posted rustybrick in Other Search Topics at September 21, 2005 9:15 AM Comments (1)

Quick Links Added to Yahoo! Search Results

Last night Yahoo! blogged a topic they named Fewer clicks, more answers..., which was there way of describing a new feature added to the SERPs page, called "Quick Links".

So for example, you do a search on Walmart at Yahoo! and you see a new line under the main result, named "Quick Links."

walmart-quick-links.gif

Now only that, you get Quick Links to Local results when you do a search in the format of millenium restaurant, but I tried a bunch of restaurants in my area and the local results didn't come up.

I posted a forum thread at Search Engine Watch Forums, I am surprised that other forums are not talking about this. I mean, Google did something a bit similar about a month and a half ago named Google Search Web Categories Revised and the forums were buzzing on it. I'll give the forums more time to catch up on Yahoo!'s late news on this topic, but Google didn't even announce this.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 21, 2005 8:36 AM Comments (0)

Google Sued by Authors Guild

Google was sued last night over the library book scanning project by the Authors Guild. They basically want to stop Google Print from existing, whereas the Authors Guild wants to protect written documents as much as possible. What is shocking (a bit) is that Google actually wrote a blog entry on the topic last night, named Google Print and the Authors Guild, PR move?

For more detailed information, as always, I recommend checking out the Search Engine Watch Blog. Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums & WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Legal Issues in Search at September 21, 2005 8:19 AM Comments (0)

Highest AdSense Click Ever?

A thread at WebmasterWorld named My Best Click Ever asks people to list the highest paid out click, they received ever. Firstly, to get the numbers of a specific click is almost impossible in AdSense. The only way to really get an accurate count is to have one impression and one click. Otherwise, your revenue for a channel can be inflated through CPM revenue. And if CPM is taken out of the equation then if you have more then one click, you can't calculate the single value of each click, you can get the average.

Having said that, here are some of the numbers reported at the thread.

  • $54.00
  • $3.71
  • $5.00
  • $1.81
  • $1.60
  • $1.00

Just remember, here are two quotes from the thread.

Google does not update channels simultaneously and sometimes has random "click dumps" which may appear like you earn more in one day, but infact its the same amount with just a click dump from an earlier time.
The CPM for this particlar channel was something in the tens of thousands. To be honest with you I don't know what to think about it, I suppose it could have been revenue carried over, but its odd that the clicks/impressions weren't also carried over. Plus it happened in a rather obscure channel.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 20, 2005 9:42 AM Comments (10)

Weird Glitch in AdWord's Trademark System

Reported over at WebmasterWorld that someone was automatically rejected for the use of the word "home" in his ad within the Google AdWords network. A day or so later, the user reported that it was an acknowledged glitch in the system and he was manually approved for the ad copy.

The end of the story is... I sent an email to google saying that they musy have been mistaken, and they responded that they indeed were wrong, and they re-approved the ad. Must have been a glitch in their system.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at September 20, 2005 9:23 AM Comments (0)

DigitalPoint Forums Earns Respect of Yahoo! & Google

Here is some SEO Forum news for you. DigitalPoint forums has recently earned the respect of Yahoo! & Google by being known as one of the most active and popular forums to discuss Google AdSense & Yahoo! Publisher Network questions. On September 2, 2005 AdSenseAdvisor registered to answer question in the AdSense Forum at DigitalPoint and on September 14, 2005 YahooSarah registered to answer questions both in the Yahoo! Forum and Yahoo! Publisher Network Forum at DigitalPoint. In addition, the contextual queen, Jenstar has over 65 posts at DigitalPoint Forums.

Recently DigitalPoint forums broke the 10,000 member mark and recently surpassed WebmasterWorld, at least on Alexa traffic stats. It is nice to see things going so well for such a new forum.

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at September 20, 2005 9:07 AM Comments (8)

The Do's & Don'ts in Link Request Emails

Todd, Stuntdubl, does it again with this outstanding thread he coined Increase Your Link Request Conversion - Don't Do This! at Search Engine Watch Forums.

Ready for the bulleted list of do's & don'ts? If you do not do any of the following, then expect your link requests conversions to be lower then they need to be.

As a link request recipient, you can guarantee you'll be hitting my recycle bin if You:
  • Don't use an e-mail from the site you are requesting a link for
  • Write an e-mail that sounds like it could have been sent to 500 people
  • Don't give your phone number
  • Don't give your full name
  • Obviously scraped a search result I know I rank for
  • Mention PageRank
  • Have to TELL me that your link directory is a resource
  • Try to give me a reciprocal link on a links page
  • Request a link on a page there are no other links outside of the site
  • Canta speaka very good English or spel corectly
  • Don't understand the value of a link
  • Can't write more than a sentence long request
  • Sent the e-mail to a "catchall" e-mail address
  • Can't address me by my first name
  • Call me "Dear Webmaster"
  • Name any of your pages "links.html"
  • Try to get 3 links from me the first time you talk to me
  • Are not even CLOSELY related to my site
  • Have nothing to offer in return
  • Only TAKE from the wonderful world wide web

Do check out the thread for more helpful advice on Increasing Your Link Request Conversions.

posted rustybrick in Link Building at September 20, 2005 8:40 AM Comments (0)

Google Secure Access Wifi Application?

You see what happens when you give your employees 20% of the time spent on the job, to fiddle with any idea they come up with? They create Google Secure Access.

Google Secure Access is a downloadable client application that allows users to establish a more secure WiFi connection.

There is also a privacy policy and download page (which I seem not to be able to access).

I believe InsideGoogle was one of the first to cover this, followed up by Danny with his security and privacy points. Lots of other discussion in the blogosphere as well. Even Reuters wrote about Google plans own WiFi service: Web site.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums & WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at September 20, 2005 8:13 AM Comments (1)

Embedded Google Alternative Searches Unrelated?

It looks like some of the UI Tests at Google, like the embedded results in the SERPs are showing unrelated search query options.

A Search Engine Watch Forums reports that a search on flaxen hair brings up Google embedded results for scud missile, relation, no idea... Here is a screen capture, just in case you missed it.

Many folks in the forums are upset with such a result.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at September 19, 2005 12:25 PM Comments (0)

AdSense Compared to YPN: Advantage YPN

Recently I was able to delivery both YPN & AdSense ads here on 50/50 rotation. In the past I used word of mouth to report on Google AdSense Versus Yahoo! Publisher Network performance. I did promised you to share some results, on a generic level, of the two programs compared side by side. So here we go...

Date Range: 09/09/2005 - 09/19/2005

Network YPN AdSense Advantage
Impressions Bit More Bit Less Slightly YPN
Clicks Bit More Bit Less Slightly YPN
CTR Equal Equal None
CPM Much Higher Much Lower YPN 81% Higher
Earnings Much Higher Much Lower YPN 82% Higher


So the reports seem to match much of what I reported here. Except for the fact that YPN had less click throughs. Let me tell you the ads matched 100% (excluding one saying Ads by Yahoo! and the other saying Ads by Google). I think its ok if I report these numbers in such a generic fashion.

posted rustybrick in Contextual Ads at September 19, 2005 11:41 AM Comments (8)

Yahoo! Adds Wayback Machine Link in Cache

Gary Price, again reports, that Yahoo Cache Now Offers Direct Links to Wayback Machine. He links to the bbcworldwide.com cache link in Yahoo! as an example. The cache header reads;

Below is a cache of http://www.bbcworldwide.com/. It's a snapshot of the page taken as our search engine crawled the Web. We've highlighted the words: bbc The web site itself may have changed. You can check the current page (without highlighting) or check for previous versions at the Internet Archive.

The words "Internet Archive" link to http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.bbcworldwide.com/. Nice little addition, IMO.

First forum coverage I found on this was at WebmasterWorld on September 6, 2005. I just posted a new thread at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at September 19, 2005 9:39 AM Comments (0)

Talk Like A Pirate Day Recognized at Ask Jeeves

sdj_pirate.gif
Jeeves is sporting a new pirate costume this morning, in respect for something called Talk Like A Pirate Day. I would have never heard of the special day, if it wasn't for Jeeves.

What I find humorous is that if you do a search on yar at Ask, it brings up the same Smart Search result.

Talk Like a Pirate Day is a parodic holiday invented in 1995 by two Americans who proclaimed September 19 as the day when everyone should talk like pirates. Instead of "hello," an observer of this holiday may greet acquaintances with "Ahoy, me hearties,” for example. Yar

Forum discussion at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at September 19, 2005 9:17 AM Comments (1)

Google Groups At Bottom of Google SERPs

Google continues to experiment with new user interfaces and advanced features. The latest finding is by Gary Price that Results from Google Groups Now Appearing at the Bottom of Google Web Results Pages.

Basically, if you do a search on linux crash or os x kernel panic or any of those types of keyword searches, at the bottom of the SERPS, on the first page, you should see something like:

groups-google-bottom.gif

I would think these would belong at the top, in the OneBox results. Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at September 19, 2005 8:54 AM Comments (0)

Are Search Engines Fat & Lazy?

A fun thread recently sprung up at Search Engine Watch Forums, which Danny Sullivan renamed Should Search Engines Get To Set Standards? The member who started the thread writes;

By emailing websites telling people they are banned because they do not cow-tow to Googles standards (and basicly the whole idea of the Communications Initiative), Google has made a statement: We are no longer interested in accuratly indexing the web, we are only interested in indexing those parts of the web that we agree with. We shall now only provide you with biased and censored results.

I don't really think there is much sinister about Google, its just getting fat and lazy. I.e. instead of using their renowned research and software engineering to overcome problems, its easier to just play the heavy and hope those problems go away.

In one way they are fat and lazy. But if you speak to any programmer, they will tell you that they are lazy (not necessarily fat). What does a programmer mean when they say they are lazy? Quite the contrary to what the member above wrote. They mean that they rather write a line or two of code that efficiently handles the issue then to manually tackle the solution each time. That is the complete opposite of the explanation given above. Google is known to try to tackle spam issues through automated, programatic solutions. Just because Google is now emailing warnings to Webmasters, it doesn't mean that Google is getting lazy. I can see Google automating the email process shortly.

Danny responds to the quote above with;

Search engines indeed do try to find technological ways to find the best pages. Link analysis is one example of that. But over time, technologies become dated, especially as people reverse engineer ways to beat the system. That can be either an aggressive black hat SEO person who finds an effective hole or just a group of bloggers who decide to embark on a linking campaign to help a site rank well for a term in response to a political action, rather than whether the site is "relevant" for that term or not. The search engines, as long as they remain effectively open systems taking content from anyone, have to keep refining their own technology.

Oh, yes, search engines are fat.

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at September 19, 2005 8:38 AM Comments (0)

CEO of WebSourced, Pat Martin Resigns

First it was Jason Dowdell, then Andy Beal and now the CEO of WebSourced, Pat Martin, who has all resigned from WebSourced. There are rumors being discussed at Search Engine Watch Forums & at ThreadWatch.

posted rustybrick in SEM / SEO Companies at September 19, 2005 8:23 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! 360 - Virtual Porn Ring Target?

Before accepting invitations within Yahoo! 360 I try to do my background checking. For some reason, this one slipped through. I received an invite from "CARAMEL_KISSES", her named sparked some investigative work, so I checked our her profile page but it looked fairly clean. So I decided to hit that "accept" invitation button. Then when viewing my home page, where it syndicates all the new items for my connected friends, I saw some porn news feeds coming in. So I immediately removed CARAMEL_KISSES from my friends list.

You won't see those feeds on her profile page, unless you are a connected friend (I assume). I forgot to take screen shots of the feeds, so I have no evidence now. But trust me, the URL of the feeds was from world-se*-news.com (put a * there so a stop filter wouldn't trigger on the ads). I have also reported her to Yahoo! 360, just now. Nice spam tactic, if that was what was intended.

posted rustybrick in Other Yahoo! Topics at September 18, 2005 9:55 AM Comments (2)

Ideas for "Blogging for Fun and Profit" Presentation?

Looks like I will be giving a little chat at the WebmasterWorld Pub Con in Las Vegas this November. I agreed to chat on the "Blogging for Fun and Profit" session, see the session I covered in New Orleans last PubCon. Now, I have no agenda at all but it will be with a fun group of people including; Jeremy Zawodny, Andy Beal, Garrett Rooney, Chris Pirillio. It turns out to be the one of two "Super Sessions" on the session grid. A super session is a session given during a time slot, with no other sessions. Brett set this up, because he feels the super sessions are sessions everyone (95% of attendees) want to see anyway, so he only has one session at that time, as opposed to the three sessions at one time. The other super session is "Search Engines and Webmasters" with Google, Yahoo, Ask and MSN on the panel.

As I said, I have no agenda at all. I was thinking that I chat about how I run this blog. How I spot good threads... Why I started the blog... How I have adapted my writing style (if you call it that) for you guys... How I handled my first advertiser... Show you what software I use for all of this and maybe post in real time...

Any other ideas? Comment here or email me at barry.schwartz@gmail.com.

Thank you.

Continue reading "Ideas for "Blogging for Fun and Profit" Presentation?"

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2005 Las Vegas at September 16, 2005 11:20 AM Comments (6)

Microsoft Buying AOL Search?

AussieWebmaster posted a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named MSN Looking to Buy Into AOL. In that post, he links to his blog posting where he writes;

According to an article in today's NY Post Microsoft is in "advanced discussions" with Time Warner to buy about half of its interests in AOL. This deal could take about two months to conclude but offers all types of possibilities.

The folks in the forum are now discussing the what-if scenarios of such an acquisition. Moderator, David Wallace says, "If Microsoft did buy AOL, they would be able to have another major venue to display their organic results as well as their PPC model. It would strike a blow to Google as they would lose a major source for their AdWords distribution." An other member writes, "f it does happen, you can look for MSN to really take their Neural Network technology to the next level. I think that MSN is looking for a way to crack into google.com traffic and they feel that doing it at the grass roots (so to speak) may help them in accomplishing this." Some more good discussion at the Search Engine Watch Forums & at WebmasterWorld.

How interesting.... :)

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at September 16, 2005 8:37 AM Comments (0)

YPN Ad Targeting Missing the Mark

Jenstar started a new thread yesterday at Search Engine Watch Forums named YPN's new ad targeting with categories. In that thread, Jennifer asks "Has anyone used this yet, and what are your initial results?"

Well I have, and as you can see (if Google ad loads, refresh) even though I set my ad category to "Computer Security" I have been getting the same "Answering Service" advertisement time and time again. Don't get me wrong, it is using "Ad Targeting" if it wasn't, I would be getting SEM ads. But are "Answering Service" at all related to a "Computer Security" category?

I am not the only one who feels YPN's Ad Targeting is way off. In the thread a member writes, "Yes, I've used it and so far it's terribly off." But to be far, it is less then one week old, and we are invite only beta testers. So they deserve some time to iron out the issues with it.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Publisher Network at September 16, 2005 8:27 AM Comments (0)

Google Sends Warnings to Sites

Nick Wilson at ThreadWatch uncovered that Google Pilot New Webmaster Communications Initiative at a Search Engine Forums thread named Google offers advice to sites on penalty. Basically, Google sent the following email to a Webmaster.

Dear site owner or webmaster of [url removed],

While we were indexing your webpages, we detected that some of your
pages were using techniques that were outside our quality guidelines,
which can be found here: [link]
In order to preserve the quality of our search engine, we have
temporarily removed some webpages from our search results. Currently
pages from [url removed] are scheduled to be removed for at least 30 days.

Specifically, we detected the following practices on your webpages:
On [url removed], we noticed that pages such as
[url removed] redirect to pages such as
[url removed] using JavaScript redirects.

We would prefer to have your pages in Google's index. If you wish to be
reincluded, please correct or remove all pages that are outside our
quality guidelines. When you are ready, please submit a reinclusion
request at [link]

You can select "I'm a webmaster inquiring about my website" and
then "Why my site disappeared from the search results or dropped in
ranking," click Continue, and then make sure to type "Reinclusion
Request" in the Subject: line of the resulting form.

Sincerely,
Google Search Quality Team

At first, I thought it was a hoax, but Matt Cutts confirmed its the real deal.

Google is trying out a pilot program to alert site owners when we're removing their site for violating our guidelines. JavaScript redirects are the first trial, but we've also sent a few emails about hidden text, I believe. This is not targeted to sites like buy-my-cheap-viagra-here.com, but more for sites that have good content, but may not be as savvy about what their SEO was doing or what that "Make thousands of doorway pages for $39.95" software was doing. Personally, I think opening up a line of communication to let webmasters know when we're taking action is a really good thing--a site owner doesn't have to guess about what happened. But again, we're starting with a trial program.

This is a great step forward for the maturity of the SEM industry. Matt Cutts also said to check his blog, because he promised to blog on the topic soon. But you must check out the detailed discussion at ThreadWatch & more forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at September 16, 2005 8:07 AM Comments (2)

Should AdWords Employees Have AdWords Accounts?

A C|Net writer pointed me in the direction of a thread at WebmasterWorld named AdRank, Affiliate Marketers and Max CPC. In that thread, a disgruntled AdWords customer discusses his disappointment with a sudden drop in rankings due to the new AdWords formula. Basically, like when you change your ads in anyway your CTR figures are wiped out, thus affecting your overall rankings in AdWords. When the new program launched, many AdWords customers that secured strong positions in the sponsored results, lost those results in a matter of a second. This particular AdWords pro, did everything he can to improve those results, even bumped up his CPC prices to $100, but it didnt work. Why?

One suggestion is that a Google AdWords employee is competing against him and is privy to the secret sauce of the new AdWords formula. Personally, I highly doubt this is good for Google and Google would allow a person internally with that level of information to use AdWords - bottom line, it is evil. But not all agree with me in the thread. To make matters worse, the way the official Google AdWords representation, AdWordsAdvisor, replied initially [[msg#19], got people really thinking, that it can be a possibility.

By policy, AdWords employees may certainly have AdWords accounts. Please rest assured, however, that they are thoroughly monitored and governed by a list of requirements as long as your arm - designed to ensure no conflict of interest.

AdWordsAdvisor then followed up [msg#50] with a more detailed explanation on policy, including;

* In order to understand the AdWords system from the advertiser's perspective, sometimes AdWords employees are AdWords advertisers. I do believe it is really important for folks who are designing and supporting a system to be users of that system, and this serves to substantially improve the product.


* Not every AdWords employee is an advertiser, however, by a long shot. Contrary to the impression that I seem to have given, it is not policy that employees must have an account. Policy merely allows for it, for employees who wish to know the product inside and out.


* What I didn't make clear (and in retrospect, I certainly wish I had) is that the vast majority of such accounts are very small - and amount to test accounts, or 'sample' accounts as slamthunderhide called them.


* A literal handful of employees advertise 'for profit', and these accounts are subject to an exceptional level of approval and scrutiny. Employees in this category tend to be people who were AdWords advertisers before they were AdWords employees - and they continue to advertise under strict guidelines and oversight. Evidently bttmfeed met one such advertiser at a merchant meeting.


* No employee advertising on AdWords, regardless of level, is able to 'beat the system' in some way. They advertise on the very same system, and are subject to the very same guidelines and policies.


* I do regret the level of upset that my comments have caused, and I've painfully learned something about the danger of posting on the fly towards the end of a long day.


To close, I am aware that simply saying that we are an ethical company will not convince everyone. Frankly, I know it won't. But as someone who has spent on average 12 hours a day at AdWords for more than three years, I am deeply familiar with what goes on here - and I know that we operate with ethics as a touchstone. And, while I know that many will remain unconvinced, I do stand behind that.

But you can see from the thread members are still not happy with Google AdWords employees having accounts. But what about Google employees running Web sites, like Matt Cutts and having his page rank #2 for bacon polenta in a matter of days. ;) It is a tough position, should AdWords employees have AdWords accounts?

My thoughts, keep the ranking formula privy to a select few engineers and those engineers do not have rights to start an AdWords account (they should get paid well enough not to discuss it). Have strict policy for AdWords employees (which they say they do) whom have AdWords accounts. Personally, I think there is nothing to these allegations, but I have no way to prove either way.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at September 15, 2005 10:16 AM Comments (1)

Ask Integrates Gifts.com into Smart Answers

Perform a search at Ask Jeeves on the keyword phrase ipod and you'll notice an old smart answers feature that comes up, customer ratings & compare prices. This is how it was done in the past, partnering with pricegrabber.com. It works well, but what about those more generic searches?

ask-comparison-shopping.gif

Based on last nights Ask Jeeves's Blog posting named Compare. Contrast. Repeat. Ask has integrated Gifts.com, an IAC property, into http://ask.gifts.com/ and Smart Answers.

The example given at the AJ blog is a search on gifts, which brings up a more generic smart answer taking you to the ask.gifts.com category landing pages.

ask-gifts.gif

Forum Coverage, I posted at Cre8asite Forums & Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at September 15, 2005 9:46 AM Comments (0)

The Risk of Link Exchange Requests

A HighRankings Forum thread named The Dangers Of Link Requests, When You're Not Very Careful, discusses some of the risks involved with link exchange requests.

We all get them all the time, I actually reply with an auto-responder (if certain criteria are met) with some automated link building tips (not like they read them anyway). But what do others do with these requests? Many delete them and forget about them but most get caught by spam filters. Other's post the request publicly for others to mock and make fun of. Some registrars hold you hostage demanding you pay $200 per domain name for the unauthorized mass emailing of these link requests.

posted rustybrick in Link Building at September 15, 2005 9:35 AM Comments (0)

Eliminating PSAs on Google AdSense

Rarely do you find a publisher that is happy to find Google AdSense serving up PSA (Public Service Announcements) instead of those high paying real ads. So how does one eliminate those PSAs from coming up? A member at WebmasterWorld, incrediBILL, started a thread on how to help eliminate these PSAs.

He describes that you first need to track when the PSAs come up. He says that by installing the "alternate ad code in AdSense you can detect PSAs loading this code from your servers which will show up in your log files and you can determine just how serious this problem is on your web site." An other method is to track by channel, so if you have one channel that is making close to $0 you know its serving lots of PSAs (keep in mind traffic). And of course, those stop words (i.e. guns, porn, pills, casinos, etc.) trip PSAs all the time.

Eliminating the PSAs

* Copy the page to a temporary file name like temp1.html, remove any potentially offensive words, upload to the server and display the page. You should initially see some default ads on the page. Now wait for the mediabot to come check the page, usually within the hour, and redisplay the page in your browser. If you continue to get actual ads on this page for a whole day you've probably fixed the problem.

* If the ads disappear and PSAs show up, try chopping up the page content into sections and put them on the server as temp2.html, temp3.html, etc. Then display each page and wait for the mediabot as before. Note - consider your navigation, page title and possibly even meta tags are causing problems so you may need to peel it down.

* Once you've determined which part of the page is causing the problem further narrow down the specific sentences, etc. as temp10.html, temp11.html, etc. and again load those pages and wait for a verdict from the mediabot.

* When you know what's causing the PSAs, try assembling everything left as maybe temp20.html and see if that page will work. You know the drill, load the pages from your domain in the browser and wait for a verdict from the mediabot.

* With a clean page, replace your original page with the corrected content and wait for Google to reindex, could take a couple of weeks. If you're impatient just redirect the old page name to a new corrected page name and get immediate results, but this could impact your SERPS so be careful.

One last set of notes - GET RID OF ALL THE TEMPXX.HTML FILES WHEN YOU'RE DONE as you don't want Google indexing these. Also, use a different set of file names with each test as mediabot seems to remember page names with offending content so keep using new page file names to test with and don't use names you might actually want to use as that name could get stuck in Google's memory, not a good thing to happen.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 15, 2005 8:50 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Instant Search

It's Google's "I'm Feeling Lucky" for the year 2005. You type in a search phrase into http://instant.search.yahoo.com/ and watch this contextual bubble overlay the bottom portion of the page, within that contextual bubble you find the number one result for your query (sometimes). Here is an example of the number one result for the search phrase, "search engine", at Yahoo!.

yahoo-instant-search.gif

Danny has a large write up at the Search Engine Watch Blog and I started a forum at the Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at September 15, 2005 8:26 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Publisher Network Offering RSS Ads?

The Queen of Contextual Ads has spotted the First sighting of Yahoo Publisher Network RSS ads. On May 17, 2005 Google Began Offering AdSense for RSS Feeds, I was approved for the beta literally three and a half hours later, they looked like this but didn't always work too well.

My main concern is how Google and Yahoo! will fight with each other over a recent rss ads patent application filed by Google. I am crossing my fingers, but I hope to be able to test out YPN RSS ads on this site soon!

I posted a thread at the contextual forum, DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Publisher Network at September 14, 2005 3:49 PM Comments (0)

Company Name in Page Title

As most of you know, the content in the title of your pages is one of the most important on-page factors for good rankings (if not the most important on page factor). A question sprung up at HighRanking Forums under the thread title Repeating Text In Multiple Titles. The member basically asks, is it not good for SEO reasons to place your company name before the other keywords in your site?

For example, Your Home Page reads, "Company Name - Keyword Phrase". Your article pages read, "Company Name - Article Name", Your product pages read "Company Name - Product Name".

In my opinion, if you must brand your company and you must have the company name in each title, then place it at the end. So in our example above, it would look like, Your Home Page reads, "Keyword Phrase - Company Name". Your article pages read, "Article Name - Company Name", Your product pages read "Product Name - Company Name". On this site, the individual archives page, just include the title of the entry in the title of the page and nothing more. On some of my other sites, I use the keyword phrase followed by company name approach. But I rarely ever use the company name followed by the keyword phrase.

Why? Most importantly, the title is used in the search engine results pages. A person, most likely, will click on a title that starts off with the query they searched on (if the terms match the title) then on a title that starts with a company name. There are obvious considerations; big branded company names, the type of searcher and so on. But on a general level, this is the case.

Forum discussion at HighRankings Forum

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at September 14, 2005 8:47 AM Comments (3)

Yahoo! Search Marketing (Overture) New Paid Listing Program Coming March 2006?

August 18th, we received a preview of Yahoo!'s new paid listing program via a Search Engine Watch Forum thread. It is now the belief of many that this is to be released in March 2006. A WebmasterWorld thread suggests that the change will take place "around March 2006." The member-base is not too happy about one specific change, going to a CTRxCPC ranking model. More discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Marketing at September 14, 2005 8:32 AM Comments (0)

Google Targets Universities with "College Life"

Found by way of WebmasterWorld, a little Google directory that looks like http://www.google.com/university/.

The URL takes you to a splash page with a selection of Google products that can be helpful to the typical college student. These products include; Gmail, Google Talk, SMS, Maps, Toolbar, Scholar and Picasa.

Since Google Talk is fairly new, one must assume the page is fairly new. I did a search at Google for "college life by Google" and came up with zero results, an other sign this page is fairly new.

You spend your life dealing with information. A lot of it is academic, a lot more is personal, it all matters, and you can probably use better tools for handling it effectively. On this page, we’d like to introduce you to a few of them.

Update: As a note, I featured the thread here before WMW featured it on their homepage. I know this one was just a coincidence, it had to be.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at September 14, 2005 8:26 AM Comments (0)

Flashing Text Introduction to AdSense Ads

From time to time I try to share threads I have found on new ways to increase conversions. I stumbled across a thread at DigitalPoint Forums which describes a new method. I do not know if this is in accordance with AdSense's TOS, so be warned if you try it on your own site. Basically, the site linked to at the thread, shows flashing words and a flashing image, and then after the flashing is done, Google AdSense shows up. It is like a little introduction to view the AdSense Ads. Does it increase CTR, I do not know for sure. But it is very creative.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 14, 2005 8:13 AM Comments (0)

Google Blog Search Engine

As Chris Sherman at SEW puts it, Google Launches Industrial Strength Blog Search but Danny doesn't think its completely industrial strength, in his SEW Blog post Thoughts On & Poking At Google Blog Search, where he says;

Top line thoughts? It's not spam free.

You can access Google Blog Search at http://www.google.com/blogsearch or at http://search.blogger.com/.

Cool thing is that you can subscribe via RSS to searches, like I often do with other blog search engines and news sites. In Danny's post about, he describes lots of the new operators that can be utilized at the blog search engine. And Google's official Google Blog Search Help is live.

Forum Round Up:
- WebmasterWorld
- Search Engine Watch Forums
- DigitalPoint Forums
- Cre8asite Forums

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at September 14, 2005 8:01 AM Comments (0)

Microsoft's Kai-Fu Lee Can Work for Google

Bright-eyed Google just got a bit brighter, with a court ruling allowing Kai-Fu Lee, former Microsoft executive, to work for Google. Under the condition that he does not recruit other Microsoft employees to work over at Google. The Wall Street Journal says;

Kai-Fu Lee remains barred from working on products, services or projects he worked on at Microsoft, including computer search technology. But while the judge said that a noncompete agreement Mr. Lee signed with Microsoft is valid, he said recruiting and staffing a Google center in China would not violate that agreement.

Mr. Lee cannot set budget or compensation levels or define the research that Google will do in China, but he can hire people to work there, the judge said.

Gary Price has a link to the full 13 pages; PDF ruling.

Forum discussion currently at WebmasterWorld

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at September 13, 2005 3:57 PM Comments (1)

MSN Search API and other MSN API's Live

Last Friday we reported on MSN releasing information on APIs for the MSN product line. Today, the APIs are live at http://msdn.microsoft.com/msn/, the Search API is available here. Other APIs available at MSN include; MSN Messenger, MSN Virtual Earth, MSN Search Toolbar API, and MSN Start.com API.

Forum chatter at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at September 13, 2005 3:20 PM Comments (1)

Name the Google 767 Jet Airliner

The other day, Google's founders purchase a Boeing 767 airliner. So instead of asking why and speculating the reason for it, lets have some clean fun with it at a new thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named Name The Google Jet.

You can name it GoogleAir, AirGoogle, Google Force, etc. Who knows, maybe they will look at the thread and name it what we voted on?

Oh, Gary Price predicted this back on April 1st. :)

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at September 13, 2005 3:12 PM Comments (0)

Yahoo! to Get Y.com Soon

A recently featured Search Engine Watch Forums thread named Yahoo Moves To Trademark Y.com shows hows Yahoo! will be gaining rights to Y.com soon. Msgraph, wrote in the thread;

1.) Some miraculous deal was reached because Yahoo was able to pulls some strings and will therefore be given Y.com in the near future. 2.) Yahoo is just covering some extra bases to prevent anyone else from attempting to trademark Y.com. Simply because they have Y! trademarked, and since IANA may never release Y.com or any other single-character domains, Yahoo is just going to take their chance on trademarking it. Or if IANA ever releases these domains, Yahoo may attempt to stake their claim on Y.com through the trademark.

Filing Application Information:

Words Only: Y.COM

Filing Date August 22, 2005

(APPLICANT) Yahoo! Inc. CORPORATION DELAWARE 701 First Avenue Sunnyvale CALIFORNIA 94089

If that isnt enough, on August 25, 2005 Yahoo! also put in a request for the trademark of an oval near an exclamation point [oval!.gif], via SEW Blog.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! News at September 13, 2005 3:04 PM Comments (0)

How Do You Spend Your AdSense Income?

Google AdSense has really given small publishers a method of earning a nice supplemental (sometimes full) income doing what they love. But some see the AdSense checks as extra spending money and some don't. A thread at WebmasterWorld asks What are the special things you do with your Adsense money?

At first I was going to skip over this thread and not report on it but then I thought again. Remember that the Yahoo! Publisher Network allows you to perform a balance transfer from your YPN account to your Yahoo! Search Marketing (YSM) account. The only requirement is that you register your YPN account under the same username as your YSM account. Screen image for you below on the interface, and see questions 35 & 36 in the Yahoo! Publisher Network Beta Help.

ypn-balance-transfer.gif

So for only one member (currently out of 11 posts) in the thread to say that he puts the money back into Google AdWords, it encourages me to post this. I am not sure the intent of launching AdSense outside of increase AdWords inventory and making more money. But with YPN, they are definitely looking for YPN publishers to transfer that money right back into their YSM accounts.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 13, 2005 9:07 AM Comments (0)

MSN AdCenter Forum Member Review

There have been a selected number of advertisers testing out the MSN Keywords AdCenter over the past couple months. This morning, one such person has created a thread at WebmasterWorld with several posts, named MSN AdCenter: my review of the new system.. Here is a summary:

- Clean & Easy to Understand User Interface; Similar to Google AdWords
- Ability to manage several campaigns under one username, like the Google Client Center
- Advanced & Cool Metrics; "view demand for each KW/KP, but then also break each of those into charts containing traffic trends (time), gender trends (M/F), and geographic stats (LA, San Diego, Paris, etc)"
- Budget Estimator (Price Estimator) can be better but it is usable.
- Reports are awesome; "create reports on all types of data including dates, performance, targeting, and the neatest of all - by time ranges (AM/PM style!)"
- Time Based Ad Delivery Options; "IE: Serve this ad for the following keywords in the "morning" only please"
- Cost to set up an account, about $5 service fee, then PPC fees onward
- $0.10 CPC minimum, but for some reasons, $0.05 bids can get through
- Bidding works based on keyword phrase and the ad. You basically set a price by keyword phrase and ad. In addition, you can opt to increase your bid to reach a targeted audience, through "targeted bidding," more often.
- "Targeted Bidding" is cool! It allows you to target based on "(1) Users in a specific geographic location (2) Users searching on specific days of the week or during a specific part of the day (3) Users of a specific gender or age"

For more details on both cool features and bugs please check out the thread at WebmasterWorld. I would be surprised if this thread is not featured within the hour on WebmasterWorld's home page.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at September 13, 2005 8:50 AM Comments (2)

Yahoo! Search Results a Bit Jumpy

There are early reports at WebmasterWorld that search engine results for queries specifically three words long, have been fluctuating. Here are some quotes...

Solid at position 4 or 5 for 4 months, this morning bouncing around 11,12,16
On yahoo.com I jumped from 4 to 2 today.
Yes, Yahoo page count for my main site is jumping a lot at the moment. Worth keeping an eye on.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 13, 2005 8:38 AM Comments (1)

Why Would a Search Engine Ban an Expired Domain Name?

There is a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named Should Search Engines Ban Expired Domain Names? In that thread, the creator believes that search engines remove domain names that reach the status of "pending delete." That fact, I do not know, but I will try to get confirmation on. But what if it was true, a expired domain names is penalized from the index.

The thread creator believes that the domain name should never lose its value. His reasoning, "If you own a good domain name and there's a lot of "traffic" going to it and you lose that domain name I have the right to purchase it and start selling something on it--perhaps the same product. I don't think it's "natural" for a search engine to step in and disrupt the normal "traffic flow" to a location."

Many argue with this and the thread has all the details on it. My thoughts are that if a domain expires, it is a good sign to the engine that they can remove it from the index. No end user wants to end up at a site that does not resolve, it produces unhappy searchers. So if a domain reaches a status of 'pending delete' then it might make sense for the de-listing process to begin.

If in fact you are buying a domain name and Web site from a company, then no devaluation of the site should be issues, in my opinion. The site has earned its reputation and now there is new management in place to operate the site. Businesses are purchased and sold each day, and the day after a business is sold, it still has its previous reputation. The reputation might be good or bad, what happens in the future, is up to the new management. My two cents.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at September 13, 2005 8:25 AM Comments (1)

Ad Targeting by Yahoo! Publisher Network

JenSense was the first I have seen to jump on the news that YPN added ad category targeting. What does Yahoo! Publisher Network Ad Targeting do? Simple, it allows you to define on a page, directory or site level the category of ads you want displayed. For example, on this individual archive page, if you see a YPN ad on the left side (might see Google AdSense, so you can refresh to get YPN), it should be about Computer Security, because I selected the Ad Category: Computing and the Ad Subcategory: Computer Security. I then associated this specific page with the ad target category. So even though this page is really about contextual ad networks and YPN, it should show computer security ads.

JenSense has more details and screen shots here but here is a screen shot of the "Manage Ad Categories" section with a page added.

Manage-Ad-Categories-S.gif
View Large Image

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Publisher Network at September 12, 2005 10:57 AM Comments (0)

Google Indexing ZIP Files

winzip_180X180.gif
A WebmasterWorld thread named Google indexed the content of my zip files reports Google indexing (temporarily) ZIP files. One member reports, "the site: command search is bringing up a list of the zipped video files on my site... google has attempted to index all of the content of each of the zip files, it's showing up as gibberish text surrounding the filename that's inside the zip file." I tried this for some of my sites, but found nothing at this time. The member later came back to report that "it now appears that google has stopped listing the zip files as part of the site: search."

But it is very interesting to see Google trying to do this and also trying to figure out the contents of the Zip file. Danny once added this request (indexing ZIP files) for the Google Desktop Search product back in October 14, 2004, "A real personal wish is for indexing of content of compressed/zip files. I constantly zip up data -- right now, none of that gets indexed by the tool." Maybe Google is working on this now? Not sure if this was the first report of Google indexing ZIP files or not...

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at September 12, 2005 9:28 AM Comments (0)

Google Sitemaps Verification Service Limited

Don't get me wrong, Google Sitemaps is a great tool for Webmasters and we should thank Google for setting it up (and Danny Sullivan for pushing it). When Google announced Google Sitemaps Verification Service Webmasters were in joy. But after a second look, many Webmasters are confused or unhappy with what was rolled out.

A WebmasterWorld Thread notes some of the confusion and disappointment in the service. One Webmaster reports, "I followed their instructions, but it's been two days now and I still see a red "NOT VERIFIED" message." And an other said, "i have tried and failed with this." There can be many issues causing the unsuccessful verification of a Google Sitemaps, and Google does provide documentation as to the reason. I have set up Google Sitemaps on one particular site, and the errors I received was not having proper 404 page headers on 404 pages. So we corrected that and the Sitemaps were verified.

Some other feedback which I agree with include; "I was a little dismayed that it only listed pages it had problems with, was hoping for a report on all the pages it has crawled." Also, "The stats you get after verifying your site is more of a problem report. For one site it told me about two broken internal links." A problem report is not really a verification report, The report description says, "We have been crawling your site as part of our regular crawl process. This includes following links from your pages and the pages of other sites. Below we have listed URLs that we were unable to reach during this crawl process, with links that explain why we could not reach them." But what about a filter of pages that were crawled within 6 hours, 12 hours, 1 day, 2 days, 5 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and so on. That would be very useful.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at September 12, 2005 9:05 AM Comments (1)

SEO Roadshow Edinburgh Notes

SEO Roadshow was this past weekend and it was much fun for all. It is hard for me to attend these weekend get together, but I can join in some of the festivities vicariously through blogs and forum postings. Nick Wilson at ThreadWatch has a nice recap of some of the things that took place at Notes from the SEORoadShow Edinburgh. Very nice gesture Danny, very nice.

Forum coverage at Search Engine Watch Forums with Mike Grehan's descriptive review. Don't forget to check out some pictures at http://www.e-marketing-news.co.uk/seo-roadshow/, there is an image of the legendary fantomaster.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Conferences at September 12, 2005 8:24 AM Comments (0)

Secondary Navigation Links are Recommended

I found a slightly disturbing thread the other day at WebmasterWorld named Duplicate navigation links downsides? You know how many sites have a form of graphical navigation for those who find graphical links more appealing and then at the footer, the site normally has alternative text based links to the same pages? I am sure you have seen it before, it is all over the place. In addition, many forums have the bread-crumb trail navigational text links at the top of the page and at the bottom of the page (a feature I love, I hate scrolling back up - hint SEW).

These are all examples of having the same link on the same page more then once. Is there something wrong with it? The thread creator said, "I'm afraid that can hurt in any way my rankings since links will be basically duplicated." I assume this thought process was triggered due to the volume of discussion on duplicate content issues that have taken place in the recent history. But having two of the same link, pointing to the same page, and if it is of use to the end user, will not hurt your rankings. In fact, they may help with getting your site indexed and ranking you higher (due to the anchor text).

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at September 9, 2005 9:55 AM Comments (8)

Ranking Number One: Risks, Ranking Higher, All Fun

I call this thread, the funny thread of the week. A WebmasterWorld thread named Google Penalizes for being #1 is both funny but at the same time you can learn a lot from it. First let me quote the initial post which has been picked apart by the members.

Google Penalizes for being #1! Yes, it's true! Once you are in the #1 Position google WILL NOT let you get any higher, but WILL allow you fall - often drastically! I have seen this time and time again.

Lesson #1: Risks :: If you have a number one ranking for a very visible query, then you better have received that ranking 100% naturally or you will lose it. We all know Google, Yahoo!, etc. will manually make hand adjustments to very popular search queries. It just makes practical sense for them to do this. So if you do have a number one ranking and you have an inkling that you should not (even the slightest), do not expect it to last.

Lesson #2: Ranking Higher :: One can make out from the quote above that this member is upset that he/she can not get his/her ranking higher then the number one organic result. Of course, the member does not mean that, but let's assume he/she did. There are several ways to get a listing above the #1 organic result in Google. You can go the AdWords route and hope that Google inserts sponsored results above the organic results (they do very often). You can also try to get into Google News, Google Images, Google Definitions, Google etc... These are all vertical searches that are often placed above the natural listings and can you give nice visibility. Try a search for google on Google and see the news items at the top.

Lesson #3: All Fun :: Have fun with the thread, enjoy it and don't get upset. Honestly, I have number one rankings, I do not deserve in some obscure engines. I do not expect them to last. I am having fun with it now and won't go to a forum to express my deep inner feelings after they are lost.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at September 9, 2005 9:12 AM Comments (3)

Vint Cerf, Developer of TCP/IP Standards, Joins Google as Chief Internet Evangelist

Vint Cerf
Very big news but of not much interest in the SEM forums. There are at least 376 Yahoo! News Items on this topic, currently the most recent article by Eric Auchard of Reuters.

Google Inc. (Nasdaq:GOOG - news) said on Thursday it hired Internet pioneer Vinton Cerf to become its "chief Internet evangelist," the latest high-powered engineer to sign up at the Web search leader.


Cerf, 62, is widely known as the "father of the Internet" for his role in developing the TCP/IP standards that form the structure of the Internet.

He was hired away from telecoms company MCI Inc. (Nasdaq:MCIP - news) and tasked with helping to develop new Internet applications for Google. MCI is in the process of merging into Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ - news).

Very few forums are talking about it, but when they are, the discussion is not like when Google does an algorithm update or something. Forums who have some discussion on it, include:
- Cre8asite Forums
- WebmasterWorld & Supporters Forum

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at September 9, 2005 8:43 AM Comments (0)

Feedback Box: Ads Here - Ads There

Many of you probably notice the addition of contextual ads to this site. The primary reason is to test out YPN versus Google AdSense. Yesterday, I was able to set up a method to barry.schwartz@gmail.com.

In addition, I have been experimenting with Google AdSense in the RSS Feeds. I have put the AdSense in every 3rd entry for the abstract entries and every entry for the full entries. This week, I switched to FeedBurner's advertiser, to test that out. I plan on testing YPN's version, if and when it comes out as well. I expect some of you to be annoyed by it. So again, please let me know by commenting here or emailing me at barry.schwartz@gmail.com.

Ultimately, I see all rss feeds containing ads of some sort. RSS is like how the Web first was, clean of ads. But, they too, one day will be commercialized. It is sad, but I see that happening. Not sure if I will keep them here or not. Hence the feedback request.

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at September 9, 2005 8:27 AM Comments (2)

MSN APIs: APIs for MSN Search, MSN Virtual Earth, MSN Messenger & MapPoint

I get all giddy when I hear there are new APIs coming out. APIs gives developers the freedom to express a level of creativity they might not be able to reach without APIs. Just think of all the current SEO tools out there that totally make the SERPs artistic. :) Seriously....

Danny Sullivan at the Search Engine Watch Blog posted an entry named New MSN APIs To Be Offered this morning. He describes that "MSN is to offer series of APIs for MSN Search, MSN Virtual Earth, MSN Messenger and MapPoint." At the MSN Developer API site it says "MSN Developer Center...Coming September 13th." So keep watching that page for updates. For a full list of features and information, Danny posted the excerpt provided by the MSN team at his blog.

Forum discussion to begin at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at September 9, 2005 8:12 AM Comments (0)

The Pipe | is an OR Operator in Google

This is more of a searching related question, but an excellent thread at Search Engine Watch Forums asks What's Link| Versus Link: Showing On Google? The initial question asked. is the syntax link|www.domain.com an alternative to the link:www.domain.com at Google? That was quickly negated after a few tests. Danny Sullivan offered a guess that the | is seen as a space when conducting a search at Google. But Danny admitted that "it's a mystery" to him as to what the | (pipe) does actually. Member "berneboy" said its obvious to him what it is, he said;

Since pipe is considered as an 'or' command in a whole bunch of programming and query languages, how about google treating it as such.

Which Danny offers a logical explanation as to why it is probably not the OR equivalent. Danny explains that he has "never seen the pipe suggested as an alternative. It could be undocumented." He then logically explained that even if "link|searchenginewatch.com = link OR searchengine.com = link OR searchenginewatch OR com" it would bring back the same results, but none do.

GoogleGuy comes to the rescue and clarifies that "| is the same as OR." He said that "the '|' character is an undocumented way to do an OR." Basically, "[agassi|davenport] is equivalent to the search [agassi OR davenport]." On a more personal note, GoogleGuy explains he likes to use the pipe alternative because "it makes [him] feel smarter."

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at September 8, 2005 3:56 PM Comments (1)

Dynamically Delivering AdSense & YPN Ads on Rotation

Yesterday I wrote an entry named Google AdSense Versus Yahoo! Publisher Network but I was not able to provide my own data in the comparison. But today, I am happy to announce that we are dynamically delivering AdSense and YPN ads. Most of you know that it is against the terms of service to have YPN & AdSense showing on the same page. The only legal way to test both AdSense & YPN against each other is to have them show randomly but not overlap each other. Through several forum posts, I heard this can be easily done using PHPAdsNew, which I currently use on this site anyway. So that means you can now take advantage of the site targeting option by Google AdSense to get your ads on this site.

How to Guide on Setting up PHPAdsNew to deliver YPN & AdSense Ads dynamically:
You do not need to follow these exact steps, but this is how I personally set it up.

(1) Download, Install & Configure PHPAdsNew.
(2) Login to the Admin Panel
(3) Click on "Inventory" section
(4) Ad a new advertiser (I named it "Contextual Ads")
(5) Under that new advertiser, "Add new campaign" (I set up two, one for homepage and one for the inner pages)
(6) Create a new "Linked Zone" for this campaign
-- a Zone type "Banner, Button or Rectangle"
-- b Size (match your size that you set up for your AdSense and YPN ads)
-- c Linked Banners should associated to the Contextual Campaign you set up earlier
(7) Go Back to the Campaign You Were Working on
(8) Click on "Banner overview" and "Add new banner"
-- a Select "HTML banner" from "Banner properties"
-- b Copy and Paste AdSense or YPN Code into the box
-- c Uncheck "Alter HTML to enable tracking of AdClicks"
-- d In the "Size" enter in the size of the ads
-- e In the "Description" describe if its AdSense or YPN ads
-- f Then make sure the proper "Linked zones" is checked off
(9) Go back to Banner overview and repeat step 8 for the other ad (if you set up Google AdSense first, then you will need to add the YPN banner Ad)
(10) Go back to the "Linked zones" for that campaign
(11) Click on the linked zone you set up
(12) Ensure the "Linked banners" in that zone are checked off
(13) Set the "Probability" to 50/50 or whatever you want for each banner
(14) Click on "Invocationcode" and Choose from the drop down, "Remote invocation for Javascript"
(15) Copy and paste that code into your Web pages, in place of the current contextual ads.

There you go. I'll share the results I can, when I have enough data for you.

posted rustybrick in Contextual Ads at September 8, 2005 9:54 AM Comments (3)

Daily SEO Contradictions

Stuntdubl does it again, with a clever thread topic that is now featured at Search Engine Watch Forums named, Top 20 SEO Contradictions. He starts off explaining that these are the arguments he hears in the SEO world almost on a daily basis. I'll quote them here, but make sure to check out the thread for others.

1. All links work vs. Contextual links work 2. Buy links for click through (or don’t buy them) vs. Buy links for search rankings 3. There’s nothing a competitor can do to hurt your site vs. Googlebowling 4. SEO is dead vs. Long live SEO 5. Directory links are important vs. Google hates directory links 6. All penalties are algorithmic vs. Lots of hand edits 7. Sandbox vs. There is no sandbox 8. Filters vs. Penalties 9. The blue pill vs. There is no spoon 10. Pagerank is dead vs. Buy links based on Pagerank (okay this one is just plain WRONG) 11. Content remix vs. Scraper sites 12. Blogs rank too well vs. SE’s don’t like blogs 13. Real simple syndication vs. Real simple stealing 14. Lots of links vs. Quality links 15. Google knows all vs. Google is dumb 16. Lots of directories vs. Good directories 17. Automated vs. Manual 18. Linking in vs. Linking Out 19. Global vs. Local 20. Google is good vs. Google is evil

What I think would be cool, is to come up with a list of "SEO Oxymoron." What I mean by that is terminology used that is contradictory to the fact. Like the term "modern orthodox" in some religions. Modern means to be ever changing and orthodox means to be never changing. :)

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at September 8, 2005 9:07 AM Comments (0)

Google AdSense Reporting Down Today Starting at 12 PST

Just a warning that Google AdSense Reporting area will be offline today for about 6 hours starting at 12:00 PST time today, Thursday. Google notified everyone via a blog posting at the Inside AdSense blog under the cute title, Temporary G.A.S.S. Relief. JenSense says AdSense stat junkies be warned. And DigitalPoint forums posted a sticky with the title AdSense Reporting Down On Thursday, saying, "I hope we don't get 50 threads tomorrow of people asking if the stats are stuck..." Trust me, they might, it being the most active Google AdSense forum I am aware of.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 8, 2005 9:00 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Indexing New Sites via Whois Data?

Reports come way from WebmasterWorld that Yahoo! is indexing new sites via whois data. One member reports;

I registered a new domain mid August and put the in-development site live a week later. I had no reason to look at logs until today - no links in and no submissions. I've just noticed that Slurp came by last week. It followed hot on the heels of a Whois IP. Is this normal of Yahoo! to check out newly registered domains.

We have discussed a bit in the past on speculation on how Google Finds Newly Registered Domain Names.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at September 8, 2005 8:51 AM Comments (0)

Google Israel Snags Employee from Microsoft Israel

google-israel-logo.gif
If we didn't have enough fun yet with Google taking one guy from Microsoft then maybe this will be fun as well. Google just opened its Israeli offices and for its first employee they hired Meir Brand as Israel country manager. According to Globes Online, "Brand has extensive business and marketing experience." SearchMarketing.co.il reports that Brand "worked for AOL , ICQ, Excite, and recently, since 2002 – at Microsoft."

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at September 8, 2005 8:31 AM Comments (0)

Google to Increase Index Size Again?

It looks like it according to a featured thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named Sept. 2005 Google Index Update & Size Increase Coming?

In that thread, member shor reported huge increases in the indexing of some of a sampling of his clients.

Sample (5 sites): Datacenters: 72.14.207.104, 64.233.187.104, 64.233.161.104

Date
5/09/2005 17:11 1,870,000 1,730,000 349,000 544,000 317,000
7/09/2005 13:00 4,910,000 4,660,000 828,000 1,512,000 864,000

One of the convincing factors, as Danny notes in the thread and in his blog postings, linked to within the thread, is that when you do a search on "the" you get over 8 billion pages. At this moment in time, at 72.14.207.104 for the search the I get 8,640,000,000 results. The is pretty amazing, since Google is only "Searching 8,168,684,336 web pages." The is a difference of 471,315,664 pages, meaning Google indexed more pages for the keyword "the" then what is listed on the Google homepage footer.

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at September 8, 2005 8:20 AM Comments (1)

Andy's Back: Marketing Pilgrim

I missed Andy's blog (SEL) so much and its great to have him back with us at a new URL, http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/.

Here is the story of Andy's Pilgrimage.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Articles & Books at September 7, 2005 5:49 PM Comments (0)

Google AdSense Versus Yahoo! Publisher Network

I have been wanting to bug my guys here to make it so that the YPN ads interchange with AdSense ads. But they are busy and I don't want to bug them with my little games. So instead, I found a thread with someone who actually did it himself. Message number nine, in this WebmasterWorld thread says;

I run Adsense and YPN on the homepage of my main site interchangeably to test which is better (equal pageviews at the end of the day, same weights). Both ad networks are both on target, although Adsense ads show more "less sophisticated" adverts (no brand name, mostly mom and pop operations); while YPN shows brand names. Google's Adsense gives me double digit CTR, while YPN only gives me 1/10 of Adsense's CTR. At the end of the day, even if YPN gives me higher earnings per click, Google gives me better revenues. It seems that G's targeting is designed to show what ads fit the page AND what ads are most likely to get click (probably due to some historical data of my target audience or whatnot). On the other hand, YPN only shows what ads can possibly be targeted to the content, but not really designed to generate high click thrus.

And to be honest, that was my thinking from day one. The CPC seems high on YPN but the CTR seems lower, due to the relevancy issues with YPN. I find the post I quoted above, to be very helpful and I hope to find more.

posted rustybrick in Contextual Ads at September 7, 2005 10:25 AM Comments (1)

AdWords in Google Images Results

Shorebreak a Preferred Member at WebmasterWorld reports that he is now seeing Adwords now in Google Images. He notes;

I just noticed for the the first time that AdWords ads are showing in certain Google Image search results. Has this been the case for a long time or is this new? I use Google Image search *fairly* regularly and have never seen it before myself.

I do not see them in the Google Images results for any of the examples listed in the thread, including Lake Tahoe but shorebreak is. An other member, NoLimits, reports seeing it as well. He notes that Google has first experimented with putting these AdWords ads at the bottom only (six to be exact) and now they are testing two ads at the top and four ads on the button.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at September 7, 2005 10:08 AM Comments (0)

Adult AdWords Ads Shown for Site Command

I have never seen an adult ad shown in the Google sponsored results when conducting a site command in Google to check the health of a large dynamic site. Basically, I used the syntax allinurl:www.domain.com site:www.domain.com and presto, an adult ad.

sex-adwords-small.gif
View Large Image

To be fair, the ads no longer come up, so it might have been a fluke. I posted a thread about this at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at September 7, 2005 9:04 AM Comments (2)

Happy Birthday Google - Lucky Seven

Yesterday, DigitalPoint forums started a thread named Googles Birthday Tomorrow, well today is tomorrow. Happy Birthday Google! As NickW notes, Google's official birth date is September 7, 1998, making Google the big seven years old. Google hasn't put up a special logo yet, but they did in the past, the one I like the best is from 2002.

4th_birthday.gif

Other forum discussion at SEO Chat Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at September 7, 2005 8:42 AM Comments (11)

LinkShare to be Sold to Rakuten, Japanese Portal

News Story: Rakuten, Leading Japanese E-Commerce Portal, to Acquire LinkShare, Leading U.S. Performance-Based E-Commerce Company

Rakuten, Inc. (JASDAQ: 4755) announced today that it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire LinkShare Corporation, a privately held New York-based performance- based marketing firm, for a cash purchase price of approximately $425 million. The acquisition is expected to be completed within four to six weeks.

We all know LinkShare as a major player in the affiliate space, providing third party tools and services to merchants and affiliates. WebmasterWorld has a more detailed discussion going on about this now, Search Engine Watch Forums just put up a thread on this topic.

posted rustybrick in Affiliate Marketing at September 7, 2005 8:35 AM Comments (0)

AdSense Musical Anthem

music-note.gif
Get your dancing shoes on, and stretch those vocal cords, because soon we will have an unofficial Google AdSense Musical Anthem. The folks at WebmasterWorld are working up a song to sing as they watch their Google AdSense checks roll in. Here are some options posted in the thread.

Using the theme to "Adam's Family" the ads they are terrific the targetting specific from google on the pacific

The adsense famileeeee:)

Yesterday.. All my stats looked really great! Now it seems like a huge mistake I shouldn't click, it anyway
the ads they are terrific the targetting specific from google on the pacific

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 7, 2005 8:24 AM Comments (0)

Link Function at Yahoo! Allows for Other Operators

Ever want a way to quickly check all your .edu backlinks, or backlinks from a specific site? Yahoo! now allows you to do so with the linkdomain command. It is simple, just use the follow syntax linkdomain:www.rustybrick.com inurl:edu to check all your backlinks from .edu sites or linkdomain:www.rustybrick.com site:www.seroundtable.com to find all the backlinks from this site to rustybrick.com. And an other useful feature, is to use the allinanchor to find out who is linking to you with particular keywords, for example linkdomain:www.seroundtable.com allinanchor:blog (doesn't seem to support allinachor after a second look). Outstanding!

I am pretty sure this is new, as is Shawn, who discovered it and posted a thread about this at DigitalPoint Forums. He named the thread Yahoo Allowing Operators With Link Functions. I believe Yahoo! upgraded the command to facilitate the up and coming, Yahoo! Site Explorer product, like they recently did last week with making the link command more accurate. I have not received an official response from Yahoo! about this change, as of yet.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 6, 2005 5:33 PM Comments (5)

Yahoo! Search Results Shifting Again

Reports over at WebmasterWorld show major shifts taking place within the Yahoo! search results. Some are reporting many junk sites filtering the population. Some believe it has to do with the Link Command Being Updated, but others are not sure. One member reports that "several referrer spammers I have been tracking have lost all their spammy backlinks -- hasn't affected their rank though." It is always funny how things improve so much for some and so little for others. No official weather report from Tim Mayer at Yahoo! as of yet.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 6, 2005 12:41 PM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Local Adds Editorial Reviews

It is very interesting to watch Local Search grow and mature. Today I found a WebmasterWorld thread named Yahoo Local Integrates Editorial Reviews. That is right, instead of the normal user reviews, they have added professional editorial style reviews. One example is of Connie's Pizza in Chicago, IL, with an editorial review.

WebmasterWorld members note that the link to vote if the review is helpful or not, is missing from the editorial reviews and is only an option for the user reviews. Here is one member's concern;

I agree with you about the potential problem of Editorial reviews trumping user generated reviews. A novice user could easily interpret the logo'd Gayot review as the authoritative opinion on the business. On the other hand, when I buy a book from Amazon the first review is always the editorial review, and then I scroll down to read user reviews. I know the difference between the two, but I can't speak for novice users. This would be interesting to explore.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Other Yahoo! Topics at September 6, 2005 9:27 AM Comments (0)

SEO 101 By Ammon & Cre8asite Family

One of the many reasons as to why Cre8asite Forums rocks is because they have a great member base. Part of that base includes Ammon Johns (aka Cre8asite Administrator Black_Knight). In my opinion, Ammon is one of the most knowledgeable SEMs in the world. It will probably be very clear to you from a recent thread at Cre8asite Forums. In that thread a member asks for help, like so many do. Ammon and team jump to the rescue offering advice. But normally you would not see the detail Ammon and the Cr8asite Family go into, when offering free assistance on SEO concepts. It is hard to summarize these efforts and details in a blog post, I strongly recommend you skim the thread to understand what I am talking about.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at September 6, 2005 9:16 AM Comments (1)

MSN Promises to BLEEEP Kill Google

John Battelle leaked that Ballmer Throws A Chair At "F*ing Google" by revealing a legal document with the following message.

Prior to joining Google, I set up a meeting on or about November 11, 2004 with Microsoft's CEO Steve Ballmer to discuss my planned departure....At some point in the conversation Mr. Ballmer said: "Just tell me it's not Google." I told him it was Google.

At that point, Mr. Ballmer picked up a chair and threw it across the room hitting a table in his office. Mr. Ballmer then said: "Fucking Eric Schmidt is a fucking pussy. I'm going to fucking bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to fucking kill Google." ....

Thereafter, Mr. Ballmer resumed trying to persuade me to stay....Among other things, Mr. Ballmer told me that "Google's not a real company. It's a house of cards."

Danny has a wonderful write up on this at the Search Engine Watch Blog and the forum discussion is taking place at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at September 6, 2005 8:52 AM Comments (0)

CSS Positioning is Not Search Spam

An Search Engine Watch Forum thread asks Is using DIV positioning for SEO, spam?

Basically, CSS positioning allows you to clean up your code so that the positioning of the code itself within the document does not match the exact rendering on the browser. So if I wanted the body content of this page to load before the side navigation of this page, or the header of this page, I just position the code in CSS to come first. It is good for many reasons but in terms of SEO it is good because the search engines read your body copy first. Since they can read the body copy first, the search engines will most likely get all your relevant copy (most engines cap off how much a page they read (xK). Also, since the copy is at the top, many search engines apply more on page weight to that copy, hopefully giving your page a slight boost in the rankings.

Now if you hide the content with CSS, then that is an other story. Positioning the content is not spam.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at September 6, 2005 8:37 AM Comments (3)

Google Backlink & PR Udate Reported

Some forums are chatting about Google having a PR and Backlink update now.

The reported datacenters affected include:
72.14.207.99
72.14.207.104
72.14.207.106

Forum discussion at:
- Search Engine Watch Forums
- SEO Chat Forums
- WebmasterWorld
- DigitalPoint Forums

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at September 6, 2005 8:31 AM Comments (7)

Happy Labor Day

No logos up at the major search engines yet, today is labor day, so posting with be slow to none today.

Last year, I wrote an entry named Labor Day at the Search Engines.

Good old Ask Jeeves.

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at September 5, 2005 9:33 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Link Command More Accurate Says Tim Mayer

And it is all my fault, Tim Mayer said. Basically, I wrote an entry on July 20, 2005 which said that Yahoo!'s link command was funky. Tim said based on that, he had his team make the link command more accurate and report more consistent results. He said, that I was wrong when I reported that Yahoo! Link Count Only Showing Sampling, it is in fact showing a more full account of links, but this time more accurate.

Tim would not get into the details of what is specifically meant about being "more accurate", but we can make some assumptions. One big assumption is that older links that are no longer found are excluded these days from a linkdomain: or link: command at Yahoo! I will go into the threads and let the folks know. Oh, and I am sorry, please do not take this out on me. :)

But you will notice they order the results nicely, example, linkdomain:www.seroundtable.com. The first 10 results are major sites linking to this site.

1. googleblog.blogspot.com
2. www.adstrategist.com
3. www.searchenginelowdown.com
4. www.ysearchblog.com
5. www.searchenginejournal.com
6. www.seroundtable.com
7. blogs.msdn.com/msnsearch
8. www.ysearchblog.com/archives/000069.html
9. blogs.msdn.com/msnsearch/archive/2005/01/18/nofollow_tags.aspx
10. www.cre8pc.com

The list continues and some powerful sites are listed there, maybe in order of linkage power, relevant to this site? :)

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 2, 2005 2:21 PM Comments (4)

Cre8asiteForums Opens Discussion on Hurricane Katrina

It's no secret the Search Engine Marketing and Optimization industry steps up to the plate when one of their own is in trouble. It's a surprisingly interactive group that fights together like siblings do, but also bands together the instant someone needs help. As they send donations to help Aaron Wall and his legal fight, so too, they are scrambling to send support to the victims and survivors of Hurricane Katrina.

Yesterday I wrote something called Sympathy Is Not Enough For Katrina Survivors, which sparked a thread of discussion behind the scenes of Cre8asiteForums. When I realized that some of the moderators outside the USA, as well as inside, had strong feelings and were trying to deal with their own despair over what's happening, I asked them how they'd feel about opening up a thread to the entire Cre8 community.

They were unanimously for the idea, and so we just launched On Hurricane Katrina: Support, Expression, Communication.

We hope it not only offers refuge for the SEO/SEM/Web Design/Usability community to share feelings, but is also where people can post resources and sites that support rescue and relief efforts.

posted cre8pc in Miscellaneous at September 2, 2005 10:26 AM Comments (1)

New Search Functions Added to MSN Search

MSNdude, official MSN Search WebmasterWorld representative, posted a new thread at WebmasterWorld named Some new ways to search. In this thread he details two new releases made by MSN this week.

The first is "a new set of operators for searching" at MSN Search. Danny Sullivan wrote up the story on the New Feed Searching Commands at MSN. Examples include; feed:"hurricane katrina" which Danny explains, "the feed: that allows you to tell MSN Search that you want to search for material just within feeds it has indexed, rather than across web pages and other documents." Also, hasfeed:google which Danny explains, "hasfeed: that's supposed to bring back any page that links to a feed that has those words in the feed content, from what I understand."

An other useful command is the hasfeed: site:seroundtable.com which shows all feed URLs on a particular site.

The next thing MSNDude announced was Microsoft Unveils New Start.com. "The new version includes support to indicate what feeds have been read or unread, automatic updates, as well as capabilities to show more or fewer headlines based on a user's preference." Check it out at http://www.start.com/, past discussion on start.com under the title Microsoft Start Page.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at September 2, 2005 9:49 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Mail Search Upgraded

This past Tuesday Gary Price reported that Enhancements Made to Yahoo Mail Search. I rarely ever look at Yahoo! mail, and even Gmail, but its an important thing to note. I have been waiting for some of the forums to start chatting about it before I write anything on the topic. Gary listed the new features:

  • Attachment Search
  • Find keywords not only in email text but also in attachments.
  • Dynamic Search Refinements
  • Results get broken down into five categories: Senders, Folders, Attachments, Message Status, and Date.
  • Photo View and Attachment Views
  • Quickly see photos and attachments associated with your results set.

At WebmasterWorld they have a thread on the topic. Here is WebmasterWorld's moderator physics comment.

When I search now it searches inside the messages (not just the titles and sender) and then shows a serp-like page with snippets and all. Also shows senders that sent emails with those key phrases in them (clicking a link to a sender narrows the search to just include said sender), folders they were found in, nice. Watch out gmail ;)

An other member noted that "the search feature only works on messages as far back as August 25." I am not sure if that is accurate but doesn't sound too accurate to me.

posted rustybrick in Other Yahoo! Topics at September 2, 2005 9:27 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Link Count Only Showing Sampling

I am not one to look at my link counts at any of the search engines these days. But I always recommended Yahoo!'s linkdomain command if people did want to check backlinks in a search engine. The syntax is simple, you type into the Yahoo! search box, linkdomain:www.domain.com and press go.

It looks, like perhaps, Yahoo! is taking Google's approach by only now showing a sampling of all your backlinks with that command. Google went through a ton of negative PR (no pun intended) when they started doing this. Yahoo! was then praised when they announced the prerelease of Yahoo! Site Explorer which is suppose to tell us information about a sites backlinks and so on. But if this linkdomain command, in fact, has been reduced to a sampling of your backlinks, it will become as useless as Google's link command.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld & DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at September 2, 2005 9:13 AM Comments (0)

Google Can Detect Some Paid Links

There is a lot of buzz recently about buying & selling links these days. Yesterday, Matt Cutts posted a blog entry named Text links and PageRank, where he warns those who sell links for the sole purpose of manipulating the SERPs. He says, "However, link-selling sites can lose their ability to give reputation (e.g. PageRank and anchortext)."

To me that says that Google might PR0 a text link selling site, but it is still hard for them to go through a anchor text selling companies network of links and devalue them all. Matt says, "But these links make it harder for Google (and other search engines) to determine how much to trust each link." So let's get to the interesting parts.

At this point, someone usually asks me: “But can’t you just not count the bad links? On the dailycal.org, I see the words ‘Sponsored Resources’. Can’t search engines detect paid links?” Yes, Google has a variety of algorithmic methods of detecting such links, and they work pretty well.

This snippet from Matt's entry tells us a few things.

(1) Search engines can do an OK job determining algorithmically what links are paid and not by the surrounding text. Text like; "sponsored links", "paid links", advertisements" and so on.
(2) Search engines will only get better at detecting these paid links.
(3) Matt really dislikes the buying and selling of links.

The one other comment I would like to note, is that DaveN has an acceptable point. Dave says, "if link buying is so bad, ban Yahoo I dare you .. search google for autos wow yahoo is number 1.. why because they purchased text links."

Does this make you wonder as to the real reason Matt Cutts started a blog?

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at September 2, 2005 8:31 AM Comments (5)

AdSense Ads triggered for "New Orleans"

I found an interesting display of sponsored listings at Google this morning when I searched the term "New Orleans." As expected, the top ad was Red Cross, with a couple more sprinkled in from various newspapers and other news sources. The two that really caught my eye were one advertising for the hiring of police officers, and the other one suggesting that a better education might help in the light of the disaster (?!?). I can understand the stretch for police officers, given the attitude generated by many pictures of looting and chaos, but the other ad seems to be simply seeking impressions to report, and somewhat distasteful.

I have started a thread at the Instant Position Forum in regards to this, which lists the seven PPC ads I saw, and would welcome comments in here or there about this subject.

My concern is that some of these ads may end up offending people with ties to New orleans. Anyone else feel this way?

posted chrisboggs in Google AdSense at September 1, 2005 1:28 PM Comments (1)

AdSense 'Ad Search' Google Ad Links

While searching for tips on AdSense on forums I found a thread at DigitalPoint forums named 'Ad Search' in Ad Link!. In that thread they show an screen capture of what is nicknamed "Ad Search' Ad Links within the AdSense program. It looks like

ad-search-adsense.gif

Supposedly it has been around for a while, but I don't remember ever seeing it. So I thought I make a note of it here.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 1, 2005 9:58 AM Comments (1)

Google AdSense on Discussion Forums

WebmasterWorld has a featured thread on AdSense and Discussion Forums named 6 Tips for Adsense on Forums. In the thread member vabtz gives six valuable tips. (1) If the topic of your forum is targeting high CPC keyword then you will make a lot more money. (2) Ensure your pages are crawlable. (3) Don't show ads to registered users (users logged in), they won't click anyway. (4) Try positioning the ads until you get the highest CTR.

For the other tips, check out the thread.

I personally like how DigitalPoint configured his AdSense on his forum. One smart method is to use AdLinks within the footer of each post that the user is looking at. For example, if you go directly to a thread at http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=26766 the Google AdSense AdLinks are directly under the first post. But if you go to a specific post at http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=299674#post299674 you will see the Ad Link ads dynamically show up under that post. Very clean, simple and tactful.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at September 1, 2005 9:40 AM Comments (0)

Outbidding Google in the Google AdWords Network

Yesterday we wrote about an "isolated case" about being unable to unrank Google's Urchin in AdWords, but Danny Sullivan feels that this is a larger issue.

First Danny links to Andrew Goodman's Should Google Be Competing with its Advertisers? (If So, How Much?) blog entry from back on December 06, 2004. In that entry, Andrew writes about how you can't outrank Google's AdWord ad for the search flight tracker (verified, Google is #1 at this moment). Also, Danny notes if you search on mapping you get Google Maps in the number one spot. So I decided to try out the new product Google came out with and search on instant messaging and guess who is number one? Google Talk. So something is definitely up.

Preceding Danny's post, asking more questions, AdWordsRep replies to the initial inquiry stating that "Google's house ads are run on the exact same system and under the exact same rules as any other AdWords advertiser. There are no special levers levered, no special buttons pushed, and no special strings pulled." The reasoning used for why a Google ad would be "glued to the top spot", as AdWordsRep says, is because Google's AdWords ranks based on CPC and CTR. Since its a Google Search Engine, and someone using it is more likely to know the Google brand, they are more likely to click on Google ads.

All in all, Danny concludes his questioning with the following...

Above all others. Perhaps since that's so clearly part of google -- using even the google domain -- it's a free house ad and hard coded? But perhaps Urchin had been treated differently, then got treated as an internal google product, then shifted back to "normal?"

It is really odd that apparently suddently, it's lost that rock solid hold it had. That doesn't seem like something you'd expect to occur in only a few house.

Anyway, anything more you can provide would be helpful. Sorry to sound so doubtful, but these other house ads just seem so weird to think they are actually costing Google money and still getting the top rankings all the time.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at September 1, 2005 8:51 AM Comments (1)

Support Aaron Wall (SEOBook) Against Traffic Power

The other day we covered some of the support threads for seobook's civil lawsuit. Today, Aaron has decided to fight Traffic Power in court. That means he will need some financial support with this fight. He is currently accepting donations via paypal, I copied and pasted the code for the paypal button below this line.



Since I hate PayPal, I have asked Aaron to post a mailing address for those who want to mail donations in, like myself. Aaron, we are behind you!

posted rustybrick in Legal Issues in Search at September 1, 2005 8:42 AM Comments (1)

Premium Sponsors + advertise

To subscribe to the Search Engine Roundtable, click here