Link Spam Detection Research Paper | Main | YSM (Overture) Charging Credit Card Logic Flawed?

Jagger 3 Take Away

Thought I share a post I like from the huge Part 3 Update Jagger WebmasterWorld thread. The post is on page 64, message number 961 by walkman.

Google's problem as I see it, after reading trust rank, is that they focus too much on likelyhoods and stats:

MIT links to you site, you must good pages, whether you have stuff about engineering or Teletubies.

You got a ROS link, so you must've cheated so we'll send you to #300, instead of just ignoring the suscpicious links unless they can be checked.
Too broad of a brush, and very easy to fall way off the radar IMO. We're not talking about from #2 to #5, we're talking going to 10 visitors a day.

Basically, from what I am hearing, at this stage of the update.... Getting a link from a solid site, seriously solid Web site, like a reputable newspaper, you are set. Im still looking for gems in these threads - I probably missed a few - but I'll keep looking.

As of 2:54AM (EST) this morning, GoogleGuy posted that Google is "still in flux, reseller. I [GoogleGuy] still expect 66.102.9.104 to spread to other data centers."



Like The Story? Vote For It On Yahoo Buzz! Or On Sphinn!

posted rustybrick in Google PageRank/SERP Updates at November 9, 2005 8:20 AM Comments (0)

Post a comment (Note: Can Take 120 Seconds For Your Comment To Show Up)

Do you want us to save your personal Information?

Premium Sponsors + advertise

To subscribe to the Search Engine Roundtable, click here