November 2004 Archives

Google Links - Link Directory of Important Google Information

Some of the best Google links for learning about all things Google as rated by webmasters. One of the members at Cre8asite Forums, projectphp, have put together an excellent list of links that pertain to many Google related sections. It was followed up with some other good lists. From whitepaper to patents to Froogle to Adwords, a lot of it is here. If you can't find what you looking for here, then try the offical Google Site Map. This list took me a bit longer than expect, as I had to pull all the urls to post on here, but I definately think its worth it.

Google Links
Google Labs - New stuff from Google.
Google Store - Buy Google Merchandise.
Google Holiday Logos
Froogle - Google Shopping engine.
Google Local Search
Google Groups - Old Usenet Posts.
Google Answers - A service that never really took off. Pay to get answers.
Google Catalog Search - Search mail order catalogues.
Google News -
Wireless Google
Google Directory
Google Image Search

Patents
Google Snippet Patent No: 6,615,209
All Googles Patent Applications
6,526,440: Ranking search results by reranking the results based on local inter-connectivity
6,678,681: Information extraction from a database
6,615,209: Detecting query-specific duplicate documents
6,529,903: Methods and apparatus for using a modified index to provide search results in response to an ambiguous search query
6,658,423: Detecting duplicate and near-duplicate files
6,754,873: Techniques for finding related hyperlinked documents using link-based analysis


Search Specific Topics
Google US Gov Search Unclesam
Google Search: Linux
Google Search: Bsd
Google Microsoft Search
Google Apple/Macintosh Search
Google University Search
Google Public Service Search
A list of Special Google Searches


Webmaster Links
Sign up for the Google Newsletter
FAQ
SEO Information for Webmasters
Google Information for Webmasters


Tools
Google Toolbar
Google Deskbar (quick google searches)
Google Desktop Search (search local files as well)
Google Alerts
Remove A URL / Page From Google
Google Translate Tool
Google Web APIs
Make Google your Default Search Engine
Google Search Appliance
Add your URL to Google


Press And Contacts
Google Blog
Contact Google
Google Advertising Programmes
Google Press Center: Press Releases
Google Investor Relations
Contact Google Sales People
Google Worldwide Offices
Google Zeitgeist (top searches etc)
Google Fact Sheet


AdWords
AdWords FAQ
Google Advertising Reporting System Login
Google Adwords: Conversion Tracking FAQ
Trademark Complaint Procedure
AdWords Accreditiation

Searching Tips and Tricks
Google Web Search Features
Google Help
Google Help Central
Cheat sheet of Searches
Google Adwords: Keyword Tool

Froogle
Froogle FAQ
Setting Up A Froogle Feed
Froogle Merchants - Program Policies


Ad Automator
Google Widens Test to Froogle Merchants
Please note: New service that i can't find info about on google. Let me know if you find something permanent.


AdWords Accreditation
AdWords Learning Center
Adwords Accreditation Start Page

posted Phoenix in Google Optimization at November 30, 2004 4:51 PM Comments (3)

What Are The Greatest SEO Myths?

Thought this was a good thread, and held a nice accord of the many beliefs and myths that have been spread throughout the SEO/SEM industry through time. There are a good number of myths out there, so much so its almost necessary to identify them in order not to make the same mistakes again. As I have long believed just because a particular method is used by many, could be one of the best reasons for not continuing it. There is an active thread over at SEW forums detailing the some of the SEO myths that have been spread about SEO through time. Some are quite hilarious, such as "AdWords are moving to the left of the screen." or "You can outsmart Google by using hidden text".

To sum up some of the real myths about SEO/SEM, here is a fun list from the thread with some I added in as well:

  • There is a right way to optimize
  • There are a million search engines
  • There are a 10,000 search engines
  • Google is the only search engine
  • Google hates me
  • Stuff keywords in your comment tags
  • PageRank is everything
  • Your should repeated your keywords 100 times on the page
  • You will not get caught for spam
  • Automate your site submission to 15,000 search engines
  • There's a perfect keyword density to achieve high rankings
  • The reason you are not ranking well is because you need more/better metatags
  • Page Rank is dead
  • All you need is more links
  • People on SEO forums know more about SEO
  • Sitewide links do not work
  • Google was created by space aliens
  • SEO does not require patience
  • New sites don't have a chance in the search engines

posted Phoenix in Search Engine Optimization at November 30, 2004 3:56 PM Comments (1)

AdSense Guru, Jenstar, Discusses Holiday Results

You have marketing, advertising, internet advertising, search advertising, pay per click, contextual ads, and then AdSense. It is rare to find someone who is a specialist in SEM, but to find someone who knows pretty much everything there is to know about AdSense - is just amazing. I strongly recommend that when you see Jenstar posting at WebmasterWorld or at Search Engine Watch Forums, that you take in every word.

Jenstar's latest thread at WMW is named Analysis of how US Thanksgiving affected AdSense earnings. In that thread, she shares some of the data she collected from her AdSense reports:

Total earnings: Down about 33% Impressions: Down about 65% CPM: Up about 25%

The rise in CPM *really* surprised me. I guess people were hoping to get an early start on the biggest shopping time of the year. Most holidays show that CPM drops off significantly as people lower bids or pause campaigns for the holidays. If only my impressions were at their normal levels, I would have had an extremely good day.

Jenstar knows the AdSense rules inside out and she is one of the brightest when it comes to contextual advertising at the forums.

Update: Make sure to check out her blog named JenSense - it's all about the AdSense & other contextual advertisers too. Wow a blog on AdSense mostly.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at November 30, 2004 9:14 AM Comments (0)

Domain Hi-Jacking - Major Issue for Search Engines and Optimizers

I have yet to discuss the topic of domain hi-jacking through the use of redirects in detail. Please do not expect me to detail how to accomplish such a hi-jacking of a domain name, that will just make things worse. But this has been a larger problem for at least a few months now. Basically, through the use of redirects, 301s and 302s, you can either seriously hurt an other domain's backlinks or take them away. Again, I am staying very vague.

There is a 34 page thread on this topic at WebmasterWorld named Dupe content checker - 302's - Page Jacking - Meta Refreshes. In addition there is a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named Come on Google, Fix it !!!. I briefly mentioned this in the Q & A session at the WMW conference (see the last Q & A). Yahoo! has once again said they have fixed the issue and the "changes have been rolled out and will take place incrementally over the coming weeks." Google, I am not aware of any changes being made.

posted rustybrick in Spam at November 30, 2004 8:55 AM Comments (0)

Greg Boser, WebGuerrilla Steps Down as Mod at WebmasterWorld

WebGuerrilla is the name Greg Boser goes under when posting at forums. I have heard rumors dating back on Friday, I believe, that WebGuerrilla has stepped down as a moderator at WebmasterWorld. He used to moderate the Google and Keyword Discussion forums, before administering the Yahoo forum at WebmasterWorld.

Recently WebGuerrilla's name has been removed as the moderators of those forums and the title "administrator" is still labeled on his profile. Nick W's ThreadWatch also has heard these rumors, where NFFC wrote, "Word reaches me, in true TW style from an anonymous source that Greg Boser, President WebGuerrilla, LLC has resigned as both an Admin and Moderator at WMW."

NFFC then adds some good thoughts in that blog entry:

I have two complaints re: Mr Boser though:

1. I don't see a "thank you" thread at WMW, he deserves one without doubt.

2. It seems Greg is used sparingly on the European SES circuit, I think thats a shame. I'm torn between trying to organising a boycott of SES London next year and trying to let the powers that be know that if he is speaking it will be the sell out of all sell outs.

Rumorville in SEM forum land.

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at November 29, 2004 7:52 PM Comments (0)

RSS Feed Options Added

There were those that requested more RSS feed options. We aim to please, so we added two new feed options, one for completed entries and an other rss feed for each category.

Full Entry RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-full.rdf
Category Feeds:
Blog Administration RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-blog-admin.rdf
Directories RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-directories.rdf
E-Commerce RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-ecommerce.rdf
Google Search Engine RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-google.rdf
Interviews RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-interviews.rdf
Keyword Research RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-keyword.rdf
Link Building RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-link-building.rdf
Microsoft MSN Search RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-full.rdf
Miscellaneous RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-miscellaneous.rdf
Other Search Engines RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-other-search-engines.rdf
Pay Per Click RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-ppc.rdf
Programming and Coding RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-programming.rdf
SEM / SEO Companies RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-sem-companies.rdf
SEO Copywriting RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-seo-copywriting.rdf
SEO Forum News RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-seo-forums.rdf
Search Engine Conferences RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-search-conferences.rdf
Search Engine Industry News RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-search-news.rdf
Search Engine Optimization RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-seo.rdf
Search Engine Tools RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-seo-tools.rdf
SPAM RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-spam.rdf
Usability RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-usability.rdf
Web Design RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-web-design.rdf
Web Promotion RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-web-promotion.rdf
Weekly Email Updates RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-email-updates.rdf
Yahoo RSS Feed: http://www.seroundtable.com/index-yahoo.rdf

Please let me know if there are any issues with these feeds or if you have other suggestions.

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at November 29, 2004 4:03 PM Comments (0)

Domain Popularity By Alan Webb

This article was contributed by Alan Webb from ABAKUS Internet Marketing, a long time friend of mine in this industry with a unique grasp of the International Search Marketing Industry.

A buzz phrase for some time now in SEO circles has been 'Link Popularity'. Rightly so as well. Google were the first to include link popularity into their ranking criteria in the form of PageRank and were closely follow by inktomi driven search engines as well as others that had the capability to factor in link popularity.

Then came the inevitable. If the ranking criteria could be manipulated, then you can bet it would be. Link spam became a plague first on guestbooks, then forums and finally blogs. Also of course, there were a great number of link farm schemes and huge link networks. Google reacted well it has to be said, and eventually discounted a large majority of the guestbook link spam, some forum and a lot of the linkfarm and organised link network shenanigans. Also my research has shown that Google now counts multiple links from a single domain as just one link when it comes to PageRank and for the ranking algorithm. Hence a sitewide link is no better than a single link on a homepage.

Therefore it is not the number of inbound links that are important, but the number of different domains that link to you.

It is very important to remember that. Especially if you are using Google for your backward link checking.
I am fairly confident I can pronounce

"Link Popularity" is dead, long live "Domain Popularity"!

Continue reading "Domain Popularity By Alan Webb"

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Articles & Books at November 29, 2004 11:23 AM Comments (0)

When will MSN Search Beta Go Live

Many search engine optimizers are anticipating the day MSN Search will be replacing its current co-branded search by Yahoo! with its own search technology found at http://beta.search.msn.com/. A thread at Search Engine Watch discusses when the members feel that MSN will go live with its beta search. For some reason, I heard January recently. Danny Sullivan, who has been around this industry more then most, says in the thread:

Bill Gates said earlier this year that the new tech would go live on MSN Search by the end of this year. That's why the Dec. 2004 date is out there. I think MSN Search may have recently backtracked and put out the Jan. 2005 date to have more time to work with. Either case, not long now.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 29, 2004 10:27 AM Comments (0)

MSN Search Slider Bug?

One of the cool features of MSN's new beta search is the MSN search Slider. There are reports at WebmasterWorld that the slider is not functioning properly. Basically, when you use the slider to fine tune the ranking factors, it adds "{mtch=#} {popl=#} {frsh=#}" to the end of your keyword search, depending on which factors you select and replace the # with a value between 100 and 0. The middle ground value should be 50, because you can either slide the slider up to 100 or down to 0.

I did some of my own tests, a search on Search Engine Optimization at MSN Beta brings back:
1. seoinc.com
2. seochat.com
3. submitexpress.com
4. searchfit.us
5. seo-guy.com/forum/search-engine-optimization-forum.html
6. patrickgavin.com
7. submitshop.net
8. submitshop.com
9. webworkshop.net
10. elixirsystems.com

A search on the same keyword term but setting the slider values to 50 (which should return the same results as above) bring back slightly different results:
1. seoinc.com
2. seochat.com
3. submitexpress.com
4. searchfit.us
5. seo-guy.com/forum/search-engine-optimization-forum.html
6. submitshop.com
7. submitshop.net
8. 1-hit.com
9. seologic.com
10. submitawebsite.com

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 29, 2004 10:17 AM Comments (0)

H=1 in Yahoo! Redirect URLs in SERPs

Late last week there was a thread started on the topic of Google's Search Spam Reporters. This thread sprung up an interesting technical detail about Yahoo's URLs and what one attribute in the URL means.

Danny Sullivan writes that when you do a search on cars in Yahoo! Search, you will find that in the number one slot is Cars.com. Danny pulled out the URL in the SERP which reads http://rds.yahoo.com/S=2766679/K=cars/v=2/SID=e/l=WS1/R=1/SS=2044565/H=1/IPC=us/SHE=0/SIG=10pe5sku9/*-http%3A//www.cars.com/

Danny says "H=1 seems to indicate the site was hardcoded to show up in response to this query. In contrast, H=0 means no hardcoding appears to be involved."

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at November 29, 2004 10:03 AM Comments (0)

Web Accessibility Required By Law in UK - Hard Pressed to Catch On With Mainstream

Web accessibility laws have long been on the books for a number of years. In the UK, The Disability Discrimination Act was enacted five years ago in order to force provision of access for users of commercial websites.

The basic summary of the Act:

"The Disability Discrimination Act makes it unlawful for a service provider to discriminate against a disabled person by refusing to provide any service which it provides to members of the public the range of auxiliary aids or services which it might be reasonable to provide to ensure that services are accessible might include accessible websites."

But how effective has it been? I found this information on a thread at Cre8asite Forums. It intrigued me, and I had to find out more. This article relates that even though laws are in effect in the UK for helping apply technical standards to ensure accessibility in many commercial websites, it appears some of the efforts have gone half done or apparently not at all. Many companies the article claims may be moving to more acceptable accessibility standards but not changing web design as a result. What ends up happening is a largely gross user experiences that makes navigating for the disabled a task in itself. Some of the main things left out include leaving out efforts in changing the navigation and content. Additionally one common issue that is arising, and one I thought was applicable to everyone working on usability is the incorrect use of the ALT tag.

So for example we plan to hand over the work of making our site accessible to webmaster or tech guy or even ourself. We go into the code and start coding the ALT tags. For the image with our logo we put "image" or we put "company logo". Ok we just made the first step to making our site accessible, right? Not even close. What is left out is the usability part of the equation, an ALT tag with the effect or our company name, example: ABC Corp, including a short description describes way much more than "image" and "company logo".

The article says that education is a critical part of enacting a law like this. A mandate that websites needs to focus on accessibility but leaves out the fact that some of the information comes with a learning curve. Not all tech people are accessibility experts, nor usability experts. The user is often left out of the equation in such a law, and likely so such things are only half as effective as they should be.

So what should companies do to reach out to disabled customers on the web? Applying standards (already in place) with the accessibility requirements. The World Wide Web Consortium, as such a place for these. Some may complain as pointed out that W3C standards impact the look and feel of the site, and ruin the use of more advanced technology. I disagree, merging the use of both would be quite an accomplished than focusing entirely on one. I can create a super accessible website conforming to standards in no time, and one that uses advanced Flash technology but merging them would be the best.

The article makes a good statistic that I can't entirely validate, but it seems on track that 9 million people in Britian have some form of disability. Enough people to make them a shining light on the radar for any government or much less commercial website.

posted Phoenix in Usability at November 26, 2004 11:45 PM Comments (0)

Search Engine Roundtable Maintenance News

Just wanted to inform you that we made a few changes to the site.

(1) The home page of the blog is now smaller in size. I used to list the past 7 days of entries on the index page, I reduced that to the past 15 entries. The page size was over a 101k, now it is about 70k on average (depending on if there images in the entries).

(2) Didn't realize how bad the left hand size navigation looks in Firefox. We improved it while adding the "Premium Sponsor" ad. So its cleaner.

Any other suggestions are welcome, I am looking into providing more RSS feed options for you as well.

Thanks.

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at November 26, 2004 9:48 AM Comments (0)

MSN Improves Search with Rosette Linguistic Analysis

Found by way of a WebmasterWorld featured post, an article named Basis Technology Enhances Multilingual Search in MSN Search Engine. An other, more detailed article on this can be found at Yahoo! News, which is basically a copy of the offical press release.

The Rosette Linguistics Platform provides MSN the ability to better handle foreign languages. One example is the quote all news and forums are using from the release:

Rosette performs linguistic analysis that helps information retrieval applications understand search queries. For example, Rosette identifies individual words for languages such as Japanese that do not use spaces between words, breaks compound words into their individual components, and identifies parts-of-speech such as verb, adjective, etc. This information increases the accuracy of search results.

This is also common in German, where they often join two words into one (i think), such as "webdesign". An other useful quote from the press release is "The Rosette Linguistics Platform uses state of the art Natural Language Processing techniques to improve information retrieval, text mining and other applications and apply them to global markets. Rosette provides capabilities like identifying the language of incoming text, providing a normalized representation in Unicode, and locating names, places and other key concepts."

MSN, looking good.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 26, 2004 9:15 AM Comments (0)

Google Hiring Quality Rater: i.e. Spam Reporters?

The Google job opportunity page has a job listing for a Quality Rater. The job description calls for a "part-time remote workers to help with search quality evaluation." There are those that believe this job is to better find and de-list sites that are found not to comply Quality Guidelines. Basically, the job title to an SEO is "Spam Reporter". Side note: wonder if many bloggers link to this as Spam Reporter, we can get a little Google bomb going. :)

There are two threads discussing this topic, one at Search Engine Watch Forums and the other at Cre8asite Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at November 26, 2004 8:42 AM Comments (0)

Gmail's Recognition of Thanksgiving

I mentioned early the search engines thanksgiving logos but I just noticed that Gmail has a special logo and letter up for the Thanksgiving holiday.

gmail-thanksgiving04.gif
A Gobble approach to email. 

In 1621, a few hundred Pilgrims and Native Americans sat down to celebrate a bountiful harvest. The feast lasted three days, and included fowl, venison, fish, berries, watercress, lobster, dried fruit, clams, and plums. There was no pumpkin pie, however. There was also an alarming lack of user-friendly webmail services.

Now, 383 years later, it's once again time to celebrate what has come to be known as Thanksgiving—a time to gather with family and friends and give thanks for all that we have. We have many things to be thankful for. But mostly, we are thankful for you—our users—who remind us of why we work so hard all year and why we love what we do. That's better than all the dried fruit and clams in the world.

Happy Thanksgiving! Thank you for making our approach to email yours.

Gobble gobble,
The Gmail Team

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at November 25, 2004 2:39 PM Comments (0)

Google Backlink Update - Thanksgiving Day

Looks like Google is doing one of those very important (note sarcasm) backlink updates. It was first spotted at WebmasterWorld last night around 10:20 (EST). Even with all the debate on the importance of the backlinks we still see Google updating the backlinks for us.

Forum Coverage:

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at November 25, 2004 10:17 AM Comments (1)

Yahoo! Update or Changes do to Clusters

There is a thread at WebmasterWorld named Yahoo Update? where members have noticed major shifts in Yahoo's search results pages for competitive keywords. GetBot in message number four says that he has been watching Yahoo! Search and noticed that Yahoo! has been serving up basically two sets of search results. He feels that Yahoo has been testing out a new algorithm that assigns more weight to those pages that have been listed in the Yahoo! Directory. His reasoning for this is that he feels that Yahoo!'s only competitive advantage is its directory.

An other point to note is something we discussed a couple days ago in the entry named Different Results in Yahoo! Search - Cluster Topic where members at Search Engine Watch Forums were noticing different results based on the case sensitivity of the keyword phrase. Tim Mayer, directory of product management search technology, answered this anomaly by saying "that the document was not being returned in one cluster and it was being returned in another" but it absolutely had nothing to do with case sensitivity. Interesting to note these two threads with Tim's response - might be some correlation.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at November 25, 2004 9:58 AM Comments (0)

Happy Thanksgiving to All

The search engines all are suited up for the special holiday, and most are paying tribute but sporting a special holiday logo. Ask Jeeves takes that ones step further by sporting a balloon type logo, it is the fifth year that Mr. Jeeves will be attending the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade (source). Check out a low quality image of the Jeeves's Balloon.

Now for the search engine logos turkey day themes:

thanksgiving04.gif

home_thanksgiving_sdj.gif

yahoo-thanksgiving-04.gif

posted rustybrick in Miscellaneous at November 25, 2004 9:30 AM Comments (0)

Welcome New Sponsor: Uncover the Web Directory

I wanted to welcome a new sponsor for the Search Engine Roundtable. The new sponsor is a new search engine friendly Web directory named Uncover the Net Web Directory. I would like to thank all of our sponsors, including Text Link Ads that is running a 15% discount on its inventory for our readers, and all the sponsors listed on the left hand navigation.

You should see the following little banner on the left hand navigation starting tomorrow.

Web Directory

Of course, the reader is most important and your feedback on the layout, content quality and coverage is always appreciated. If you rather not post a comment with feedback, feel free to email me at barry.schwartz@gmail.com.

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at November 25, 2004 9:27 AM Comments (0)

Kim Krause is Getting Married!

It just would not be right if I did not mention anything about Kim Krause's big announcement. Kim is getting married! I am in total shock. I am incredibly happy for Kim and her future. I would like to publicly wish her and her family a happy, healthy and prosperous future together.

If you do not know, Kim has been one of those people that were instrumental in helping this Web site get started. Without her support, early, early on, I would probably not be writing here today. Again, she has helped tremendously behind the scenes as well as by posting outstanding entries at this site.

Kim - I can not believe it. So, so, so happy for you! Oh, and I made this little something, hoping you would think it is funny.

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at November 24, 2004 10:54 PM Comments (0)

Froogle Wish Lists - Create Your Christmas List Online (via Google)

Christmas lists are one of those things that I always forget to do each year or at least don't do that well, as I know most of the things I want most of my friends and loved ones don't have a clue what they are all about (you want top search engine rankings, gift certificate to Google Adwords, and a new blog...what???). I know I have to be real, and a new service from Froogle was fun to find today to help make it easy for them. With the holidays upon us, it probably a good time to get something together to just to make sure you don't get a bread maker, or bag of rocks this year, or even worse socks.

This comes way for the Google Blog, and it appears some of the engineers over there decided to solve a long time problem of developing Christmas wish list the Google way...create one with Froogle that can be searched, created, and shared with many people.

Jason Shellen explains how to create your own Froogle Wish List:


Want one of your own? Just go to Froogle, search for a few things from thousands of online merchants, and click 'Add to list' for any item you want to add to your Shopping List. You'll need to sign in to your Google account or create one if you haven't already (if you have a Gmail account or Groups 2 login, you already have a Google account). If you want to share items, just click the 'In Wish List' checkbox and whammo, you now have a web page of your holiday wish list to share with friends and family. This year maybe I'll get iPod socks instead of argyle!

Now Jason, what are iPod socks? Funniest thing I have heard today that you can actually buy socks for your iPod. Cool! According to the the product description: Dress your iPod up in any one of six vibrant color socks, Just slide your iPod into the sock to keep it safe and warm. :) Slide it out to dock or change playlists. It's as easy as... putting on a pair of socks. Sounds pretty easy to me. Fun, and definately better than argyle socks. ;)

posted Phoenix in Shopping Search Engines at November 24, 2004 6:25 PM Comments (1)

The Value of a Domain Name

There is a nice thread going on at Cre8asite Forums named Is a Domain Name Worth It?, which discusses a blog entry by Barry Welford named Domain Names: the ultimate "vanity plates". You know something, I think it is worth quoting Bill Slawski's post once again, because he put so much detail into it.

There is a lot of value to a domain name.

1. Branding - By using your own domain name, you are working towards building an image that applies to your business. It is just one of many indicia that people see of the whole package, from business name, domain name, logo, tagline, mission statement, corporate history, to the more involved aspects of the business relationship with customers, vendors, competitors, and others who might interact with the organization.

2. Portability - you can take a domain name with you if you need to move from one server to another, or one host to another. IP addresses change, as do server names, if you find yourself on a service that provides a directory or a subdomain for your site instead of a domain name.

3. Memorability - a good domain name is easy to remember, and may lead to people not having to look the name up, or search for it amongst bookmarks or favorites.

4. Credibility - a domain name is more credible than just an IP address, or a directory or subdomain that includes the name of an ISP or shared host.

5. Type-in traffic - some domain names have value in that people will just type the address in a browser without knowing what might be on the other side, such as sex.com, or business.com.

6. Matching Offline Branding - branding efforts offline can be reflected on the web by the use of a well known business name or product name, or some other distinction about a business. This is true enough that a well known company will fight others under a trademark theory to take over a domain name that is in commercial use, or that is held by someone only with the intent of selling it to the trademark owner.

7. The appropriate tld - Chances are that if you are a commercial business that operates in a global environment, a name that uses the .com ending may be the most attractive choice for your business. Or, if you are a nonprofit, you would prefer one that ends with a .org. If you want to focus upon business in a country where local business is important, and search engines don't question your place of origin and business, a country specific two-letter tld may be of more value. The tld used in the domain name can be part of the value of a domain name by indicating what type of organization the site is, or where it is located.

At the WebmasterWorld conference there was a small discussion on domain names. In that discussion, Brett Tabke, the founder of WebmasterWorld, said that his logo is his domain name. What he meant by that is that he did not invest a whole lot on his logo because, as he said, "his best branding is the letters you type into the URL box in your browser when going to WebmasterWorld". It is a classic statement which shows the importance of a URL. I disagree with Brett in that I feel he should invest in a new logo that adds more to the WebmasterWorld brand, but I agree with his and Bill's views on a domain name.

posted rustybrick in Web Promotion at November 24, 2004 6:03 PM Comments (0)

Search Engines to Provide Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Services

Andy reports that Ask Jeeves and Lycos is getting into the SEO business. Andy is not worried for his company, Keyword Rankings. He said:

I don't see a threat here for anyone other than very bad SEO firms. The good ones will still find plenty of clients. Besides, the search engines already offer PPC management solutions, yet PPC management is still being outsourced to third-party, impartial, SEM firms. The same will happen with SEO.

Some of the forums already picked up the news and are discussing it now. Over at I Help You Forums Kal lists the two pages to find these servers, Lycos's Site Side Optimization and Ask Jeeves Direct Marketing Solutions. Lycos clearly lists out the prices on a per page basis, Ask Jeeves does not. If you had a dynamic site with 100,000 pages, it can get pretty expensive.

I think someone asked why don't the search engines sell SEO services at one of the last conference I attended. I thought it was a no brainer, and so did the people who answered the question on the panel. It would be a conflict of interest for a search engine to provide SEO service.

These threads are definitely worth checking out in the following forums:
- I Help You
- Search Guild
- Search Engine Watch

posted rustybrick in SEM / SEO Companies at November 24, 2004 12:24 PM Comments (0)

Ad Blindness Towards PPC Ads (Sponsored Results)

Do you have ad blindness towards the sponsored results found at the search engines? You know the results off to the right side or boxed in at the very top of the results. Some people do. They simply will not click on a paid search listing. At Cre8asite Forums there is a thread named When do you click? where you see two outstanding individuals (also happen to be forum admins at Cre8asite) go at it about why you should or should not click on these PPC ads.

Ammon Johns, aka Black_Knight, suggests that when searching for general information he is more likely to look towards the organic, free search results. But when Ammon is in buy mode and looking for product information, he often looks towards the paid, PPC, sponsored listings.

Bill Slawski, aka bragadocchio, says that he "never look[s] at sponsored/featured listings on the search engines." Bill explains because he expects "most sponsored ads are based upon a broad match, and I have no expectation that many of them will be a good match for most of the queries I fashion, and often refashion as I am searching."

Ammon then responds stating that "broad match is generally considered the trademark of the amatuer, for exactly the reasons you stated." Ammon goes on to explain that "Conversion is the single most important thing in most PPC campaigns, and the first step to that is ensuring that a listing won't mislead anyone into a click that didn't serve them." And the final quote I would like to leave with is "It is only PPC that adds a penalty to getting untargeted listings or unqualified visitors."

posted rustybrick in Pay Per Click Engines at November 24, 2004 9:39 AM Comments (1)

Reciprocal Links Are Not Evil

I will repeat, reciprocal links are not evil. All this discussion in the forums about how people only want one-way links because they heard reciprocal links are bad and can get you kicked out of the search engines is taken way out of proportion. One example of such a thread is at Search Engine Watch named Reciprocal Links Are Evil!. Let me explain.

As I said in my response, there is nothing wrong to have site A link to site B and site B link to site A. When linking to any site, you need to ask yourself "will this link be of value to my web site visitor?" If the answer is yes, then by all means - link away. Take this site for example, it gets many links from search engine related news sites, forums, blogs and even search engine official blogs. Does that mean I should not link to them back? Of course I should. I link to forums, blogs, new sites and the official search blogs every day. They link to me, I link to them - a reciprocal link, in a sense. But I link to them because they have a document of value to my reader. They link to this site because, I hope, this site has a document of value to their reader. Its the natural development of links that search engines want to see.

This does not mean that you should email everyone that is on topic to your site and ask them to swap links. You can of course, but to some extent. Make sure it feels natural and looks natural. Some might argue that looking natural is not so important, well if it is not, it will be in the near future. As Nick W says in the thread "be inventive - be extaordinary - be contraversial - be outstanding and link out generously and all good things will follow. Really they will..."

I have an article I wrote on this topic to try to clear things up. I have named the article Web Links from the Search Engine's Perspective. See I just linked to a document I think will be of use to you. :) Of course it is a link to my corporate site but I do not care, I still hope it will be helpful.

posted rustybrick in Link Building at November 24, 2004 8:55 AM Comments (0)

Using Drop Down Menus That Work Successfully In The Search Engines

Found a good thread over at SEW forums this morning that asks about particular types of drop down menus? Which are better CSS DHTML menus or Java Script menus. For the search engines the natural answer is CSS menus. They are easily spidered by the search engines and present a wide variety of options enabling the webmaster extra benefit in its use. Orion, responds that "hand-coding the menus populated with links right after the body tag and then repositioning the menu to be displayed where you want them not only improves link relevance but facilitates the crawler finding right away the links". Another member gives some good advice that while Google may read Java Script to some extent there are many other search engines that will not, so it best to use CSS for this.

An interesting argument I hadn't heard before was brought up about the CSS and JS menus. Apparently one of the member says that in some CSS drop downs use java script to just change divs from visible to hidden. So essentially your site is going to have:

- invisible div layers
- transparent gifs (to trigger the visible / hidden functions)
- link text inside divs with parameters that says hidden.

Hmm, not exactly what most people want. I use CSS menus in some of my site, and I don't run into this particular problem, nor am too extremely worried about it if I did. It does look like old school spam tactics, but then again its really not and while as one member relates a "stupid spider" might not understand I am not following the argument that it could put you at some risk. I guess the best way to find out would be to test it.

So what do you do if you are currently using a JS drop down menu? Can't change to CSS yet? Well good question. If you are using a JS Drop Down, I guess one of the first things you should consider is how the menu is being used in the code. Is the javascript placed in a file outside of the code on the page? Also as some of the members in the thread suggest, make sure you have a link to your site map near the top of the page, or at least the most important links on your site. If you can help it, put the site map link in an inline link where its part of a sentence and not a single link. Either way will work fine, just be sure to adjust for JS menus for all search engines.

Continue discussing JS and CSS Drop Down menus at SEW Forums.

posted Phoenix in Search Engine Optimization at November 23, 2004 2:09 PM Comments (0)

Different Results in Yahoo! Search - Cluster Topic

I spotted a thread named Don't Get it? Case sensitive at Yahoo? at Search Engine Watch Forums which describes a case of conducting a search in upper case versus lower case brings back different results. The example given in the thread is a search on "Squaw Creek Condos" versus a search on "squaw creek condos" in Yahoo! Search.

Although I personally don't see any different results at this point in time, Danny Sullivan in the thread reports "First gets one match; second gets two!". Of course that sprung my interest, so I emailed Tim Mayer over at Yahoo! Search for some insight. He got to the bottom of it, telling me;

I looked into this and the only reason for this abnormality is that the document was not being returned in one cluster and it was being returned in another. Nothing to do with case sensitivity.

We often find slightly different results at Google when searching on the same term (no matter upper or lower case) due to data center fluctuations. Good to know we have a similar occurrence at Yahoo! Search.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at November 23, 2004 11:07 AM Comments (0)

Making the Change from Ordinary Copywriter to Online (SEO) Copywriter

At the WebmasterWorld conference I met an individual that just began writing for Web sites. He explained to me, briefly, how he has changed his writing style. He just thinks keywords, keywords and keywords when writing his page copy. He then asked me how do I go about it. To be honest, I said I really do not think about it. I said its really just how I write these days, I think keyword without having to think keywords. But I think almost any copywriter can easily transit from the old school offline copywriting to the new school online seo copywriting in a matter of a day.

A thread at HighRankings named When Does A Copywriter Become An Seo Writer?, where the member asks "how do you convert to an SEO writer?" Jill Whalen, probably the most well known SEO copywriter, responds with "Basically, for the copywriters I've worked with, I've just given them the keyword phrases, then they do their research on the topic as usual, and just try to write with the keywords in mind. It's often very difficult the for the first page, but after that they always pick up right up."

An other member offers the following advice:

I've been a copywriter for going on 30 years, writing for websites for about 7 and I still don't know whether I could call myself an SEO writer!
I can tell you that I do apporach a few things a bit differently when I'm doing web work. I'm a tad more self conscious about defining the page structure and working from fairly detailed outlines into relatively short blocks of copy - partly to make the page more scannable and partly to guide the type spec more finitely: indicating H tags and bold type as appropriate to highlight the overal content and maybe attract a couple points from the SEs.
Compared to print, I'm more goal-oriented for each page and para, knowing that, unless I keep the sign-posts to "what's next" in the foreground, the visitor is as inclined to click over to another site as to click through to my other pages for more info.
I also find that SE 'bots aren't real clever about metaphors & jargon & such, either, so my copy tends to be a little more grounded and literal than it would be for print or video. For the same reason, where I used to use benefit statements as anchor text for links to deeper pages, I work a bit harder at mentioning the product or feature by name in the text so I can anchor my links to soething more like a keyword. That's a fine line, though, sinceit can get repetitive and spammy - I use go that way more often on top level pages that linking to fairly different topics.
Meanwhile, I haven't done enough sites end-to-end to be sure whether the my approach is really helping or if I've just been lucky with the keywords I've gone after!
As others on this forum keep telling us, just focus on writing for your customer/visitor/user and the rest is gravy.

This makes for a nice thread.

posted rustybrick in SEO Copywriting at November 23, 2004 9:48 AM Comments (0)

Loophole into the Yahoo! Directory

A member over at HighRankings started a thread named  How To Get Listed On Yahoo, Easily And Cheap, Proven method, no Yahoo-express, which provides just that. Here is how it works.

(1) Sign up for an expired domain name service that show sites listed in the Yahoo! Directory
(2) Wait for the domain names to come into your inbox
(3) Purchase the domain name for several dollars
(4) Build up the site and content
(5) Call Yahoo asking them to switch the site into the new appropriate category. He said, just tell them you changed businesses and tell them that you forgot the email address you signed up under.
(6) Presto a free listing at least for the remainder of the service period, which could be for ever.

I am sure the Yahoo! Directory folks will patch this up shortly.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Directory at November 23, 2004 9:32 AM Comments (0)

MSN Search Beta Penalizes MSN Search Blog

Ok, I lied in the title of the thread, but it did get you to click over from your RSS feed aggregator, didn't it? ;) But there is some truth to this title, MSN Search Beta does not currently rank MSN's new search blog on the first page of the results. Try it yourself, MSN Search Blog Query at MSN Search Beta and if they fixed it by now, see my screen capture.

Of course, good search engines like Google and Yahoo show the proper result in the number one slot. For some reason Ask Jeeves does not list the blog on the first page either, but Ask is slower at updating then the others. I do see that Ask Jeeves has some of the blog's pages indexed.

Interesting find and the thread discussing this can be found at Search Engine Watch under the title of MSN Search Beta stiffs MSN Search Blog.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 23, 2004 9:10 AM Comments (0)

Multiple AdSense Ads on a Page Not Showing

I recently launched a new site and I noticed that the AdSense ads were not all showing. I have noticed in the past that adsense ads, when first launched, showed white blank spaces. But after a minute the ad would appear. This new site, was the first where I put the maximum allowed, three, ads on a single page. I knew the issue was not an issue with Norton Software Blocking AdSense because I tested this on several operating systems and browsers. So I started a thread over at Search Engine Watch forums named Multiple Ads - Different Sizes - Should it Work?.

I at first thought the issue was that Google might not allow different sized ads on the same page. But that didn't make sense, so I asked in the thread. Soon after I received some excellent responses. David Wallace quoted the AdSense Support page:

Can I display more than one set of Google ads on a web page?

Currently, AdSense publishers may place up to three ad units on one web page. Our system will detect the multiple ad units and will display unique ads to each ad unit. This system is optimized for pages with highly targeted Google ads - some pages may not show ads in the second or third ad unit. In this case, the ad unit will show as a transparent box, or will contain any alternate ad or color specified in the ad code.

But Jenstar, WMW forum moderator gave us a gem.

When you ad multiple ad units to a page, I have noticed that it will usually only show ads in the first ad unit - sometimes for days - before they begin appearing in the second and third. Not sure if it is due to an inventory issue, a low priority for newly added multiple ad units, or perhaps they respider the page to get different keyword combos for each ad unit, but I have noticed this many times. It is rare that I see ads in the second and third ad units when viewing a newly uploaded page for the first time - and those ad units without ads will seem to vanish (to prevent three PSA ad units appearing on the same page). So it is a consistent problem, but one that often makes publishers go back and recheck their code to try and figure out what the issue is.

The problem should correct itself within a few days. On rare occassions, there could be a consistent ad inventory problem with not enough ads available, and those second and third units will remain blank. But a quick check with the AdSense Preview Tool can give you a quick idea if there is inventory and whether those ads will eventually show up.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at November 22, 2004 4:19 PM Comments (0)

PubSub LinkRanks Deploys Form of Temporal Link Analysis

Back in October we highlighted a thread started by Orion on the topic of Weighing the Time of a Link: Temporal Link Analysis, which discusses various algorithmic formulas that can be applied to link data in order to improve search results. The thread now gets a more practical when Bob Wyman, CEO of PubSub.com shows how his engine ranks pages. As opposed to most link algorithms, PubSub.com, DayPop.com and PopDex.com all use a form of time based link analysis to define which pages are most popular NOW.

On the PubSub LinkRanks explanation page it describes how it all works. Basically, it first collects and maps the linking data from weblogs in its index, then it assigns values for each link pointing to a page, then applies a
"Link Scores for Each Domain" and finally they apply the time factor of the link data by weighing "the trailing ten days' link scores by factors of 2".

Bob joins the Search Engine Watch thread named Temporal Link Analysis to add his practical experience with assigning time metrics to linkage data. Orion asks some excellent questions, join in.

PubSub asks that I include this link that goes nowhere, http://psi.pubsub.com/20040413:linkranks:1 "to see if we can construct a conversation thread around the topic by using a common URN."

posted rustybrick in Search Technology at November 22, 2004 10:11 AM Comments (0)

Follow Up Threads on WMW Pub Conference

If you want to know what you missed or did not miss and my session coverage did not do it for you, then check out the three threads below that have attendee discussion on the last WebmasterWorld conference.

- WebmasterWorld
- SearchEngineWatch
- V7 Forums

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 22, 2004 9:43 AM Comments (0)

More Scumware in Google Organic Results

A super moderator over t IHelpYou started a thread named Adwords mixed in the Search Results! Huh? where he documents a case of scumware changing the results of Google's organic search results page listings. This has been reported back by Phoenix on June 14th, he named his entry Adware hijacking Google Organic Results which actually got some good coverage at some of the news sites. So here is an other case, what a shame.

adwords2.jpg

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at November 22, 2004 9:25 AM Comments (0)

Circuit Workers - Tired Of Same Posts In Different Forums?

A sign of a news related topic in this industry is when you find a thread on the topic at most of the forum. But one thing I have been noticing way too often in the past 6 months or so, is that people are posting the same post in multiple forums. The most recent example is the news on "Google founders to offload 14 million shares". Here are just some of the forums I found discussing the same thing, with the same thread title and member posting.

- WebmasterWorld
- SEO Chat
- Cre8asite
- IHelpYou
- V7 Forums

Just to name a few. :)

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at November 22, 2004 9:21 AM Comments (0)

Chris Boggs - Associate Editor

Search Engine Roundtable Associate Editor Chris Boggs, of eMergent Marketing, the search arm of Brulant, Inc., is a specialist in search engine optimization and paid search advertising. Chris joined Brulant in 2007 as the Manager of the SEO team.

Chris has worked in Search Engine Marketing since 2000, starting in-house and moving into a consulting role in 2002. Chris has worked with organizations ranging in size from small businesses to Fortune 500. Chris is experienced in performing "hands-on" SEO from keyword research to content development and link development strategizing, as well as pay-per-click (PPC) campaign creation and management.

Chris is actively involved in the SEM Community. He speaks regularly at major search marketing conferences, is a Moderator and Expert columnist for Incisive Media’s Search Engine Watch, and is Associate Editor for the Search Engine Roundtable blog. Chris serves as Secretary of the 2008-2009 Board of Directors of SEMPO, the Search Engine Marketing Professional's Organization. Chris also writes frequent articles related to SEM, and has been published in a variety of online and print journals.

posted rustybrick in Blog Administration at November 21, 2004 12:52 PM Comments (0)

SEMPO Announces Board of Director Nominations

So yesterday I met Dana Todd for the first time in real life. Of course I heard her speak in person, she is kinda hard to miss with the red hair, but never actually had the time to say hi. Nice person, she showed me her new camera/video phone - in fact, she asked Brett and I to say the first thing that comes to mine when you think search, in the video camera - I said "spam". That was a long tangent that I normally do not get on.

SEMPO announced today, I think it was today, that they will be accepting "Board of Director Nominations". I thought it was an excellent announcement, bringing in new hope, bright future and greater acceptance of the almost crippled organization. So, to find out what other's thought about it, i posted a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums. I guess they can not win.

Good luck to the new board, who ever they might be and I wish the best to the next chair - tough position to fill.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Marketing Organizations at November 19, 2004 2:12 PM Comments (0)

MSN's Near Me Search - Making Sure Your Included

Found some discussion going on over at Highrankings about the Microsoft's "Near Me" search option. While this is as one member puts it is "nothing earth shattering", I thought I would highlight how you can get your website included in Near Me searches on MSN and some questions from members about how MSN actually searches for your "location". According to a recent post in the MSN blog, the MSN recommends you format your address like the following on the footer of your page:


1 Microsoft Way Redmond, WA, 98052

MSN recommends implementing this if you website serves a local need, they go on to say that they look for "strings of text that are location references", and that address hold a high degree of confidence as opposed to other parts of text on the page. Unfortunately they are not going to deduct you location primarily from you "About Us" page as these pages do not rank normally well in the index. In order to ensure even further that MSN find you location correctly they recommend you use "capitalization for the city name and state."

I am not sure specifically if MSN can deduct your location if you address is formatted like so, instead of what they recommend:


1 Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA
98052

My guess is that they hopefully have made provisions to deduct your location for this specific format.

Some of the members also question whether " websites hosted on non-local servers?" will be included in Near Me searches and also if local results can be served via the ip address location of the server. While MSN appears not to be doing this, its some interesting thoughts, of what if.

Webmasters inserting an address the way recommended could be helpful for those that serve a local need. Web design firms might also be willing to make a change in order to show up better for local searches conducted for their area. Here is an example of a food bank search, and a web design search for your area.

posted Phoenix in Microsoft MSN Search at November 19, 2004 1:56 PM Comments (0)

Ask Jeeves Asks Google's AdWords

Have you ever spoke with an expert in a field and asked them a question about a topic they should have the answer to, but they respond that they need to ask someone else? Well, what about Ask Jeeves? You do a search at Ask Jeeves, and then you find Mr. Jeeves requesting Google AdWords to give you the answer. Isn't Ask Jeeves suppose to be the expert (I believe that is the origin of "teoma" the technology Ask Jeeves uses to power the engine).

For example, do a search on pay per click at Ask Jeeves. The first 10 results are from AdWords and then if you scroll all the way down, you find the Teoma results.

One person at the WebmasterWorld conference asked why doesn't Ask Jeeves move those AdWords results away? In fact, someone said that when Ask had the PFI program, he saw that he was getting tons of impressions but zero click throughts, implying that no one really sees the Teoma results. Ask Jeeves is really proud of Teoma and I believe they should promote it more in their major search presence.

Do you think Ask Jeeves will Meltdown? like these other WebmasterWorld forum members? Will the cannibalization of its own technology hurt Ask Jeeves in the long run?

posted rustybrick in Ask.com at November 19, 2004 11:58 AM Comments (0)

GoogleGuy Once Again Responds to Link Command

As some of you know, the folks over at Search Engine Watch forums, including myself, have been giving Google a heck of a time with the link command. The thoughts are, that if Google provides it and claims on their Web site that it shows all backlinks to a Web page, then it should work as such. Of course, you and I know that it shows a selection of backlinks to a page, but not everyone new to Google and SEO knows that.

So, GoogleGuy stopped by the thread to chime in. Some interesting quotes for you:

I'm pretty sure I've said it several times. Google's link: command shows some, but not all backlinks to the specified url. That's the first time someone has pointed out the wording on that link: page; I'll be happy to mention it to our webmaster. Was someone really expecting to receive 2.6 million+ links because of the wording of that page?

Now that would be nice, thank you GoogleGuy.

This is very interesting historical information for you guys that analyze how Google handles the link popularity stuff:

Google doesn't return all backlinks in response to a link: command. In the ancient days, it was because there was a finite amount of storage space on the machines that served link: requests. So we only kept the backlinks for the top N pages. Later as we moved to a different indexing system, we kept backlinks for the top M% of pages. This was helpful for important pages, but it meant that Mom and Pop sites with lower PageRank wouldn't have as good a chance to see their backlinks.

And proof that Google does listen to SEO's suggestions:

At SES London, DaveN had a suggestion. He said: why don't you give all pages an equal chance of seeing backlinks? That's good for users, who will have a greater chance of seeing backlinks for a given page, and it's especially good for smaller websites--they'd have a chance to see backlinks. It seemed like a good idea, so we implemented it. In fact, in order to give each page a better chance of seeing backlinks (instead of just the top M% of pages), we doubled the amount of backlinks that Google exports to the outside world. So users now have access to twice as much link: data as before; it's just not all the top PageRank pages.

Do you think Google will show ALL backlinks in its next update? We will see...

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at November 19, 2004 9:53 AM Comments (1)

Closing Notes at WebmasterWorld Conference 7

New Orleans will be where the next WMW conference will be, based on audience vote. They are now going to give away the iPOD. They are also planning on having an other WMW conference here in Vegas in a year from now. And here they go, they are pulling out the winner now, Jessie picked it and the winner is.... Daniel Dent from Omega, happens to be sitting in the front row, congrats! 888.com is giving away a portal DVD player, the winner is Chris Kramer. They are setting up drinks now in the other room. This afternoon they are going to NY NY, there is a pub there that they will having the PubConf. Joseph Morin from Boost Rankings helped select it and set it up. He then thanked the panelist from the last session, and he thanked everyone for attending.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 18, 2004 3:22 PM Comments (0)

Super Session: Running with the Big Dogs! - WMW Conf 7

This is the last official session of the day, after this everyone goes to the bars. I don't - I head back to NY. Brett thanked all the speakers, the exhibitors, he thanked Matthew who is his new right hand man. This session is about people who started small and made it big (well not fortune 500).

Christine Churchil from KeyRelevance who sold net mechanic way back, was up first. The good news is that you can compete against big guys but you also go up against amazon types. Pros of small companies are; leaner, nimbler, more resilient, enthusiastic and ingenious, and grassroots understanding of business sector. Corporate negatives; slow to change, bureaucratic, fights turf wars, lack of communication, and risk averse. Some advantages of big companies include; distribution, resources (people/money), infrastructure, and brand recognition. What can a little guy do?

(1) Build Trust through, site design, address and phone, trust seals, privacy policy, customer testimonials, product reviews and awards, and guarantees.
(2) Build Relationships; maintain a dialog with existing customers, sell more products to current customers, offer valuable content, email newsletter, and soft-sales.
(3) Automate Everything; online help, make transaction process simple, confirm email receipt automated, and use third part software
(4) Improve the Customer Experience; usability matters, fix site errors, easy navigation and clear pricing.

Jessie Stricchiola from Alchemist Media Inc was next up, glad to see she is doing well. Back in 1997 she did SEO while in school, and had a small company. She then got hired to work in house in California and then later on started her own customer. She has three people and outsources a lot. She is a small dog and will share her small dog experience. If you do not have a big operation then you a probably dealing with the following elements; (1) reliance on word of mouth lead generation, (2) lack of top 10 rankings for SEO related terms, (3) limited cash flow/lack of marketing budget to spend on other marketing. She will give us some small dog, dog tricks. Success of your business is dependent on your relationship with your customers. SEO-CRM is dependent on expectation management (no standards in this industry and constant change, cost variation due to the lack of commoditization, client issues (design teams, external agencies, ego issues). Major components of SEO -CRM are client selection, expectation management and communication. Client Selection; clients understanding of the SEO industry, prior SEO engagements, development resources, commitment and availability, and financial status and account process. She then goes through her real life examples of these issues. Communication & Expectations; what you will and wont do, the risks involved, influential factors out of your control, what your expectations are of their team throughout the project and consider incorporating these elements into your agreement.

Finally Anne Kennedy from Beyond Ink. She said small business need to work with each other to succeed. Build strategic alliances. Make sure to protect your reputation, they do not sub contract their core competencies. Choose clients carefully. Match the solution to the problem (not a one size fits all). At the same time, don't overplay your hand. Remember even when you get it all right, its still a dog's life.

That covers all the sessions. I hope to write up a short recap for you all later on.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 18, 2004 3:14 PM Comments (0)

Google Scholar (Beta) - Scholarly Literature Research

Google makes an interesting move yesterday jumping into the realm of academic and scholar web search by releasing the beta version of Google Scholar.


Scholar enables you to search specifically for scholarly literature, including peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, preprints, abstracts and technical reports from all broad areas of research. Use Google Scholar to find articles from a wide variety of academic publishers, professional societies, preprint repositories and universities, as well as scholarly articles available across the web.

According to Google, Scholar will not initially carry Web search advertisements, which put it in line to be completely absent of any "commercial" intent. It may carry advertisements later, but those of the "scholarly" kind.

Having tested out Scholar the past hour. I am quite impressed with the abilities of this engine. According to Anurag Acharya, a principal engineer at Google, the engine is powered by specially tailored search algorithms to find relevant results to the topic at hand. This is going to delight some in higher learning. Instead of professors having to "Google" a students paper to see if they got it off the web, they may now be recommending Google as a source for obtaining research which before might have not been the case.

Scholar boasts some impressive features, mainly in the results themselves. For example a search for "outbreeding depression", an very select research area in Evolution pull up about 1250 results. Quite a number were the amount of research is not as extensive as say "string theory dynamics".

You may also conduct author specific searches using the following operator: author:nameofauthor. An example search is here. Or how about a search for amazing inventor who died well over a 100 years ago, author:tesla nikola. Nice and necessary feature, as its use will allow of searching along research conducted by specific authors.

Another nice aspect of the results provided is the cross referencing between multiple sources. Instead of one source for the article you can get up to 100 different ones from .edu, .gov, and many other sites that host these particular articles. Duplicate content apparently okay. Citations are probably the single best feature I can find, as in any research you must state the source of some of the information and cite it appropriately. My original example works well here to show how citations work.

One thing amiss that I wished was possible is searching within a range of dates. I try doing a search for the most recent document using a Julian date format, as used in regular google search, "semantics daterange:2453005-2453310". This is the date range for Jan. 2004 to November 1, 2004. Yet, Scholar was not able to handle such a search. In the regular results you are presented with dates of the articles, such as "2003", or "1999" but the information stops there, and I don't know if it possible to search for a specific range. Reason this might be important, is if you are doing research, you often times need to know about the most recent research or articles on the subject. While some things stand the test of time, others don't.

There is some discussion on Google Scholar at SEW forums, as well as some comment by Danny Sullivan in today's Search Engine Watch article.

posted Phoenix in Google News & Press at November 18, 2004 1:58 PM Comments (0)

Link Building and Referral Tracking - WMW Conf 7

George Kepnick from LocalLaunch was first up. He will tell us mostly how to hire someone internally to build links. Why do you need a link builder? It can save you time, its a profitable addition to your company, it is scalable. Strategic examples of link building, directory, geo targeted and industry specific links. How do I start? You need an email account from the client's address, computer, excel, browser. Compensation methods; hourly, per link, per PR, and internships. Where do you find link builders? online (craigslists), college/high school, word of mouth. What do you look for? Internet users, computer savvy, excel skills, blogger skills. How to train? The basics; be careful with long dynamic looking URL, check backlinks on the url of the page you request the links, excel is important (columns; type of links, free, recip, paid, PR, number of outgoing links, submission date, approval, submitted to page, and page your listing should be on. The list of keywords is important, then search for "add url + keyword" stuff like that. How to motivate your link builder? tell them they are important and what they are doing is important, offer bonuses, experience will help, foot in the door. RoboForm helps save time, and WMW Subscription helps you learn.

Next up was Roger Montti from martinibuster. He breaks down sites into categories based on competitiveness. Leverage personal networks, directories, paid links and buy other websites for inbound links. He said he called some guy who had a hobby site that was ranking very well and he bought it for $800. He sometimes searches on "temporarily down for maintenance" and calls the web site owners and tries to buy them. Don't worry too much about DMOZ, submit once and then walk away, you do not need DMOZ. Some long term strategies include; build your own backlink network, build your own directories, and blog away. Link development for highly competitive topics like casino, you need to be very aggressive text link buying, aggressive domain name purchases and automated link exchanges. Consider outsourcing link development but be careful with price (a good price is 5 - 7 per link) and the quality varies. Built an attractive links page, do not hide it.

Q & A:

Q: What do you recommend for automated networks and link exchanges?
A: Roger said he personally doesn't like them, but he partners with people who do. He doesn't recommend it for the average Web site.

Q: Do we need to be worried about lots of link exchanges (reciprocal links)?
A: Mikkel said do not put all your eggs in one basket, there are other types of links. Reciprocal link campaigns can only go so far. Build viral pages (tools, articles, etc.) that people want to link to you - one way. Mikkel gave an example of little online movies they made, and they are very viral, they are jokes. Build unique tools that are useful. Then give it away, for a link.

Q: Someone asked, I have 27,000 links but I want to pay someone to pay to give me more, how do I know if they are duplicating the links I already have?
A: It is very hard, almost impossible. Mikkel recommends using the API and George recommends GoogleAlert.com.

Q: IP addresses and Class C - how important to separate them out?
A: If you are aggressive about it, then you need to watch you back. You can track it down easily if someone or something raises a red flag.

Q: Which programs should you stay away from and which should you use?
A: Roger, you really have to learn the software before using it. Do not go on all automated mode. ARELIS is good for finding link partners. Mikkel, said if you want to go back hat, then build your own systems. Its ok, but if your going to do it, make sure you do not leave a footprint and the only way to do it is to build your own tools.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 18, 2004 1:38 PM Comments (0)

Keynote Address II - WMW Conf 7

The room is pretty empty, I guess most of the people stayed late at the Yahoo! party. He first offered the keynote to Sergy, then to MSN and then to Tim O'Reilly. So he decided to just talk about WebmasterWorld and where it is going to go. He asked if anyone here has not visited WMW, and a few people raised their hands. WMW does what they can to build a community, through the focus of a webmaster target. Brett says he hasn't changed much, he predicts over the next 6 - 9 months, he will be changing things. Everyone can have their own personal blogs at WMW, they are not sure how exactly its going to work. He is going to try to actually sell the WMW software, 98% done. WMW is going to move to CSS shortly, he is going to bite the bullet and do that, mainly because of the bandwidth savings and code clean up. They are going to spin off some new domains, new forums and sub domains to make it easier for people to find things. They are going to expand to more forums, like databases, specific search engines, break down the european forums. He then asked how many people are members of the supporters forum, most raised their hand. WMW is hiring perl programmers and general 'net techs' (people who get the picture), he said they do not want to turn into what SearchEngineForums turned into.

Q & A:

Q: John from ClickTracks asked, he said he is a vendor and he avoided participating in WMW because he didn't want to "pitch" his product? Any advice.
A: When questions come up, Brett said that we want you to come in an answer them. He said, often people ask questions just to pitch. Its a touch call.

Q: Do you see WMW becoming more politically active like SEMPO, etc?
A: No, we will leave it alone.

Q: What is the scope on the newsletter?
A: If they can hire someone to free up some of his time, they will do it. It takes a full day out of a week to do he said.

Q: Will there be a PubCon this afternoon?
A: Yes, this afternoon they will announce it.

Q: Will there be printed books coming out?
A: He is half done with a book, he contributed to Google Hacks and an O'Reilly book.

Q: Will you be video taping these sessions?
A: No, most the search reps will not allow it anyway.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 18, 2004 12:22 PM Comments (0)

AdWords To Potentially Ban Affiliates? - Not Now Anyway Says Google

There has been some active discussion going on over at Webmasterworld in regards to Google potentially stopping affiliates from bidding in Adwords, which ultimately direct that traffic to merchant websites. As there are a good number of affiliates that use Adwords to promote a particular product, service, website, and with quite good success. So much so that you can now see on any given search a affiliate ad somewhere in the sponsored section. You can imagine the shock and horror if Google decided it didn't like this type of advertising and eliminated the process altogether. There might be riots at webmaster conferences, but hopefully not. ;) From what I have read, and the adwords reps I have talked to, I am not seeing why the big fuss regarding this. While this could potentially be a shot at affiliates, there are definately many ways to still promote your ads successfully even if you are an affiliate without a content site. From the rep I talked to recently and the feeling I got was that Google values content pages, especially when advertisers are directing their advertising to their OWN content pages. Its makes sense their stance, you often have more information to make an educated decision on content oriented pages, more choices, the traffic is going to YOUR website and not some affiliate page or lead form, you are not confusing the users, and so on.

The discussion at WMW raised some good points. Many of the member questioned whether Google could take the hit financially should they decide to exclude affiliates from bidding. There isn't probably a way to exclude anyone, just exclude the ads and urls they are running, plus if the ads affiliates are running aren't as relevant, you get this:

No interest => no clicks => no revenue for google => disabled keywords => no more ads

Google of course has indirectly commented on this, with their cat and mouse chase type answers. AdwordsRep was helpful though and summarized the basic position at the moment from an earlier thread.

Google’s affiliate policy has not been changed. This means that your approved affiliate AdWords ads will continue to run on Google.com. Please be assured that we have no current plans to completely block affiliates from AdWords. If we do make any changes to our affiliate policy, you’ll be notified.

No changes apparently, or at least for now. However I think what Google is doing, is giving affiliates a chance to clean up their ads (or act) before implementing any policies against this type of bidding. I recently had some keywords disabled that were pointing to links that google felt needed to be tagged as affiliate links. While I disagreed, I had to comply or risk not advertising at all. I first received this message from them:

Hello Ben,

Thank you for your continued interest in the Google AdWords program. Please know that if you are directing users directly to URLs for your partners, please manipulate your display URL. This will ensure that user does not feel misled when clicking on your ad. Your other option would be to create a form page within the website for those specific programs.

They even provide instructions for affiliates to help clean up their ads:

We will display all ads exactly as our advertisers enter them into our system, so be sure to check that the information in the 'Display URL' field accurately reflects the destination of the ad and that your 'Destination URL' functions properly. To edit your 'Display URL' and 'Destination URL,' please follow the steps below:
  • 1. Log in to your AdWords account.
  • 2. Click the campaign that contains the Ad Group you want to edit.
  • 3. Click the appropriate Ad Group.
  • 4. Locate the appropriate ad above or below the Ad Group table.
  • 5. Click 'Edit' below the ad.
  • 6. Change the URL fields as needed.
  • 7. Click 'Save Changes.'
Note: You can still edit your ad when an Ad Group is paused. To do so, simply follow the same directions above.

Clearly there is more effort to clean up this then to actually ban affiliates altogether. It wouldn't make sense to do so. Instead the better option is to help them, because ultimately they are paying for it.

posted Phoenix in Google AdWords at November 18, 2004 11:05 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Party at the Palm's Club Rain - WMW Conf 7

I just got back from the Yahoo! Search party that took place at the Palms Hotel & Casino's Rain Nightclub. By the way, it was not easy to find the hotel's Web site, I had to search several times - the search phrase that worked well in Google was palm hotel and casino as opposed to palm vegas or others like that. Anyway, back to the party...

WebmasterRadio.FM co-something the event, when I got there they were discussing the shows they have planned. They even announced that in early 2005, Tim Mayer and Jeremy Zawodny will be guests on the show. Seems like this will be a very interesting and educational talk show, so check it out.

The club was interesting, I did not bring a camera, but I am sure you will be able to find pictures from your buddies. I believe Jeremy Zawodny will be posting pictures at his blog entry named Come to the Yahoo Party at Webmaster World, where he invites his Apache Con friends. In fact, before the conference, Jeremy presented at the Community Building, Blogs and Forums session where he talked about a review he posted at his blog on the Motorola Bluetooth phone, which I happened to have purchased just about a week ago. So I spoked to him about some of the integration issues/solutions (if any) between my car, my mac and the 5% bluetooth phone.

Back to the party...

Tim Mayer came over to me, when I was sitting on some sofa, kind of off in the corner. I asked him he they (Yahoo!) hires top notch spammers in an effort to combat spam. You know, like how governments and large companies hire hackers to prevent being hacked. Tim said they have not, they just hire 'engineers'. Which got me thinking, what if the Yahoo! people decided to pass some special gas through the air at this party. The gas contained a drug that turned spammers into the extreme opposite of a spammer (just a note to readers, I am not using the word 'spammer' in a derogatory fashion). I told Tim, that if they had this solution, it might solve a huge chunk of the spam issues they have overnight. Of course I was joking, everyone at the party were clean, white hats.

yahoo-party-rain-palm.jpg

After that I decided to walk around a bit to 'mingle'. But due to this bad head cold and the very loud bass vibrations coming from the speakers, I just had to leave. Wish I was feeling better, but what can I do. Overall the party looked to be very fun, people were having a blast, everyone was play gambling and the SEOs were chatting away.

Yahoo! - Great Party!

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! News at November 18, 2004 1:05 AM Comments (0)

Community Building, Blogs and Forums - WMW Conf 7

Community Building, Blogs and Forums - WMW Conf 7

Roger Dooley from Compstar was first up. He brought up two books, Into Thing Air and Touching the Void. He discussed how these books received lots of good feedback from online reviews. 40% of American's participate in online communities, that is a big number. Types of the communities include, "shared interests", "commerce", "social business" communities, etc. He then put up a cartoon saying "Aren't you a little old to have imaginary friends", Web communities have real world impact (we are at this conference, aren't we). Online communities include, reviews, forums, blogs, email lists, chats, and wikis. Forum community benefits include; (1) communicate company message, (2) first hand customer feedback, (3) content and traffic, (4) community and "fans" (apple customers are fans, sometimes obsessed). Forum Communities Costs; (1) time and effort to built critical mass in a forum, (2) frank feedback cuts both ways, (3) inevitable criticism, (4) legal issues (5) continuous management (24/7 year round). Build your community; (1) establish a mission for your community, (2) review internal strengths and determine what to outsource, (3) allocate adequate resources, (4) keep expectations in check, and (5) monitor and adjust course. If people who are building the community are not having fun, then it wont work. Is there a formula for a profitable forum? He then put up a long mathematical equation, which got a laugh - but it was a real formula from MIT.

Next up was Jennifer Slegg, Jenstar Mod at WMW. Building a community requires; finding and choosing mods, getting members, encourage quality posts, avoid empty forums and stop spam. Getting good mods is one of the hardest things to find she said, I agree. One thing she also said about mods was to find mods that are unbiased - it helps. And you need at least one mod who you can trust, so you can leave the keys of the forum to that person. Ways to keep moderators happy;pay them, free advertising, moderator only perks, involve them in the decision making whenever possible, discuss the goals of the forums with your mods, and avoid stepping on their toes whenever possible. What type of power should you give the mods? Those are things you need to think about. Finding members, to do so, make sure your forum is spider-able, you want to make it easy for new members to view and post in threads, encourage word of mouth referrals, advertiser your forums. Avoid the empty forum syndrome by keeping the number of forums low at the beginning, have easy post threads, pad the forum with multiple user names, keep threads on topic, and offer posting incentives. Setting initial ground rules, make sure your faqs are clear.

Amanda Watlington was next up, she spoke at the SES San Jose session on this topic. So far it looks like the same info, so view my coverage of that session named Web Feeds, Blogs & Search. She showed some stats of how much traffic some blogs get. There are many blog tools; blogger, live journal, typepad, diaryland, movable type, aol journals, etc. Which one should I use? Depends on the features you need and your technical background. She explains how RSS works a bit and showed some RSS reader examples. Blogs are great for link building. She said blogs increase perception of thought leadership within the community, deepens customer relationship, boosts media relations and enhances your relationship with your committed audience. She then rants on some poor blogs and talks about some good blogs in regards from an SEO view.

Finally was Jeremy Zawondy from Yahoo, he is referred to as one of the most famous bloggers out there. He quickly showed how the Web changed over time. He shows how blogs are growing incredibly, something like 12 blogs a minute or so. He then shows a chart on "Weblog posts per day" and you see if major things happen in real life, more posts are on that day (see the US conventions time lines). Big Media vs. Blogs, they looked at inbound sources and you see that blog penetration is huge. Comment spam has been crazy in the last year or so. Comment spam is killing the community aspect of the blogs, because people are adding moderation systems and closed communities. Content quality is all over the board, so it is kind of a bad thing. Weblog traffic; he splits it into two groups. (1) The regular reader (subscribers) and they visit often, daily. (2) Search engine referrals; which takes a few days (not immediate), the searchers have very specific goals, he said product reviews are his most popular blogs (check my sunbeam review at my rustybrick blog, i must have 50 comments). Advertising; there is a decreasing resistance to commercial messages (product endorsements, comments get hairy with ads, contextual ads are spreading) and link exchanges are not popular.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 17, 2004 8:00 PM Comments (0)

Super Session: Search Engines and Webmasters - WMW Conf 7

Tim Mayer from Yahoo was up first. Yahoo gets about 1.76B pageviews per day, 325 million unique users, 157 million active registered users, 7.6 million unique paying relationships. People sometimes ask if Yahoo! has different data centers (like Google) he said they pretty much deploy test changes all the time, that is why you see changes. They released My Yahoo Search and the features within it (Save, Store, Remember searches, block sites, folders to save pages within, you can also publish your saved pages to an XML feed or MyYahoo. In addition, you can sort the results, see how you found the results in the past. He said my.search.yahoo.com currently points to a Malaysia search by mistake. He then showed how you can easily add xml feed to yahoo through the SERPs (if its available) and to go to add.my.yahoo.com/rss. They support RSS, RDF in the crawl, they support ATOM in My Yahoo but not the crawl. 99% of the index is free, to get in, get a link from a page already in the Yahoo index (then goes through some other SEO basics). http://submit.search.yahoo.com/free/request/ is a way to submit your site for free, but be careful using it - dont spam it. Then talks about the robot.txt stuff. They will be trying to merge all the robots they have (normal slurp, multimedia, shopping, news, etc.

Redirect Handling By Yahoo. All this stuff should be working ok in two weeks. Redirects from one domain to another will index the "target" rather then the "source". Meta Redirects: > 1 sec treated as a 301, < 1 sec is treated as a 302. Redirects internal will keep the source as the main link. This will be launched shortly, and you should see stuff happening in the next four weeks. This should fix all the issues discussed in the forums.

Next up was Dan Boberg from Overture, part of Yahoo. Was a bit funny at the beginning about WMW jokes. He is going to review five marketing segments. (1) We know that consumers value search and we know how they search. Research is the number one reason why people use the internet., then entrainment and then to find things they heard about via word of mouth. 80% enter more then one word when searching, 47% enter 3 or more words. (2) Customer segmentation is about dividing up your customer base. He discusses about the buyer's life cycle; discovery, research, comparison, and purchase phases. (3) Web business models include; e-commerce, lead generation, content, customer service - then you need to measure each model differently. (4) Then we move into Branding, which is important. Paid listings in addition to organic help with branding. (5) Customer experience best practices, multiple channel awareness.

Michael Palka from Ask Jeeves was up next, he said that Paul Gardi (who normally gives these presentations) is now too important to give these presentations, and followed up that joke about saying he will give us spam tips. He talked about how Ask Jeeves grew, is growing, yada yada. He said although that they are larger, he said its probably not worth trying to manipulate the results of Ask Jeeves - stick with Google and Yahoo - of course that got a laugh and applause. He then went into what makes Ask Jeeves great. He talks about subject specific popularity and communities, hubs and authorities - all topics discussed here a few times. He said same subject links are very popular, they like text links.

Matt Cutts from Google is up next. Spoke to him right before the session to say hi. Although he is worth a lot more then the last time I saw him, he still looks the same. :) In addition he has cant talk well, he lost his voice, I wonder how he is going to give this presentation. He said he loves the WebmasterWorld community is very lovable. He started off saying that it was the one year anniversary of the Florida, and he said GoogleGuy was posting, but he said he doesn't want to announce anything big at this conference. He said he is very excited about AdWords Professional program. Google's mission statement, "organize the world's information to make it universally accessible and useful." They do not want to limit themselves on the search engine business only. He went through the new features, 8 billion pages, they now have a date on every cached page (he is proud of that), Gmail just added email forwarding and pop3 - they have no plans to charge for it. They have no plans to charge for Froogle inclusion. Google desktop search, lots of internationalization and a whole big list. Google is doing a better job with expired domains. Doubled the amount of link data which he explains to be better. They broadened out more accessibility to those links. He is a good politician. They keep the lines open he says AdWordsAdvisor has 1,750 posts and GoogleGuy has 2,400 posts. How does Google handle spam reports? He started saying that you should not rely on CSS Z layers or cloaking anymore. To be reindexed send an email to webmaster@google.com with "re-inclusion request" in the subject line and in a few weeks you should be reincluded in time. He then showed examples of a cloaked site for "cheap airplane tickets", he showed the cloaked page versus the user page. He then shows off some templates where you replace keywords into templates, same content over and over again but just swap out several keywords. He then showed some guest book spam, comment spam, forum spam, link exchanges, etc. He finished off saying SEO will get easier, but spam will get harder.

Q & A:
Q: Can a site be both a hub and authority in the Teoma world?
A: Yes but most are not, but it is possible.

Q: Does a site get tagged to be in a community in Teoma?
A: He started off saying, why are people asking me questions, they should ask Google or Yahoo. He said sites do not get tagged.

Q: An other Q for Ask Jeeves. Are you guys ever going to move your AdWords ads out of the way?
A: He said AdWords is so great, they want it front and center. He said they are always looking to enhance the user experience. They are looking for ways to improve that.

Q: Ask again, how about killing the Ask frame?
A: Might happen soon, its possible.

Q: An other question for Ask
A: Michael, Ask, said the rest of the panel can go home.

Q: The question continues, back a while ago he did the PFI to Ask and he got lots of impressions but zero clicks. Only clicks he got from Ask was from AdWords. The Ads are in the way and they dont see the natural results.
A: He said it is hard to comment on a specific example. He said it seems like a odd situation. Michael could not answer the question, he needs to see his example.

Q: How do the engines handle "DBA" (doing business as VS. database admin)?
A: Google praised Ask refinement tools, Ask thanked them.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 17, 2004 6:10 PM Comments (0)

Site Promotion and Traffic Acquisition on a Tight Budget - WMW Conf 7

Jessie Stricchiola is not feeling well, she was recently sick, so I hope she gets better soon. She was suppose to be on the panel and is a great speaker.

Adam Jewell from Net Plus Marketing was first up. He started off with explaining that since it is your business, you are most experienced in your industry and you know your product best, you know your seasonalities, why people buy your products and the keywords your customers use to find you. If you can provide your expertise on your site, then it will help people link to you and buy from you. SEO is one of the most overlooked marketing areas for most companies. When using AdWords, opt-out of content syndication initially, include a call to action and your keyword in the title, match keywords & copy to landing page, buy exact, phrase and broad match initially, and track everything. He then shows examples of some basic how tos with AdWords, and landing pages.

Anne Kennedy from Beyond Ink was next up. She will start off with real case studies. She recommends bartering for expertise you do not have, she swapped ad space for keyword research with the chamber of commerce. Optimize for niche markets, Lobster company gains sales from only organic results. Launch with good links, regional hotel site launched with links from the chamber of commerce and convention which helped rocket them up within days in the SERPs. She then listed some resources including; SEO Book, Digital Point's Tools, she recommends web trends, click tracks and conversion ruler for tracking purposes, she then goes through some directories like dmoz and yahoo and she provides an other list (these are posted at the forums and in this blog somewhere anyway). She then discusses Search News sites such as Yahoo! News and Google News, these sites are huge.

Next up was Brett Tabke to talk about Traffic Beyond the Search Engines. Direct Navigation accounts for more traffic on average beyond the search engines. He estimates that 60 - 80% of site traffic comes from "traditional means". 20 - 40% come from search results, both paid and free results. Traffic can come from reciprocal link exchanges, strategic alliances, topic directories, contests, guest books, commenting at blogs, affiliate programs, do a story on a site and they will link back, email newsletters, mailing lists, email a friend. He then showed the hamsters site (if you do not know what I mean, ask me). Usenet and forums are good. Coupons work, go to conferences and trade shows. Start a weblog, classified ads, trade mags, etc.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 17, 2004 3:16 PM Comments (0)

Proactive Linking - WMW Conf 7

Bruce Clay was up first, bruceclay.com. He said most people who do linking campaigns are doing it in an ad-hoc fashion. He said there are three components to ranking; technical, expertness and copy-writing.

Inbound linking considerations;
- IP Numbers should be different (he said this is natural)
- PageRank is important, natural structure is good
- Anchor Text, he said using different anchor text is important, its more natural
- WhoIs Name, its good to make them different
In these areas, they need to be managed. Don't take any link, just because you can.

Outbound linking considerations;
- Reciprocal links c an be incestuous
- "Fuzzy up" the island boundaries, link out to those sites even if they don't link back to you

He then talked a bit about themed links within your own site, and called it "silo" linking, which helps you rank well for both generic and specific keywords. Personally, I am not too sure about that.

He then said, it seems like PDF documents and not filtered by the search engines. So links in PDF documents can be worth a ton.

Jim Banks from WebDiveristy, was next up. Changing your mindset, back in the "gold digging days" everyone was trying to beat the rush but many failed. Types of Visitors; accidental tourists, browsers, evaluators, shoppers, buyers and repeat visitors. The selection process; its not one size fits all, different strategies for each type of visitor, just measure ROI each step of the way. Testing ground; AdWords is a great test area, keyword selection and categorization based on type of visitor, 3 titles/3 descriptions in a 3 x 3 grid, take off the auto optimize option, run test with one keyword as an exact match with 24/7 coverage, measure your CTR versus ROI, run test for at least 2 weeks, evaluate total spend versus CPS versus sales volume to establish the optimum time to spend organically. Results at the end; know the starts and dog keywords, 2 weeks to gather the data, hunt your links and provide anchor text based on what you know will work - but for the transactional keywords expect and be happy to pay for the links. Trying before you buy; you can refine your strategy in weeks, time costs, PPC will give you the data you need to make informed rational decision, if successful you can always fund the organic link activity with PPC profit, be prepared to go through some drawing boards.

Greg Boser now made a few follow up comments. He said the most under used tool for link building is PPC for the keyword research. "You are what your links say you are." Once you get those links, its very hard to shift those links later on. Try to stay under the radar at all times. He said pace yourself with link buys, getting 20,000 links in one week, stands out. Don't worry about getting low PR links, good anchor text is more important - uninstall the tool bar he said.

Q & A:
Q: Guestbook links have 0 pagerank, tell us about that?
A: Guestbooks do give off nice anchor text weight, even without pagerank in Google.

Q: Speak to blogs, the side bar links in the blog, in text blogs, and other links in a blog.
A: Greg said the links that show up in the paragraph of the blogs are/will be better then the links on the side bar. Not that it is this way today.

Q: What are your thoughts on outsourcing your link building overseas?
A: Jim Banks said that he used people overseas and the quality is questionable. Bruce Clay said he has been approached by overseas companies, his problem is that it doesn't always fit into his managed link development process. Greg says he focuses on push; good content, good tools, good feeds and more - this way we do not have to ask for links, they just come.

Q: Can Bruce expand more on "Silo" linking?
A: Basically he is a strong believer of themed internal linking. This is kind of shocking to me, I am surprised he is saying this.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 17, 2004 1:56 PM Comments (0)

Keynote Address - WMW Conf 7

Noel McMichael, CEO of Marketleap, will be giving the keynote address. He said he did adapt his presentation from the last SES show, he will be adding and moving into the black hat/white hat debate topic. He said if your going to thrive, there are seven things you must do, which he will discuss in his presentation. He described how Marketleap started in November 1999, out of a two bedroom apartment with business class DSL. They focused on Web development projects and a few months later they decided to contract a CFO and lawyers - he said never go cheap with this stuff. Then in March 2000 they hired internal dedicated developers, the NASDAQ was diving, NBCi went out of business (Marketleap's largest client). In January 2001 they decided to go viral, building tools to help people come back time and time again. Then in March 2002 they had a need for cash flow, so they got a line of credit of 100k from the bank. In July 2002 they hired two more people and grew to 5 people, hiring Keith Boswell and Derrick Wheeler. He then shows a chart of the "ecosystem" of the search marketing industry and went off on a bit of a tangent about spammers. So where did Marketleap align itself with the search engines? They went into the paid inclusion reseller business (with inktomi in sept. 2002). Then Singing reseller (which then got bought out by AOL) then AV reseller (Overture bought AV), then Fast reseller and overture buys then, then Overture reseller and Yahoo buys them and then infospace resller (no one bought them yet).

June 2003, they have a reseller meltdown. Ink/Overture cut XML paid inclusion reseller from 24+ to 4. They kept Marketleap, which was huge for them. He said he remembers when Inktomi put a big heart on a big van and drove it around Yahoo!'s headquarters saying "Will You Be Mine". Then August 2003 they grew from 7 to 10 people with no office, just virtual people. 2004 came along and search became huge and the VCs came in. They were getting 2 to 3 calls a week, and he disliked many of the VCs. Then in July 2004 they were acquired by Digital Impact, a huge email marketing company. So they grew from 10 to 284 employees, Noel now has an office and there are 6 different locations. They are now in four different ecosystems (search, email, interactive and digital print). Noel's job is to watch over his alignment in the search ecosystem with Marketleap.

Seven imperatives for success in the SEM ecosystem:
(1) Define ecosystem directions and values
> Share directions and values (see Linux, eBay, Microsoft)
> Align interests wherever possible
> Involved SEO providers in business planning and innovation
(2) Foster Open Relationships
> transparency enables and trust
(3) Focus all participants on the end customer
> who is the customer
> your immediate customer may be the next link in the value chain
(4) Treat employees, partners and vendors as investors of human capital
(5) The search engines must define governance and the rules of engagement
> its not for SEMPO
> standards and guidelines are very gray always
(6) Leverage Knowledge and Innovation of External Entities
> drop the "not invented here" syndrome (he looks at the Google API limiting you to 1,000 query limit
(7) Evolve or Become Extinct
> Abandon change management
> Change is constant, embrace it and accept it
> There are always opportunities for First Movers

He then added, hire outrageous individuals that contradict the norm, and put up a picture of Mikkel. :)

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 17, 2004 12:47 PM Comments (0)

Webmaster Radio Launches

I think, officially, Webmaster Radio launched yesterday. I guess this means that there is competition for SEO Radio, which never hurt the public.

WebmasterRadio.FM is lifting the "veiled curtain" called the Internet to bring the business community together through an interactive, Internet based radio network. WebmasterRadio.FM offers an all-star line up of radio shows hosted by the most respected names in the Internet business world. Here on WebmasterRadio.FM listeners can find programming with a vast appeal to anyone looking to be a part of a community destination and learn industry specific information from the most successful marketers and technology experts in the world. The LOUNGE (formally the chat room) is open 24/7 allowing listeners to communicate with each other, from around the globe in real time.


Our new show line up includes:

- Next Stuff Now hosted by Chris Tolles, VP of Topix.net
- Domain Master with Monte Cahn of Moniker.com
- RainMaker hosted by SEGuru (Daron Babin) and Brandy Shapiro-Babin
- SEO RockStars with hosts: Todd (Oilman) Friesen and Jake (bakedjake) Baille
- Hats Off with Jessie Stricchiola, President of Alchemist Media Inc.
- Cover Story with Brandy Shapiro-Babin and David McInnis, President PR Web
- Affiliate Marketing Today with Haiko de Poel, Jr. President AbestWeb.com
- Wizards of Web hosted by Jeffrey and Bryan Eisenberg, Future Now, Inc.

flag_01.gif

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Marketing Organizations at November 17, 2004 12:00 PM Comments (0)

Google's White Lies

A member at SEW forums starts a new thread named Google quirks summary (all lies...). In that thread he details four 'observations' he found. (1) "The link: feature does not seem able to return any meaningful information." (2) "The link: feature does not seem able to return any meaningful information." (3) His issue with "common words" like "the". (4) "The link: feature does not seem able to return any meaningful information."

Danny Sullivan adds to the thread something pretty funny. He said "Check out this Google cached page from HowStuffWorks.com. At the top, there's the usual Google disclaimer:

Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.

That's not true. Google is indeed affiliated with the page. That page carries AdSense ads, not to mention a Google search box on it. Google is earning money off that page. There's definitely an affiliation."

Sorry for the lack of forum coverage over the next two days, as many of you know I am at the WebmasterWorld conference and giving you rolling, live updates on that. The blog is on EST, so keep that in mind when looking at the conference times and post times - there is a 3 hour difference. I am basically clicking the submit button as soon as the last speaker steps off the podium. I hope Ben and some of the guest authors will chime in with forum posts in my absence.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at November 17, 2004 11:05 AM Comments (0)

Informal Discussion with Tim Mayer and the Yahoo! Search Folks

I had the opportunity to speak with Tim Mayer, Aaron Ferstman and Nancy Evars from Yahoo! Search after the last session of the day. Let me take you through the conversation in chronological order, as best as I remember it.

After the "Search Engine Friendly Design and Coding (Especially Flash)", which Tim spoke at, I met up with Aaron at the speakers platform. Aaron was waiting for Tim to finish answering individual attendee questions. Aaron and I discussed the normal stuff you discuss with people when you first meet them. We discussed the fact that people in California like to buy big 4 wheel drive SUVs and how people in New York like to buy small fast cars. I myself just leased the Lexus SC430 (sporty convertible), and as you know, it does not drive well in the snow - you also probably know that New York tends to get its share of snow. We just found it funny that people in Cali like cars that are more suited to New Yorkers and New Yorkers like cars that are more suited for Californians.

After the car talk, we discussed what it takes to speak at these conferences, especially as a representative from the search engines. I commented that Tim does an excellent job. We agreed that these speakers need to be politicians. Soon after, Tim was ready for a cigarette so he pushed his way (being dramatic - he did not push anyone) out the conference room out onto the street where he can get a breath of fresh air (or cigarette). There Tim, Aaron and Nancy sat to talk about various topics.

We discussed the Yahoo! Search Blog, which Nancy works on and the conversations ultimately lead to Jeremy Zawodny, who will be arriving tomorrow, and his blog. Jeremy is known to say things in his personal blog which ruffel the feathers of some of the more corporate types over at Yahoo!, but overall it seems to me that most of the people over at Yahoo! are fairly relaxed. After meeting Tim, I get that impression.

The blog conversation moves on to, of course, to comment spam. Yahoo! Search Blog, as you know, allows for commenting - as opposed to Google's blog. Jeremy has a lot of experience with blogging and he uses MT Blacklist to fight comment spam on his blog as well as the Yahoo! Search Blog. Tim made a comment that he was at some bar with the WMW crew and one mentioned that they tried to comment spam Jeremy's blog. Of course Jeremy blocked the comment spammer from doing so in the future. But another WMW folk said that if he was spamming blogs, he would make sure not to spam a Yahoo! employee's blog.

We then discussed ThreadWatch.org, NickW's blog, Tim loves reading it. Tim finds ThreadWatch to be more of a forum then a blog, I see his point - but I disagree. We discussed giving ThreadWatch.org a link on the left hand navigation of the Yahoo Search Blog site. I think it might happen in the near future. From ThreadWatch we moved onto forums. We discussed some of the exciting threads, such as the one about how people post spammers in order to show Yahoo! and Google who the spammers are. Tim kind of hinted that he wouldn't do anything manually when he finds such a thread. Of course he could not comment on Google's behalf.

I then asked Tim about all the PM's he gets or Sticky Mails (as they are referred to at WMW). He says he gets some of the funniest things. One story he told me was about this Sticky he got from someone who basically copied content off another site and complained that his site was not listed. After Tim responded to the member who sent him the sticky mail, the member responded that he was a cab driver and he should give him a break. Of course, Tim knew that this person was not a cab driver - so he found the whole situation funny.

That conversation lead to how Yahoo! handles the re-inclusion of pages that were delisted. He said that you can email an address and Yahoo! should review it within 2 weeks or so. He gave me specific examples of such cases, but no need to mention them here. At first, he explained, Yahoo! was bombarded with requests for re-inclusion (this occurred after Yahoo! merged all the other engines into one). But now, a re-inclusion request should be reviewed quickly.

Then the Yahoo folks split up and I walked with Tim back to the Hilton. During the walk, we talked more about giving NickW that link on the Yahoo Search Blog and some football talk. Tim is a Steelers fan, I myself am a Jet fan (yes I know). We talked a bit about how we used to run rotisseries before it was all automated on the Web. He used to fax back and forth sheets between people. I actually had my brother write small programs to help keep track of the stuff.

As we approached the Hilton, we talked about how Yahoo's Blog links to Google's blog and how MSN's blog links to both Yahoo's Blog and MSN's Blog. But you do not see Google linking to either Yahoo or MSN. :) Which lead us to talk about those Google bombs, and the recent "more evil than Satan", when queried at MSN Search Beta brought up Google. Of course the engines play games with each other, and he shared some funny stories with me on that. At that point we exchanged cards and parted ways.

It was nice meeting the folks at Yahoo. Nancy was nice to talk to, real smart and fun. Aaron is an all around nice guy, seems very hard working and honest. Tim has way too much fun over at Yahoo!, seems way to laid back and, to be serious, is an excellent communicator.

posted rustybrick in Interviews at November 16, 2004 11:21 PM Comments (5)

Search Engine Friendly Design and Coding (Especially Flash) - WMW Conf 7

Its been almost a year since I attended a session of this nature. I was not too impressed last time, so I am hoping things have changed within the year. Brett introduces the panel, by saying its the first time WMW is doing this panel.

Ted Ulle, WMW Admin, was up first. His slide says "The Vegas Diet", basically how you can trim down your <body>. He looks at the text to code ratio, the more you reduce the code in your files the smaller the file the easier it is to spider. Its not an algorithm thing, Google doesn't look at the ratio for ranking purposes. But it does make it easier to maintain, fewer errors. Fewer packets, less bandwidth needed to serve to the user and the spiders. He discusses how he removes indents, they waste space and less bytes (now that can be argued). Your information architecture does not need to match your directory structure. Just because the click trail is long, it doesnt mean you need to make a longer URL. He says why use an /image directory, throw everything in the root (this might make some of the readers sick). A no brainer is putting CSS and JavaScript in external files. Don't do inline styles, and dont need the span tag. Some of the real magic of CSS; you still can use tables for basic structure, the two most underused CSS (1) style elements such as p tag, h tags, li tags should all be defined and (2) you can declare multiple classes in one declaration, i.e. <p class="c l r". He uses a CSS toolkit, which makes much sense for many reasons.

George Shaw who will discuss from a Flash point of view. Why should you use flash? Flash provides for motion, more then a gif or other technology. It also provides for a very good method of delivering sound. Also advanced interactivity, and scalability (fits a screen dynamically) and load control. If none of these items are important, then your best bet is to not use Flash. Problems with Flash, content is not readily crawlable, flash pages are not seen as multiple pages (often). Full site flash is bad for SEO purposes. Flash and HTML together is a better solution. He is working on a method to come up with a solution to build an all flash web site SEO friendly, without deploying cloaking. They try to break the content up into layers, basically HTML pages which is fully searchable and then they take a Flash layer and sit that on top of the content layer. The only issue they have now is the trust issue. The search engines need to trust that the HTML layer is accurately displaying the Flash layer content.

Next up is Gregory Market from Infuse Creative asked how many are SEOs versus Flash people versus Marketing people. A year or so ago Macromedia allowed many to download the Flash SDK, asking the search engines to use the SDK. Google now does read, index, and rank flash sites. He then adds, has it made a difference? Do a search on "hubble" and the # 7 site is a flash site, but this is do to inbound anchor text. But Google is crawling and navigating through Flash navigation. But we do not know how Google weighs the embedded flash elements. As of today, the Flash SDK has been turned off. His big Macromedia announcements: that Macromedia is working on it. :) Now for some best practices "workaround" solutions. Problem, only one page is indexed. Solution, build a secondary html site or build a flash movie for each page. Do not detect flash compatibility on your index page, your index page is where search engines learn about your site. Often flash sites do not have titles or descriptions. Most flash pages have little text, add more text to your flash documents and mix in flash and html. www.searchguild.com/seflash.html will show you what the SDK shows. Don't use pop ups or framesets. Make sure your pages are linked well, navigation is key when you have broken out your flash pages. He then goes through some general SEO tips. He then goes into some of the grey workaround methods. Invisible text, noscript tag or css hidden z layer, or IP delivery. He went through a case where Google allowed NPR radio to cloak the audio files in text, Danny Sullivan has a good recap article on that. Checkout RichMediaSEO.com.

Tim Mayer from Yahoo was next. The beginning the speech will be very basic, so I will just chime in with notes as it gets interesting. Not that Tim is not an interesting person, :). If you are using Flash at this point, that you will rarely get a number one listing. They are trying to get Flash publishers to put more information in the meta information but its a matter of trust. They are trying to extract more information from the swf file, its had to do. They are extracting the links from the swf files - which might be most important. He then posted some sources, were-here.com and Jakob Nieslen's view on flash.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 16, 2004 8:02 PM Comments (0)

Super Session: History of SEO/SEM Theory and Testing - WMW Conf 7

Calum I. Mac Ceod was first up. He discussed how Google used to rank pages (title and pagerank). Now its a bit more complicated, with proximity and linkage data. He goes through the various on page factors and describes how most are not too important anymore. He then goes into PageRank and how sites some times have PR 0 or gray PR. He also discusses how some pages that do not pass PR. He then moves on to anchor text and its importance. Google has done strange things with redirects. He then goes into geo-location very quickly. Content is of course important. To be honest, it is very hard to understand the presentation - I am bad with accents and the slides are a bit poor. That is the evolution of Google. What can we see next? localization you should see and better spam detection.

Next up was Keith Petterson from Red Zone Global, he just got married. He says SEO is a bit like gambling with the rushes he gets from ranking high and the downs he gets when he gets when his sites get banned (not sure if his pages do get bad). He describes how he first got into SEO, probably like most of you (client asked them to get traffic). He said he had the number 3 spot on Excite for the big "S" word on the Internet, then in 99 AOL dropped Excite. "Write good content and you will naturally obtain good traffic." He said he heard from many webmaster's who feel they have good content but bad rankings. He said its not all about content, obviously. Develop a strategy, where am I now and where do I want to be tomorrow. He said you need to keep track of your rankings. He thinks of an algorithm as a puzzle. A mix between on page and off page factors. He said its important to know what will and wont get indexed by search engine. He tracks rank over time, he says he is extremely analytical. "Scalpel versus hatchet", he believes you make small changes and do not destroy a site and rebuild it.

Daron Babin SEGuru, he started WebmasterFM, he said he has been in the game since before it was an industry. He discussed how every 10 minutes you were resubmitting and your rankings improved and then your competitors did it, etc. He gets a bit into the black hat and white hat discussion, today your ok and tomorrow your not. He is happy to see that the wall is down between SEOs and the Search Engines. He then goes into how the forums are a tool, it used to be where people used to say, here is a new bot IP address. He mentioned cloaking and how he got caught, or he might be joking. He said would take a slice of the pie, Google, AV, Excite, etc. and would extract 5000 listings and compare all the title tags and measure them using a statistical model (think he said linear regression trend analysis). He analyzed every factor by hand in the past, it took him two weeks to built the perfect page. He said he built a cloaked page and the search engine won because the searcher got the page he wanted and he won because he got the sale. The searcher was happy he said, because "he made his wife happy" - that made a laugh through the audience. He recommends writing a page of content and pulling out the keywords, then give it to someone and ask them to figure out what they keyword is. He said its about the other words on the page, its that important. If the keyword is "apple" is the page about computers or fruit? :)

They called out Matt in the back of the room and he waived. :)

Greg Boser of WebGuerrilla was next up. He said he started back in mid to late 1996. He built it and they did not come. So he stumbled upon Danny Sullivan's article - he said he had to mail him a check (before e-commerce). He said he is not ashamed, he optimized for algorithms and not for terms of service. Back in the earlier days, it was more about generating eye balls, because he could put up banner ads at high CPC. He said it was very on page and meta tag driven SEO. He described how he met John Heard who makes a product named "IP delivery" and discovered cloaking. The purpose was to stop his competitors from stealing his code and he had a ton of fun, because he gave the competitors weird tags to mess them up. He called these pages "poison pages". He said any content provided by the government is free to use. So he took content from these pages and then did find and replace on the keywords in the Web page with the other keywords. He fed it to the engines to see how the engines ranked them and figured out keyword density that way. He said search engine like their own search results a lot, so the SERP pages have good content. He said he is still a big fan of IP Delivery, even these days. Cloaking turned into a way to custom tailer each page to each individual engine. InfoSeek used to swap between 3 algorithms, so every Sunday at 11am they switched from domain A to domain B and got back to the top of the rankings. Then linkage data became very important with the rise of Google, Inc. So over time they built software tools to look more at linkage data. He didnt trust anyone, he tested everything himself. He sees IP technology is coming back with Yahoo, Google, and MSN all competing for the same landscape. He says he deploys IP Delivery based on the user's perspective, he doesnt care if the search engines dont like it, as long as the customer is ok with it - then its a win - win situation. He said, technically he is a spammer - but real spammers dont have conversion rates. He came out and said MSN loves side wide links (I have seen this to be true) whereas the others do not like site wide links as much. It will be interesting to see how text ad purchasing becomes more advanced.

Q & A Time:

Q: What are your thoughts on hosting a network of sites on the same IP or C-block?
A: They all say get them all on a different IP address. He said don't make it easy for the search engines to find all your sites.

Q: Do you see any changes happening as the holiday season comes up?
A: They said, do you have an AdWords account? :) He said he wants MSN out there, he misses those days. You need to prep yourself for the algo changes. Right now its just Google, it helps to have more engines in the game. He said use your PR to your advantage, public relations - PR. They then get into Florida and he said it was brutal and the most hideous thing he has seen before. He said, dont buy that car until January, because you might need it for AdWords. If you go in brute force, you must have your back up plan. Then Greg gets into spam reporting on the forums, he said he never reported anyone in any way because that is where he learned it (Google Cache).

Q: How do you displace a competitor from the rankings?
A: No real answer. Just out rank them was offered.

Greg doesnt compare his spam to email spam or adware, spyware. "We" typically, SEM for us is targeted, unlike other spam. Government has some time to regulate SERPs and spam. AdWare is malicious and is different. Blog spamming is an http request, very little damage, less then a bot crawling your site.

Q: What do you think about redirect hi-jacking?
A: Greg said it is sad to me that it works. He said it is probably the biggest flaw in the search engines today. Daron said "Do onto others as you want them to do onto you." What you can try to do to prevent it, is redirect the redirect.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 16, 2004 6:00 PM Comments (0)

PFI Topics and Issues - WMW Conf 7

Greg Boser is the moderator and he introduced the panel. The first man up was Jim Stobb from PositionTech. He discusses what paid inclusion is: (1) new sites are usually indexed within 72 hours (2) existing pages are recrawled every 48 hours. Two programs (1) Direct Submit (pay per page, flat 12 month fee and plus a CPC and (2) Trusted Feed (pay per click, and designed for sites with 200 or more URLs). Trusted feed key features are; (1) its trusted because they are from a feed and are reviewed by the engines (2) ultimate control over the site content and updated 48 hours and can do geo-targeting (3) click through reporting. Trusted feeds show up in natural results and they are not for everyone. Large sites/commercial sites are good for trusted feeds, so are database driven sites, CMS sites, and flash/multimedia sites. He showed an example of staples.com's search terms and clicks for its trusted feed program (hope he got approval). When producing the feed they require a destination URL, product name, manufacturer, product description, part #, tracking URL are all important to capture. He showed a screen capture of a staples product and highlighted the data on the page that is being requested in the trusted feed. I wonder if people understand that feeds are normally in csv or xml format and that a bot doesn't try to determine what criteria is used to figure out what the page is talking about. I think the point is getting across, most people do not look puzzled. He then discusses the value of choosing PositionTech to manage your trusted feeds. Then he goes into how they use the data dump and the crawling process, then showed a sample final feed format.

Next up was Tim Mayer from Yahoo, Greg introduces him as the first search rep to post at a forum under his real name. Tim's task is to support the much debated Overture PFI programs. He reasons that this gives the web-master a support line when it comes to ranking issues. The next slide is named "Why do we need a feed program?" Less then 1% of the index is PFI content, this is a premium service. He said the more Yahoo crawls the less unique content they find (maybe they are looking in the wrong place - just kidding). This program, he admits, is somewhat controversial, but has lead to a dialog between the SEO and the engines. PFI offers higher redundancy - ensures your content is always in the index even if your site goes down. Then discusses Site Match and Site Match Xchange (which is for larger sites). Pros include content inclusion across all networks, frequent refresh, quality review and interaction with the engines and detailed reporting (ROI stuff). Tim clarifies that PFI doesn't mean that your rankings will improve (or at least that is how I interpreted it).

Joe Laratro from MoreVisibility.com was next up, he said he was from Florida (good to know). He defined PFI and XML feeds - PFI is a pull of data and XML trusted feed is a push of data (good explanation to start off with). He then goes over the guidelines; subject to editorial review, subject to strict algorithms, typical requirements (title < 70 characters, description < 180, keywords < 3 to 5, body text), category CPC card rates, ability to use 3 feed types (RLD, category and product). He goes over the benefits of using trusted feeds; all covered earlier. Pitfalls to avoid; duplicate content, keyword stuffing, artificial geo targeting, repetitive titles, keyword duplication on the titles (search engine optimization, search engine placement and search engine marketing - you repeated search engine three times), and product not found pages. Candidates for PFU; 20+ pages, dynamic sites, not crawlable sites, sites not in the index, and and if your willing to guarantee to be index.

Dave Roth from Razorfish, a pretty big Web design company and very well known. Dave will discuss how they manage and optimize these feeds. They call themselves the largest SEM in the industry now. They target all types of companies, no niches here. They deal with a lot of e-commerce site customers, and they are lacking optimization. One of the biggest problems the clients have is that there is not enough data to make an informed decision, which results in negative ROI. You need to know price, margins, profitability targets and track by all types of levels. They apply forecasting models to client's data to see what they should expect in ROI on a very detailed levels. He then goes through the pyramid affect of keywords targets and conversion based on that (generic keywords have higher volume but less conversions, specific keywords have lower volume but higher conversions). He shows a sample excel document with the formulas used to analyze a feed and forecasting model. He said, don't try this at home - basically call Razorfish to do this (or an other firm).

Some Q & A:

Q: Can you put price in the feed?
A: In the description yes, not in the title. And they don't recommend including part # in title (that seems weird to me), they explain that it often brings back weird results.

Q: The banning issue...Greg Boser asked this.
A: Tim said, Yahoo will check to make sure your content is not banned. They are very focused on comprehensiveness. They feel its important to rank relevant sites first in the SERPs. PositionTech said if you submit it will enable Yahoo to re-review the site. Most of the time these penalties can be corrected and put back in Yahoo.

Tim said, most of the WMW stickies he gets about being banned are actually not the site being banned, but other issues such as SEO design issues.

Q: Greg then brings up click fraud. He said he knows Google disallows certain proxies for AdSense ads but doesn't apply that disallow list to AdWords. In addition, he knows, based on 'click frauding' his own stuff that the companies do not find and refund all fraud.
A: Razorfish says you probably have to rely on 3rd party tools to track it and then bring that data to Overture, Google, etc.
Tim said they do and are working on preventing click-fraud. As always, its a constant battle between spammers and the content providers. Its an area they need to focus on.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 16, 2004 3:02 PM Comments (0)

Design and Coding for the Complete Package - WMW Conf 7

Roger Dooley from CompStar was up first, his forum name is "rogerd". He first goes into the question about building the software yourself or using a pre-built software application. The first question you need to ask is "is your business really that different?" When using pre-built software, especially open source, look at proven install counts, look at feedback and requests by the current user base, and most of these have features that you will need down the road - things you did not anticipate. So open source is good for small budgets. But once you have it, you will probably need to make modifications. Software designers rarely design for search engines or what they have done is no longer important (i.e. meta tags). Encouraging signs that new open source applications are SEO compliant.

He then goes on the topic of adding features through outsourcing and goes through some of the points you should look at when selecting a company. Well developed freelance marketplaces, reputation aids, escrow protects buyer and coder, prepare specs carefully, communicate clearly and often, graphics & design can be outsourced too and check that wish list. I personally hate outsourcing any development tasks, I have in the past and it stinks. I only now outsource design projects.

He said its important to remember that there is life beyond search engines. The other PR, press releases. He is a personal fan of online press centers (company background, bios, past press releases, past press coverage, unique products or services, story ideas, mailing lists and contact info. Make sure to make your site media friendly (not just search engine friendly). He then discusses some of the types of "viral marketing" (I love this topic), such as email a friend features, add to favorites, most popular, print this page features. I have some good examples (as some of you do) on this topic. If you add a comment to this entry, it will remind me to discuss it after the conference. Some entries at this blog where I discussed Viral Marketing include; Subservient Chicken - Viral Marketing by Burger King and Orkut Viral Marketing Success & Down Briefly at 8:25AM (EST) (the last one I was mistaken, sorry). But I have my own case study which I can share with you later. He then went into the branding component of a Web site, consistency is critical! He said it all starts with your logo, your logo can define your business. This will increase conversions on your site - so don't take it lightly.

Next up was Ted Ulle from Mews Group, his slide started off with the "Complete Package". Make your workflow support your priorities for your site. Every Web site has a goal, and make sure its simple and seamless for the end user. He says, "Simplicity is the Discipline". He said the first thing you do after you know your goal is your Web Strategy (SEO), then your back end choices, then built metrics, the info architecture, then menu and nav, then graphic design and then copy and calls to action. He takes a shot that if you start with design, then it will blow up on you. He said its critical to document all key decisions as you go. (A) The Web strategy and SEO part: Mine your market's languages through forums, email and keyword neighborhoods (this is to find out what real people use to describe your business). Then research the market's concerns in addition to the languages. Build a process and not a product. (B) Back end choices: You have choices, the technology is your bedrock. (c) Build in your metrics, already know the business goals, define the key metrics, look at data that you can action on, too many metrics will blur the picture, the logs are not enough normally. (C) Information Architecture - just learn something about the field and he listed a few threads at WMW. (D) Menu and NAv: Tell a story in your menu, single words or longer phrases, too many choices on your menu is like no choices (his rule is no more then 7, the sweet spot is 5). (E) Graphic Design comes now and not before (he hits on designers now again - humor). It must obey all the decisions you made up to this point, the design must respect the medium (i.e. html). (F) Write Copy and Call To Actions. No time to be timid, a good copy writer is worth every penny he says.

So where do "seems" come from? "Showing off" works against your business. Graphic designers try to show off, or server side spaghetti, client side feature overkill, print mindset, IT folks is writing copy (for auto-responders you see it often). Keep your balance between technology and aesthetics - the whole balance is marketing. He said accidents will happen and showed some funny images of accidents - he also listed some examples of problems that occur.

Next up was Jen Weeks from Future Now, Inc. Persuasion Architecture is the methodology they use. Many people call her to maximize conversions, concerned about rankings and maximize ROI on keywords. Her case study is RAD-Direct who wanted a redesign to increase conversions. Persuasion Architecture; persona, keyword research, and uncovery, wire-framing, story-boarding prototyping and development. She went through what each stage means. "Uncovery" is defining the potential traffic. Wire-framing, if you don't know, is the detailing of what pages you need. Story-boarding is the copy development stage. She then went though the specific issues with the old site and what they did to improve it, hard to explain - sorry. One thing of interest is that she calls "bounce rates" -> "drop off rates", just interested me.

Then Brett discussed a bit about what he put into WebmasterWorld. His first concern was compatibility with all browsers. He tested every browser, ran every validators and he said it pays off now because it runs on phones now. He said he can run his whole site from his iPaq. In addition, he said he wants to make sure its easy to use. He tries to keep the content way at the top, as high as possible. He said his pages are very simple looking, just like Google. He said he doesn't really have a logo, he said the most important branding point on the site is the URL (keep the user on the site as long as possible). He said the Google Cache might be the most important thing they did, because it keeps users there. With WMW they have a rule where first time posters, the mods try to welcome and engage them right away. He said he was the first forum to allow for private messaging, so they come back to check their "sticky mail".

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 16, 2004 1:24 PM Comments (0)

So Many Firefox Extensions For Your Pleasure

Found a good list over at Highrankings with a multitude of firefox extensions. Install firefox, plugin many of the extensions below and you have yourself a pretty nice browser capable of many things. It also appears Jill has given up her old browser (Clickgarden...what's that?) and decided to make the Firefox her default browser. Thanks Phil for this list:

DOM Inspector - downloadstatusbar.mozdev.org/eznav/
Web Developer - www.chrispederick.com/work/firefox/webdeveloper/
EZ Nav - downloadstatusbar.mozdev.org/eznav/
Adblock - adblock.mozdev.org/
Super DragAndGo - morphis.eu.org/
Checky - checky.sourceforge.net/
Bookmark Synchronizer - cgi29.plala.or.jp/~mozzarel/
Diggler - diggler.mozdev.org
Statusbar Clock - www.cosmicat.com/
Slogger - www.kenschutte.com/firefoxext/
User Agent Switcher - www.chrispederick.com/work/firefox/useragentswitcher/
Google Pagerank - www.tapouillo.com/firefox_extension/
googlebar - googlebar.mozdev.org/
Mozilla Calendar - www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/
Search Status - www.quirk.co.za/searchstatus/
SwitchProxy Tool - jgillick.nettripper.com/
ColorZilla - www.iosart.com/firefox/colorzilla/
ConQuery - conquery.mozdev.org/
Prefbar - prefbar.mozdev.org

posted Phoenix in Miscellaneous at November 16, 2004 1:19 PM Comments (0)

Finding the Right Host - Unique IP's & C-Class Blocks

Good active thread on SEW forums about finding a hosting company that will support the use of unique ip's on different c blocks. There has been a good amount of discussion on this in the past, and while I don't plan to summarize the whole argument, I will highlight the opinions of those regarding the matter.

Nick, a member at SEW forums, posted on trying to find a hosting company that would correctly accomodate the use of unique dedicated IP addresses for websites someone might have. He relates to finding a hosting company to do this is quite difficult, or not something that every host can do. The thread quickly turned to a debate on whether these unique dedicated IP websites were better than websites that were hosted on virtual hosting accounts. Jeff M. posted that there is factual data to to support the fact that virtual hosted domains can rank number 1 for their competitive keywords. So if you hosted virtually, which a good number of people probably are, then you should be quite okay. I have optimized many virtual hosted accounts that have done quite well in the serps.

Several members voiced their opinion that the whole concept of dedicated ip address is without merit, and that it does nothing essentially for SEO. But! It depends on your intent and use of these accounts. If you intention is to link together multiple websites of similar content then this is where unique ip addresses do help out. ihelpyou made a good point back when the thread was started that "If an owner's "intent" is to spam the search engines with multiple domains for pretty much "one" main website, with the goal to achieving higher link popularity, then maybe what your post implies has some merit."

Having several websites hosted on dedicated IP's I understand the use of this method. But my reason for this is more web site related issues, and to make sure that I cover all areas so that potentially nothing happens without myself knowing about it. This is not an SEO/SEM technique in my opinion, its a webmaster technique. The member NFCC makes a very good point, and its sums up the use of dedicated IP's on c-class blocks, quite well, "I think that when the oppourtunity to control any aspect of our work presents itself we should take it."

Continue discussing Hosting on Unique IP's and C Blocks

posted Phoenix in Link Building at November 16, 2004 1:01 PM Comments (1)

WebmasterWorld Conference #7 Opening Ceremonies

Brett started off explaining how the conference began in pubs and bars and now it has grown to this (looks to me to be about 1,000 attendees here). He thanked Matthew for all his support, he then thanked Todd (oilman) who handled all the exhibitors (over 30 exhibitors) - he also attended all of the WMW conference (maybe the only), Erika - his finance - getting married in three weeks, thanked Neal Mashall the main webmaster at WMW, he thanked the sponsors (infosearch (also known as trafficlogic), Google, Yahoo, and GenieKnows.com), he also thanked some of the press that showed up Wall Street Journal, NY Times and many others (he even mentioned my name - thanks), he thanked the moderators of the sessions. He said he will ship the ppt slides on a CD to all attendees, will give away an IPOD to one person. He then highlighted some of the upcoming sessions. He said also that Google will explain the new AdWord Professional program tomorrow at lunch. And Yahoo will be having a party tomorrow night. He then discussed about the new Webmaster Radio show which is launching today at WebmasterRadio.FM. He explained what "Super Sessions" and why there are no other sessions at the same time besides for the super sessions. When will the next WMW conference take place? Probably after April 15th, place is still unknown for sure.

FYI - Got WiFi working, a bit slow, but working. Also a bit expensive at $25 per day.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 16, 2004 12:41 PM Comments (0)

301 Redirects with Yahoo! Stores

Yahoo! Shopping offers one of the easiest and quickest routes to setting up an online e-commerce store front. There must be thousands of Yahoo! Shops within the Yahoo network and then additional stores that tap into the network through various feeds.

One of the major issues with a Yahoo! Store is the lack of flexibility when it came to configuring the server to handle certain requests. Nacho, a moderator over at SEW and the owner of MexGrocer.com, knows a thing or two about Yahoo! Stores. He posted a thread today named Yahoo! Stores finally offer 301 redirect, where he discusses how Yahoo! allows some additional flexibility in setting up 301 redirects.

However, if the solution Yahoo! provides does not meet your needs, then Nacho listed an addition work around.

We set up a dedicated hosting account outside of Yahoo! because Yahoo! Webhosting would only allow one domain per account. We set up the server assigining an individual zone record for each domain as if it was their own site, here is an example:


Code:

zone "domain.com" {
type master;
file "/etc/namedb/primary/domain.com.db";
allow-transfer {imatest;};
notify yes;
};


Then uploaded the .htaccess file to the root directory of each domain via FTP with the 301 redirects like so:

Code:

redirect 301 / http://www.domain.com/

redirect 301 /index.html http://www.domain.com/index.html

repeat for every file . . .

Then our robots.txt file so that the spiders send read to not index/follow 301, here is how:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /
Then you go to your registrar and change DNS primary and secondary to your new server. This usually looks something like this:

NS1.hositngcompany.COM
NS2.hositngcompany.COM
Then you wait for DNS to roll over and verify that spiders have done their work. If they haven't check for errors. For example, go type in one of your domains in the search box additional to the page title, spot the link and click on it. It should follow to the right location of the new domain. If it isn't go back and check everything one more time.

Finally, go back to the Store Manager and under Site Settings (all the way to the right), look for "Domain Names" and start deleting every additional domain you did a 301 redirect for. MAKE SURE YOU DON'T DELETE YOUR MAIN DOMAIN NAME (the one you did not do a 301 for).

Very good information, unique and useful.

Oh, stay tuned for WMW conference coverage, coming up.

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at November 16, 2004 10:57 AM Comments (0)

WebmasterWorld Conference #7 Coverage

I just wanted to let everyone know that I will be attending the WebmasterWorld's Conference. I hope to be able to provide the conference coverage I have in the past for this conference, I actually plan on it, so stay tuned. The conference begins tomorrow morning and ends Thursday afternoon. It looks like the wi-fi access is not to be found, so that means I hope there will be a press/speaker room with net access or I will have to run back to my room to post the session information - I did it before, but the trips between the session rooms and the hotel can get tiring.

People are of course discussing this conference at the WebmasterWorld Community Center and also at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in WebmasterWorld 2004 Las Vegas at November 15, 2004 11:54 AM Comments (0)

Using the Same Keyword in All Your Backlinks

A thread at HighRankings named Backlinks Anchor Text Could Be The Same? discusses if you should try to get the same keyword or keyword phrase for all of your inbound links. It is of course interesting looking at your backlinks, I developed a Web based application that uses the Google API to analyze the backlinks found within Google, including the anchor text pointing to your pages. I named the tool Google Link Popularity Analysis Tool, but Optilink also has a pretty nice desktop application the queries more then just Google. In both those applications, it is very easy to see how people link to you.

One thing you realize is that the anchor text pointing to your pages are often different. However, there are some links you do control (i.e. the ones you pay for or maintain yourself). I put up a test page on this blog several months ago to test the effectiveness of targeting a single keyword only. I only had links with a single keyword to that page, the page had good content, but again only had one keyword pointing to it. Of course, it had hundreds links with the same keyword pointing to the page. The keyword was very competitive and I achieved top 10 rankings for that keyword phrase.

Does one get penalized if 100% of ones links contain the same keyword? Hard to say, makes for an interesting topic at HighRankings. I have now set up a new test page, in order to test several other factors, one factor is having multiple types of related keywords pointing to the same page. We will see.

posted rustybrick in Link Building at November 15, 2004 11:34 AM Comments (1)

Web Page Ranking Using Link Attributes

Web Page Ranking Using Link Attributes, the WLR Algorithm, as referred to over at the Search Engine Watch Forums, is the next topic referenced by Orion. This topic, relative to the others, seems a bit easier to understand. The paper, 2 pages long, explains a concept of applying weights to links based on the HTML attributes surrounding those links. So a link surrounded by a header tag will be worth more then a link surrounded by no tag at all.

For those algorithm junkies, it looks a bit like this:

W(j, i) = L(j, i)(c + T(j, i) + AL(j, i) + RP(j, i))

where given a link from page j to page i:

L(j, i) = 1 if the link exists, or 0 otherwise
T(j, i) = a value that depends on the tag where the link is inserted
AL(j, i) = the length of the anchor text of the link divided by a constant d
RP(j, i) = the relative position of the link in the page weighted by a constant b

Members are discussing this topic now at the WLR Algorithm thread.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at November 15, 2004 9:03 AM Comments (0)

Did You Find the MSN Slider?

The question of wether or not people can find the MSN search slider is being discussed at Cre8asite Forums. I personally had a very difficult time finding the sliders. I finally found them within "search builder" and then by clicking on more time on "results ranking". They look somewhat like this:

msn-sliders.jpg

For more information on the sliders visit MSN's Help Section.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 15, 2004 8:44 AM Comments (0)

Google Refunds Click Fraud Costs

Came across a good thread over at Cre8asite forums about Google refunding some money to an advertiser using AdWords that received some fraudulant clicks from their content network. It was encouraging to see a user report this refund. Google states they are "very serious about catching invalid clicks", and use specific tools and techniques to catch on to fraudelent behavior. They do not however disclose the details of the filtering technology that help catch robots or users who click for inappropriate reasons.

The member stated he saw an increase in CTR from 3-4% to about 12% in a short amount of time. He suspected something but didn't contact Google about it. Google quickly responded to the situation, and he received a refund in his bank account for the fradulent click throughs. Ammon Johns, suggested one site to help monitor click fraud, at Click Detective. Seems to be pretty useful for catching this, they are not the only service however, so if interested its probably wise to investigate a couple other ones.

Read up on Google Click Quality Standards

posted Phoenix in Google AdWords at November 12, 2004 6:46 PM Comments (1)

MSN Search Headers

A dedicated reader, Umit Yoruk, of this site emailed me once again with a nice find. He found the various variations of the MSN Search Headers.

msn-header-variations.jpg

Default Style
Blue Sky
American Swimmer - Phelps
Leaves
Automobile
Halloween
Rain

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 12, 2004 3:31 PM Comments (0)

Google's Gmail to Offer POP Access

People have been asking for Google to offer POP access to Gmail, and they finally have announced that they will. For more information on how to set up gmail in your desktop email client see Gmail Help Center - POP Section. The announcement was made a couple days ago, and it read;

Today, the Gmail Team is happy to announce free POP access for Gmail users. POP access has been a much requested Gmail feature and we're pleased to announce that we're now making it available to all users over the next couple of weeks.

With POP access, Gmail users can download a copy of their messages using any email program (such as Microsoft Outlook), or any device (e.g. Blackberry, mobile phones) that supports POP. And of course with POP access on Gmail, users can access their messages offline.

For instance, a user working from her home office who prefers to retrieve email via Microsoft Outlook can easily do so by configuring her Outlook client and enabling POP access on Gmail. Gmail messages received via POP will not display advertisements and Gmail will leave messages on the server by default, so users can still access their messages via the Gmail web interface.

Both POP access and automatic forwarding (which enables users to send incoming messages to the email account of their choice) will be provided to Gmail users for free, and we have no plans to charge for either feature. Both enable users to choose which email interface is best for them, without having to worry about losing access to their messages. Think of it as "email portability."

Finally, just a reminder that we're beta testing Gmail and the interface and search capabilities are only available in English at the moment. However, users can read and send messages in many other languages. We hope you enjoy these new features and as always, we encourage you to send us your thoughts
and feedback.

Thanks,

The Gmail Team

Forum discussion at SEO Chat and WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at November 12, 2004 9:40 AM Comments (0)

Firefox Browser Defaults Google to Start Page

Firefox and Google have teamed up. Google made a customized start page for the firefox user, and it looks something like this.

firefox-google-start-page.jpg

There is a lot of forum discussion going on, at WebmasterWorld and DigitalPoint. Chris Sherman, this week, wrote not one, not two, but three articles on firefox.

posted rustybrick in Google News & Press at November 12, 2004 9:33 AM Comments (0)

MSN Does Not Steal Google Results to Seed New Index

Rumorville, conspiracy theory, and over speculation results in crazed forum discussion and a possible slashdot mentioning. Jason Dowdell, someone I have spoken with often for about a year now, published a blog entry named Microsoft Crawling Google Results For New Search Engine?, which caused major forum craze. Jason's blog entry was republished at WebProNews and also reprinted in the WebProWorld forum. I decided to hold off on mentioning it until hearing more from MSN and some of the other experts in the field.

My first impressions were that (1) it was not true, (2) if it was, it would be extremely unethical, (3) they have no reason to go that path, (4) if someone found out, it would ruin them in the short term, (5) and there might be some legal issues (not that I know for sure).

Of course, many of the forums are discussing this topic. Over at WebmasterWorld, the official MSN representative said the following in respond to these rumors; "Also regarding relevance, there has been some speculation on some online forums about MSNBot using Google search result pages to build our index. Let us set the record straight – that is simply not true. We respect robots.txt and as a result we will not crawl Google’s search result pages." Which GoogleGuy (the official Google representative) responds to "Hey msndude, thanks for the pointers, and thanks for debunking the notion that MSN is crawling via scraping Google's index somehow. I saw an email that someone wrote to us, and it didn't sound like something MSN would do. Glad to hear it from the source though. :)"

So what does leading industry expert, Danny Sullivan think? In his post in the the SEW thread named Microsoft Scraping Google and Yahoo! SERPS?, he also debunks this rumor. I like every word of his post, so I will quote it now.

There are plenty of software packages that will screen scape search results in order to create search fodder for those trying to generate AdSense or other traffic.

It's entirely possible that MSN has simply crawled one of these pages. So yes, it would have crawled Google search results -- but these could have been Google search results that were copied and transferred to a different site.

That's far more likely than the idea that MSN is somehow scraping Google. I mean what, MSN starts jumping over to Google, entering site:someonessite.com commands for upteen million sites to do some guesswork on harvesting sites? Farfetched. Much more likely it ran across the results as I've described.

The actual story is also just incorrect. MSN never required a fee to be spidered. MSN still, on the flagship site, partners with Yahoo for its search results. Yahoo has operated a paid inclusion program but as many will attest, has also spidered pages for free aside from this. MSN dropped paid inclusion pages back in July -- but despite this, they already were and still are crawling the web for free via Yahoo (and via themselves, on the beta site).

And the fastest way to get relevant pages is to crawl Google for every page listed from a site? Not. You'd instead do what the other crawlers do, harvest links from across the web and start indexing the ones you see most often.

Of course I am not angry at my buddy Jason, this is a simple blog to blog debate now. :)

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 12, 2004 8:58 AM Comments (0)

MSN Responds to Down Time

This morning I reported that MSN was unavilable, the MSN blog has some more feedback on that.

In the process of making our new MSN Search beta broadly available we experienced some technical difficulties that caused the beta service to function improperly or be unavailable for some users for periods of time. We're working through these issues one by one and you should see service availability and quality improve soon if not already.  We apologize for any inconvenience. 


We expected to find some problems in the beta, and we expect there will also be times when we limit service availability for maintenance purposes.  We want to find those problems in order to help us build a higher quality product, and we appreciate your help in doing this.


A few other notes:


1) Several people have reported problems with the search service and with this blog that appear to be browser compatibility issues with FireFox.  We're working on broad browser support and have done some specific testing in this area, but it's clear more is needed.  Thank you for the reports.   


2) When reporting issues, please include as much detailed information as you can in your report so that we can reproduce and fix the bug.  E.g. for browser errors, tell us which type of browser, the version number, and information on any proxy you're using.  For relevance problems, tell us the exact query you entered, any other special settings you're using, e.g. via search builder, and the resulting URL you expected to see.


3) The "Help us Improve" link at the bottom of the results page is an easy way to give us feedback.


Thanks


osh

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 11, 2004 2:03 PM Comments (0)

Whats The Difference Between A Web Directory & Link Farm?

Web directories have been going up faster than new search engines these days. More and more webmasters are starting to realize the benefits these "directories" may have on the overall promotion of your site or your clients site. The great part is there are many good directories out there. Consider it the "Golden Age of Web Directories" with so many to choose from you could spend all day submitting to them.

Yet, with all these new directories, does this mean they actually represent quality sources to obtain a link from? I have seen a lot of specific niche directories and large directories go up recently, and honestly I have been pretty disappointed with the construction, quality, and usefulness of them. I wouldn't pay nor dare submit my link to some of them. Most to those that look like they took 15 minutes and a cup of coffee to set up.

A thread over at High Rankings talks about this, and the differences between a link farm and a web directory. One of the members questioned a new directory advertising members linking to members. They quickly uncovered for him that this "directory" was really a link farm who purpose was to inflate link popularity. Unlike other directories where valid links to sites are within related categories, sites that participate in link farming contain links to totally unrelated sites. These days the lines are getting more blurred with webmasters making changes to directories to resemble more "link farmish" type settings (more urls per page and less organization) with a web directory facelift. Packaged and then promoted via spam to anyone's email address they can find. You know the ones I am talking about, "I just added your link to my directory, would you...". Yeah those.

Jill makes a good point that helps define the difference between the two better, in that a reciprocal link is not the same as members linking to each other". There are several definations for a link farm, their use has evolved over time in order to reflect trends and ways to get around methods of detection. One member asks whether a "link farm" is called a "link farm" if a search engine never spiders it or can not crawl the site? I guess this is like if a tree fails in the forest and no one is around to here it, did it really fall? A link farm is a link farm regardless. The best thing to do regarding link farms is to avoid them all together, and be wise to tricks to disguise them as something else.

Continue reading Link Exchange Directory Project

posted Phoenix in Link Building at November 11, 2004 12:29 PM Comments (1)

Microsoft Launches MSN Search Blog

First Google launched a Google Search Blog in May, then Yahoo launched YSearch Blog and now that Microsoft launched its own engine, they decided to launch the msnsearch's WebLog, yesterday.

The first entry at the blog read;

As you all know we have decided to join the fray and we have been listening to what you've had to say about our TechPreview. We've decided to start our own blog so that we can keep you all up-to-date on what's happening with our product, our team and our industry.
Keep watching this space for updates.

Thank you Andy for finding this and I started a thread on this topic at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 11, 2004 10:20 AM Comments (0)

Google Not Handling Redirects Correctly?

It seems as if Google has switched the way it handles 301 redirects with the way it handles 302 redirects. According to a post by Ammon Johns at Cre8asite, he says:

The biggest change is in how Google is handling 302 redirects. It used to list nothing but the url, and have nothing cached for a URL where there was a 302 redirect. Now it is caching the page that the redirect points to, from the url where the 302 redirect is. But it now seems to have messed up on 301 redirects. Its like they got it backwards.

For an example of this check the cache of the URL for Overture.com
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=cache:www.overture.com/

http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=overture
Note that google is now showing a snippet, not just a description for the Overture root domain. It also has a 'cached' link.

There are two threads, that I found, discussing this recent anomaly. One at Cre8asite named How Google Handles 301 and 302 Pages and an other at Search Engine Watch named Accidental PageJacking increases with new 8 billion index.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at November 11, 2004 9:28 AM Comments (0)

Veterans Day Logos

Most the engines do not have Veterans Day logos up, or not yet at least.

My favorite, Ask Jeeves has one, its not a major difference in the logo but you will notice the little flower added to the jacket:

veterans_day.gif

And one forum that made the effort to recognize Veterans Day is Cre8asite Forums with this logo:

cre8asite_logo-verteran.gif

posted rustybrick in Miscellaneous at November 11, 2004 9:18 AM Comments (0)

Google Surpasses 8 Billion Indexed Pages: 4-byte DocIds Put to Shame

Big news, not the fact that MSN search went live, well kinda but the fact that Google has nearly doubled its index by reaching 8,058,044,651 indexed pages. Have you seen an increase in your site's pages indexed by Google? I have.

Anyway, one important note made by GoogleGuy (and something that is apparent by this major stepping stone) is that Google is "not limited by four-byte docids." There has been a theory floating around that Google was limited by the number of pages they can possibly index over the past 4 months or so.

Now for the forum roundup:

posted rustybrick in Google Search Engine at November 11, 2004 9:04 AM Comments (0)

MSN Search Live But Temporarily Unavailable

A day or so ago we discussed that Microsoft will be launching the new search technology today. Chris Sherman wrote a nice article on the launch this morning. See below for the forum links and my thoughts. So MSN Search decided to launch this new search at http://beta.search.msn.com/, I believe - based on Chris's article.

So I went there to test it out and got the follow:

msn-live-but-down.jpg

"This site is temporarily unavailable, please check back soon."

Ok Microsoft, we are live - but let's see your stuff. :)

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 11, 2004 8:38 AM Comments (0)

Search Giants Vying For Market Share

Just came across some interesting stats from WebSiteStory, an internet analytic firm, about the increases in market share for the search leaders.
There is obviously lots of buzz about Microsofts release of their search engine tommorrow, but what are some current numbers about who is handling the most internet searches. What are they up against? Based on what this article said:

The search kingpin [Google] handled 49% of U.S. Internet searches in October, up from 41% in March, according to the Internet analytics firm WebSideStory.

Microsoft who is currently right now [Wednesday] licensing technology from Yahoo is handling about 14% of U.S. searches.

With Yahoo, owning about 24% of the market.

The article goes to highlight some analyst responses, such as Morgan Stanley who have downplayed Microsoft's threat to Google and Yahoo going on to say the "software giant would have to be significantly better to steal away entrenched users". Whether you agree or disagree, I guess it going to have to come down to how the users like MSN's new search engine. Its been in testing stages for quite some time and tommorrow we will see it in full use, which will be quite an interesting show.

Read more from Google, Meet Microsoft

posted Phoenix in Search Engine Industry News at November 10, 2004 6:16 PM Comments (0)

More on MSN Search - Microsoft to Combat Google & Yahoo

As mentioned this morning, MSN Search is to be launched Thursday. This obviously makes a big impact on the search engine optimization community, we have yet an other engine to 'optimize for.' But yet, there were many more search engines just a year or so ago - most of them were swallowed by Yahoo!.

Danny Sullivan has an excellent and detailed blog entry named MSN Search Technology To Debut (Again) This Week, where he takes you through a time line of "important announcements and releases in Microsoft's progress toward having its own search engine." A must read, if I may say so.

I still believe that Microsoft will win the battle of the search wars, if you are interested in the logic I used to come to such a conclusion, please read my entry named Relevancy's Importance in Microsoft's Quest. After all, Microsoft is still a bit ticked off with Google for de-listing microsoft.com back in May 2003.

Other forum coverage not mentioned earlier:

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 10, 2004 3:05 PM Comments (0)

Tools to Help Manage Link Building

There is a thread just getting started over at Cre8asite named Managing a Link Development Campaign, where some suggestions in regards to tools to manage the link building process are listed. Feel free to list some here as well.

Some listed include:
- Download.com Listing
- Zeus
- ARELIS

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Tools at November 10, 2004 2:31 PM Comments (0)

ICANN Policy - Locking Not Required

I know this is not search related but there is a ton of buzz going on at all the forums on the latest news by ICANN (Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers). People are think that this new policy states that if someone initiates a transfer for a domain name you own, and you do not respond within 5 days, that the domain name will automatically transfer to the person who initiated the transfer. No questions asked. This seems to be a misunderstanding of the policy ICANN released. I spoke with my registrar this morning, and I spend top dollars to ensure I have a registrar I can call and get through to, and they said that the transfer will not go through if I do not act.

What happens is that I will receive an email from the person requesting the transfer. If I do not respond to that request then nothing will happen. However if I do respond with a yes, then that registrar (the one initiating the transfer) emails my registrar to give up the domain name. Now if my registrar does not respond, then it will go though within 5 days automatically. You see, I (the owner of the domain name) still needs to respond, if I don't then nothing should happen. This information is from my registrar and seems to be accurate.

A thread at WebmasterWorld has an excellent post summarizing this explanation on the 3rd page. I will quote that single post here to save your time:

Woah woah woah woah WOAH! Take it easy, everyone. Look carefully at the document ... here, I'll help:

THE LAYPERSON'S OVERVIEW

The relevant blurb:


If you wish to transfer your domain name from one ICANN-accredited registrar to another, you may initiate the transfer process by contacting the registrar to which you wish to transfer the name. This registrar is required to confirm your intent to transfer your domain name using Initial Authorization for Registrar Transfer. If you do not respond or return Initial Authorization for Registrar Transfer, your transfer request will not be processed.


THE APPARENTLY CONFLICTING DOCUMENT

Note: The second document predates the first ... but it is of no consequence.

The relevant blurb:


Failure by the Registrar of Record to respond within five (5) calendar days to a notification from the Registry regarding a transfer request will result in a default "approval" of the transfer.


THE EXPLANATION

In document #1, we see that "If you do not respond or return Initial Authorization for Registrar Transfer, your transfer request will not be processed."

In document #2 it seems to be limited by the relevant blurb. But people ...

this is a two-part process! Yay! :)

In document #1, it says that YOU, as the Administrative Contact of Record must agree to the transfer by responding to an email sent to the Administrative Contact of Record.

Next, FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER FROM YOU, document #2 says that if the Registrar of Record does not respond within 5 calendar days, then the transfer will go through, as the default action.

It's a bonus for us!

Now, your transfer won't be crapped on by the failure of your CURRENT registrar to acknowledge the email sent by your FUTURE registrar. Previously, a registrar could "forget" or "miss" an authorization request, and keep your domain. Now, in addition to your permission, which you have always needed to give for a transfer and will continue to need to do, if the registrar "misses" or "forgets" to respond to the transfer request, your transfer will go through just as you intended.

If YOU reply in the negative or don't respond to the initial Administrative Contact of Record email (because you initiated the transfer and then went on vacation or because it's a bogus request), you'll never get to the second step involving the current registrar, and the transfer will NOT go through.

If YOU reply in the positive, by clicking on the link to authorize the transfer, THEN it goes to the current registrar, and if they respond in the affirmative or do not respond at all within 5 calendar days, your request goes through per your instructions.

Do you really think that ICANN would make it easier to hijack a domain?

The automatic locking of all domains by NetSol and others is a move on their part to make it more difficult for us to move to a lower-priced registrar. Don't fall for it.

Get some sleep tonight, folks. :)

posted rustybrick in Miscellaneous at November 10, 2004 2:22 PM Comments (0)

Google Advertising Professionals

"Designed for professionals who currently manage or want to manage multiple AdWords client accounts, the Google Advertising Professionals program can help you become a more successful ad manager – for free." More information at https://adwords.google.com/select/ProfessionalWelcome.

professional_welcome_signup.gif

According to Brett's post at WebmasterWorld, he says there will be a discussion on this "new program at a special lunch time session next week at WebmasterWorld Search Conference #7." I will be there, so I hope to have more details and audience responses on this program.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at November 10, 2004 2:00 PM Comments (0)

MSN Search Live Thursday, Nov 11th

Looks like it is going to happen this Thursday. MSN Search, according to a New York Times Article will be launching its search engine this Thursday, November 11th.

Forums are buzzing about it at:

And others, I have to run to a meeting, I will make sure to update you on more later.

posted rustybrick in Microsoft MSN Search at November 10, 2004 7:15 AM Comments (0)

Searching For Clicks (Conversions) In Second Tier Search Engines

There seems to be a some good talk lately about PPC engines and the many factors surrounding there use. Which results in better conversions Google or Overture? Why does it take so long to list an ad in Overture? Which engine brings in more traffic? Lots of talk on Overture and Google, enough to make your head spin several times before coming back down. A good thread on SEW forums discusses the various other PPC search engines that are available to marketers. When it comes down to it, Google and Overture take up a good portion of the market for PPC, but there are so many other oppourtunities out there for attacking another vertical that could result in similar traffic.

Chris Sherman posted on a recent article that talks about the various second tier PPC engine out there, and reasons why these low-cost alternatives can provide comparable ROI and conversions similar to Google or Overture. At the last SES conference I attended I quite remember the zeal and tenacity of the particular second tier search engines advertising themselves in the exhibit hall. They obviously want your business, and are very willing to prove what they claim they can do. It was encouraging to see, and especially chat with representatives about their technology and if they covered the verticals I was looking for. One thing I wished more PPC engines had was breath of subject areas to advertise in and more information on their traffic sources. One specializes in Business, another in Shopping, another in Finance. But as pointed out in this thread, the specific specialities of the engines help to focus on your target market and help improve conversions on your site. They stick to what they know. So much so that one site in particular list over 642 Pay Per Click Search Engines here. You might not even known there were that many, but it means a good amount of oppourtunity.

Some of the members expressed opinions about the quality of conversions from second tier search engines. One member said "using smaller engines depends upon your objective". Chicago another SEW forum member argued that "there is no such thing as the second tier as this group is totally reliant upon the "third/fourth tiers" and beyond to serve clicks." There is discussion about conversions on second tier engines, with several members relating to experiences that were less than desirable and others finding good value in the traffic.

Continue discussing Search for Clicks Away from Google and Overture

posted Phoenix in Second Tier PPC Engines at November 9, 2004 8:28 PM Comments (0)

Higher Rankings the Higher Revenue Per Click on AdSense

Shaw, aka DigitalPoint, has posed an interesting observation. He has seen a correlation between the natural rankings of a page for a keyword term and the earned revenue per click on the AdSense ads for that page. He said, and its just an observation, that he has seen the revenue per click go up as the rankings for that page rises. The theory is that Google's smart pricing system takes into account the natural rankings for a page for a specific keyword phrase. The higher the rankings, the higher the price should be per click on the AdSense ads.

Here is the specific example given:

One site ranked around #25 in the SERPs for it's keywords. AdSense paid roughly $0.10 per click. As it slowly moved up in natural rankings, so did the AdSense per click payout, until now it's top 5 and it gets $1.50 per click on average (nothing else has changed).

Conversely, I have a site that did rank top 5 for something, and it was getting about $1.20 for AdSense. The rankings have dropped, and the AdSense per click payout mirrored that drop (now it's averages $0.02 per click).

I wanted to point people to the thread over at DigitalPoint Forums to drive some more thoughts on this topic.

posted rustybrick in Google AdSense at November 9, 2004 5:20 PM Comments (0)

Mutual Funds with Google Holdings

Looking to invest in Google but want to do it within a mutual fund? There is a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named Google Mutual Funds???, where a member asks which mutual funds have Google stock within their portfolios.

SEOBook answers his question by suggesting two links, a Legg Mason Fund and Fidelity Fund. I am sure there are others, but I did not research any.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at November 9, 2004 1:41 PM Comments (0)

Site Aging Effect in Terms of SEO

There has been lots of chatter in the forums, especially with all the sandbox discussion, about the aging of a site and its affect on the way the pages rank for keyword phrases. In a thread at SEO Chat named Proof Of Search Position Based On Age Of Domain? shares his personal data with the members. The data shows how over time, his rankings dramatically improved for a selection of keyword phrases. Of course there are other factors, and the thread gets into that - I won't.

There is no doubt in my mind that older sites, do better in the results then newer sites - keeping everything else equal. If I put up a page at my corporate site, which has been live since at least 1999, it will rank higher then if I put up a new site. I have specific examples of keyword phrases that proves this. I am not sure if my clients would like me to share them with you at this point in time.

But to talk on a more general level, I have launched sites for clients all on a specific topic. The goal is to have this site (the home page) rank well for the most generic keyword phrase. At the same time, I put up a new page announcing the launch of the new site. I named the page in relation to the client's topic, so the page is naturally optimized for my client's keyword phrase. I even link from my page to the client's home page. Now my corporate site is primarily about Web development services, it has nothing to do with what my client's site is about. I would expect after five or so months that my client's site would rank above my single page announcing his site, in the search results over at Google. But that is not the case.

Of course there is this sandbox affect. But again, I am fairly confident that I can get a specific keyword phrase to rank better (no matter of site theme) on an aged site versus a newer site. There is an aging affect, I do not think it is at the level of temporal link analysis but there is some sort of non-thematic aging affect going on and has been for a couple years.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at November 9, 2004 1:30 PM Comments (2)

Must Haves: Custom 404 Error Pages

I prefixed the title of this entry with the words "must have". That is because every Web site must have a custom 404 error page. What is a standard, or non custom 404 error page? Well, every go to a URL and find this?

standard-404-page.gif

I am sure you have, these are the default apache 404 error pages. But you are in luck, you can create easy to use, custom 404 error pages. Apple's 404 page is often talked about when creating a custom 404 error page. For example, go to http://www.apple.com/seroundtable/, there is obviously no such page at Apple, but they give you the following page (I only captured a portion of the screen, see the link above for the full page).

custom-apple-404-s.gif

Now isn't that much better? Of course, we all get lazy and we push off making these useful pages. For example, this site doesn't have a custom 404 page, I think I will add one today, if I get around to it. But my corporate site has a custom 404 page. The rustybrick custom 404 page includes the line of reassurance, "Can't find what your looking for?", a Google search box that limits the search to my site, and a site map - all included within the standard navigation.

Please don't forget, a custom 404 is both good for your users and the search engines (however, the search engines really would prefer a standard 404 page - I think).

This entry comes by way of a post at Cre8asite named Custom 404 Error Pages. The post has more resources on how to build a custom 404 pages and other sample 404 pages (good and bad).

posted rustybrick in Usability at November 9, 2004 8:50 AM Comments (1)

SEO Chat Forums Gets Ready for the Holidays

SEO Chat Forums has already begun decorating for the holiday season. The christmas lights are up and the holiday spirit is felt. Check out the temporary holiday SEO Chat logo.

seo-ready-for-holidays.jpg

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at November 9, 2004 8:31 AM Comments (0)

Should You Underline Links In Your Navigation?

Are underlined links better for in your site's navigation? There is an active thread at Cre8asite discussing the various reasons why you might underline or not underline links. It goes into how users might be "trained" to recognize underline links in the various parts of your site. Why its good to be consistent with your links for the sake of usability and what colors are most recognized. Naturally underlined blue links are seen as the most recognized, they have been a standard method for using links correctly for quite some time. But what about different colors, hovers, and straight non-underlined links? There are a couple of approaches being discussed that help illustrate whether underling works best.

One of the members reasons that it depends on the "context" of the link, and your intention for the user. Do you assume that your visitors are pretty intuitive and can easy decipher where to click next? For those that are not as web savvy, nothing beats a blue underlined link, a tradition even my never touched a computer in his life grandfather can learn to use pretty quickly. Nick W goes on to say that you should underline links in the body of your copy. Putting inline lines inside a sentence and making them stand out eliminates the need for extra thought which can help them navigate better. One particular idea for use in content was to use a "dotted" underline in blue that goes to red on hover for making it clear that the link leads to a page somewhere else. You can then use the standard underline in the top and side navigation sections to easily define the various types of links on the site. Those in the navigation within the site, and those links that lead off the page.

The discussion goes on to discuss the various coloring options for links. The member Scratch, asks the question "Is the user 100% obvious that these are links?". If so then you have the option to change the text decoration. If it isn't obvious with decoration, maybe consider why it isn't obvious.

Continued discussing Links in navigation, to underline or not to underline?

posted Phoenix in Usability at November 8, 2004 5:50 PM Comments (0)

SEO's Reveal Secrets

Interesting thread with a nice twist to start off the week. Basically a thread over at SEW forums was started to allow SEO's to reveal their secrets in one sentence. Not that they all will, but its a start. Members post what they think you should know and some things to ponder about on SEO. Its also a place to say whats on your mind this week and contemplate the advice from the experts. Check out the Padded Room and the discussion SEO, all the secrets revealed in this thread.

posted Phoenix in Search Engine Optimization at November 8, 2004 12:55 PM Comments (0)

Major SERP Shifts at Yahoo Last Week

WebmasterWorld members are reporting major search results shifts at Yahoo over the past week. Some are saying "this is Yahoo's answer to Google's Florida update."

On November 2nd the following was first reported:

On Saturday, I noticed that after MONTHS my site had suddenyl gone up about 20 spaces in Yahoo serps. However, after Saturday the results are back to how they were...unfortunately. Is this a sign of results to come or is there another explanation?

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Optimization at November 8, 2004 10:41 AM Comments (0)

Preparing for This Years Florida

The folks over at WebmasterWorld started a new thread named One year anniversary of the "Florida" Update in preparation if it "can happen again?"

Well can it happen again? Based on history, it will. Google has often made major algorithmic shifts it the core of the algorithm right before the big purchase season of Christmas and New Years. As more and more sites become involved in the search engine optimization craze, more and more people realize the direct impact of these changes to the business's profits.

Of course this is why many experts, like Danny Sullivan, believe you should not have all your eggs in one basket. Play both the PPC game and the SEO game, and don't forget about last years customers. Email marketing, and the other types of online marketing efforts can be huge.

How are you preparing? :)

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at November 8, 2004 10:36 AM Comments (0)

Speegle - The Talking Search Engine

Last month we found one of the first talking web directories, today we find news of a talking search engine named Speegle. The Herald writes, "A SCOTTISH computer speech technology company has launched what it claims to be the world's first talking search engine."

And funny enough, GoogleGuy was the first to post this news over at WebmasterWorld.

posted rustybrick in Other Search Engines at November 8, 2004 10:28 AM Comments (0)

Conversion Rates Between PPC (Paid) and Organic (Free) Results

In a thread over at Cre8asite Forums named Organic vs Paid traffic ROI?, there is a discussion going on about the different conversion rates and ROI seen between the pay per click traffic (paid traffic) and organic traffic (free traffic). I have personally heard at conferences that people are more likely to click on organic results over paid results. However, I do not remember hearing the differences in terms of conversions or ROI when it comes to paid versus free search.

In the thread, one member says:

I use PPC for one site which also comes top for the same keywords.

One great thing about PPC ads is you can turn them on and off, and experiment. At first I thought by having an ad show for a word we are number for was just throwing money away, so i turned the ads off, profits dropped, turn them back on profits increase, repeated just to make sure.

Results could suggest a few things,
1. Our ad text appeals more to some people more than the description/title in the serps – can’t please everyone.
2. Some people will click on the ads first, so its either us or a competitor.

No major difference in conversions, if anything the PPC converts better as i make sure the ad is very relevant. Have tried several niches with PPC and lost money, PPC is not always the answer, a lot can depend on the product/service. One thing i would recommend is to continue to use PPC for as long as it makes a profit and don’t stop just because you come top in the serps(test this, each site may be different)

This can make for a very educational thread.

posted rustybrick in Tracking & Conversion Measurements at November 8, 2004 8:48 AM Comments (0)

Simplicity Equals Trust - How Simple Should Your Site Be?

Very good thread that I hope gets more responses is being discussed over at Cre8asite Forums, about the nature of simple websites that help communcate and instill trust in visitors. A recent article talks about how people trust simply designed websites, and that having a plain text, unadorned format seems soothing and trustworthy as something that is plastered with gaudy graphics and fast talking content.

Some of the members detailed their own options, specifically how this concept is also used in engineering, that if something looks "good" then it must be good. The member radiorental details some mental steps one might take when viewing a simple website, such as:


In this case, the brain makes the following assumptions that lead to trust
1)front end looks simple therefore the backend must be
2)If backend is simple then there is less to go wrong
3)if its less likely to go wrong then I trust it will not.

simple = trust

This makes sense, and I know myself I have often gone through these steps in websites I have visited. Deciphering the technology behind the scenes can take up some of your thought time. You want to figure it out, and translate that into how well you might trust what they are saying or what they are doing. If it looks to complicated and there are questionable underlying reasons why they want your business, email, or information then I don't put my trust in them.

I recently had a discussion with a colleague about simple and ugly websites and how they are effective in selling. Ugly websites do sell, but only when that ugly isn't too strong. Simple websites do help sell because of trust, but only when they aren't too polished and actually make an effort to sell without all the glitz and glitter. The interesting thing is when it comes down to it, how we present our website whether it be personal or professional tells a lot about our motives. Many professional or company websites out there are very polished, old school, nice business sites, but what does a professional website say = its got commercial motives (most of the time). A good example of a large site that does quite well and whose simplicity helps build trust is craigslist.com. It's as simple as you can get, but very indepth with a focus that could translate trust to help the visitor reach the information they are looking for. No guady graphics, no advertising on the homepage, just simple trustable links and information that can't be maligned with something else. Upon your next redesign or new website, you might take some of these ideas into focus, because you might be stuck with a design for quite awhile.

Read the original article that prompted the threads - Where web surfers go when they haven't slept a wink

posted Phoenix in Usability at November 5, 2004 3:38 PM Comments (0)

Jill Whalen's Black Hat/ White Hat Article

Jill Whalen, owner of HighRankings, publishes a wildly read newsletter named the High Rankings Advisor. In her most recent newsletter, Jill writes an entry named Black Hat/White Hat, which discusses her view on the labels used as well as the techniques performed. I will not comment on an opinionated level here, I rather not get into it now. :)

However, there is a very interesting thread going on at the HighRanking Forum under the title Black Hat/white Hat Article, High Ranking Newsleter, makes for very interesting reading. Enjoy!

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Articles & Books at November 5, 2004 12:24 PM Comments (0)

Gmail Outages This Morning

Good thing Google keeps most of their projects in beta. Gmail service was down for a pretty long time this morning. I was unable to login and so were others.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at November 5, 2004 10:53 AM Comments (0)

New Article on Web Links

Link building is a huge component of the SEO world. It is for that reason, that I tried to explain what Web links are in this new article I wrote named Web Links from the Search Engine's Perspective. I wrote this while on the plane from Sweden, so I hope I got everything right. :)

By the end of this short article you should be able to understand:

  • What Web links are
  • The difference between incoming links and outgoing links
  • The different terminology used in the SEO community to describe some links
  • How search engines view links
  • and what links represent to the search engines (natural vs. unnatural linking).

So go ahead and read Web Links from the Search Engine's Perspective and feel free to comment here.

posted rustybrick in Link Building at November 5, 2004 10:16 AM Comments (0)

PPC Firms with Multiple Clients in Same Industry

Case: A PPC management firm with two clients that sell the same product.

A thread at SEW named Ethical Issues of PPC Management for Multiple Clients in the Same Field discusses one members ethical dilemma with this situation. Of course, this makes for a very interesting debate in the forums, a thread I fell is worth checking out.

If you have two or more individuals in the company that do the hands on PPC management, then I feel the solution is simple. Have one individual manage the first client and the next manage the second client. This way the same individual is not competing against himself.

posted rustybrick in Pay Per Click Engines at November 5, 2004 9:04 AM Comments (0)

Click Fraud Thread Develops Towards the End

ProjectPHP, most of you have seen him around at the forums, tipped me off on this. At the end of a thread on click fraud that we covered about a month ago, in the entry named 50% of PPC Clicks are Fraud, we learn more.

In the 3rd page of the thread it says

Netscape's quick Searches, if they are words you bid on, can cause budgets to absolutely blow out, and fast. In your case, it was $1,000 per day. That is a massive ammount to potentially save, and a tip well worth knowing!!

I nice bit of advice to share with you.

posted rustybrick in Pay Per Click Engines at November 5, 2004 8:46 AM Comments (0)

Overture's Guidelines a Tad Too Strict?

I was both shocked and at the same time laughing while reading a post over at Search Engine Watch Forums. The post contained a text based chat session (I think), between an Overture customer and an Overture Representative. In the conversation, the customer wanted to target a local region that just had a major hailstorm. The customer sold window screens (or something like that) and it was the hope of the customer to target these victims of the hailstorm, in order to find replacement window parts. Smart marketing, right? Well, Overture would not let the customer place an ad with the term "Hailstorm" in the ad text. Why? Because "your website doesn't have any pages about hailstorms, we can't approve your ad." The conversation gets funnier, so read the post.

posted rustybrick in Overture Precision Match at November 5, 2004 8:36 AM Comments (0)

No Navigation from Yahoo! Search to Yahoo.com

I ended up at the Yahoo! Search Home Page today and wanted to go to Yahoo!'s Home Page. I was looking all over the place for a link to navigate the the Yahoo! index page and could not find it. Do you see it?

yahoo-search-yahoo-nav.gif

At My Yahoo! they have a clear link to the Yahoo!'s Home Page.

ylinks_l.gif

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at November 4, 2004 3:05 PM Comments (1)

Flat Rate PPC Pricing

Can it be? PPC companies like Overture and Google will be stepping out the the auction style pricing models and offer flat rate pay per click prices? A ClickZ article named Yahoo!'s Overture Looks At Simpler Models to Court Advertisers says it is a possibility for Overture.

Overture is considering offering advertisers a flat-rate pricing model to make paid search simpler for small- and medium-sized businesses, according to Ted Meisel, president of Overture and SVP at Yahoo!

I could not find any forum discussion on this topic yet, so I started a thread at Search Engine Watch Forums. In addition, Danny Sullivan blogged on this topic.

posted rustybrick in Pay Per Click Engines at November 4, 2004 1:43 PM Comments (0)

Sick Of Link Exchange Requests - Pick The Best From the Worst

Inbox flooded with link exchange requests? Have no idea if you should take them up on their offer or not? An interesting thread over at Highrankings discuss what to look for in a good link exchange. With link building growing steadly and more and more webmasters realizing the benefits of such techniques, it necesssary to use your time wisely. In my own inbox I get anywhere from 5-15 link requests a week. How many do I actually respond to? Maybe one email total. But rarely does it go beyond that. Last week I received two requests from a realtor that had the website name wrong including the page they wanted a link on. I wrote realtor back telling him this was of no interest and that he might change the way he approached webmasters for link exchange. Get the facts straight, and make it personal and of value.

Additionally most of the time the page that your link will be on, ends up in some psuedo link directory hidden deep within a site or very unorganized and of no value whatsoever to my site. These link directories and their category pages in my opinion are not effective ways to help grow your site. I am sure you can think of some you have seen lately. You must search out link exchanges that are a VALUE to your site for the search engines and your visitors. Look for pages that are not overrun with useless links. Also, be sure that on the link page a search engine spider can actually find your link. Avoid pages that parse the link with an outgoing script. My general rule of thumb is that if the email is automated: Do NOT respond back to it.

Some things to consider about these email:
1. Where will your link be located on the site? Cheap directory or useful resources page?
2. How new is the website, will it be worth your time to presue this link exchange? Will it actually help me in the search engines?
3. Is the site of value to users? Or is it just generated for the purpose of search engines rankings?
4. How many sites are on the page you receive a link from? More than 15, you might want to forget it.
5. Is the email directed to you or a huge generated email list?

If you just don't know what to do, you best bet is to take Scottie's advice: "Hit the Delete Button".

Continue reading I Am Kinda Sick of Link Exchange Requests

posted Phoenix in Spam at November 4, 2004 12:41 PM Comments (0)

Hilltop and Theme Based Optimization

Ever since the beginning of 2004, after the Florida update in November 2003, there has been discussion of the hilltop paper and "theming" a site's pages. In fact, read some of the past entries on the topic written here named:
- Dan Thies Writes on the New Google
- Webby's Back - Topic Austin Theory
- Authority Can't Do it Alone - Bring Out the Hub
- True Meaning of Themed Sites & The Level of Importance in the Ranking Algorithms

A topic over at WebmasterWorld named Anyone besides me not swallowed the "Hilltop" magic pill yet?, started by moderator BakedJake, discusses this topic. It is true, in my opinion, that page ranking at Google has nothing to do with themeing your pages in your site. I have spoken with experts who tell me this is the case and even Google Reps hinted at this.

The question is, "When you play chess you try to anticpate your opponents most likely next move(s), and make make your move accordingly. So planning today for hilltop tommorow, isn't a bad idea." That is for a different thread. :)

posted rustybrick in Search Technology at November 4, 2004 9:23 AM Comments (0)

A World Without the Search Engines

A thread titled World Without Search Engines, Amen started by forum admin at Cre8asite Forums, Bill Slawski, might just be the SEO thread of the month. If not the thread of the month, for sure the thread of the week. Ok, so what is this thread about?

It is about a passage from the Google Information for Webmasters that reads; "Another useful test is to ask, 'Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?'"

That prompted Bill to ask several questions - to start a very interesting and thoughtful thread. Here is the first post by Bill:

I've sort of looked at that statement with some derision in the past. Search Engines do exist, and advice like that isn't going to change that fact. But, I've been thinking lately that it might not be such a bad idea to take the question more seriously.

What would you do if search engines didn't exist?

Imagine that the search engines all shut down. How would people find your web site?

What efforts might you make offline?

What would you do online?

Would you be considering exchanging links with anyone in particular?

How would you tell that a particular site was a good candidate to exchange links with?

How might television, magazines, newsletters, blogs, RSS, syndicated articles, forums, and so on, play into your post-search engine plans?

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at November 4, 2004 9:12 AM Comments (0)

Unique Titles for Each Web Page

Basic but necessary thread on the importance of unique title for every page within your Web site. Marcia says;

Each page should have a unique title - one that will attract clicks.

A title consisting of keywords separated by commas may not be the most appealing to surfers - it's the title that appears as the clickable link in the SERPs. So make it about 8-9 words or less, including the main keyword phrase for the page and also a word or two that's a variation or additional modifier, to target a little wider variety of phrases.

Mikkel adds;

Yes, every page should have a unique title but you can certainly reuse parts of it. However, you should remember, that in any case it is not likely that you will rank for more than a few keywords on each page - the keywords that are most prominent on the page and in linking to the page. So keep it short at simple.

Read more here...

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at November 4, 2004 8:36 AM Comments (0)

Comprehensive Study on Importance of Keywords in URLs

One of the most debated topics in the SEO community (besides for the black hat versus white hat topics) is the question; do keywords in the URL improve a page's rankings? It is funny, some top notch SEOs claim they do, while others claim they do not. A thread at Search Engine Watch Forums named Do keywords in URL influence your rank? by a WebCEO employee, provides a comprehensive but questionable study on the importance of the keywords in the URLs.

In the study, they compared "competitive keywords" and "uncompetitive keywords". The conclusion of the study reported the following:

For Yahoo presence of keywords in URL is a considerable ranking factor.

In case of competitive keywords, Google takes presence of keywords in URL as overoptimization and penalizes a page.

In case of uncompetitive keywords, Google uses this factor in its ranking process.

Please make sure to read or skim the thread.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at November 3, 2004 9:22 AM Comments (1)

SES Conference Locations & Times

Every wonder why Search Engine Strategies Conferences are held when they are? For example; the Chicago conference is coming up in December. If you know Chicago, you know it is coined the "windy city", not because of its warm breezy air. Chicago is a cold place in December, and so is New York in March. Sweden wasn't so bad this month, but it had potential to be rainy and cold every day.

Then you have the San Jose conference in the Summer. I remember San Jose being very comfortable, so no complaints from me. Well, I rarely complain anyway. When I attend these conferences, I pretty much stay in the hotel most the time, covering the sessions.

Danny Sullivan comments on;

As for how we [SES conference times/locations] ended up this way, the first SES show was in San Francisco in November 1999. A NY show followed in March 2000, London in June 2000 I think, then back to SF in August, then Dallas in November of that year. I honestly can't recall why SF didn't happen again in November, rather than being moved up.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Conferences at November 3, 2004 9:14 AM Comments (0)

Sci-Fi Search Bot Novel

There is an individual writing a novel that he describes as "some hacker tries to use crawlers to inoculate viri into servers." The thread can be found at Search Engine Watch forums and is named Some help for a Novel?.

This thread has been very interesting to read. :)

posted rustybrick in Search Theory at November 3, 2004 9:04 AM Comments (0)

Yahoo! Search Goes Wireless

Yahoo! Mobile, released just recently, will allow you to search Yahoo! Search while on the road. A post by Nacho at SEW forums said;

I liked how they display both Sponsored Results and Web Matches. The two right navigation ads appear first then the central highlighted ones second. Organic or natural listings are limited to 10 results -- nice and clean. Then another 2 (the first 2 on the right) sponsored ads reappear.

It gives you the ability to move to Images, Directory, Local, News and Products as well. They have enabled shortcuts and advanced search. The "Also try:" function had the words overlapping one another.

Google recently released Google SMS (Short Message Service) and has a Wireless Google User Guide. Mobile search undoubtedly be huge.

yahoo-mobile-phone.gif

posted rustybrick in Yahoo! Search Engine at November 3, 2004 8:25 AM Comments (0)

Google Desktop Search For Mac

The new and already popular Google Desktop search feature is going to becoming to a Mac near you. According to an article at a CNET affiliate named Google plans desktop search tool for Macs, "Google plans to release a version of its desktop search tool for computers that run Apple Computer's Mac operating system, Google's chief executive, Eric Schmidt, said Friday."

The question is, why would Google (1) waste time on such a small niche of the market (btw, I am included in that niche) and (2) why would they compete with Apple's own powerful and quick search tool, Spotlight. Spotlight is "a radically new and lightning fast way to find anything saved on your personal computer. Email messages, contacts and calendars, along with files and folders, all show up in Spotlight results."

Forum discussion on this topic at DigitalPoint Forums.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at November 2, 2004 2:55 PM Comments (0)

Google Cafe in Cairo, Egypt

I am not sure how true this is, but its one of those unique posts that must be mentioned when spotted. A thread at SEO Chat named Google's new branch in cairo, has a picture that looks as follows:

Google Cafe in Cairo, Egypt

Here is the large version of the image.

posted rustybrick in Other Google Topics at November 2, 2004 2:23 PM Comments (8)

Correction on Supplemental Results Entry

October 26th of this year, I wrote an entry named Supplemental Result Are Keyword Based based on a WMW world post. It seems as if, a point made in the thread and in my entry is not 100% accurate. Danny Sullivan sent me an email stating "Supplemental results should indeed be pages that are actually live on the web."

Danny goes on to say

Yes, heard from Google, the pages are definitely reflecting what's live on the web. If the terms aren't present, it's just that they haven't been revisited, not that Google is trying to use the SR as some type of archive.

For more information on some of the mysterious qualities of the Google supplemental results, visit http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3071371.

Sorry for any confusion and thank you Danny.

posted rustybrick in Google Optimization at November 2, 2004 11:35 AM Comments (0)

Press Release On Search Rankings

Now this must be one of the funniest press releases I have ever seen. A company named Simply Wow released a press release with the headline Simply Wow(r) Achieves Top Ranking on Search Engine Placement Results at Google.com, it was picked up by Yahoo! News. If I would announce every top ranking I have achieved, wow, I would have tons of frivolous press releases.

Forum discussion at Search Engine Watch.

posted rustybrick in Search Engine Optimization at November 2, 2004 11:18 AM Comments (0)

Election Day Logos

Get out there and vote. :)

vote2004.gif

sdj_vote_2004.gif

posted rustybrick in Miscellaneous at November 2, 2004 8:14 AM Comments (0)

Cre8asite Forums Halloween Logo

I had to acknowledge Cre8asite's tribute to Halloween. They put up this temporary Cre8asite Logo, all dressed up in it's Halloween costume.

cre8asite_hlogo.gif

Just an FYI - I am flying back to New York over night. I should be back on track with this site Tuesday.

posted rustybrick in SEO Forum News at November 1, 2004 3:00 AM Comments (0)

AdWords Reports Pending

Reports at WebmasterWorld account for the end of the month ROI reports not functioning properly. One member reports "Sure would like to run my keyword ROI for end of month, but any report I try to run just hovers in "pending" status. Been a couple of hours now..." An other says, "I have some comments but they're pending, pending, pending."

The issue on my side seems to be resolved now.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at November 1, 2004 2:56 AM Comments (0)

The Site Map Link

A thread at Cre8asite named Where to put the site map link?, discusses the location of the link in terms of page placement and number of pages.

Some suggest in the thread to place the site map link at the top, header, portion of your pages. Some say, place it at the footer. I personally do it differently on different sites. What does it depend on? The layout of the site.

I am a believer of placing the site map link on every single page, not just the home page. In addition, I do not like breaking out site maps into sub site maps. I feel that site maps that have sub site maps are more category, to sub category to sub sub category pages. And thus should be treated as such.

posted rustybrick in Usability at November 1, 2004 2:54 AM Comments (0)

AdWords Classifications to be Revised

The Old: Strong, Moderate, At Risk and Disabled
The New: Active, Disabled and In Trial

Sometime in November Google is revamping the classification of keyword status... Strong, Moderate, At Risk and Disabled will be gone. Replacing them will be Active and Disabled, as well as "In Trial".

In Trail has been delivered to meet the problem of quick disabling of terms. Google will use its predictive modelling to know what words are not going to do well and give them more time to run. Instead of the 1,000 impressions and you're out... this new system may allow terms as much as 10 times more access to eyeballs.

There will be a limit to the number of In Trial terms an account can have at any given time.

The Disabling of a term with under .5% CTR will continue.

As reported at Search Engine Watch Forums.

posted rustybrick in Google AdWords at November 1, 2004 1:55 AM Comments (1)

Premium Sponsors + advertise

To subscribe to the Search Engine Roundtable, click here